- Lead
- 4,811
- Total
- 15,731
- vs nation
- R+29.1
- Turnout
- 75.8%
Iosco County, MI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 75.8% of 20,909 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 4,386
- Total
- 15,363
- vs nation
- R+33.0
- Turnout
- 74.2%
- Lead
- 4,000
- Total
- 13,429
- vs nation
- R+31.9
- Turnout
- 65.2%
- Lead
- 667
- Total
- 13,385
- vs nation
- R+8.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 726
- Total
- 14,187
- vs nation
- R+2.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 744
- Total
- 14,006
- vs nation
- R+2.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 160
- Total
- 13,222
- vs nation
- D+0.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,830
- Total
- 12,424
- vs nation
- D+6.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+30.6MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 25,3472024 5-year
- Population density
- 46 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 550 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $50,0662024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 91.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+23.2 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+58.8 in 1924MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Roscommon County, MI · twin score 96.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 75.8%15,849 participants ÷ 20,909 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +13.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 62.4%–65.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15,849 | 20,909 ± 155 | 75.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 12,753 | 20,964 ± 171 | 60.8% | Audited | A/A |
| 15,470 | 20,847 ± 184 | 74.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 11,905 | 20,754 ± 147 | 57.4% | Audited | A/A |
| 13,597 | 20,866 ± 166 | 65.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 13,385 | 21,073 | 63.5% | Derived | — | |
| 14,187 | 21,110 | 67.2% | Derived | — | |
| 14,006 | 21,147 extrapolated | 66.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 36 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
36 precincts · 15,731 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -City of East Tawas, Precinct 1City of East Tawas, Precinct 1 | 626 | 1,014 | 27 | 1,667 | 37.6% | 60.8% | R+23.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Oscoda Township, Precinct 1Oscoda Township, Precinct 1 | 561 | 897 | 24 | 1,482 | 37.9% | 60.5% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -Plainfield Township, Precinct 2Plainfield Township, Precinct 2 | 442 | 993 | 24 | 1,459 | 30.3% | 68.1% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -Au Sable Township, Precinct 1Au Sable Township, Precinct 1 | 450 | 751 | 19 | 1,220 | 36.9% | 61.6% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -Oscoda Township, Precinct 4Oscoda Township, Precinct 4 | 463 | 655 | 24 | 1,142 | 40.5% | 57.4% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -Tawas Township, Precinct 1Tawas Township, Precinct 1 | 278 | 830 | 11 | 1,119 | 24.8% | 74.2% | R+49.3 |
| Precinct -Oscoda Township, Precinct 3Oscoda Township, Precinct 3 | 430 | 669 | 15 | 1,114 | 38.6% | 60.1% | R+21.5 |
| Precinct -Baldwin Township, Precinct 1Baldwin Township, Precinct 1 | 371 | 687 | 10 | 1,068 | 34.7% | 64.3% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -City of Tawas City, Precinct 1City of Tawas City, Precinct 1 | 384 | 641 | 25 | 1,050 | 36.6% | 61.0% | R+24.5 |
| Precinct -Grant Township, Precinct 1Grant Township, Precinct 1 | 326 | 708 | 12 | 1,046 | 31.2% | 67.7% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -Plainfield Township, Precinct 1Plainfield Township, Precinct 1 | 242 | 555 | 10 | 807 | 30.0% | 68.8% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -Wilber Township, Precinct 1Wilber Township, Precinct 1 | 170 | 349 | 7 | 526 | 32.3% | 66.3% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -Oscoda Township, Precinct 2Oscoda Township, Precinct 2 | 168 | 349 | 4 | 521 | 32.2% | 67.0% | R+34.7 |
| Precinct -Burleigh Township, Precinct 1Burleigh Township, Precinct 1 | 107 | 264 | 4 | 375 | 28.5% | 70.4% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -Alabaster Township, Precinct 1Alabaster Township, Precinct 1 | 113 | 228 | 5 | 346 | 32.7% | 65.9% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -Reno Township, Precinct 1Reno Township, Precinct 1 | 101 | 230 | 4 | 335 | 30.1% | 68.7% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -Sherman Township, Precinct 1Sherman Township, Precinct 1 | 61 | 196 | 3 | 260 | 23.5% | 75.4% | R+51.9 |
| Precinct -City of Whittemore, Precinct 1City of Whittemore, Precinct 1 | 51 | 139 | 4 | 194 | 26.3% | 71.6% | R+45.4 |
| Alabaster Township 00001069-00760-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Au Sable Charter Township 00001069-04300-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Baldwin Township 00001069-04920-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Burleigh Township 00001069-11740-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| East Tawas City 00001069-24420-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Grant Township 00001069-34280-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oscoda Charter Township 00001069-61340-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oscoda Charter Township 00002069-61340-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oscoda Charter Township 00003069-61340-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oscoda Charter Township 00004069-61340-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Plainfield Township 00001069-64640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Plainfield Township 00002069-64640-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Reno Township 00001069-67960-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sherman Township 00001069-73180-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tawas City 00001069-78140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tawas Township 00001069-78100-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Whittemore City 00001069-87140-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Wilber Township 00001069-87180-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Iosco County, MI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
61.6%
4,336 votes · D+23.2
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 51.5%
Republican
Herbert Hoover1928
76.8%
1,873 votes · R+54.2
Runner-up · Warren G. Harding, 1920 · 76.7%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
7,309votes
51.5% of the vote · D+5.1
Runner-up · John Kerry, 2004 · 6,557 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
10,155votes
64.6% of the vote · R+30.6
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 9,759 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Bill Clinton1996
+6.2pts D vs U.S.
Place D+14.7 · U.S. D+8.5
Runner-up · Al Gore, 2000 · +0.7 pts
Republican
Thomas E. Dewey1948
+43.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+39.3 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Thomas E. Dewey, 1944 · +42.4 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Iosco County, MI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 33.6%4,897 | 66.4%9,688 | 14,585 |
| 2020 | R | 39.4%5,663 | 60.6%8,700 | 14,363 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 21,293 |
| 2018 | 21,319 |
| 2020 | 22,651 |
| 2022 | 23,321 |
| 2024 | 23,688 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+83 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,143 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $61,019 in average income, against $57,727 for residents who stayed — 6% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+14.5 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Iosco County, MI itself (R+30.6).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Ogemaw County, MI58R+42.0
- Alcona County, MI52R+41.7
- Oakland County, MI48D+10.6
- Genesee County, MI38D+4.2
- Wayne County, MI35D+29.0
- Arenac County, MI30R+40.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Alcona County, MI48
- Ogemaw County, MI47
- Oakland County, MI39
- Genesee County, MI35
- Arenac County, MI32
- Wayne County, MI29
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −80 |
| 2012 | +16 |
| 2013 | +156 |
| 2014 | +141 |
| 2015 | +88 |
| 2016 | +122 |
| 2017 | +45 |
| 2018 | +137 |
| 2019 | +182 |
| 2021 | +472 |
| 2022 | +380 |
| 2023 | +155 |
| 2024 | +246 |
| 2025 | +83 |
Iosco sits along Lake Huron's Sunrise Side, where a tourism economy and an aging, predominantly white population have tracked alongside a steady rightward shift in presidential margins over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 23.2 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 58.8 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 30.6 points.
A population of 25,347, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $50,066 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Roscommon County and Cheboygan County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Iosco County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26069/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.