HarrisDemocratic39.9%16,338TrumpRepublican58.0%23,738KennedyIndependent1.3%534
R+18.1- Lead
- 7,400
- Total
- 40,914
- vs nation
- R+16.6
- Turnout
- 49.8%
Akashiccounty
Vigo County, IN
Contests in this Place (87 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 49.8% of 82,716 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic41.6%18,123TrumpRepublican56.3%24,545JorgensenLibertarian2.1%900
R+14.7- Lead
- 6,422
- Total
- 43,594
- vs nation
- R+19.2
- Turnout
- 53.1%
ClintonDemocratic39.7%15,922TrumpRepublican54.7%21,924JohnsonLibertarian4.3%1,723
R+15.0- Lead
- 6,002
- Total
- 40,105
- vs nation
- R+17.1
- Turnout
- 48.9%
ObamaDemocratic49.3%19,712RomneyRepublican48.4%19,369JohnsonLibertarian1.9%768
D+0.9- Lead
- 343
- Total
- 40,005
- vs nation
- R+3.0
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic57.3%25,040McCainRepublican41.5%18,121OtherAll other candidates1.2%545
D+15.8- Lead
- 6,919
- Total
- 43,706
- vs nation
- D+8.6
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic46.4%18,426BushRepublican52.8%20,988OtherAll other candidates0.8%330
R+6.4- Lead
- 2,562
- Total
- 39,744
- vs nation
- R+4.0
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic48.5%17,570BushRepublican49.7%18,021OtherAll other candidates1.8%637
R+1.2- Lead
- 451
- Total
- 36,228
- vs nation
- R+1.8
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic46.7%17,974DoleRepublican40.9%15,751PerotReform11.7%4,508
D+5.8- Lead
- 2,223
- Total
- 38,499
- vs nation
- R+2.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+18.1MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 106,1092024 5-year
- Population density
- 263 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 404 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $52,9762024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 84.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 5.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.2%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+31.0 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+22.1 in 1972MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Delaware County, IN · twin score 96.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 49.8%41,228 participants ÷ 82,716 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +20.0 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -5.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 29.9%–42.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41,228 | 82,716 ± 427 | 49.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 27,464 | 83,000 ± 417 | 33.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 44,250 | 83,388 ± 398 | 53.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 45,930 | 83,446 ± 464 | 55.0% | Audited | A/A |
| 40,882 | 83,604 ± 474 | 48.9% | Audited | A/A | |
| 40,005 | 83,195 | 48.1% | Derived | — | |
| 43,706 | 81,049 | 53.9% | Derived | — | |
| 39,744 | 78,903 extrapolated | 50.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Vigo County only. The complete district District 8 result is shown below for comparison.
Vigo County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Christopher Rector0—
Mario Foradori0—
Mary Allen0—
Tabitha Zeigler0—
District District 8 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 175 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
175 precincts · 40,914 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -RILEY-ARILEY-A | 340 | 695 | 23 | 1,058 | 32.1% | 65.7% | R+33.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-GHONEY CREEK-G | 460 | 542 | 21 | 1,023 | 45.0% | 53.0% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -08-C08-C | 448 | 508 | 23 | 979 | 45.8% | 51.9% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -09-F09-F | 485 | 472 | 20 | 977 | 49.6% | 48.3% | D+1.3 |
| Precinct -OTTER CREEK-AOTTER CREEK-A | 271 | 683 | 16 | 970 | 27.9% | 70.4% | R+42.5 |
| Precinct -LOST CREEK-ALOST CREEK-A | 298 | 639 | 21 | 958 | 31.1% | 66.7% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -08-F08-F | 370 | 525 | 15 | 910 | 40.7% | 57.7% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-BHONEY CREEK-B | 285 | 532 | 14 | 831 | 34.3% | 64.0% | R+29.7 |
| Precinct -LOST CREEK-DLOST CREEK-D | 268 | 526 | 20 | 814 | 32.9% | 64.6% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-CHONEY CREEK-C | 302 | 471 | 13 | 786 | 38.4% | 59.9% | R+21.5 |
| Precinct -RILEY-BRILEY-B | 214 | 505 | 10 | 729 | 29.4% | 69.3% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -FAYETTE-BFAYETTE-B | 209 | 487 | 9 | 705 | 29.6% | 69.1% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -09-G09-G | 304 | 378 | 17 | 699 | 43.5% | 54.1% | R+10.6 |
| Precinct -OTTER CREEK-BOTTER CREEK-B | 233 | 445 | 12 | 690 | 33.8% | 64.5% | R+30.7 |
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-EHONEY CREEK-E | 240 | 436 | 10 | 686 | 35.0% | 63.6% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -FAYETTE-AFAYETTE-A | 127 | 539 | 12 | 678 | 18.7% | 79.5% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEK-ASUGAR CREEK-A | 203 | 459 | 10 | 672 | 30.2% | 68.3% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -06-C06-C | 250 | 402 | 15 | 667 | 37.5% | 60.3% | R+22.8 |
| Precinct -PIERSON- APIERSON- A | 160 | 476 | 11 | 647 | 24.7% | 73.6% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEK-DSUGAR CREEK-D | 191 | 437 | 12 | 640 | 29.8% | 68.3% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-HHONEY CREEK-H | 266 | 351 | 13 | 630 | 42.2% | 55.7% | R+13.5 |
| Precinct -LINTON-ALINTON-A | 149 | 464 | 15 | 628 | 23.7% | 73.9% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-FHONEY CREEK-F | 269 | 340 | 16 | 625 | 43.0% | 54.4% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -08-D08-D | 303 | 304 | 15 | 622 | 48.7% | 48.9% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -OTTER CREEK-GOTTER CREEK-G | 228 | 379 | 11 | 618 | 36.9% | 61.3% | R+24.4 |
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-DHONEY CREEK-D | 253 | 349 | 12 | 614 | 41.2% | 56.8% | R+15.6 |
| Precinct -06-B06-B | 224 | 371 | 14 | 609 | 36.8% | 60.9% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -OTTER CREEK-DOTTER CREEK-D | 170 | 402 | 17 | 589 | 28.9% | 68.3% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -PRAIRIE CREEK-APRAIRIE CREEK-A | 94 | 465 | 11 | 570 | 16.5% | 81.6% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -06-A06-A | 246 | 305 | 8 | 559 | 44.0% | 54.6% | R+10.6 |
| Precinct -LOST CREEK-CLOST CREEK-C | 190 | 343 | 10 | 543 | 35.0% | 63.2% | R+28.2 |
| Precinct -09-D09-D | 263 | 267 | 11 | 541 | 48.6% | 49.4% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -01-B01-B | 212 | 295 | 7 | 514 | 41.2% | 57.4% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -OTTER CREEK-FOTTER CREEK-F | 155 | 347 | 6 | 508 | 30.5% | 68.3% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -PRAIRIETON-APRAIRIETON-A | 140 | 353 | 9 | 502 | 27.9% | 70.3% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEK-CSUGAR CREEK-C | 150 | 342 | 8 | 500 | 30.0% | 68.4% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -NEVINS-BNEVINS-B | 120 | 367 | 6 | 493 | 24.3% | 74.4% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -03-E03-E | 270 | 213 | 9 | 492 | 54.9% | 43.3% | D+11.6 |
| Precinct -08-G08-G | 262 | 214 | 15 | 491 | 53.4% | 43.6% | D+9.8 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEK-ESUGAR CREEK-E | 236 | 240 | 11 | 487 | 48.5% | 49.3% | R+0.8 |
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-IHONEY CREEK-I | 204 | 265 | 17 | 486 | 42.0% | 54.5% | R+12.6 |
| Precinct -04-C04-C | 227 | 234 | 6 | 467 | 48.6% | 50.1% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -08-B08-B | 217 | 223 | 12 | 452 | 48.0% | 49.3% | R+1.3 |
| Precinct -08-A08-A | 255 | 177 | 7 | 439 | 58.1% | 40.3% | D+17.8 |
| Precinct -NEVINS-ANEVINS-A | 129 | 301 | 8 | 438 | 29.5% | 68.7% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -05-E05-E | 229 | 195 | 9 | 433 | 52.9% | 45.0% | D+7.9 |
| Precinct -OTTER CREEK-EOTTER CREEK-E | 153 | 269 | 8 | 430 | 35.6% | 62.6% | R+27.0 |
| Precinct -03-D03-D | 221 | 186 | 11 | 418 | 52.9% | 44.5% | D+8.4 |
| Precinct -02-A02-A | 192 | 203 | 13 | 408 | 47.1% | 49.8% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -OTTER CREEK-COTTER CREEK-C | 148 | 233 | 12 | 393 | 37.7% | 59.3% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -07-F07-F | 200 | 180 | 10 | 390 | 51.3% | 46.2% | D+5.1 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEK-FSUGAR CREEK-F | 127 | 250 | 6 | 383 | 33.2% | 65.3% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -09-A09-A | 176 | 191 | 5 | 372 | 47.3% | 51.3% | R+4.0 |
| Precinct -LOST CREEK-BLOST CREEK-B | 125 | 233 | 12 | 370 | 33.8% | 63.0% | R+29.2 |
| Precinct -HONEY CREEK-AHONEY CREEK-A | 115 | 240 | 9 | 364 | 31.6% | 65.9% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -07-G07-G | 170 | 186 | 7 | 363 | 46.8% | 51.2% | R+4.4 |
| Precinct -07-E07-E | 154 | 201 | 4 | 359 | 42.9% | 56.0% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -03-A03-A | 172 | 178 | 4 | 354 | 48.6% | 50.3% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -08-E08-E | 152 | 170 | 8 | 330 | 46.1% | 51.5% | R+5.5 |
| Precinct -03-C03-C | 175 | 139 | 7 | 321 | 54.5% | 43.3% | D+11.2 |
| Precinct -07-D07-D | 154 | 155 | 12 | 321 | 48.0% | 48.3% | R+0.3 |
| Precinct -03-H03-H | 168 | 139 | 9 | 316 | 53.2% | 44.0% | D+9.2 |
| Precinct -03-F03-F | 189 | 118 | 6 | 313 | 60.4% | 37.7% | D+22.7 |
| Precinct -02-D02-D | 122 | 172 | 8 | 302 | 40.4% | 57.0% | R+16.6 |
| Precinct -05-C05-C | 203 | 95 | 3 | 301 | 67.4% | 31.6% | D+35.9 |
| Precinct -SUGAR CREEK-BSUGAR CREEK-B | 90 | 202 | 6 | 298 | 30.2% | 67.8% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -03-B03-B | 156 | 127 | 5 | 288 | 54.2% | 44.1% | D+10.1 |
| Precinct -04-D04-D | 150 | 120 | 5 | 275 | 54.5% | 43.6% | D+10.9 |
| Precinct -07-C07-C | 103 | 153 | 7 | 263 | 39.2% | 58.2% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -09-E09-E | 151 | 98 | 7 | 256 | 59.0% | 38.3% | D+20.7 |
| Precinct -05-A05-A | 124 | 123 | 6 | 253 | 49.0% | 48.6% | D+0.4 |
| Precinct -01-A01-A | 136 | 99 | 4 | 239 | 56.9% | 41.4% | D+15.5 |
| Precinct -07-A07-A | 113 | 118 | 1 | 232 | 48.7% | 50.9% | R+2.2 |
| Precinct -07-B07-B | 99 | 119 | 4 | 222 | 44.6% | 53.6% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -02-E02-E | 122 | 85 | 7 | 214 | 57.0% | 39.7% | D+17.3 |
| Precinct -02-F02-F | 93 | 112 | 6 | 211 | 44.1% | 53.1% | R+9.0 |
| Precinct -03-G03-G | 123 | 65 | 9 | 197 | 62.4% | 33.0% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -01-C01-C | 102 | 85 | 9 | 196 | 52.0% | 43.4% | D+8.7 |
| Precinct -02-B02-B | 90 | 80 | 2 | 172 | 52.3% | 46.5% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -01-D01-D | 85 | 73 | 6 | 164 | 51.8% | 44.5% | D+7.3 |
| Precinct -02-C02-C | 108 | 48 | 5 | 161 | 67.1% | 29.8% | D+37.3 |
| Precinct -05-B05-B | 87 | 69 | 2 | 158 | 55.1% | 43.7% | D+11.4 |
| Precinct -04-B04-B | 63 | 60 | 3 | 126 | 50.0% | 47.6% | D+2.4 |
| Precinct -05-D05-D | 50 | 54 | 2 | 106 | 47.2% | 50.9% | R+3.8 |
| Precinct -04-A04-A | 42 | 25 | 0 | 67 | 62.7% | 37.3% | D+25.4 |
| Precinct -09-B09-B | 16 | 22 | 1 | 39 | 41.0% | 56.4% | R+15.4 |
| 01-A18_1816700010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 01-B18_1816700020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 01-C18_1816700030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 01-D18_1816700040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 02-A18_1816700050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 02-B18_1816700060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 02-C18_1816700070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 02-D18_1816700080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 02-E18_1816700090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 02-F18_1816700100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 03-A18_1816700110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 03-B18_1816700120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 03-C18_1816700130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 03-D18_1816700140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 03-E18_1816700150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 03-F18_1816700160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 03-G18_1816700170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 03-H18_1816700180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 04-A18_1816700190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 04-B18_1816700200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 04-C18_1816700210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 04-D18_1816700220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 05-A18_1816700230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 05-B18_1816700240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 05-C18_1816700250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 05-D18_1816700260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 05-E18_1816700270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 06-A18_1816700280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 06-B18_1816700290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 06-C18_1816700300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 07-A18_1816700310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 07-B18_1816700320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 07-C18_1816700330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 07-D18_1816700340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 07-E18_1816700350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 07-F18_1816700360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 07-G18_1816700370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 08-A18_1816700380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 08-B18_1816700390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 08-C18_1816700400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 08-D18_1816700410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 08-E18_1816700420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 08-F18_1816700430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 08-G18_1816700440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-A18_1816700450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-A (PRAIRIETON)18_1816700451 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-B18_1816700460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-C18_1816700470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-D18_1816700480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-E18_1816700490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-F18_1816700500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-G18_1816700510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| 09-H (NV)18_1816700520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FAYETTE-A18_1816700540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| FAYETTE-B18_1816700550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-A18_1816700560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-B18_1816700570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-C18_1816700580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-D18_1816700590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-E18_1816700600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-F18_1816700610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-G18_1816700620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-H18_1816700630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| HONEY CREEK-I18_1816700640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LINTON-A18_1816700690 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOST CREEK-A18_1816700650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOST CREEK-B18_1816700660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOST CREEK-C18_1816700670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| LOST CREEK-D18_1816700680 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEVINS-A18_1816700700 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| NEVINS-B18_1816700710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OTTER CREEK-A18_1816700720 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OTTER CREEK-B18_1816700730 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OTTER CREEK-C18_1816700740 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OTTER CREEK-D18_1816700750 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OTTER CREEK-E18_1816700760 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OTTER CREEK-F18_1816700770 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| OTTER CREEK-G18_1816700780 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PIERSON- A18_1816700800 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRAIRIE CREEK-A18_1816700790 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRAIRIETON-A18_1816700810 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RILEY-A18_1816700820 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| RILEY-B18_1816700830 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK-A18_1816700840 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK-B18_1816700850 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK-C18_1816700860 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK-D18_1816700870 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK-E18_1816700880 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| SUGAR CREEK-F18_1816700890 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Vigo County, IN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
65.1%
33,018 votes · D+31.0
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · 59.0%
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
60.7%
29,730 votes · R+22.1
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 58.4%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
33,018votes
65.1% of the vote · D+31.0
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1940 · 29,308 votes
Republican
Richard Nixon1972
29,730votes
60.7% of the vote · R+22.1
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 26,259 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
James M. Cox1920
+18.3pts D vs U.S.
Place R+7.9 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · Adlai Stevenson, 1956 · +14.3 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+19.2pts R vs U.S.
Place R+14.7 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +17.1 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
RGreg GoodeState Senate · 38
RTim YocumState House · 42
DTonya PfaffState House · 43
RBruce BordersState House · 45
RBob HeatonState House · 46
Seats representing Vigo County, IN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 4 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 39.7%15,408 | 60.3%23,448 | 38,856 |
| 2020 | R | 39.7%16,429 | 60.3%24,906 | 41,335 |
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 79,722 |
| 2018 | 72,592 |
| 2020 | 72,795 |
| 2022 | 75,021 |
| 2024 | 70,670 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+335 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net −2,882 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $48,299 in average income, against $71,229 for residents who stayed — 32% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+33.0 on average — 15 points more Republican-leaning than Vigo County, IN itself (R+18.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Clay County, IN239R+56.9
- Marion County, IN148D+27.6
- Sullivan County, IN131R+52.7
- Vermillion County, IN126R+44.7
- Parke County, IN93R+56.9
- Hendricks County, IN55R+21.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marion County, IN221
- Clay County, IN204
- Vermillion County, IN138
- Sullivan County, IN123
- Parke County, IN77
- Hendricks County, IN67
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +92 |
| 2012 | −160 |
| 2013 | −509 |
| 2014 | −631 |
| 2015 | −651 |
| 2016 | −58 |
| 2017 | −391 |
| 2018 | −444 |
| 2019 | −547 |
| 2021 | +24 |
| 2022 | +109 |
| 2023 | −26 |
| 2024 | −25 |
| 2025 | +335 |
Vigo County, home to Terre Haute and Indiana State University, voted with the presidential winner in nearly every election for decades before breaking that pattern; its R+18.1 margin in 2024 reflects a broader working-class realignment across the Midwest.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 31.0 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 22.1 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 18.1 points.
A population of 106,109, a 84% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $52,976 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Delaware County and Madison County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Delaware County
Indiana
96.0twin score
elasticity2000–2012 trajectory
Madison County
Indiana
87.0twin score
elasticity2008–2012 trajectorypopulation scale
Isabella County
Michigan
86.7twin score
2000–2012 trajectoryelasticity≠ median age
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare Vigo County with…
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Vigo County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18167/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Vigo County
Indiana at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Vigo County, Indiana vote in 2024?
In 2024, Vigo County, Indiana voted Republican by 18.1 points (R+18.1), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 40,914 votes cast, 16,338 went Democratic and 23,738 went Republican.
When did Vigo County, Indiana last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Vigo County, Indiana voted Democratic was 2012.
How many people live in Vigo County, Indiana?
Vigo County, Indiana has a population of 106,109 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Vigo County, Indiana?
Median household income in Vigo County, Indiana is $52,976 — below the national median of $80,734. The Indiana state median is $71,957.
What is the political history of Vigo County, Indiana?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Vigo County, Indiana from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 16 went Democratic and 17 went Republican.