- Lead
- 4,525
- Total
- 9,065
- vs nation
- R+48.4
- Turnout
- 68.0%
Hancock County, IL
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 68.0% of 13,487 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,591
- Total
- 9,403
- vs nation
- R+53.3
- Turnout
- 67.4%
- Lead
- 4,291
- Total
- 9,121
- vs nation
- R+49.1
- Turnout
- 62.2%
- Lead
- 1,621
- Total
- 9,111
- vs nation
- R+21.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,020
- Total
- 9,469
- vs nation
- R+18.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,862
- Total
- 9,899
- vs nation
- R+16.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 878
- Total
- 9,691
- vs nation
- R+9.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 40
- Total
- 9,178
- vs nation
- R+8.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+49.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 17,2812024 5-year
- Population density
- 22 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 794 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $65,8652024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 94.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.7%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+29.3 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+49.9 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Adams County, IA · twin score 87.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 68.0%9,166 participants ÷ 13,487 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.0 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -8.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 54.0%–55.1%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9,166 | 13,487 ± 78 | 68.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 7,372 | 13,800 ± 121 | 53.4% | Audited | C/A |
| 9,467 | 14,051 ± 138 | 67.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 7,195 | 14,261 ± 148 | 50.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 9,121 | 14,674 ± 91 | 62.2% | Audited | C/A | |
| 9,111 | 14,881 | 61.2% | Derived | — | |
| 9,469 | 14,476 | 65.4% | Derived | — | |
| 9,899 | 14,071 extrapolated | 70.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 148/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Hancock County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Hancock County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 68 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
68 precincts · 9,166 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -NAUVOONAUVOO | 148 | 310 | 24 | 482 | 30.7% | 64.3% | R+33.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -MONTEBELLO 3MONTEBELLO 3 | 169 | 294 | 12 | 475 | 35.6% | 61.9% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -DALLAS CITYDALLAS CITY | 115 | 318 | 21 | 454 | 25.3% | 70.0% | R+44.7 |
| Precinct -MONTEBELLO 2MONTEBELLO 2 | 164 | 258 | 7 | 429 | 38.2% | 60.1% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -CARTHAGE 1CARTHAGE 1 | 97 | 312 | 19 | 428 | 22.7% | 72.9% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -MONTEBELLO 1MONTEBELLO 1 | 126 | 286 | 16 | 428 | 29.4% | 66.8% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -CARTHAGE 2CARTHAGE 2 | 105 | 280 | 6 | 391 | 26.9% | 71.6% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct -LAHARPE 1LAHARPE 1 | 57 | 305 | 9 | 371 | 15.4% | 82.2% | R+66.8 |
| Precinct -CARTHAGE 3CARTHAGE 3 | 100 | 247 | 15 | 362 | 27.6% | 68.2% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -MONTEBELLO 4MONTEBELLO 4 | 82 | 255 | 14 | 351 | 23.4% | 72.6% | R+49.3 |
| Precinct -AUGUSTAAUGUSTA | 52 | 282 | 9 | 343 | 15.2% | 82.2% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -WARSAW 3WARSAW 3 | 111 | 213 | 12 | 336 | 33.0% | 63.4% | R+30.4 |
| Precinct -CHILICHILI | 47 | 268 | 4 | 319 | 14.7% | 84.0% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -LAHARPE 2LAHARPE 2 | 71 | 232 | 5 | 308 | 23.1% | 75.3% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -CARTHAGE 4CARTHAGE 4 | 58 | 219 | 8 | 285 | 20.4% | 76.8% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -SONORASONORA | 65 | 183 | 16 | 264 | 24.6% | 69.3% | R+44.7 |
| Precinct -ST MARYSST MARYS | 57 | 199 | 4 | 260 | 21.9% | 76.5% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -WARSAW 2WARSAW 2 | 81 | 169 | 4 | 254 | 31.9% | 66.5% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -APPANOOSEAPPANOOSE | 37 | 192 | 9 | 238 | 15.5% | 80.7% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -PRAIRIEPRAIRIE | 39 | 172 | 3 | 214 | 18.2% | 80.4% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -ROCK CREEKROCK CREEK | 29 | 161 | 4 | 194 | 14.9% | 83.0% | R+68.0 |
| Precinct -BEAR CREEKBEAR CREEK | 32 | 152 | 8 | 192 | 16.7% | 79.2% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -ROCKY RUN-WILCOXROCKY RUN-WILCOX | 36 | 149 | 6 | 191 | 18.8% | 78.0% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -HARMONYHARMONY | 29 | 148 | 2 | 179 | 16.2% | 82.7% | R+66.5 |
| Precinct -WALKERWALKER | 25 | 145 | 7 | 177 | 14.1% | 81.9% | R+67.8 |
| Precinct -WARSAW 1WARSAW 1 | 55 | 112 | 4 | 171 | 32.2% | 65.5% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -PONTOOSUCPONTOOSUC | 50 | 104 | 6 | 160 | 31.3% | 65.0% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -ST ALBANSST ALBANS | 21 | 137 | 2 | 160 | 13.1% | 85.6% | R+72.5 |
| Precinct -PILOT GROVEPILOT GROVE | 30 | 125 | 1 | 156 | 19.2% | 80.1% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -FOUNTAIN GREENFOUNTAIN GREEN | 17 | 136 | 1 | 154 | 11.0% | 88.3% | R+77.3 |
| Precinct -DURHAMDURHAM | 26 | 113 | 10 | 149 | 17.4% | 75.8% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -WYTHEWYTHE | 19 | 127 | 3 | 149 | 12.8% | 85.2% | R+72.5 |
| Precinct -HANCOCKHANCOCK | 33 | 105 | 4 | 142 | 23.2% | 73.9% | R+50.7 |
| APPANOOSE Voting District17_1706700201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| AUGUSTA Voting District17_1706702501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BEAR CREEK Voting District17_1706701801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARTHAGE I Voting District17_1706701301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARTHAGE II Voting District17_1706701302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARTHAGE III Voting District17_1706701303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARTHAGE IV Voting District17_1706701304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHILI Voting District17_1706702401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DALLAS CITY Voting District17_1706700401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DURHAM Voting District17_1706700501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FOUNTAIN GREEN Voting District17_1706701001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HANCOCK Voting District17_1706701401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HARMONY Voting District17_1706701901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAHARPE I Voting District17_1706700601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LAHARPE II Voting District17_1706700602 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTEBELLO I Voting District17_1706701101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTEBELLO II Voting District17_1706701102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTEBELLO III Voting District17_1706701103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTEBELLO IV Voting District17_1706701104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MONTEBELLO V Voting District17_1706701105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NAUVOO Voting District17_1706700101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PILOT GROVE Voting District17_1706700901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PONTOOSUC Voting District17_1706700301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRAIRIE Voting District17_1706701201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ROCK CREEK Voting District17_1706700801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ROCKY RUN Voting District17_1706702101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SONORA Voting District17_1706700701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ST ALBANS Voting District17_1706702301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ST MARYS Voting District17_1706702001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WALKER Voting District17_1706702201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WARSAW I Voting District17_1706701501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WARSAW II Voting District17_1706701502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WARSAW III Voting District17_1706701503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WILCOX Voting District17_1706701601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WYTHE Voting District17_1706701701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Hancock County, IL · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
64.1%
8,808 votes · D+29.3
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1900 · 53.3%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
74.0%
6,708 votes · R+49.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 73.4%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
8,808votes
64.1% of the vote · D+29.3
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 7,726 votes
Republican
Dwight D. Eisenhower1952
9,181votes
66.1% of the vote · R+32.4
Runner-up · Wendell Willkie, 1940 · 9,108 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1900
+16.1pts D vs U.S.
Place D+8.6 · U.S. R+7.5
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1908 · +15.3 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+53.3pts R vs U.S.
Place R+48.8 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +49.1 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Hancock County, IL. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 0.0%0 | 100.0%7,768 | 7,768 |
| 2020 | R | 21.2%1,946 | 78.8%7,230 | 9,176 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 13,272 |
| 2018 | 12,903 |
| 2020 | 13,108 |
| 2022 | 12,324 |
| 2024 | 12,804 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−63 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,711 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $48,023 in average income, against $78,526 for residents who stayed — 39% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+30.0 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Hancock County, IL itself (R+49.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lee County, IA68R+27.7
- McDonough County, IL40R+18.8
- Adams County, IL35R+47.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lee County, IA80
- McDonough County, IL58
- Adams County, IL43
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −109 |
| 2012 | −153 |
| 2013 | −271 |
| 2014 | −212 |
| 2015 | −132 |
| 2016 | −6 |
| 2017 | −203 |
| 2018 | −105 |
| 2019 | −102 |
| 2021 | −77 |
| 2022 | −61 |
| 2023 | −25 |
| 2024 | −192 |
| 2025 | −63 |
Hancock County's 2024 presidential margin of nearly 50 points Republican reflects a broader shift in Illinois's western Mississippi River bluffs, where small-town and agricultural communities have moved sharply away from statewide Democratic voting patterns over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 29.3 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 49.9 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 49.9 points.
A population of 17,281, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $65,865 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Adams County and Van Buren County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Hancock County, Illinois. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/17067/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.