Lyon County, Nevada
Precinct data
Results by precinct
80 precincts · 33,099 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -1414 | 540 | 1,421 | 19 | 1,980 | 27.3% | 71.8% | R+44.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -1313 | 446 | 1,301 | 10 | 1,757 | 25.4% | 74.0% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -2727 | 401 | 1,127 | 18 | 1,546 | 25.9% | 72.9% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -1616 | 417 | 968 | 13 | 1,398 | 29.8% | 69.2% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -66 | 338 | 1,037 | 4 | 1,379 | 24.5% | 75.2% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct -77 | 201 | 1,023 | 5 | 1,229 | 16.4% | 83.2% | R+66.9 |
| Precinct -3333 | 398 | 811 | 9 | 1,218 | 32.7% | 66.6% | R+33.9 |
| Precinct -3939 | 335 | 872 | 8 | 1,215 | 27.6% | 71.8% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -1111 | 352 | 825 | 6 | 1,183 | 29.8% | 69.7% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -99 | 337 | 822 | 8 | 1,167 | 28.9% | 70.4% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -3838 | 316 | 806 | 12 | 1,134 | 27.9% | 71.1% | R+43.2 |
| Precinct -2222 | 222 | 867 | 11 | 1,100 | 20.2% | 78.8% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -2525 | 262 | 802 | 5 | 1,069 | 24.5% | 75.0% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -1515 | 342 | 694 | 14 | 1,050 | 32.6% | 66.1% | R+33.5 |
| Precinct -3737 | 276 | 657 | 7 | 940 | 29.4% | 69.9% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -3232 | 303 | 590 | 14 | 907 | 33.4% | 65.0% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -1717 | 190 | 705 | 4 | 899 | 21.1% | 78.4% | R+57.3 |
| Precinct -33 | 250 | 550 | 10 | 810 | 30.9% | 67.9% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct -4040 | 242 | 524 | 9 | 775 | 31.2% | 67.6% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -3030 | 252 | 506 | 8 | 766 | 32.9% | 66.1% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -3131 | 208 | 552 | 5 | 765 | 27.2% | 72.2% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -1212 | 221 | 529 | 5 | 755 | 29.3% | 70.1% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -22 | 142 | 579 | 7 | 728 | 19.5% | 79.5% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct -2828 | 181 | 515 | 10 | 706 | 25.6% | 72.9% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -2323 | 192 | 472 | 8 | 672 | 28.6% | 70.2% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -11 | 170 | 496 | 3 | 669 | 25.4% | 74.1% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -2626 | 145 | 513 | 7 | 665 | 21.8% | 77.1% | R+55.3 |
| Precinct -2424 | 147 | 464 | 10 | 621 | 23.7% | 74.7% | R+51.0 |
| Precinct -2929 | 171 | 419 | 6 | 596 | 28.7% | 70.3% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -1919 | 175 | 266 | 2 | 443 | 39.5% | 60.0% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -44 | 87 | 342 | 3 | 432 | 20.1% | 79.2% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -3636 | 123 | 277 | 3 | 403 | 30.5% | 68.7% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -3434 | 93 | 298 | 3 | 394 | 23.6% | 75.6% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -2121 | 83 | 304 | 3 | 390 | 21.3% | 77.9% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -1818 | 98 | 235 | 7 | 340 | 28.8% | 69.1% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -1010 | 91 | 207 | 2 | 300 | 30.3% | 69.0% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct -3535 | 81 | 199 | 3 | 283 | 28.6% | 70.3% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -88 | 38 | 187 | 2 | 227 | 16.7% | 82.4% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -2020 | 72 | 68 | 1 | 141 | 51.1% | 48.2% | D+2.8 |
| Precinct -55 | 16 | 31 | 0 | 47 | 34.0% | 66.0% | R+31.9 |
| Precinct No. 1-EAST MASON VALLEY #132_3201901 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 10-SOUTH DAYTON #232_3201910 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 11-SOUTH DAYTON #332_3201911 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 12-SOUTH DAYTON #432_3201912 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 13-NORTH DAYTON #132_3201913 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 14-NORTH DAYTON #232_3201914 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 15-NORTH DAYTON #332_3201915 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 16-NORTH DAYTON #432_3201916 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 17-NORTH DAYTON #532_3201917 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 18-MOUND HOUSE #132_3201918 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 19-MOUND HOUSE #232_3201919 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 2-EAST MASON VALLEY #232_3201902 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 20-SILVER CITY32_3201920 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 21-STAGECOACH #132_3201921 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 22-STAGECOACH #232_3201922 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 23-SILVER SPRINGS #132_3201923 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 24-SILVER SPRINGS #232_3201924 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 25-SILVER SPRINGS #332_3201925 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 26-SILVER SPRINGS #432_3201926 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 27-FERNLEY #132_3201927 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 28-FERNLEY #232_3201928 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 29-FERNLEY #332_3201929 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 3-WEST MASON VALLEY #132_3201903 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 30-FERNLEY #432_3201930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 31-FERNLEY #532_3201931 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 32-FERNLEY #632_3201932 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 33-FERNLEY #732_3201933 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 34-FERNLEY #832_3201934 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 35-FERNLEY #932_3201935 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 36-FERNLEY #1032_3201936 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 37-FERNLEY #1132_3201937 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 38-FERNLEY #1232_3201938 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 39-FERNLEY #1332_3201939 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 4-WEST MASON VALLEY #232_3201904 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 40-FERNLEY #1432_3201940 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 5-WEST MASON VALLEY #332_3201905 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 6-SPRAGG-PLUMMER32_3201906 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 7-SMITH VALLEY #132_3201907 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 8-SMITH VALLEY #232_3201908 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct No. 9-SOUTH DAYTON #132_3201909 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −19.5% |
| 1896 | +62.0% |
| 1900 | +24.6% |
| 1904 | −39.4% |
| 1908 | −10.3% |
| 1912 | +25.9% |
| 1916 | +6.1% |
| 1920 | −42.7% |
| 1924 | −29.7% |
| 1928 | −13.7% |
| 1932 | +36.6% |
| 1936 | +42.4% |
| 1940 | +5.1% |
| 1944 | −11.7% |
| 1948 | −20.7% |
| 1952 | −43.2% |
| 1956 | −37.0% |
| 1960 | −19.4% |
| 1964 | −2.6% |
| 1968 | −22.6% |
| 1972 | −49.2% |
| 1976 | −4.9% |
| 1980 | −44.4% |
| 1984 | −42.9% |
| 1988 | −29.9% |
| 1992 | −8.0% |
| 1996 | −13.8% |
| 2000 | −27.6% |
| 2004 | −32.1% |
| 2008 | −17.9% |
| 2012 | −28.6% |
| 2016 | −41.5% |
| 2020 | −41.1% |
| 2024 | −44.4% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 16 points more Democratic.
56,514 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+1,370 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +11,955 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $68,495 in average income, against $72,059 for residents who stayed — 5% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+5.4 on average — 39 points more Democratic-leaning than Lyon County, NV itself (R+44.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Washoe County, NV740D+1.0
- Carson City, NV352R+11.3
- Douglas County, NV110R+32.9
- Churchill County, NV89R+50.2
- Clark County, NV81D+2.6
- Sacramento County, CA46D+19.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Washoe County, NV591
- Carson City, NV256
- Churchill County, NV109
- Douglas County, NV86
- Clark County, NV53
- Storey County, NV30
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −717 |
| 2012 | −434 |
| 2013 | +122 |
| 2014 | +300 |
| 2015 | +650 |
| 2016 | +821 |
| 2017 | +1,252 |
| 2018 | +1,948 |
| 2019 | +1,691 |
| 2021 | +1,827 |
| 2022 | +874 |
| 2023 | +1,148 |
| 2024 | +1,103 |
| 2025 | +1,370 |
Lyon County, a rural stretch east of Carson City, delivered a 44-point Republican presidential margin in 2024—among the widest in a state that statewide remains closely contested.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 62.0 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 49.2 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 44.4 points.
A population of 61,680, a 70% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $80,812 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Noble County and Tehama County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lyon County, Nevada. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/32019/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.