- Lead
- 22,060
- Total
- 55,439
- vs nation
- R+38.3
- Turnout
- 79.5%
Lapeer County, MI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 79.5% of 70,087 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 19,115
- Total
- 52,650
- vs nation
- R+40.8
- Turnout
- 77.1%
- Lead
- 17,303
- Total
- 45,183
- vs nation
- R+40.4
- Turnout
- 67.5%
- Lead
- 4,938
- Total
- 43,115
- vs nation
- R+15.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,374
- Total
- 45,362
- vs nation
- R+10.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,470
- Total
- 44,147
- vs nation
- R+14.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,602
- Total
- 37,234
- vs nation
- R+12.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 939
- Total
- 32,841
- vs nation
- R+5.7
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+39.8MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 88,8372024 5-year
- Population density
- 137 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 647 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $77,3062024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 89.7%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+17.7 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+71.3 in 1924MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- St. Clair County, MI · twin score 93.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 79.5%55,697 participants ÷ 70,087 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +13.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 66.0%–68.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55,697 | 70,087 ± 374 | 79.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 44,198 | 69,384 ± 352 | 63.7% | Audited | A/A |
| 52,948 | 68,637 ± 329 | 77.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 39,888 | 68,237 ± 311 | 58.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 45,803 | 67,837 ± 360 | 67.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 43,115 | 66,121 | 65.2% | Derived | — | |
| 45,362 | 67,342 | 67.4% | Derived | — | |
| 44,147 | 68,563 extrapolated | 64.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 71 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
71 precincts · 55,439 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Dryden Township, Precinct 1Dryden Township, Precinct 1 | 876 | 2,522 | 34 | 3,432 | 25.5% | 73.5% | R+48.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Hadley Township, Precinct 1Hadley Township, Precinct 1 | 1,043 | 2,217 | 38 | 3,298 | 31.6% | 67.2% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -Almont Township, Precinct 2Almont Township, Precinct 2 | 706 | 1,842 | 30 | 2,578 | 27.4% | 71.5% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -City of Lapeer, Precinct 1City of Lapeer, Precinct 1 | 938 | 1,399 | 31 | 2,368 | 39.6% | 59.1% | R+19.5 |
| Precinct -Arcadia Township, Precinct 1Arcadia Township, Precinct 1 | 502 | 1,515 | 37 | 2,054 | 24.4% | 73.8% | R+49.3 |
| Precinct -Lapeer Township, Precinct 2Lapeer Township, Precinct 2 | 660 | 1,358 | 20 | 2,038 | 32.4% | 66.6% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -North Branch Township, Precinct 1North Branch Township, Precinct 1 | 498 | 1,503 | 28 | 2,029 | 24.5% | 74.1% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -Imlay Township, Precinct 1Imlay Township, Precinct 1 | 451 | 1,491 | 31 | 1,973 | 22.9% | 75.6% | R+52.7 |
| Precinct -City of Lapeer, Precinct 2City of Lapeer, Precinct 2 | 782 | 1,156 | 33 | 1,971 | 39.7% | 58.7% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -Almont Township, Precinct 1Almont Township, Precinct 1 | 486 | 1,418 | 27 | 1,931 | 25.2% | 73.4% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -Oregon Township, Precinct 2Oregon Township, Precinct 2 | 700 | 1,157 | 24 | 1,881 | 37.2% | 61.5% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -Oregon Township, Precinct 1Oregon Township, Precinct 1 | 604 | 1,248 | 27 | 1,879 | 32.1% | 66.4% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -Mayfield Township, Precinct 3Mayfield Township, Precinct 3 | 595 | 1,201 | 21 | 1,817 | 32.7% | 66.1% | R+33.4 |
| Precinct -Deerfield Township, Precinct 2Deerfield Township, Precinct 2 | 504 | 1,262 | 20 | 1,786 | 28.2% | 70.7% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -Metamora Township, Precinct 1Metamora Township, Precinct 1 | 530 | 1,207 | 24 | 1,761 | 30.1% | 68.5% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -Mayfield Township, Precinct 1Mayfield Township, Precinct 1 | 526 | 1,182 | 24 | 1,732 | 30.4% | 68.2% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -Deerfield Township, Precinct 1Deerfield Township, Precinct 1 | 424 | 1,254 | 24 | 1,702 | 24.9% | 73.7% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -Attica Township, Precinct 2Attica Township, Precinct 2 | 430 | 1,227 | 25 | 1,682 | 25.6% | 72.9% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -Marathon Township, Precinct 1Marathon Township, Precinct 1 | 477 | 1,018 | 22 | 1,517 | 31.4% | 67.1% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -Attica Township, Precinct 1Attica Township, Precinct 1 | 375 | 1,114 | 14 | 1,503 | 25.0% | 74.1% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -Metamora Township, Precinct 2Metamora Township, Precinct 2 | 453 | 962 | 17 | 1,432 | 31.6% | 67.2% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct -Elba Township, Precinct 3Elba Township, Precinct 3 | 385 | 1,012 | 12 | 1,409 | 27.3% | 71.8% | R+44.5 |
| Precinct -Mayfield Township, Precinct 2Mayfield Township, Precinct 2 | 472 | 850 | 15 | 1,337 | 35.3% | 63.6% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -Lapeer Township, Precinct 1Lapeer Township, Precinct 1 | 379 | 867 | 20 | 1,266 | 29.9% | 68.5% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -Elba Township, Precinct 2Elba Township, Precinct 2 | 444 | 778 | 6 | 1,228 | 36.2% | 63.4% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -Marathon Township, Precinct 2Marathon Township, Precinct 2 | 363 | 846 | 12 | 1,221 | 29.7% | 69.3% | R+39.6 |
| Precinct -Goodland Township, Precinct 1Goodland Township, Precinct 1 | 237 | 927 | 11 | 1,175 | 20.2% | 78.9% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -Burnside Township, Precinct 1Burnside Township, Precinct 1 | 169 | 880 | 15 | 1,064 | 15.9% | 82.7% | R+66.8 |
| Precinct -City of Imlay City, Precinct 2City of Imlay City, Precinct 2 | 399 | 583 | 13 | 995 | 40.1% | 58.6% | R+18.5 |
| Precinct -Elba Township, Precinct 1Elba Township, Precinct 1 | 308 | 607 | 15 | 930 | 33.1% | 65.3% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -Rich Township, Precinct 1Rich Township, Precinct 1 | 198 | 710 | 15 | 923 | 21.5% | 76.9% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -Burlington Township, Precinct 1Burlington Township, Precinct 1 | 174 | 678 | 12 | 864 | 20.1% | 78.5% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -City of Imlay City, Precinct 1City of Imlay City, Precinct 1 | 250 | 407 | 6 | 663 | 37.7% | 61.4% | R+23.7 |
| Almont Township 00001087-01680-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Almont Township 00002087-01680-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Arcadia Township 00001087-03280-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Attica Township 00001087-04040-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Attica Township 00002087-04040-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brown City 00001087-11180-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Burlington Township 00001087-11840-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Burnside Township 00001087-11900-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Deerfield Township 00001087-21160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Deerfield Township 00002087-21160-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Dryden Township 00001087-23160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Dryden Township 00002087-23160-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Elba Township 00001087-25160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Elba Township 00002087-25160-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Elba Township 00003087-25160-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Goodland Township 00001087-32960-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hadley Township 00001087-35840-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hadley Township 00002087-35840-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Imlay City 00001087-40320-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Imlay City 00002087-40320-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Imlay Township 00001087-40300-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lapeer City 01001087-46040-01001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lapeer City 01002087-46040-01002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lapeer City 01003087-46040-01003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lapeer City 01004087-46040-01004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lapeer Township 00001087-46060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lapeer Township 00002087-46060-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marathon Township 00001087-51420-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marathon Township 00002087-51420-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Mayfield Township 00001087-52500-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Mayfield Township 00002087-52500-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Mayfield Township 00003087-52500-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Metamora Township 00001087-53360-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Metamora Township 00002087-53360-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Branch Township 00001087-58090-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oregon Township 00001087-61060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oregon Township 00002087-61060-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rich Township 00001087-68160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Lapeer County, MI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
58.8%
8,595 votes · D+17.7
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 47.3%
Republican
Calvin Coolidge1924
83.6%
6,297 votes · R+71.3
Runner-up · Herbert Hoover, 1928 · 82.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
21,457votes
47.3% of the vote · R+3.0
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 18,796 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
38,398votes
69.3% of the vote · R+39.8
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 35,482 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
−4.4pts D vs U.S.
Place R+10.5 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 · −4.9 pts
Republican
Thomas E. Dewey1944
+51.5pts R vs U.S.
Place R+44.1 · U.S. D+7.5
Runner-up · Wendell Willkie, 1940 · +49.9 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Lapeer County, MI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 2 state senate and 3 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 27.4%14,127 | 72.6%37,502 | 51,629 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 66,834 |
| 2018 | 66,901 |
| 2020 | 72,188 |
| 2022 | 73,494 |
| 2024 | 75,355 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+383 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,360 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $62,696 in average income, against $74,818 for residents who stayed — 16% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+5.4 on average — 34 points more Democratic-leaning than Lapeer County, MI itself (R+39.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Oakland County, MI481D+10.6
- Genesee County, MI422D+4.2
- Macomb County, MI413R+13.7
- St. Clair County, MI103R+34.6
- Tuscola County, MI100R+43.0
- Sanilac County, MI81R+47.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Genesee County, MI493
- Oakland County, MI354
- Macomb County, MI285
- St. Clair County, MI120
- Tuscola County, MI119
- Sanilac County, MI82
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −193 |
| 2012 | −76 |
| 2013 | +5 |
| 2014 | −135 |
| 2015 | +153 |
| 2016 | −174 |
| 2017 | +81 |
| 2018 | −95 |
| 2019 | −183 |
| 2021 | +329 |
| 2022 | +344 |
| 2023 | +576 |
| 2024 | +345 |
| 2025 | +383 |
Lapeer County, anchored by its small county-seat city of the same name, has moved steadily toward lopsided Republican margins over two decades as its largely white, working-class exurban population pulled away from the Detroit metro's political orbit.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 17.7 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 71.3 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 39.8 points.
A population of 88,837, a 90% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $77,306 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of St. Clair County and Sanilac County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lapeer County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26087/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.