Huron County, Michigan
Precinct data
Results by precinct
60 precincts · 18,728 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -City of Bad Axe, Precinct 1City of Bad Axe, Precinct 1 | 632 | 1,084 | 32 | 1,748 | 36.2% | 62.0% | R+25.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Sebewaing Township, Precinct 1Sebewaing Township, Precinct 1 | 422 | 1,256 | 17 | 1,695 | 24.9% | 74.1% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -Caseville Township, Precinct 1Caseville Township, Precinct 1 | 532 | 886 | 18 | 1,436 | 37.0% | 61.7% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -Winsor Township, Precinct 1Winsor Township, Precinct 1 | 336 | 869 | 14 | 1,219 | 27.6% | 71.3% | R+43.7 |
| Precinct -Colfax Township, Precinct 1Colfax Township, Precinct 1 | 289 | 810 | 11 | 1,110 | 26.0% | 73.0% | R+46.9 |
| Precinct -Bingham Township, Precinct 1Bingham Township, Precinct 1 | 335 | 759 | 14 | 1,108 | 30.2% | 68.5% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -Port Austin Township, Precinct 1Port Austin Township, Precinct 1 | 416 | 679 | 9 | 1,104 | 37.7% | 61.5% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -City of Harbor Beach, Precinct 1City of Harbor Beach, Precinct 1 | 363 | 625 | 20 | 1,008 | 36.0% | 62.0% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -Sand Beach Township, Precinct 1Sand Beach Township, Precinct 1 | 214 | 680 | 10 | 904 | 23.7% | 75.2% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -Sherman Township, Precinct 1Sherman Township, Precinct 1 | 185 | 532 | 10 | 727 | 25.4% | 73.2% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -Lake Township, Precinct 1Lake Township, Precinct 1 | 242 | 379 | 8 | 629 | 38.5% | 60.3% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -Hume Township, Precinct 1Hume Township, Precinct 1 | 186 | 394 | 6 | 586 | 31.7% | 67.2% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct -Rubicon Township, Precinct 1Rubicon Township, Precinct 1 | 116 | 424 | 7 | 547 | 21.2% | 77.5% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct -City of Caseville, Precinct 1City of Caseville, Precinct 1 | 183 | 321 | 4 | 508 | 36.0% | 63.2% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -Lincoln Township, Precinct 1Lincoln Township, Precinct 1 | 116 | 366 | 3 | 485 | 23.9% | 75.5% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -Grant Township, Precinct 1Grant Township, Precinct 1 | 100 | 374 | 6 | 480 | 20.8% | 77.9% | R+57.1 |
| Precinct -Meade Township, Precinct 1Meade Township, Precinct 1 | 146 | 311 | 4 | 461 | 31.7% | 67.5% | R+35.8 |
| Precinct -Dwight Township, Precinct 1Dwight Township, Precinct 1 | 121 | 331 | 3 | 455 | 26.6% | 72.7% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -Brookfield Township, Precinct 1Brookfield Township, Precinct 1 | 79 | 351 | 6 | 436 | 18.1% | 80.5% | R+62.4 |
| Precinct -Sheridan Township, Precinct 1Sheridan Township, Precinct 1 | 94 | 315 | 1 | 410 | 22.9% | 76.8% | R+53.9 |
| Precinct -Sigel Township, Precinct 1Sigel Township, Precinct 1 | 60 | 266 | 1 | 327 | 18.3% | 81.3% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -Paris Township, Precinct 1Paris Township, Precinct 1 | 70 | 245 | 3 | 318 | 22.0% | 77.0% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -McKinley Township, Precinct 1McKinley Township, Precinct 1 | 72 | 228 | 7 | 307 | 23.5% | 74.3% | R+50.8 |
| Precinct -Chandler Township, Precinct 1Chandler Township, Precinct 1 | 52 | 241 | 2 | 295 | 17.6% | 81.7% | R+64.1 |
| Precinct -Bloomfield Township, Precinct 1Bloomfield Township, Precinct 1 | 56 | 223 | 3 | 282 | 19.9% | 79.1% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -Gore Township, Precinct 1Gore Township, Precinct 1 | 37 | 84 | 1 | 122 | 30.3% | 68.9% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -Pointe Aux Barques Township, Precinct 1Pointe Aux Barques Township, Precinct 1 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 21 | 61.9% | 38.1% | D+23.8 |
| 0630474000001063-04740-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0630842000001063-08420-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0630906000001063-09060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0631094000001063-10940-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0631376000001063-13760-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0631378000001063-13780-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0631460000001063-14600-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0631714000001063-17140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0632354000001063-23540-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0632712000001063-27120-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0633308000001063-33080-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0633426000001063-34260-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0633646000001063-36460-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0633996000001063-39960-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0634430000001063-44300-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0634764000001063-47640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0635036000001063-50360-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0635260000001063-52600-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0636052000001063-60520-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0636236000001063-62360-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0636518000001063-65180-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0636570000001063-65700-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0637014000001063-70140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0637126000001063-71260-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0637220000001063-72200-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0637304000001063-73040-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0637316000001063-73160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0637388000001063-73880-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0638214000001063-82140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 0638796000001063-87960-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct -Fairhaven Township, Precinct 1Fairhaven Township, Precinct 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct -Oliver Township, Precinct 1Oliver Township, Precinct 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct -Verona Township, Precinct 1Verona Township, Precinct 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +11.1% |
| 1896 | −9.3% |
| 1900 | −25.2% |
| 1904 | −45.9% |
| 1908 | −39.6% |
| 1912 | −9.1% |
| 1916 | −43.7% |
| 1920 | −66.9% |
| 1924 | −72.1% |
| 1928 | −29.9% |
| 1932 | +0.5% |
| 1936 | −11.5% |
| 1940 | −59.7% |
| 1944 | −60.8% |
| 1948 | −50.9% |
| 1952 | −62.8% |
| 1956 | −53.3% |
| 1960 | −24.8% |
| 1964 | +8.0% |
| 1968 | −37.9% |
| 1972 | −36.8% |
| 1976 | −23.6% |
| 1980 | −37.8% |
| 1984 | −47.1% |
| 1988 | −24.4% |
| 1992 | −2.8% |
| 1996 | +4.7% |
| 2000 | −12.5% |
| 2004 | −11.7% |
| 2008 | −0.4% |
| 2012 | −14.8% |
| 2016 | −38.3% |
| 2020 | −39.3% |
| 2024 | −40.6% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 25,207 |
| 2018 | 24,994 |
| 2020 | 26,221 |
| 2022 | 26,453 |
| 2024 | 26,679 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−28 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −722 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $44,574 in average income, against $66,402 for residents who stayed — 33% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+19.6 on average — 21 points more Democratic-leaning than Huron County, MI itself (R+40.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tuscola County, MI65R+43.0
- Macomb County, MI61R+13.7
- Oakland County, MI53D+10.6
- Sanilac County, MI36R+47.7
- Bay County, MI27R+14.7
- Saginaw County, MI26R+3.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tuscola County, MI92
- Bay County, MI57
- Sanilac County, MI56
- Oakland County, MI51
- Macomb County, MI33
- Saginaw County, MI31
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −238 |
| 2012 | −145 |
| 2013 | −82 |
| 2014 | −71 |
| 2015 | −93 |
| 2016 | −170 |
| 2017 | −51 |
| 2018 | +34 |
| 2019 | −103 |
| 2021 | +173 |
| 2022 | +92 |
| 2023 | −18 |
| 2024 | −22 |
| 2025 | −28 |
A rural thumb-peninsula county where agriculture and Great Lakes shoreline define daily life, Huron has delivered Republican presidential margins above 35 points in recent cycles, making it one of the state's most reliably one-sided counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 11.1 points in 1892 and a Republican high of 72.1 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 40.6 points.
A population of 31,113, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,870 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Langlade County and Marinette County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Huron County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26063/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.