- Lead
- 9,173
- Total
- 23,425
- vs nation
- R+37.7
- Turnout
- 67.4%
Macoupin County, IL
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 67.4% of 35,064 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 8,788
- Total
- 24,070
- vs nation
- R+41.0
- Turnout
- 77.3%
- Lead
- 7,633
- Total
- 22,391
- vs nation
- R+36.2
- Turnout
- 61.7%
- Lead
- 1,482
- Total
- 21,083
- vs nation
- R+10.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,199
- Total
- 22,373
- vs nation
- D+2.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 220
- Total
- 22,785
- vs nation
- D+1.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,266
- Total
- 21,389
- vs nation
- D+5.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 3,872
- Total
- 21,075
- vs nation
- D+9.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+39.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 44,3502024 5-year
- Population density
- 51 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 863 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $70,8052024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+32.9 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+39.2 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Montgomery County, IL · twin score 93.7
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 67.4%23,647 participants ÷ 35,064 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +25.5 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +3.5 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 41.9%–50.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23,647 | 35,064 ± 134 | 67.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 18,308 | 35,385 ± 145 | 51.7% | Audited | A/A |
| 27,405 | 35,468 ± 149 | 77.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 18,728 | 35,813 ± 133 | 52.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 22,391 | 36,317 ± 97 | 61.7% | Audited | C/A | |
| 21,083 | 36,702 | 57.4% | Derived | — | |
| 22,373 | 37,058 | 60.4% | Derived | — | |
| 22,785 | 37,414 extrapolated | 60.9% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 148/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Macoupin County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Macoupin County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 106 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
106 precincts · 23,646 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -STAUNTON 1STAUNTON 1 | 292 | 578 | 35 | 905 | 32.3% | 63.9% | R+31.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -VIRDEN 1VIRDEN 1 | 233 | 563 | 14 | 810 | 28.8% | 69.5% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -DORCHESTERDORCHESTER | 238 | 546 | 22 | 806 | 29.5% | 67.7% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -BRIGHTON 2BRIGHTON 2 | 170 | 609 | 18 | 797 | 21.3% | 76.4% | R+55.1 |
| Precinct -CARLINVILLE 1CARLINVILLE 1 | 322 | 440 | 29 | 791 | 40.7% | 55.6% | R+14.9 |
| Precinct -CAHOKIA 1CAHOKIA 1 | 239 | 525 | 25 | 789 | 30.3% | 66.5% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct -GILLESPIE 2GILLESPIE 2 | 276 | 462 | 24 | 762 | 36.2% | 60.6% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -VIRDEN 2VIRDEN 2 | 239 | 482 | 33 | 754 | 31.7% | 63.9% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -STAUNTON 3STAUNTON 3 | 264 | 463 | 22 | 749 | 35.2% | 61.8% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -CARLINVILLE 3CARLINVILLE 3 | 237 | 484 | 21 | 742 | 31.9% | 65.2% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -SHIPMANSHIPMAN | 141 | 564 | 19 | 724 | 19.5% | 77.9% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -BRIGHTON 1BRIGHTON 1 | 129 | 560 | 18 | 707 | 18.2% | 79.2% | R+61.0 |
| Precinct -CAHOKIA 2CAHOKIA 2 | 240 | 438 | 24 | 702 | 34.2% | 62.4% | R+28.2 |
| Precinct -BRIGHTON 3BRIGHTON 3 | 156 | 488 | 22 | 666 | 23.4% | 73.3% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -STAUNTON 4STAUNTON 4 | 213 | 406 | 22 | 641 | 33.2% | 63.3% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -CARLINVILLE 2CARLINVILLE 2 | 231 | 354 | 19 | 604 | 38.2% | 58.6% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -MT OLIVE 2MT OLIVE 2 | 218 | 365 | 15 | 598 | 36.5% | 61.0% | R+24.6 |
| Precinct -GILLESPIE 1GILLESPIE 1 | 203 | 352 | 27 | 582 | 34.9% | 60.5% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -CARLINVILLE 4CARLINVILLE 4 | 183 | 366 | 21 | 570 | 32.1% | 64.2% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -BUNKER HILL 2BUNKER HILL 2 | 131 | 419 | 18 | 568 | 23.1% | 73.8% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -BUNKER HILL 3BUNKER HILL 3 | 157 | 390 | 16 | 563 | 27.9% | 69.3% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -NORTH OTTERNORTH OTTER | 161 | 385 | 15 | 561 | 28.7% | 68.6% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -GILLESPIE 3GILLESPIE 3 | 209 | 319 | 14 | 542 | 38.6% | 58.9% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -STAUNTON 2STAUNTON 2 | 174 | 346 | 19 | 539 | 32.3% | 64.2% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -BUNKER HILL 1BUNKER HILL 1 | 127 | 392 | 19 | 538 | 23.6% | 72.9% | R+49.3 |
| Precinct -GIRARD 1GIRARD 1 | 156 | 356 | 10 | 522 | 29.9% | 68.2% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -MT OLIVE 1MT OLIVE 1 | 167 | 323 | 15 | 505 | 33.1% | 64.0% | R+30.9 |
| Precinct -CARLINVILLE 5CARLINVILLE 5 | 170 | 282 | 21 | 473 | 35.9% | 59.6% | R+23.7 |
| Precinct -GIRARD 2GIRARD 2 | 156 | 308 | 9 | 473 | 33.0% | 65.1% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -BRUSHY MOUNDBRUSHY MOUND | 114 | 331 | 15 | 460 | 24.8% | 72.0% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -NORTH PALMYRANORTH PALMYRA | 90 | 339 | 11 | 440 | 20.5% | 77.0% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -SOUTH PALMYRASOUTH PALMYRA | 57 | 323 | 4 | 384 | 14.8% | 84.1% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -POLKPOLK | 97 | 277 | 9 | 383 | 25.3% | 72.3% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -CHESTERFIELDCHESTERFIELD | 76 | 291 | 8 | 375 | 20.3% | 77.6% | R+57.3 |
| Precinct -HILYARDHILYARD | 90 | 230 | 7 | 327 | 27.5% | 70.3% | R+42.8 |
| Precinct -SHAWS POINTSHAWS POINT | 100 | 216 | 9 | 325 | 30.8% | 66.5% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -NILWOODNILWOOD | 65 | 245 | 4 | 314 | 20.7% | 78.0% | R+57.3 |
| Precinct -MT OLIVE 3MT OLIVE 3 | 75 | 212 | 8 | 295 | 25.4% | 71.9% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -MT OLIVE 4MT OLIVE 4 | 99 | 177 | 8 | 284 | 34.9% | 62.3% | R+27.5 |
| Precinct -SOUTH OTTERSOUTH OTTER | 55 | 220 | 7 | 282 | 19.5% | 78.0% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -BIRDBIRD | 38 | 141 | 4 | 183 | 20.8% | 77.0% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -SCOTTVILLESCOTTVILLE | 25 | 149 | 0 | 174 | 14.4% | 85.6% | R+71.3 |
| Precinct -BARRBARR | 28 | 143 | 2 | 173 | 16.2% | 82.7% | R+66.5 |
| Precinct -WESTERN MOUNDWESTERN MOUND | 28 | 130 | 5 | 163 | 17.2% | 79.8% | R+62.6 |
| Precinct -HONEY POINTHONEY POINT | 23 | 76 | 2 | 101 | 22.8% | 75.2% | R+52.5 |
| BARR 1 Voting District17_17117BR01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BIRD Voting District17_17117BD00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRIGHTON 1 Voting District17_17117BT01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRIGHTON 2 Voting District17_17117BT02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRIGHTON 3 Voting District17_17117BT03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BRUSHY MOUND Voting District17_17117BM00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BUNKER HILL 1 Voting District17_17117BH01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BUNKER HILL 2 Voting District17_17117BH02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| BUNKER HILL 3 Voting District17_17117BH03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CAHOKIA 1 Voting District17_17117CK01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CAHOKIA 2 Voting District17_17117CK02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CAHOKIA 3 Voting District17_17117CK03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CAHOKIA 4 Voting District17_17117CK04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CAHOKIA 5 Voting District17_17117CK05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARLINVILLE 1 Voting District17_17117CN01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARLINVILLE 2 Voting District17_17117CN02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARLINVILLE 3 Voting District17_17117CN03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARLINVILLE 4 Voting District17_17117CN04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARLINVILLE 5 Voting District17_17117CN05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CARLINVILLE 6 Voting District17_17117CN06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CHESTERFIELD 1 Voting District17_17117CF01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DORCHESTER 1 Voting District17_17117DH01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DORCHESTER 2 Voting District17_17117DH02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILLESPIE 1 Voting District17_17117GP01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILLESPIE 2 Voting District17_17117GP02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILLESPIE 3 Voting District17_17117GP03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILLESPIE 4 Voting District17_17117GP04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILLESPIE 5 Voting District17_17117GP05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GILLESPIE 6 Voting District17_17117GP06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GIRARD 1 Voting District17_17117GD01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GIRARD 2 Voting District17_17117GD02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HILYARD Voting District17_17117HY00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY POINT Voting District17_17117HP00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT OLIVE 1 Voting District17_17117MO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT OLIVE 2 Voting District17_17117MO02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT OLIVE 3 Voting District17_17117MO03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT OLIVE 4 Voting District17_17117MO04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT OLIVE 5 Voting District17_17117MO05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MT OLIVE 6 Voting District17_17117MO06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NILWOOD 1 Voting District17_17117NW01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NILWOOD 2 Voting District17_17117NW02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORTH OTTER Voting District17_17117NO00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NORTH PALMYRA 1 Voting District17_17117NP01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| POLK Voting District17_17117PK00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SCOTTVILLE Voting District17_17117ST00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHAWS POINT Voting District17_17117SP00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHIPMAN 1 Voting District17_17117SH01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHIPMAN 2 Voting District17_17117SH02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SHIPMAN 3 Voting District17_17117SH03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SOUTH OTTER Voting District17_17117SO00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SOUTH PALMYRA 1 Voting District17_17117SP01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STAUNTON 1 Voting District17_17117ST01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STAUNTON 2 Voting District17_17117ST02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STAUNTON 3 Voting District17_17117ST03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STAUNTON 4 Voting District17_17117ST04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| STAUNTON 5 Voting District17_17117ST05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VIRDEN 1 Voting District17_17117VD01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VIRDEN 2 Voting District17_17117VD02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VIRDEN 3 Voting District17_17117VD03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| VIRDEN 4 Voting District17_17117VD04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WESTERN MOUND Voting District17_17117WM00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Macoupin County, IL · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
64.4%
15,227 votes · D+28.7
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 62.6%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
68.6%
16,065 votes · R+39.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 67.1%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
15,227votes
64.4% of the vote · D+28.7
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 14,896 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
16,153votes
67.1% of the vote · R+36.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 16,065 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Michael Dukakis1988
+20.8pts D vs U.S.
Place D+13.1 · U.S. R+7.7
Runner-up · Al Smith, 1928 · +20.1 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+41.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+36.5 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · +37.7 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Macoupin County, IL. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 2 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 37.4%8,566 | 62.6%14,345 | 22,911 |
| 2020 | R | 30.7%7,264 | 69.3%16,363 | 23,627 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 33,570 |
| 2018 | 34,607 |
| 2020 | 33,438 |
| 2022 | 33,379 |
| 2024 | 32,567 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+22 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −2,091 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,431 in average income, against $73,512 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+18.6 on average — 21 points more Democratic-leaning than Macoupin County, IL itself (R+39.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Madison County, IL293R+13.2
- Sangamon County, IL131R+4.9
- Montgomery County, IL90R+44.0
- Jersey County, IL54R+50.2
- St. Clair County, IL23D+7.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Madison County, IL275
- Sangamon County, IL134
- Montgomery County, IL81
- Jersey County, IL55
- St. Clair County, IL34
- Morgan County, IL27
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −28 |
| 2012 | −593 |
| 2013 | −281 |
| 2014 | −341 |
| 2015 | −232 |
| 2016 | −78 |
| 2017 | −61 |
| 2018 | −96 |
| 2019 | −282 |
| 2021 | −67 |
| 2022 | −200 |
| 2023 | +105 |
| 2024 | +41 |
| 2025 | +22 |
Macoupin's shift mirrors the broader realignment of rural Illinois: a county that sent Democrats to Springfield for generations recorded a 39-point Republican presidential margin in 2024, reflecting rapid change among white working-class voters.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 32.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 39.2 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 39.2 points.
A population of 44,350, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $70,805 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Montgomery County and Tuscarawas County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Macoupin County, Illinois. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/17117/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.