HarrisDemocratic35.8%24,325TrumpRepublican62.4%42,451KennedyIndependent1.7%1,190
R+26.6- Lead
- 18,126
- Total
- 68,027
- vs nation
- R+25.2
- Turnout
- 67.5%
Akashiccounty
Tazewell County, IL
Contests in this Place (89 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 67.5% of 100,864 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic35.8%24,819TrumpRepublican61.4%42,513JorgensenLibertarian1.7%1,175
R+25.5- Lead
- 17,694
- Total
- 69,276
- vs nation
- R+30.0
- Turnout
- 68.3%
ClintonDemocratic31.9%20,685TrumpRepublican59.8%38,707JohnsonLibertarian5.2%3,358
R+27.8- Lead
- 18,022
- Total
- 64,751
- vs nation
- R+29.9
- Turnout
- 63.0%
ObamaDemocratic39.9%24,438RomneyRepublican57.7%35,335JOHNSONLibertarian1.4%887
R+17.8- Lead
- 10,897
- Total
- 61,282
- vs nation
- R+21.6
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic46.0%29,384McCainRepublican52.1%33,247OtherAll other candidates1.9%1,223
R+6.0- Lead
- 3,863
- Total
- 63,854
- vs nation
- R+13.3
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic41.4%25,814BushRepublican57.8%36,058OtherAll other candidates0.7%466
R+16.4- Lead
- 10,244
- Total
- 62,338
- vs nation
- R+14.0
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic43.5%25,379BushRepublican54.0%31,537NaderGreen1.8%1,022
R+10.6- Lead
- 6,158
- Total
- 58,348
- vs nation
- R+11.1
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic45.0%24,139DoleRepublican45.4%24,395PerotReform9.0%4,814
R+0.5- Lead
- 256
- Total
- 53,678
- vs nation
- R+9.0
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+26.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 130,2902024 5-year
- Population density
- 202 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 647 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $77,9822024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 91.9%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+34.5 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+34.4 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Clark County, IN · twin score 81.2
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 67.5%68,117 participants ÷ 100,864 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +16.5 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -5.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 51.1%–53.0%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 68,117 | 100,864 ± 356 | 67.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 52,366 | 100,928 ± 319 | 51.9% | Audited | C/A |
| 69,276 | 101,374 ± 330 | 68.3% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2018Mid | 51,432 | 102,037 ± 363 | 50.4% | Audited | C/A |
| 65,053 | 103,209 ± 332 | 63.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 61,282 | 102,829 | 59.6% | Derived | — | |
| 63,854 | 99,589 | 64.1% | Derived | — | |
| 62,338 | 96,349 extrapolated | 64.7% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 154/183.
- 2020: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 152/2.
- 2018: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 150/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Tazewell County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Tazewell County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
JB Pritzker0—
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 211 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
211 precincts · 67,144 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Morton 02Morton 02 | 400 | 842 | 45 | 1,287 | 31.1% | 65.4% | R+34.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Washington 10Washington 10 | 495 | 735 | 44 | 1,274 | 38.9% | 57.7% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -Morton 08Morton 08 | 419 | 760 | 42 | 1,221 | 34.3% | 62.2% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -Washington 09Washington 09 | 424 | 747 | 47 | 1,218 | 34.8% | 61.3% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -Washington 08Washington 08 | 467 | 643 | 57 | 1,167 | 40.0% | 55.1% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -Groveland 12Groveland 12 | 474 | 660 | 28 | 1,162 | 40.8% | 56.8% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -Fondulac 04Fondulac 04 | 512 | 607 | 40 | 1,159 | 44.2% | 52.4% | R+8.2 |
| Precinct -Groveland 08Groveland 08 | 438 | 688 | 27 | 1,153 | 38.0% | 59.7% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -Morton 04Morton 04 | 366 | 716 | 47 | 1,129 | 32.4% | 63.4% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -Washington 13Washington 13 | 430 | 619 | 37 | 1,086 | 39.6% | 57.0% | R+17.4 |
| Precinct -Washington 04Washington 04 | 449 | 559 | 49 | 1,057 | 42.5% | 52.9% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -Hopedale 01Hopedale 01 | 232 | 780 | 29 | 1,041 | 22.3% | 74.9% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -Morton 03Morton 03 | 365 | 635 | 34 | 1,034 | 35.3% | 61.4% | R+26.1 |
| Precinct -SpringLake 01SpringLake 01 | 274 | 748 | 10 | 1,032 | 26.6% | 72.5% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -Morton 11Morton 11 | 353 | 628 | 43 | 1,024 | 34.5% | 61.3% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -Washington 02Washington 02 | 385 | 592 | 37 | 1,014 | 38.0% | 58.4% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -Elm Grove 01Elm Grove 01 | 212 | 759 | 40 | 1,011 | 21.0% | 75.1% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct -Washington 06Washington 06 | 322 | 644 | 30 | 996 | 32.3% | 64.7% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -Cincinnati 04Cincinnati 04 | 368 | 595 | 30 | 993 | 37.1% | 59.9% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -Tremont 01Tremont 01 | 223 | 720 | 49 | 992 | 22.5% | 72.6% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -Washington 11Washington 11 | 398 | 552 | 36 | 986 | 40.4% | 56.0% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -Morton 01Morton 01 | 302 | 639 | 42 | 983 | 30.7% | 65.0% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -Delavan 01Delavan 01 | 319 | 628 | 27 | 974 | 32.8% | 64.5% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -Washington 14Washington 14 | 373 | 573 | 24 | 970 | 38.5% | 59.1% | R+20.6 |
| Precinct -Fondulac 03Fondulac 03 | 393 | 541 | 26 | 960 | 40.9% | 56.4% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -Fondulac 07Fondulac 07 | 364 | 559 | 26 | 949 | 38.4% | 58.9% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -Cincinnati 02Cincinnati 02 | 421 | 491 | 32 | 944 | 44.6% | 52.0% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -Pekin 16Pekin 16 | 399 | 517 | 23 | 939 | 42.5% | 55.1% | R+12.6 |
| Precinct -Washington 12Washington 12 | 380 | 521 | 32 | 933 | 40.7% | 55.8% | R+15.1 |
| Precinct -Pekin 02Pekin 02 | 349 | 550 | 24 | 923 | 37.8% | 59.6% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -Groveland 10Groveland 10 | 323 | 569 | 26 | 918 | 35.2% | 62.0% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -Fondulac 01Fondulac 01 | 340 | 517 | 37 | 894 | 38.0% | 57.8% | R+19.8 |
| Precinct -Pekin 12Pekin 12 | 377 | 491 | 26 | 894 | 42.2% | 54.9% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -Groveland 01Groveland 01 | 289 | 558 | 34 | 881 | 32.8% | 63.3% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -Pekin 07Pekin 07 | 376 | 469 | 19 | 864 | 43.5% | 54.3% | R+10.8 |
| Precinct -Morton 06Morton 06 | 276 | 553 | 31 | 860 | 32.1% | 64.3% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -Washington 05Washington 05 | 347 | 485 | 28 | 860 | 40.3% | 56.4% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -Pekin 11Pekin 11 | 331 | 504 | 21 | 856 | 38.7% | 58.9% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -Morton 10Morton 10 | 264 | 554 | 36 | 854 | 30.9% | 64.9% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -Cincinnati 01Cincinnati 01 | 218 | 613 | 22 | 853 | 25.6% | 71.9% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -Mackinaw 03Mackinaw 03 | 281 | 543 | 29 | 853 | 32.9% | 63.7% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -Pekin 04Pekin 04 | 328 | 485 | 24 | 837 | 39.2% | 57.9% | R+18.8 |
| Precinct -Groveland 02Groveland 02 | 291 | 518 | 26 | 835 | 34.9% | 62.0% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -Pekin 03Pekin 03 | 333 | 484 | 17 | 834 | 39.9% | 58.0% | R+18.1 |
| Precinct -Cincinnati 05Cincinnati 05 | 336 | 479 | 18 | 833 | 40.3% | 57.5% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -Groveland 03Groveland 03 | 313 | 485 | 30 | 828 | 37.8% | 58.6% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -Elm Grove 02Elm Grove 02 | 275 | 529 | 23 | 827 | 33.3% | 64.0% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -Fondulac 06Fondulac 06 | 272 | 526 | 20 | 818 | 33.3% | 64.3% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -Morton 05Morton 05 | 268 | 517 | 31 | 816 | 32.8% | 63.4% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -Mackinaw 01Mackinaw 01 | 200 | 583 | 20 | 803 | 24.9% | 72.6% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -Pekin 14Pekin 14 | 293 | 474 | 17 | 784 | 37.4% | 60.5% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -Groveland 11Groveland 11 | 302 | 458 | 16 | 776 | 38.9% | 59.0% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct -Groveland 09Groveland 09 | 233 | 512 | 22 | 767 | 30.4% | 66.8% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -Morton 09Morton 09 | 242 | 501 | 20 | 763 | 31.7% | 65.7% | R+33.9 |
| Precinct -Washington 01Washington 01 | 319 | 412 | 24 | 755 | 42.3% | 54.6% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -Mackinaw 02Mackinaw 02 | 221 | 511 | 19 | 751 | 29.4% | 68.0% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -Sand Prairie 01Sand Prairie 01 | 193 | 533 | 22 | 748 | 25.8% | 71.3% | R+45.5 |
| Precinct -Morton 07Morton 07 | 323 | 398 | 16 | 737 | 43.8% | 54.0% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct -Pekin 05Pekin 05 | 305 | 410 | 18 | 733 | 41.6% | 55.9% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -Pekin 01Pekin 01 | 264 | 419 | 12 | 695 | 38.0% | 60.3% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -Pekin 08Pekin 08 | 289 | 383 | 18 | 690 | 41.9% | 55.5% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -Tremont 02Tremont 02 | 133 | 537 | 20 | 690 | 19.3% | 77.8% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -Fondulac 05Fondulac 05 | 270 | 394 | 15 | 679 | 39.8% | 58.0% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct -Pekin 09Pekin 09 | 282 | 372 | 19 | 673 | 41.9% | 55.3% | R+13.4 |
| Precinct -Pekin 06Pekin 06 | 257 | 396 | 19 | 672 | 38.2% | 58.9% | R+20.7 |
| Precinct -Washington 07Washington 07 | 240 | 384 | 35 | 659 | 36.4% | 58.3% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -Groveland 06Groveland 06 | 235 | 402 | 14 | 651 | 36.1% | 61.8% | R+25.7 |
| Precinct -Groveland 04Groveland 04 | 222 | 410 | 18 | 650 | 34.2% | 63.1% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -Dillon 01Dillon 01 | 133 | 489 | 26 | 648 | 20.5% | 75.5% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct -Groveland 05Groveland 05 | 249 | 377 | 14 | 640 | 38.9% | 58.9% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -Groveland 07Groveland 07 | 215 | 397 | 14 | 626 | 34.3% | 63.4% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct -Pekin 15Pekin 15 | 233 | 371 | 14 | 618 | 37.7% | 60.0% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -Fondulac 02Fondulac 02 | 275 | 311 | 27 | 613 | 44.9% | 50.7% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -Pekin 10Pekin 10 | 218 | 340 | 17 | 575 | 37.9% | 59.1% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -Washington 03Washington 03 | 210 | 335 | 19 | 564 | 37.2% | 59.4% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -Pekin 13Pekin 13 | 137 | 363 | 18 | 518 | 26.4% | 70.1% | R+43.6 |
| Precinct -Cincinnati 03Cincinnati 03 | 125 | 280 | 7 | 412 | 30.3% | 68.0% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -Hittle 01Hittle 01 | 76 | 243 | 5 | 324 | 23.5% | 75.0% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -Malone 01Malone 01 | 31 | 71 | 2 | 104 | 29.8% | 68.3% | R+38.5 |
| BOYNTON 1 Voting District17_1717900101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CINCINNATI 1 Voting District17_1717900201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CINCINNATI 2 Voting District17_1717900202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CINCINNATI 3 Voting District17_1717900203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CINCINNATI 4 Voting District17_1717900204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CINCINNATI 5 Voting District17_1717900205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CINCINNATI 6 Voting District17_1717900206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| CINCINNATI 7 Voting District17_1717900207 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DEER CREEK Voting District17_1717900301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DELAVAN 1 Voting District17_1717900401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DELAVAN 2 Voting District17_1717900402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DELAVAN 3 Voting District17_1717900403 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| DILLON Voting District17_1717900501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELM GROVE 1 Voting District17_1717900601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELM GROVE 2 Voting District17_1717900602 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| ELM GROVE 3 Voting District17_1717900603 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 1 Voting District17_1717900701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 10 Voting District17_1717900710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 11 Voting District17_1717900711 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 12 Voting District17_1717900712 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 13 Voting District17_1717900713 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 14 Voting District17_1717900714 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 15 Voting District17_1717900715 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 2 Voting District17_1717900702 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 4 Voting District17_1717900704 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 5 Voting District17_1717900705 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 6 Voting District17_1717900706 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 7 Voting District17_1717900707 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 8 Voting District17_1717900708 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FONDULAC 9 Voting District17_1717900709 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 1 Voting District17_1717900801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 10 Voting District17_1717900810 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 11 Voting District17_1717900811 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 12 Voting District17_1717900812 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 13 Voting District17_1717900813 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 14 Voting District17_1717900814 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 15 Voting District17_1717900815 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 16 Voting District17_1717900816 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 17 Voting District17_1717900817 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 18 Voting District17_1717900818 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 19 Voting District17_1717900819 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 2 Voting District17_1717900802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 3 Voting District17_1717900803 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 4 Voting District17_1717900804 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 5 Voting District17_1717900805 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 6 Voting District17_1717900806 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 7 Voting District17_1717900807 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 8 Voting District17_1717900808 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| GROVELAND 9 Voting District17_1717900809 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HITTLE Voting District17_1717900901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HOPEDALE 1 Voting District17_1717901001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HOPEDALE 2 Voting District17_1717901002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LITTLE MACKINAW 1 Voting District17_1717901101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LITTLE MACKINAW 2 Voting District17_1717901102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MACKINAW 1 Voting District17_1717901201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MACKINAW 2 Voting District17_1717901202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MACKINAW 3 Voting District17_1717901203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MALONE Voting District17_1717901301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 1 Voting District17_1717901401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 10 Voting District17_1717901410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 11 Voting District17_1717901411 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 12 Voting District17_1717901412 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 13 Voting District17_1717901413 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 14 Voting District17_1717901414 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 15 Voting District17_1717901415 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 16 Voting District17_1717901416 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 2 Voting District17_1717901402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 3 Voting District17_1717901403 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 4 Voting District17_1717901404 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 5 Voting District17_1717901405 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 6 Voting District17_1717901406 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 7 Voting District17_1717901407 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 8 Voting District17_1717901408 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| MORTON 9 Voting District17_1717901409 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 1 Voting District17_1717901901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 10 Voting District17_1717901910 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 13 Voting District17_1717901913 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 14 Voting District17_1717901914 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 15 Voting District17_1717901915 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 16 Voting District17_1717901916 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 17 Voting District17_1717901917 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 18 Voting District17_1717901918 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 19 Voting District17_1717901919 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 20 Voting District17_1717901920 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 21 Voting District17_1717901921 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 22 Voting District17_1717901922 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 23 Voting District17_1717901923 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 24 Voting District17_1717901924 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 25 Voting District17_1717901925 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 26 Voting District17_1717901926 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 27 Voting District17_1717901927 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 29 Voting District17_1717901929 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 30 Voting District17_1717901930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 31 Voting District17_1717901931 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 32 Voting District17_1717901932 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 33 Voting District17_1717901933 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 34 Voting District17_1717901934 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 35 Voting District17_1717901935 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 4 Voting District17_1717901904 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 5 Voting District17_1717901905 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 6 Voting District17_1717901906 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 7 Voting District17_1717901907 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 8 Voting District17_1717901908 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PEKIN 9 Voting District17_1717901909 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Boyton 01Boyton 01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -DeerCreek 01DeerCreek 01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Little Mackinaw 01Little Mackinaw 01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SAND PRAIRIE 1 Voting District17_1717901501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SAND PRAIRIE 2 Voting District17_1717901502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGLAKE 1 Voting District17_1717901601 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SPRINGLAKE 2 Voting District17_1717901602 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TREMONT 1 Voting District17_1717901701 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TREMONT 2 Voting District17_1717901702 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TREMONT 3 Voting District17_1717901703 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 1 Voting District17_1717901801 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 10 Voting District17_1717901810 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 11 Voting District17_1717901811 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 12 Voting District17_1717901812 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 13 Voting District17_1717901813 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 14 Voting District17_1717901814 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 15 Voting District17_1717901815 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 16 Voting District17_1717901816 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 17 Voting District17_1717901817 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 18 Voting District17_1717901818 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 2 Voting District17_1717901802 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 3 Voting District17_1717901803 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 4 Voting District17_1717901804 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 5 Voting District17_1717901805 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 6 Voting District17_1717901806 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 7 Voting District17_1717901807 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 8 Voting District17_1717901808 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| WASHINGTON 9 Voting District17_1717901809 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Tazewell County, IL · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
66.5%
16,487 votes · D+34.5
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 64.5%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
67.1%
31,937 votes · R+34.4
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1980 · 62.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
29,384votes
46.0% of the vote · R+6.0
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 28,561 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
42,513votes
61.4% of the vote · R+25.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 42,451 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Woodrow Wilson1912
+14.1pts D vs U.S.
Place D+33.7 · U.S. D+19.5
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · +12.3 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+30.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+25.5 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +29.9 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
RSally TurnerState Senate · 44
DDave KoehlerState Senate · 46
RNeil AndersonState Senate · 47
RChris BalkemaState Senate · 53
RBill HauterState House · 87
DSharon ChungState House · 91
RTravis WeaverState House · 93
RNorine HammondState House · 94
RDennis TipswordState House · 105
Seats representing Tazewell County, IL. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 4 state senate and 5 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 2.8%1,572 | 97.2%54,235 | 55,807 |
| 2020 | R | 31.9%21,874 | 68.1%46,642 | 68,516 |
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 94,293 |
| 2018 | 95,297 |
| 2020 | 944,087 |
| 2022 | 92,388 |
| 2024 | 91,753 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+325 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −4,980 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $59,345 in average income, against $86,510 for residents who stayed — 31% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+6.6 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Tazewell County, IL itself (R+26.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Peoria County, IL1,013D+4.6
- Woodford County, IL269R+42.0
- McLean County, IL200D+4.9
- Mason County, IL83R+42.2
- Fulton County, IL69R+23.8
- Cook County, IL54D+41.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Peoria County, IL812
- Woodford County, IL226
- McLean County, IL188
- Mason County, IL85
- Cook County, IL62
- Fulton County, IL54
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +84 |
| 2012 | +47 |
| 2013 | −130 |
| 2014 | −1,230 |
| 2015 | −1,225 |
| 2016 | −575 |
| 2017 | −562 |
| 2018 | −1,114 |
| 2019 | −644 |
| 2021 | −214 |
| 2022 | −267 |
| 2023 | +333 |
| 2024 | +192 |
| 2025 | +325 |
Tazewell's largely white, working-class electorate along the Illinois River corridor has shifted decisively rightward over two decades, delivering Republican presidential margins that have roughly doubled since 2008.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 34.5 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 34.4 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 26.6 points.
A population of 130,290, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $77,982 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Clark County and Warrick County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Clark County
Indiana
81.2twin score
population scaleelasticity2008 margin
Warrick County
Indiana
76.9twin score
% White% Latino% Black≠ elasticity
Clinton County
Michigan
76.8twin score
% Whiteelasticitypopulation scale≠ Scottish ancestry
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Tazewell County, Illinois. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/17179/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Tazewell County
Illinois at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Tazewell County, Illinois vote in 2024?
In 2024, Tazewell County, Illinois voted Republican by 26.6 points (R+26.6), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 68,027 votes cast, 24,325 went Democratic and 42,451 went Republican.
When did Tazewell County, Illinois last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Tazewell County, Illinois voted Democratic was 1992.
How many people live in Tazewell County, Illinois?
Tazewell County, Illinois has a population of 130,290 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Tazewell County, Illinois?
Median household income in Tazewell County, Illinois is $77,982 — below the national median of $80,734. The Illinois state median is $83,390.
What is the political history of Tazewell County, Illinois?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Tazewell County, Illinois from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 13 went Democratic and 21 went Republican.