Midland County, Michigan
Precinct data
Results by precinct
83 precincts · 50,301 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 4, Precinct 8City of Midland, Ward 4, Precinct 8 | 1,458 | 1,285 | 60 | 2,803 | 52.0% | 45.8% | D+6.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 5, Precinct 10City of Midland, Ward 5, Precinct 10 | 1,385 | 1,343 | 55 | 2,783 | 49.8% | 48.3% | D+1.5 |
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 3, Precinct 6City of Midland, Ward 3, Precinct 6 | 1,364 | 1,357 | 45 | 2,766 | 49.3% | 49.1% | D+0.3 |
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 2, Precinct 4City of Midland, Ward 2, Precinct 4 | 1,391 | 1,165 | 38 | 2,594 | 53.6% | 44.9% | D+8.7 |
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 5, Precinct 9City of Midland, Ward 5, Precinct 9 | 1,399 | 1,107 | 38 | 2,544 | 55.0% | 43.5% | D+11.5 |
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 4, Precinct 7City of Midland, Ward 4, Precinct 7 | 1,284 | 1,211 | 41 | 2,536 | 50.6% | 47.8% | D+2.9 |
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 3, Precinct 5City of Midland, Ward 3, Precinct 5 | 1,212 | 1,144 | 36 | 2,392 | 50.7% | 47.8% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 2, Precinct 3City of Midland, Ward 2, Precinct 3 | 1,083 | 1,132 | 46 | 2,261 | 47.9% | 50.1% | R+2.2 |
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 1, Precinct 1City of Midland, Ward 1, Precinct 1 | 1,106 | 1,058 | 36 | 2,200 | 50.3% | 48.1% | D+2.2 |
| Precinct -City of Midland, Ward 1, Precinct 2City of Midland, Ward 1, Precinct 2 | 1,017 | 1,132 | 42 | 2,191 | 46.4% | 51.7% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -Lincoln Township, Precinct 1Lincoln Township, Precinct 1 | 563 | 1,011 | 29 | 1,603 | 35.1% | 63.1% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -Edenville Township, Precinct 1Edenville Township, Precinct 1 | 470 | 1,110 | 19 | 1,599 | 29.4% | 69.4% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -Jerome Township, Precinct 2Jerome Township, Precinct 2 | 440 | 1,043 | 26 | 1,509 | 29.2% | 69.1% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -Larkin Township, Precinct 1Larkin Township, Precinct 1 | 511 | 896 | 13 | 1,420 | 36.0% | 63.1% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -Jerome Township, Precinct 1Jerome Township, Precinct 1 | 513 | 856 | 16 | 1,385 | 37.0% | 61.8% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -Midland Township, Precinct 1Midland Township, Precinct 1 | 474 | 835 | 19 | 1,328 | 35.7% | 62.9% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -Warren Township, Precinct 1Warren Township, Precinct 1 | 299 | 882 | 17 | 1,198 | 25.0% | 73.6% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -Larkin Township, Precinct 2Larkin Township, Precinct 2 | 478 | 683 | 16 | 1,177 | 40.6% | 58.0% | R+17.4 |
| Precinct -Lee Township, Precinct 1Lee Township, Precinct 1 | 322 | 780 | 18 | 1,120 | 28.7% | 69.6% | R+40.9 |
| Precinct -Mills Township, Precinct 1Mills Township, Precinct 1 | 350 | 727 | 16 | 1,093 | 32.0% | 66.5% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -Larkin Township, Precinct 3Larkin Township, Precinct 3 | 468 | 548 | 16 | 1,032 | 45.3% | 53.1% | R+7.8 |
| Precinct -Mount Haley Township, Precinct 1Mount Haley Township, Precinct 1 | 318 | 698 | 10 | 1,026 | 31.0% | 68.0% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -Homer Township, Precinct 3Homer Township, Precinct 3 | 380 | 625 | 18 | 1,023 | 37.1% | 61.1% | R+23.9 |
| Precinct -Lee Township, Precinct 2Lee Township, Precinct 2 | 291 | 710 | 14 | 1,015 | 28.7% | 70.0% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -Greendale Township, Precinct 1Greendale Township, Precinct 1 | 275 | 686 | 14 | 975 | 28.2% | 70.4% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -Ingersoll Township, Precinct 1Ingersoll Township, Precinct 1 | 302 | 643 | 28 | 973 | 31.0% | 66.1% | R+35.0 |
| Precinct -Hope Township, Precinct 1Hope Township, Precinct 1 | 259 | 690 | 9 | 958 | 27.0% | 72.0% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -Homer Township, Precinct 1Homer Township, Precinct 1 | 321 | 463 | 8 | 792 | 40.5% | 58.5% | R+17.9 |
| Precinct -Homer Township, Precinct 2Homer Township, Precinct 2 | 252 | 502 | 10 | 764 | 33.0% | 65.7% | R+32.7 |
| Precinct -Ingersoll Township, Precinct 2Ingersoll Township, Precinct 2 | 200 | 493 | 7 | 700 | 28.6% | 70.4% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -Porter Township, Precinct 1Porter Township, Precinct 1 | 175 | 482 | 9 | 666 | 26.3% | 72.4% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -Geneva Township, Precinct 1Geneva Township, Precinct 1 | 198 | 450 | 9 | 657 | 30.1% | 68.5% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -City of Coleman, Precinct 1City of Coleman, Precinct 1 | 207 | 404 | 14 | 625 | 33.1% | 64.6% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -Jasper Township, Precinct 1Jasper Township, Precinct 1 | 161 | 420 | 12 | 593 | 27.2% | 70.8% | R+43.7 |
| 1111710000001111-17100-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1112483000001111-24830-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1113182000001111-31820-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1113486000001111-34860-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1113898000001111-38980-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1113898000002111-38980-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1113898000003111-38980-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1113916000001111-39160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114062000001111-40620-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114062000002111-40620-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114156000001111-41560-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114176000001111-41760-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114176000002111-41760-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114176000003111-41760-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114176000004111-41760-00004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114616000001111-46160-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114616000002111-46160-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114616000003111-46160-00003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114664000001111-46640-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114664000002111-46640-00002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1114768000001111-47680-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378001001111-53780-01001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378001002111-53780-01002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378001003111-53780-01003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378001004111-53780-01004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378001005111-53780-01005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378002001111-53780-02001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378002002111-53780-02002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378002003111-53780-02003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378002004111-53780-02004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378003001111-53780-03001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378003002111-53780-03002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378003003111-53780-03003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378003004111-53780-03004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378004001111-53780-04001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378004002111-53780-04002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378004003111-53780-04003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378004004111-53780-04004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378004005111-53780-04005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378005001111-53780-05001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378005002111-53780-05002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378005003111-53780-05003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378005004111-53780-05004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115378005005111-53780-05005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115380000001111-53800-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115432000001111-54320-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1115594000001111-55940-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1116574000001111-65740-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| 1118402000001111-84020-00001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −11.0% |
| 1896 | −0.5% |
| 1900 | −18.2% |
| 1904 | −45.0% |
| 1908 | −37.5% |
| 1912 | −7.4% |
| 1916 | −17.9% |
| 1920 | −60.5% |
| 1924 | −66.7% |
| 1928 | −64.8% |
| 1932 | −3.2% |
| 1936 | −1.0% |
| 1940 | −24.0% |
| 1944 | −31.3% |
| 1948 | −28.3% |
| 1952 | −45.0% |
| 1956 | −49.7% |
| 1960 | −35.2% |
| 1964 | +16.5% |
| 1968 | −29.2% |
| 1972 | −26.0% |
| 1976 | −18.8% |
| 1980 | −17.3% |
| 1984 | −33.0% |
| 1988 | −19.3% |
| 1992 | −7.2% |
| 1996 | −3.8% |
| 2000 | −15.2% |
| 2004 | −13.9% |
| 2008 | −3.6% |
| 2012 | −15.4% |
| 2016 | −19.2% |
| 2020 | −14.6% |
| 2024 | −15.2% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 65,519 |
| 2018 | 64,793 |
| 2020 | 69,666 |
| 2022 | 70,670 |
| 2024 | 71,866 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+11 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −2,363 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $62,760 in average income, against $96,105 for residents who stayed — 35% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+10.6 on average — 4.6 points more Democratic-leaning than Midland County, MI itself (R+15.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Saginaw County, MI315R+3.3
- Bay County, MI311R+14.7
- Isabella County, MI147R+7.5
- Gladwin County, MI118R+40.7
- Oakland County, MI79D+10.6
- Clare County, MI54R+37.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Bay County, MI336
- Saginaw County, MI243
- Isabella County, MI146
- Gladwin County, MI108
- Kent County, MI78
- Oakland County, MI76
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −161 |
| 2012 | −432 |
| 2013 | −339 |
| 2014 | −483 |
| 2015 | −150 |
| 2016 | −454 |
| 2017 | −289 |
| 2018 | −211 |
| 2019 | −241 |
| 2021 | −5 |
| 2022 | +357 |
| 2023 | +187 |
| 2024 | −153 |
| 2025 | +11 |
Midland County's economy has long centered on the petrochemical industry, and its white-collar engineering and management workforce contributes to a Republican presidential lean that has held steady for decades, landing at R+15.2 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 16.5 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 66.7 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 15.2 points.
A population of 83,757, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $77,705 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Grand Traverse County and Emmet County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Midland County, Michigan. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/26111/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.