HarrisDemocratic37.4%49,503TrumpRepublican61.3%81,217KennedyIndependent0.4%588
R+23.9- Lead
- 31,714
- Total
- 132,448
- vs nation
- R+22.5
- Turnout
- 86.3%
Akashiccounty
Livingston County, MI
Contests in this Place (85 available)
President34 · 1892–2024 · 3 mapped
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
Boundary by 2024 margin · Precinct returns · VEST · MIT Election Lab
The precinct map shows the 2024 presidential vote; the timeline scrubs the county’s overall result across 1892–2024.
President results by year
2024 turnout 86.3% of 154,487 citizens 18+
BidenDemocratic37.9%48,220TrumpRepublican60.5%76,982JorgensenLibertarian1.2%1,511
R+22.6- Lead
- 28,762
- Total
- 127,197
- vs nation
- R+27.1
- Turnout
- 86.1%
ClintonDemocratic32.3%34,384TrumpRepublican61.7%65,680JohnsonLibertarian4.0%4,266
R+29.4- Lead
- 31,296
- Total
- 106,489
- vs nation
- R+31.5
- Turnout
- 76.0%
ObamaDemocratic37.7%37,216RomneyRepublican60.9%60,083SteinGreen0.4%375
R+23.2- Lead
- 22,867
- Total
- 98,640
- vs nation
- R+27.0
- Turnout
- —
ObamaDemocratic42.5%42,349McCainRepublican55.8%55,592OtherAll other candidates1.7%1,697
R+13.3- Lead
- 13,243
- Total
- 99,638
- vs nation
- R+20.6
- Turnout
- —
KerryDemocratic36.3%33,991BushRepublican62.8%58,860OtherAll other candidates1.0%891
R+26.5- Lead
- 24,869
- Total
- 93,742
- vs nation
- R+24.1
- Turnout
- —
GoreDemocratic38.1%28,780BushRepublican59.1%44,637NaderGreen2.0%1,498
R+21.0- Lead
- 15,857
- Total
- 75,475
- vs nation
- R+21.5
- Turnout
- —
ClintonDemocratic37.4%22,517DoleRepublican50.8%30,598PerotReform10.5%6,337
R+13.4- Lead
- 8,081
- Total
- 60,242
- vs nation
- R+21.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+23.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 195,8332024 5-year
- Population density
- 346 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 565 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $103,0392024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 92.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 3.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+18.1 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+51.7 in 1952MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Grand Traverse County, MI · twin score 87.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
2004–20248 cycles · 5 audited
- 2024 turnout
- 86.3%133,281 participants ÷ 154,487 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.2 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.9 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 72.1%–75.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Participation by cycle
Presidential Midterm Derived, pre-2016
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 133,281 | 154,487 ± 637 | 86.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 109,658 | 152,620 ± 570 | 71.9% | Audited | A/A |
| 127,839 | 148,523 ± 599 | 86.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 98,702 | 144,978 ± 482 | 68.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 107,147 | 141,018 ± 461 | 76.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 98,640 | 133,536 | 73.9% | Derived | — | |
| 99,638 | 132,863 | 75.0% | Derived | — | |
| 93,742 | 132,190 extrapolated | 70.9% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 153 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
153 precincts · 132,448 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -City of Howell, Precinct 1City of Howell, Precinct 1 | 1,469 | 1,824 | 43 | 3,336 | 44.0% | 54.7% | R+10.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Deerfield Township, Precinct 1Deerfield Township, Precinct 1 | 778 | 2,091 | 37 | 2,906 | 26.8% | 72.0% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -Howell Township, Precinct 2Howell Township, Precinct 2 | 947 | 1,855 | 46 | 2,848 | 33.3% | 65.1% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct -Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 4Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 4 | 1,078 | 1,489 | 43 | 2,610 | 41.3% | 57.0% | R+15.7 |
| Precinct -City of Brighton, Precinct 3City of Brighton, Precinct 3 | 1,277 | 1,268 | 44 | 2,589 | 49.3% | 49.0% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct -Hamburg Township, Precinct 1Hamburg Township, Precinct 1 | 1,080 | 1,426 | 44 | 2,550 | 42.4% | 55.9% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -Hamburg Township, Precinct 7Hamburg Township, Precinct 7 | 1,163 | 1,298 | 32 | 2,493 | 46.7% | 52.1% | R+5.4 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 4Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 4 | 1,040 | 1,383 | 29 | 2,452 | 42.4% | 56.4% | R+14.0 |
| Precinct -Marion Township, Precinct 2Marion Township, Precinct 2 | 893 | 1,528 | 30 | 2,451 | 36.4% | 62.3% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -Hartland Township, Precinct 3Hartland Township, Precinct 3 | 868 | 1,529 | 39 | 2,436 | 35.6% | 62.8% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 3Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 3 | 937 | 1,396 | 28 | 2,361 | 39.7% | 59.1% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -Hamburg Township, Precinct 6Hamburg Township, Precinct 6 | 1,056 | 1,280 | 25 | 2,361 | 44.7% | 54.2% | R+9.5 |
| Precinct -Conway Township, Precinct 1Conway Township, Precinct 1 | 569 | 1,752 | 31 | 2,352 | 24.2% | 74.5% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct -Howell Township, Precinct 1Howell Township, Precinct 1 | 796 | 1,485 | 31 | 2,312 | 34.4% | 64.2% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -Hamburg Township, Precinct 3Hamburg Township, Precinct 3 | 957 | 1,289 | 32 | 2,278 | 42.0% | 56.6% | R+14.6 |
| Precinct -Hartland Township, Precinct 4Hartland Township, Precinct 4 | 750 | 1,472 | 26 | 2,248 | 33.4% | 65.5% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -Cohoctah Township, Precinct 1Cohoctah Township, Precinct 1 | 574 | 1,644 | 29 | 2,247 | 25.5% | 73.2% | R+47.6 |
| Precinct -Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 6Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 6 | 843 | 1,360 | 32 | 2,235 | 37.7% | 60.9% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -Unadilla Township, Precinct 1Unadilla Township, Precinct 1 | 746 | 1,436 | 37 | 2,219 | 33.6% | 64.7% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -City of Howell, Precinct 2City of Howell, Precinct 2 | 965 | 1,220 | 32 | 2,217 | 43.5% | 55.0% | R+11.5 |
| Precinct -Marion Township, Precinct 4Marion Township, Precinct 4 | 629 | 1,544 | 27 | 2,200 | 28.6% | 70.2% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -Hartland Township, Precinct 2Hartland Township, Precinct 2 | 797 | 1,348 | 21 | 2,166 | 36.8% | 62.2% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 3Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 3 | 883 | 1,245 | 24 | 2,152 | 41.0% | 57.9% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 2Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 2 | 785 | 1,333 | 33 | 2,151 | 36.5% | 62.0% | R+25.5 |
| Precinct -Oceola Township, Precinct 2Oceola Township, Precinct 2 | 839 | 1,238 | 34 | 2,111 | 39.7% | 58.6% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -Tyrone Township, Precinct 2Tyrone Township, Precinct 2 | 770 | 1,309 | 27 | 2,106 | 36.6% | 62.2% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -Handy Township, Precinct 3Handy Township, Precinct 3 | 641 | 1,436 | 17 | 2,094 | 30.6% | 68.6% | R+38.0 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 6Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 6 | 732 | 1,304 | 21 | 2,057 | 35.6% | 63.4% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -Tyrone Township, Precinct 4Tyrone Township, Precinct 4 | 624 | 1,390 | 26 | 2,040 | 30.6% | 68.1% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -Tyrone Township, Precinct 3Tyrone Township, Precinct 3 | 636 | 1,367 | 30 | 2,033 | 31.3% | 67.2% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -Hamburg Township, Precinct 4Hamburg Township, Precinct 4 | 938 | 1,039 | 31 | 2,008 | 46.7% | 51.7% | R+5.0 |
| Precinct -Oceola Township, Precinct 1Oceola Township, Precinct 1 | 661 | 1,307 | 18 | 1,986 | 33.3% | 65.8% | R+32.5 |
| Precinct -Hamburg Township, Precinct 2Hamburg Township, Precinct 2 | 893 | 1,078 | 14 | 1,985 | 45.0% | 54.3% | R+9.3 |
| Precinct -Hartland Township, Precinct 1Hartland Township, Precinct 1 | 704 | 1,255 | 20 | 1,979 | 35.6% | 63.4% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -Marion Township, Precinct 1Marion Township, Precinct 1 | 616 | 1,332 | 22 | 1,970 | 31.3% | 67.6% | R+36.3 |
| Precinct -Tyrone Township, Precinct 1Tyrone Township, Precinct 1 | 716 | 1,220 | 22 | 1,958 | 36.6% | 62.3% | R+25.7 |
| Precinct -Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 5Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 5 | 768 | 1,147 | 29 | 1,944 | 39.5% | 59.0% | R+19.5 |
| Precinct -Marion Township, Precinct 3Marion Township, Precinct 3 | 577 | 1,199 | 23 | 1,799 | 32.1% | 66.6% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 6Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 6 | 733 | 1,023 | 22 | 1,778 | 41.2% | 57.5% | R+16.3 |
| Precinct -Putnam Township, Precinct 2Putnam Township, Precinct 2 | 601 | 1,099 | 19 | 1,719 | 35.0% | 63.9% | R+29.0 |
| Precinct -City of Brighton, Precinct 2City of Brighton, Precinct 2 | 846 | 849 | 22 | 1,717 | 49.3% | 49.4% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -Hamburg Township, Precinct 5Hamburg Township, Precinct 5 | 751 | 941 | 24 | 1,716 | 43.8% | 54.8% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -Oceola Township, Precinct 4Oceola Township, Precinct 4 | 510 | 1,118 | 22 | 1,650 | 30.9% | 67.8% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct -Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 7Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 7 | 600 | 1,014 | 18 | 1,632 | 36.8% | 62.1% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 4Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 4 | 627 | 970 | 23 | 1,620 | 38.7% | 59.9% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 5Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 5 | 622 | 961 | 19 | 1,602 | 38.8% | 60.0% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -Hartland Township, Precinct 5Hartland Township, Precinct 5 | 574 | 997 | 25 | 1,596 | 36.0% | 62.5% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -Handy Township, Precinct 1Handy Township, Precinct 1 | 485 | 1,067 | 19 | 1,571 | 30.9% | 67.9% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 1Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 1 | 612 | 932 | 18 | 1,562 | 39.2% | 59.7% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 1Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 1 | 602 | 941 | 14 | 1,557 | 38.7% | 60.4% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 1Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 1 | 644 | 875 | 25 | 1,544 | 41.7% | 56.7% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -Oceola Township, Precinct 6Oceola Township, Precinct 6 | 507 | 971 | 13 | 1,491 | 34.0% | 65.1% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -Handy Township, Precinct 2Handy Township, Precinct 2 | 518 | 948 | 21 | 1,487 | 34.8% | 63.8% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -Oceola Township, Precinct 5Oceola Township, Precinct 5 | 543 | 865 | 16 | 1,424 | 38.1% | 60.7% | R+22.6 |
| Precinct -Iosco Township, Precinct 2Iosco Township, Precinct 2 | 383 | 1,007 | 17 | 1,407 | 27.2% | 71.6% | R+44.3 |
| Precinct -Putnam Township, Precinct 3Putnam Township, Precinct 3 | 605 | 759 | 18 | 1,382 | 43.8% | 54.9% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 3Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 3 | 615 | 718 | 27 | 1,360 | 45.2% | 52.8% | R+7.6 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 2Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 2 | 557 | 741 | 19 | 1,317 | 42.3% | 56.3% | R+14.0 |
| Precinct -Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 2Brighton Charter Township, Precinct 2 | 440 | 839 | 17 | 1,296 | 34.0% | 64.7% | R+30.8 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 9Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 9 | 506 | 766 | 17 | 1,289 | 39.3% | 59.4% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -Putnam Township, Precinct 1Putnam Township, Precinct 1 | 520 | 654 | 17 | 1,191 | 43.7% | 54.9% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -Iosco Township, Precinct 1Iosco Township, Precinct 1 | 291 | 871 | 12 | 1,174 | 24.8% | 74.2% | R+49.4 |
| Precinct -Oceola Township, Precinct 3Oceola Township, Precinct 3 | 317 | 814 | 16 | 1,147 | 27.6% | 71.0% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -Putnam Township, Precinct 4Putnam Township, Precinct 4 | 421 | 667 | 19 | 1,107 | 38.0% | 60.3% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 10Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 10 | 407 | 643 | 14 | 1,064 | 38.3% | 60.4% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 7Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 7 | 416 | 622 | 11 | 1,049 | 39.7% | 59.3% | R+19.6 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 8Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 8 | 435 | 577 | 13 | 1,025 | 42.4% | 56.3% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 7Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 7 | 356 | 574 | 19 | 949 | 37.5% | 60.5% | R+23.0 |
| Precinct -City of Brighton, Precinct 1City of Brighton, Precinct 1 | 428 | 504 | 7 | 939 | 45.6% | 53.7% | R+8.1 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 9Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 9 | 337 | 536 | 14 | 887 | 38.0% | 60.4% | R+22.4 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 5Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 5 | 280 | 572 | 14 | 866 | 32.3% | 66.1% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 8Genoa Charter Township, Precinct 8 | 223 | 380 | 2 | 605 | 36.9% | 62.8% | R+26.0 |
| Precinct -Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 11Green Oak Charter Township, Precinct 11 | 196 | 286 | 6 | 488 | 40.2% | 58.6% | R+18.4 |
| Brighton City 00001093-10620-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton City 00002093-10620-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton City 00003093-10620-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton City 00004093-10620-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00001093-10640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00002093-10640-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00003093-10640-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00004093-10640-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00005093-10640-00005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00006093-10640-00006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00007093-10640-00007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00008093-10640-00008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township 00009093-10640-00009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Cohoctah Township 00001093-16920-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Conway Township 00001093-17920-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Deerfield Township 00001093-21220-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Deerfield Township 00002093-21220-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00001093-31860-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00002093-31860-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00003093-31860-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00004093-31860-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00005093-31860-00005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00006093-31860-00006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00007093-31860-00007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00008093-31860-00008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00009093-31860-00009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00010093-31860-00010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00011093-31860-00011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Genoa Township 00013093-31860-00013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00001093-35060-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00002093-35060-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00003093-35060-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00004093-35060-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00005093-35060-00005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00006093-35060-00006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00007093-35060-00007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00008093-35060-00008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Green Oak Township 00009093-35060-00009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamburg Township 00001093-36100-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamburg Township 00002093-36100-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamburg Township 00003093-36100-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamburg Township 00004093-36100-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamburg Township 00005093-36100-00005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamburg Township 00006093-36100-00006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamburg Township 00007093-36100-00007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hamburg Township 00008093-36100-00008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Handy Township 00001093-36340-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Handy Township 00002093-36340-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Handy Township 00003093-36340-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hartland Township 00001093-37040-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hartland Township 00002093-37040-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hartland Township 00003093-37040-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hartland Township 00004093-37040-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Hartland Township 00005093-37040-00005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Howell City 00001093-39540-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Howell City 00002093-39540-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Howell City 00003093-39540-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Howell Township 00001093-39560-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Howell Township 00002093-39560-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Howell Township 00003093-39560-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Iosco Township 00001093-40900-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Iosco Township 00002093-40900-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marion Township 00001093-51640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marion Township 00002093-51640-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marion Township 00003093-51640-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marion Township 00004093-51640-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oceola Township 00001093-60120-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oceola Township 00002093-60120-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oceola Township 00003093-60120-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oceola Township 00004093-60120-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oceola Township 00005093-60120-00005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Putnam Township 00001093-66540-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Putnam Township 00002093-66540-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Putnam Township 00003093-66540-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Putnam Township 00004093-66540-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tyrone Township 00001093-81160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tyrone Township 00002093-81160-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tyrone Township 00003093-81160-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Tyrone Township 00004093-81160-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Unadilla Township 00001093-81240-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Livingston County, MI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
59.0%
9,698 votes · D+18.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 50.1%
Republican
Dwight D. Eisenhower1952
75.6%
9,790 votes · R+51.7
Runner-up · Ronald Reagan, 1984 · 74.4%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
49,503votes
37.4% of the vote · R+23.9
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 48,220 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
81,217votes
61.3% of the vote · R+23.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 76,982 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
+7.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+1.7 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1900 · +5.2 pts
Republican
Thomas E. Dewey1944
+50.9pts R vs U.S.
Place R+43.4 · U.S. D+7.5
Runner-up · Thomas E. Dewey, 1948 · +48.4 pts
current representation
Current officeholders
RLana TheisState Senate · 22
DJennifer ConlinState House · 48
RAnn BollinState House · 49
RJason WoolfordState House · 50
Seats representing Livingston County, MI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 3 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
U.S. House elections · 2 House
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 36.4%45,446 | 63.6%79,356 | 124,802 |
| 2020 | R | 40.8%50,070 | 59.2%72,590 | 122,660 |
voter registration
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
Registered voters
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 145,712 |
| 2018 | 147,860 |
| 2020 | 161,562 |
| 2022 | 164,803 |
| 2024 | 168,253 |
domestic migration
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+412 net domestic migration · 2025
20112025
Net +10,903 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $82,470 in average income, against $109,299 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+16.5 on average — 40 points more Democratic-leaning than Livingston County, MI itself (R+23.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Oakland County, MI1,184D+10.6
- Wayne County, MI749D+29.0
- Washtenaw County, MI594D+44.4
- Genesee County, MI419D+4.2
- Ingham County, MI282D+29.7
- Macomb County, MI135R+13.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Oakland County, MI984
- Genesee County, MI553
- Washtenaw County, MI462
- Wayne County, MI428
- Ingham County, MI328
- Kent County, MI124
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +577 |
| 2012 | +311 |
| 2013 | +951 |
| 2014 | +868 |
| 2015 | +1,181 |
| 2016 | +870 |
| 2017 | +949 |
| 2018 | +1,063 |
| 2019 | +611 |
| 2021 | +1,330 |
| 2022 | +1,051 |
| 2023 | +657 |
| 2024 | +72 |
| 2025 | +412 |
Livingston County sits on Detroit's outer suburban ring, where low-density growth and a predominantly white, college-educated-but-conservative electorate have produced some of the widest Republican presidential margins in the state for two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 18.1 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 51.7 points in 1952. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 23.9 points.
A population of 195,833, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $103,039 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Grand Traverse County and Emmet County.
Political twins — counties
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Grand Traverse County
Michigan
87.3twin score
college shareelasticity% unaffiliated≠ median income
Emmet County
Michigan
85.3twin score
college shareelasticityPolish ancestry≠ median income
Midland County
Michigan
85.0twin score
12-yr trendcollege share% White≠ median income
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Cite this page
All citations released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Akashic Intelligence.
Livingston County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26093/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.
License: CC BY 4.0
Embed this page
A live widget for your site — no API key, attribution built in, CC BY 4.0. All widgets & sizes →
Cities & towns in Livingston County
Michigan at the ballot boxAll elections →
Frequently asked questions
How did Livingston County, Michigan vote in 2024?
In 2024, Livingston County, Michigan voted Republican by 23.9 points (R+23.9), carried by the Republican candidate. Out of 132,448 votes cast, 49,503 went Democratic and 81,217 went Republican.
When did Livingston County, Michigan last vote Democratic?
The most recent presidential election in which Livingston County, Michigan voted Democratic was 1964.
How many people live in Livingston County, Michigan?
Livingston County, Michigan has a population of 195,833 according to the 2024 American Community Survey 5-year estimates from the US Census Bureau.
What is the median household income in Livingston County, Michigan?
Median household income in Livingston County, Michigan is $103,039 — above the national median of $80,734. The Michigan state median is $72,875.
What is the political history of Livingston County, Michigan?
Akashic tracks 38 presidential elections in Livingston County, Michigan from 1876 to 2024. Of those, 4 went Democratic and 30 went Republican.