- Lead
- 4,036
- Total
- 11,664
- vs nation
- R+33.1
- Turnout
- 74.9%
Langlade County, WI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 74.9% of 15,647 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 3,626
- Total
- 11,165
- vs nation
- R+36.9
- Turnout
- 73.6%
- Lead
- 3,228
- Total
- 10,186
- vs nation
- R+33.8
- Turnout
- 66.5%
- Lead
- 1,243
- Total
- 10,519
- vs nation
- R+15.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 101
- Total
- 10,402
- vs nation
- R+6.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,484
- Total
- 11,074
- vs nation
- R+10.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 926
- Total
- 9,721
- vs nation
- R+10.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 868
- Total
- 8,631
- vs nation
- D+1.5
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+34.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 19,4902024 5-year
- Population density
- 22 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 871 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $55,8782024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 91.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+45.1 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+41.3 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Shawano County, WI · twin score 89.6
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 74.9%11,722 participants ÷ 15,647 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.3 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 59.6%–64.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11,722 | 15,647 ± 132 | 74.9% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2022Mid | 9,115 | 15,631 ± 134 | 58.3% | Audited | B/A |
| 11,242 | 15,274 ± 156 | 73.6% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2018Mid | 9,316 | 15,236 ± 157 | 61.1% | Audited | B/A |
| 10,262 | 15,437 ± 113 | 66.5% | Audited | B/A | |
| 10,519 | 15,544 | 67.7% | Derived | — | |
| 10,402 | 15,766 | 66.0% | Derived | — | |
| 11,074 | 15,988 extrapolated | 69.3% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 292/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 27 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
27 precincts · 11,664 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -TOWN OF ROLLING WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ROLLING WARDS 1-2 | 266 | 644 | 6 | 916 | 29.0% | 70.3% | R+41.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -TOWN OF ELCHO WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ELCHO WARDS 1-2 | 270 | 598 | 10 | 878 | 30.8% | 68.1% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ANTIGO WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ANTIGO WARDS 1-2 | 250 | 601 | 12 | 863 | 29.0% | 69.6% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF POLAR WARDS 1-2TOWN OF POLAR WARDS 1-2 | 180 | 476 | 10 | 666 | 27.0% | 71.5% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 7CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 7 | 226 | 369 | 6 | 601 | 37.6% | 61.4% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NORWOOD WARD 1TOWN OF NORWOOD WARD 1 | 164 | 422 | 2 | 588 | 27.9% | 71.8% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NEVA WARD 1TOWN OF NEVA WARD 1 | 176 | 396 | 6 | 578 | 30.4% | 68.5% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF UPHAM WARDS 1-2TOWN OF UPHAM WARDS 1-2 | 167 | 397 | 4 | 568 | 29.4% | 69.9% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WOLF RIVER WARDS 1-2TOWN OF WOLF RIVER WARDS 1-2 | 159 | 394 | 10 | 563 | 28.2% | 70.0% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 9CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 9 | 182 | 317 | 6 | 505 | 36.0% | 62.8% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 4CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 4 | 199 | 244 | 9 | 452 | 44.0% | 54.0% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 1CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 1 | 175 | 239 | 6 | 420 | 41.7% | 56.9% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 2CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 2 | 175 | 234 | 3 | 412 | 42.5% | 56.8% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 6CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 6 | 155 | 237 | 8 | 400 | 38.8% | 59.3% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 3CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 3 | 154 | 228 | 10 | 392 | 39.3% | 58.2% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 8CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 8 | 132 | 239 | 1 | 372 | 35.5% | 64.2% | R+28.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF AINSWORTH WARD 1TOWN OF AINSWORTH WARD 1 | 92 | 252 | 6 | 350 | 26.3% | 72.0% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LANGLADE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LANGLADE WARDS 1-2 | 100 | 227 | 2 | 329 | 30.4% | 69.0% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 5CITY OF ANTIGO WARD 5 | 99 | 224 | 4 | 327 | 30.3% | 68.5% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ACKLEY WARD 1TOWN OF ACKLEY WARD 1 | 109 | 210 | 4 | 323 | 33.7% | 65.0% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EVERGREEN WARD 1TOWN OF EVERGREEN WARD 1 | 85 | 217 | 5 | 307 | 27.7% | 70.7% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PECK WARDS 1-2TOWN OF PECK WARDS 1-2 | 46 | 171 | 3 | 220 | 20.9% | 77.7% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WHITE LAKE WARD 1VILLAGE OF WHITE LAKE WARD 1 | 65 | 110 | 0 | 175 | 37.1% | 62.9% | R+25.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PRICE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF PRICE WARDS 1-2 | 43 | 97 | 1 | 141 | 30.5% | 68.8% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF VILAS WARD 1TOWN OF VILAS WARD 1 | 24 | 114 | 1 | 139 | 17.3% | 82.0% | R+64.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SUMMIT WARD 1TOWN OF SUMMIT WARD 1 | 32 | 74 | 1 | 107 | 29.9% | 69.2% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PARRISH WARD 1TOWN OF PARRISH WARD 1 | 21 | 51 | 0 | 72 | 29.2% | 70.8% | R+41.7 |
presidential history
Party record book
Langlade County, WI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
71.6%
6,332 votes · D+45.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 67.2%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
68.6%
4,059 votes · R+41.3
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 66.7%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
6,332votes
71.6% of the vote · D+45.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 5,837 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
7,782votes
66.7% of the vote · R+34.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 7,330 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
+27.3pts D vs U.S.
Place D+45.1 · U.S. D+17.8
Runner-up · Al Smith, 1928 · +22.1 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+36.9pts R vs U.S.
Place R+32.5 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +33.8 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Langlade County, WI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+164 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +174 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,773 in average income, against $63,805 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+23.4 on average — 11 points more Democratic-leaning than Langlade County, WI itself (R+34.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Marathon County, WI58R+18.6
- Shawano County, WI36R+36.2
- Forest County, WI23R+33.4
- Outagamie County, WI22R+10.2
- Oneida County, WI21R+17.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marathon County, WI69
- Shawano County, WI34
- Brown County, WI24
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −155 |
| 2012 | −166 |
| 2013 | −149 |
| 2014 | −139 |
| 2015 | −132 |
| 2016 | +52 |
| 2017 | +90 |
| 2018 | +94 |
| 2019 | −6 |
| 2021 | +130 |
| 2022 | +171 |
| 2023 | +28 |
| 2024 | +192 |
| 2025 | +164 |
Langlade County, anchored by Antigo in the northwoods, has shifted steadily toward dominant Republican margins over the past decade as its small-town, predominantly white, working-class electorate moved away from competitive voting patterns.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 45.1 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 41.3 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 34.6 points.
A population of 19,490, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $55,878 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Shawano County and Marinette County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Langlade County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55067/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.