- Lead
- 7,702
- Total
- 18,969
- vs nation
- R+39.1
- Turnout
- 76.5%
Huron County, MI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 76.5% of 24,967 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 7,241
- Total
- 18,437
- vs nation
- R+43.7
- Turnout
- 74.3%
- Lead
- 6,113
- Total
- 15,944
- vs nation
- R+40.4
- Turnout
- 63.4%
- Lead
- 2,288
- Total
- 15,484
- vs nation
- R+18.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 67
- Total
- 17,135
- vs nation
- R+7.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,042
- Total
- 17,466
- vs nation
- R+9.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,012
- Total
- 16,095
- vs nation
- R+13.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 701
- Total
- 14,855
- vs nation
- R+3.8
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+40.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 31,1132024 5-year
- Population density
- 37 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 836 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $58,8702024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 93.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+11.1 in 1892MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+72.1 in 1924MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Langlade County, WI · twin score 87.4
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 76.5%19,109 participants ÷ 24,967 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 62.1%–65.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19,109 | 24,967 ± 118 | 76.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 15,124 | 25,246 ± 96 | 59.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 18,566 | 24,982 ± 100 | 74.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 13,976 | 25,213 ± 91 | 55.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 16,167 | 25,508 ± 82 | 63.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 15,484 | 26,000 | 59.6% | Derived | — | |
| 17,135 | 25,847 | 66.3% | Derived | — | |
| 17,466 | 25,694 extrapolated | 68.0% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Huron County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Huron County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 60 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
60 precincts · 18,728 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -City of Bad Axe, Precinct 1City of Bad Axe, Precinct 1 | 632 | 1,084 | 32 | 1,748 | 36.2% | 62.0% | R+25.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Sebewaing Township, Precinct 1Sebewaing Township, Precinct 1 | 422 | 1,256 | 17 | 1,695 | 24.9% | 74.1% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -Caseville Township, Precinct 1Caseville Township, Precinct 1 | 532 | 886 | 18 | 1,436 | 37.0% | 61.7% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -Winsor Township, Precinct 1Winsor Township, Precinct 1 | 336 | 869 | 14 | 1,219 | 27.6% | 71.3% | R+43.7 |
| Precinct -Colfax Township, Precinct 1Colfax Township, Precinct 1 | 289 | 810 | 11 | 1,110 | 26.0% | 73.0% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -Bingham Township, Precinct 1Bingham Township, Precinct 1 | 335 | 759 | 14 | 1,108 | 30.2% | 68.5% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -Port Austin Township, Precinct 1Port Austin Township, Precinct 1 | 416 | 679 | 9 | 1,104 | 37.7% | 61.5% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -City of Harbor Beach, Precinct 1City of Harbor Beach, Precinct 1 | 363 | 625 | 20 | 1,008 | 36.0% | 62.0% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -Sand Beach Township, Precinct 1Sand Beach Township, Precinct 1 | 214 | 680 | 10 | 904 | 23.7% | 75.2% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -Sherman Township, Precinct 1Sherman Township, Precinct 1 | 185 | 532 | 10 | 727 | 25.4% | 73.2% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -Lake Township, Precinct 1Lake Township, Precinct 1 | 242 | 379 | 8 | 629 | 38.5% | 60.3% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -Hume Township, Precinct 1Hume Township, Precinct 1 | 186 | 394 | 6 | 586 | 31.7% | 67.2% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct -Rubicon Township, Precinct 1Rubicon Township, Precinct 1 | 116 | 424 | 7 | 547 | 21.2% | 77.5% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -City of Caseville, Precinct 1City of Caseville, Precinct 1 | 183 | 321 | 4 | 508 | 36.0% | 63.2% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -Lincoln Township, Precinct 1Lincoln Township, Precinct 1 | 116 | 366 | 3 | 485 | 23.9% | 75.5% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -Grant Township, Precinct 1Grant Township, Precinct 1 | 100 | 374 | 6 | 480 | 20.8% | 77.9% | R+57.1 |
| Precinct -Meade Township, Precinct 1Meade Township, Precinct 1 | 146 | 311 | 4 | 461 | 31.7% | 67.5% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -Dwight Township, Precinct 1Dwight Township, Precinct 1 | 121 | 331 | 3 | 455 | 26.6% | 72.7% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -Brookfield Township, Precinct 1Brookfield Township, Precinct 1 | 79 | 351 | 6 | 436 | 18.1% | 80.5% | R+62.4 |
| Precinct -Sheridan Township, Precinct 1Sheridan Township, Precinct 1 | 94 | 315 | 1 | 410 | 22.9% | 76.8% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct -Sigel Township, Precinct 1Sigel Township, Precinct 1 | 60 | 266 | 1 | 327 | 18.3% | 81.3% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -Paris Township, Precinct 1Paris Township, Precinct 1 | 70 | 245 | 3 | 318 | 22.0% | 77.0% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -McKinley Township, Precinct 1McKinley Township, Precinct 1 | 72 | 228 | 7 | 307 | 23.5% | 74.3% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -Chandler Township, Precinct 1Chandler Township, Precinct 1 | 52 | 241 | 2 | 295 | 17.6% | 81.7% | R+64.1 |
| Precinct -Bloomfield Township, Precinct 1Bloomfield Township, Precinct 1 | 56 | 223 | 3 | 282 | 19.9% | 79.1% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -Gore Township, Precinct 1Gore Township, Precinct 1 | 37 | 84 | 1 | 122 | 30.3% | 68.9% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -Pointe Aux Barques Township, Precinct 1Pointe Aux Barques Township, Precinct 1 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 21 | 61.9% | 38.1% | D+23.8 |
| Bad Axe City 00001063-04740-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bingham Township 00001063-08420-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bloomfield Township 00001063-09060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brookfield Township 00001063-10940-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Caseville City 00001063-13760-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Caseville Township 00001063-13780-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Chandler Township 00001063-14600-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Colfax Township 00001063-17140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Dwight Township 00001063-23540-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Fairhaven Township 00001063-27120-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Gore Township 00001063-33080-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grant Township 00001063-34260-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Harbor Beach City 00001063-36460-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hume Township 00001063-39960-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lake Township 00001063-44300-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lincoln Township 00001063-47640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| McKinley Township 00001063-50360-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Meade Township 00001063-52600-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oliver Township 00001063-60520-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Paris Township 00001063-62360-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pointe Aux Barques Township 00001063-65180-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Port Austin Township 00001063-65700-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Fairhaven Township, Precinct 1Fairhaven Township, Precinct 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Oliver Township, Precinct 1Oliver Township, Precinct 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Precinct -Verona Township, Precinct 1Verona Township, Precinct 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rubicon Township 00001063-70140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sand Beach Township 00001063-71260-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sebewaing Township 00001063-72200-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sheridan Township 00001063-73040-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sherman Township 00001063-73160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sigel Township 00001063-73880-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Verona Township 00001063-82140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Winsor Township 00001063-87960-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Huron County, MI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
53.9%
7,349 votes · D+8.0
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 49.4%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
82.6%
8,354 votes · R+66.9
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 81.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
8,367votes
48.8% of the vote · R+0.4
Runner-up · John Kerry, 2004 · 7,629 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
13,224votes
69.7% of the vote · R+40.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 12,731 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Grover Cleveland1892
+9.4pts D vs U.S.
Place D+11.1 · U.S. D+1.7
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1896 · −3.2 pts
Republican
Wendell Willkie1940
+69.7pts R vs U.S.
Place R+59.7 · U.S. D+9.9
Runner-up · Thomas E. Dewey, 1944 · +68.3 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Huron County, MI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 25.3%4,514 | 74.7%13,310 | 17,824 |
| 2020 | R | 28.1%5,020 | 71.9%12,816 | 17,836 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 25,207 |
| 2018 | 24,994 |
| 2020 | 26,221 |
| 2022 | 26,453 |
| 2024 | 26,679 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−28 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −722 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $44,574 in average income, against $66,402 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+19.6 on average — 21 points more Democratic-leaning than Huron County, MI itself (R+40.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tuscola County, MI65R+43.0
- Macomb County, MI61R+13.7
- Oakland County, MI53D+10.6
- Sanilac County, MI36R+47.7
- Bay County, MI27R+14.7
- Saginaw County, MI26R+3.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tuscola County, MI92
- Bay County, MI57
- Sanilac County, MI56
- Oakland County, MI51
- Macomb County, MI33
- Saginaw County, MI31
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −238 |
| 2012 | −145 |
| 2013 | −82 |
| 2014 | −71 |
| 2015 | −93 |
| 2016 | −170 |
| 2017 | −51 |
| 2018 | +34 |
| 2019 | −103 |
| 2021 | +173 |
| 2022 | +92 |
| 2023 | −18 |
| 2024 | −22 |
| 2025 | −28 |
A rural thumb-peninsula county where agriculture and Great Lakes shoreline define daily life, Huron has delivered Republican presidential margins above 35 points in recent cycles, making it one of the state's most reliably one-sided counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 11.1 points in 1892 and a Republican high of 72.1 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 40.6 points.
A population of 31,113, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,870 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Langlade County and Marinette County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Huron County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26063/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.