Western Connecticut Planning Region, Connecticut
Akashic| Kamala Harris ✓Democratic | 58.2% | 172,345 |
|---|---|---|
| Donald TrumpRepublican | 40.2% | 118,999 |
| OtherAll other candidates | 1.5% | 4,583 |
Precinct-level results (18 precincts) — table
| Precinct | Winner | Margin |
|---|---|---|
| 190-Bethel | Democratic | D+9.2 |
| 190-Bridgewater | Democratic | D+5.0 |
| 190-Brookfield | Republican | R+4.0 |
| 190-Danbury | Democratic | D+7.6 |
| 190-Darien | Democratic | D+18.9 |
| 190-Greenwich | Democratic | D+16.0 |
| 190-New Canaan | Democratic | D+13.6 |
| 190-New Fairfield | Republican | R+10.1 |
| 190-New Milford | Republican | R+4.4 |
| 190-Newtown | Democratic | D+9.8 |
| 190-Norwalk | Democratic | D+28.6 |
| 190-Redding | Democratic | D+29.4 |
| 190-Ridgefield | Democratic | D+27.0 |
| 190-Sherman | Democratic | D+9.0 |
| 190-Stamford | Democratic | D+26.7 |
| 190-Weston | Democratic | D+40.2 |
| 190-Westport | Democratic | D+44.2 |
| 190-Wilton | Democratic | D+30.7 |
Precinct data
Results by precinct
18 precincts · 308,364 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -190-Stamford190-Stamford | 35,570 | 20,370 | 930 | 56,870 | 62.5% | 35.8% | D+26.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -190-Norwalk190-Norwalk | 26,526 | 14,586 | 602 | 41,714 | 63.6% | 35.0% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -190-Greenwich190-Greenwich | 19,603 | 14,122 | 464 | 34,189 | 57.3% | 41.3% | D+16.0 |
| Precinct -190-Danbury190-Danbury | 16,318 | 13,971 | 415 | 30,704 | 53.1% | 45.5% | D+7.6 |
| Precinct -190-Newtown190-Newtown | 9,316 | 7,624 | 338 | 17,278 | 53.9% | 44.1% | D+9.8 |
| Precinct -190-Westport190-Westport | 11,769 | 4,476 | 237 | 16,482 | 71.4% | 27.2% | D+44.2 |
| Precinct -190-New Milford190-New Milford | 7,311 | 7,995 | 219 | 15,525 | 47.1% | 51.5% | R+4.4 |
| Precinct -190-Ridgefield190-Ridgefield | 9,704 | 5,520 | 252 | 15,476 | 62.7% | 35.7% | D+27.0 |
| Precinct -190-Darien190-Darien | 6,988 | 4,732 | 201 | 11,921 | 58.6% | 39.7% | D+18.9 |
| Precinct -190-New Canaan190-New Canaan | 6,644 | 5,023 | 248 | 11,915 | 55.8% | 42.2% | D+13.6 |
| Precinct -190-Bethel190-Bethel | 5,977 | 4,950 | 184 | 11,111 | 53.8% | 44.6% | D+9.2 |
| Precinct -190-Wilton190-Wilton | 7,054 | 3,689 | 207 | 10,950 | 64.4% | 33.7% | D+30.7 |
| Precinct -190-Brookfield190-Brookfield | 5,029 | 5,458 | 175 | 10,662 | 47.2% | 51.2% | R+4.0 |
| Precinct -190-New Fairfield190-New Fairfield | 3,653 | 4,485 | 107 | 8,245 | 44.3% | 54.4% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -190-Weston190-Weston | 4,294 | 1,797 | 116 | 6,207 | 69.2% | 29.0% | D+40.2 |
| Precinct -190-Redding190-Redding | 3,619 | 1,948 | 118 | 5,685 | 63.7% | 34.3% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -190-Sherman190-Sherman | 1,212 | 1,008 | 35 | 2,255 | 53.7% | 44.7% | D+9.0 |
| Precinct -190-Bridgewater190-Bridgewater | 607 | 548 | 20 | 1,175 | 51.7% | 46.6% | D+5.0 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +5.6% |
| 1880 | +0.2% |
| 1884 | +2.8% |
| 1888 | +0.7% |
| 1892 | No data |
| 1896 | −39.4% |
| 1900 | −16.9% |
| 1904 | −20.1% |
| 1908 | −23.5% |
| 1912 | +5.1% |
| 1916 | −10.4% |
| 1920 | −36.5% |
| 1924 | −44.1% |
| 1928 | −13.3% |
| 1932 | −6.0% |
| 1936 | +11.1% |
| 1940 | +0.8% |
| 1944 | −2.7% |
| 1948 | −13.1% |
| 1952 | −22.4% |
| 1956 | −40.3% |
| 1960 | −6.8% |
| 1964 | +22.1% |
| 1968 | −9.8% |
| 1972 | −29.3% |
| 1976 | −16.7% |
| 1980 | −20.9% |
| 1984 | −32.0% |
| 1988 | −18.8% |
| 1992 | −3.5% |
| 1996 | +7.8% |
| 2000 | +8.9% |
| 2004 | +3.5% |
| 2008 | +17.4% |
| 2012 | +9.8% |
| 2016 | +18.0% |
| 2020 | +25.4% |
| 2024 | +18.0% |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Democratic; the presidential vote runs 6.8 points more Republican.
426,101 registered voters · 2025
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−3,667 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −16,173 over 2021–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $185,658 in average income, against $267,407 for residents who stayed — 31% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+25.2 on average — 7.2 points more Democratic-leaning than Western Connecticut Planning Region, CT itself (D+18.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Westchester County, NY2,005D+26.1
- New York County, NY1,398D+64.2
- Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT1,159D+19.6
- Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT648D+11.2
- Bronx County, NY533D+45.1
- Kings County, NY515D+43.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Greater Bridgeport Planning Region, CT1,761
- New York County, NY1,683
- Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT1,208
- Westchester County, NY917
- South Central Connecticut Planning Region, CT736
- Kings County, NY430
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2021 | +2,346 |
| 2022 | −6,028 |
| 2023 | −4,779 |
| 2024 | −4,045 |
| 2025 | −3,667 |
Western Connecticut Planning Region sits in New England. In 2024 it voted Democratic.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 25.4 points in 2020 and a Republican high of 44.1 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 7.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 18.0 points.
A population of 627,071, a 59% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $128,188 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Burlington County and Greater Bridgeport Planning Region.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Western Connecticut Planning Region, Connecticut. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/09190/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.