- Lead
- 5,975
- Total
- 13,489
- vs nation
- R+42.8
- Turnout
- 62.5%
Hocking County, OH
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 62.5% of 21,798 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 5,857
- Total
- 13,824
- vs nation
- R+46.8
- Turnout
- 63.0%
- Lead
- 4,722
- Total
- 13,103
- vs nation
- R+38.1
- Turnout
- 59.8%
- Lead
- 128
- Total
- 12,890
- vs nation
- R+4.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 105
- Total
- 13,016
- vs nation
- R+8.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 761
- Total
- 13,199
- vs nation
- R+3.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,228
- Total
- 10,756
- vs nation
- R+11.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 629
- Total
- 10,356
- vs nation
- R+2.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+44.3MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 27,7992024 5-year
- Population density
- 66 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 421 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $62,9602024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 94.6%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+35.1 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+44.3 in 2024MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Pike County, OH · twin score 95.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 62.5%13,616 participants ÷ 21,798 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +18.9 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.6 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 43.5%–46.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13,616 | 21,798 ± 226 | 62.5% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 9,693 | 21,998 ± 194 | 44.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 13,915 | 22,084 ± 189 | 63.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 10,177 | 22,035 ± 191 | 46.2% | Audited | A/A |
| 13,103 | 21,897 ± 146 | 59.8% | Audited | A/A | |
| 12,890 | 22,306 | 57.8% | Derived | — | |
| 13,016 | 21,935 | 59.3% | Derived | — | |
| 13,199 | 21,564 extrapolated | 61.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 53 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
53 precincts · 13,489 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS 3PRECINCT FALLS 3 | 262 | 688 | 6 | 956 | 27.4% | 72.0% | R+44.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS 1PRECINCT FALLS 1 | 288 | 624 | 8 | 920 | 31.3% | 67.8% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MARION 1PRECINCT MARION 1 | 256 | 654 | 4 | 914 | 28.0% | 71.6% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LOGAN 3PRECINCT LOGAN 3 | 259 | 598 | 6 | 863 | 30.0% | 69.3% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LOGAN 1PRECINCT LOGAN 1 | 324 | 499 | 2 | 825 | 39.3% | 60.5% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LOGAN 2PRECINCT LOGAN 2 | 246 | 559 | 11 | 816 | 30.1% | 68.5% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT GREEN 1PRECINCT GREEN 1 | 170 | 590 | 3 | 763 | 22.3% | 77.3% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT GOOD HOPEPRECINCT GOOD HOPE | 196 | 540 | 8 | 744 | 26.3% | 72.6% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRY 1PRECINCT PERRY 1 | 172 | 553 | 5 | 730 | 23.6% | 75.8% | R+52.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT STARRPRECINCT STARR | 177 | 530 | 11 | 718 | 24.7% | 73.8% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LOGAN 4PRECINCT LOGAN 4 | 204 | 451 | 8 | 663 | 30.8% | 68.0% | R+37.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WASHINGTONPRECINCT WASHINGTON | 133 | 495 | 4 | 632 | 21.0% | 78.3% | R+57.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT LAURELPRECINCT LAUREL | 173 | 417 | 9 | 599 | 28.9% | 69.6% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT FALLS 2PRECINCT FALLS 2 | 131 | 450 | 5 | 586 | 22.4% | 76.8% | R+54.4 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT WARDPRECINCT WARD | 178 | 354 | 2 | 534 | 33.3% | 66.3% | R+33.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT GREEN 2PRECINCT GREEN 2 | 126 | 401 | 6 | 533 | 23.6% | 75.2% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT SALTCREEKPRECINCT SALTCREEK | 101 | 385 | 1 | 487 | 20.7% | 79.1% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT MARION 2PRECINCT MARION 2 | 89 | 323 | 2 | 414 | 21.5% | 78.0% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT PERRY 2PRECINCT PERRY 2 | 82 | 321 | 2 | 405 | 20.2% | 79.3% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -PRECINCT BENTONPRECINCT BENTON | 137 | 247 | 3 | 387 | 35.4% | 63.8% | R+28.4 |
| PRECINCT BENTON39_39073073AAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT CARBON HILL39_39073073ABD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS 139_39073073AAM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS 339_39073073AAO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS 439_39073073AAP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT FALLS 539_39073073AAQ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT GOOD HOPE 139_39073073AAR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT GOOD HOPE 239_39073073AAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT GREEN 139_39073073AAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT GREEN 239_39073073AAU | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT HIDE A WAY HILLS39_39073073ABG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LAUREL 139_39073073AAV | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LAUREL 239_39073073ABI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LAURELVILLE39_39073073AAY | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 1B39_39073073AAB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 1C39_39073073AAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 1D39_39073073AAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 2A39_39073073AAE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 2B39_39073073AAF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 3A39_39073073AAG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 3C39_39073073AAI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 4B39_39073073AAJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT LOGAN 4C39_39073073AAK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MARION 139_39073073AAW | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MARION 239_39073073AAX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT MURRAY CITY39_39073073ABE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PERRY 139_39073073AAZ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT PERRY 239_39073073ABH | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT SALTCREEK39_39073073ABA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT STARR 139_39073073ABB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT STARR 239_39073073ABC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WASHINGTON39_39073073ABF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| PRECINCT WEST LOGAN39_39073073ABJ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Hocking County, OH · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
67.6%
5,951 votes · D+35.1
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 61.6%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
71.8%
9,679 votes · R+44.3
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 70.4%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
6,580votes
61.6% of the vote · D+24.5
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 6,259 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
9,737votes
70.4% of the vote · R+42.4
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 9,679 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
James M. Cox1920
+23.2pts D vs U.S.
Place R+3.0 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · William J. Bryan, 1896 · +13.3 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2020
+46.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+42.4 · U.S. D+4.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · +42.8 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Hocking County, OH. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 29.0%3,711 | 71.0%9,071 | 12,782 |
| 2020 | R | 25.6%3,477 | 74.4%10,082 | 13,559 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 18,444 |
| 2018 | 18,653 |
| 2020 | 18,645 |
| 2022 | 18,446 |
| 2024 | 18,430 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+134 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,221 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $52,466 in average income, against $62,724 for residents who stayed — 16% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+15.5 on average — 29 points more Democratic-leaning than Hocking County, OH itself (R+44.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Fairfield County, OH155R+24.0
- Franklin County, OH75D+28.4
- Athens County, OH65D+10.7
- Perry County, OH43R+54.5
- Ross County, OH36R+39.3
- Pickaway County, OH34R+48.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Fairfield County, OH169
- Athens County, OH96
- Franklin County, OH88
- Pickaway County, OH46
- Perry County, OH41
- Ross County, OH24
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −19 |
| 2012 | −179 |
| 2013 | −680 |
| 2014 | +82 |
| 2015 | −273 |
| 2016 | −147 |
| 2017 | +75 |
| 2018 | −60 |
| 2019 | −52 |
| 2021 | +214 |
| 2022 | −137 |
| 2023 | −157 |
| 2024 | −22 |
| 2025 | +134 |
Hocking County's rugged Appalachian terrain and shrinking industrial base have driven one of the sharpest partisan shifts in the state over the past two decades, with the 2024 presidential margin reaching R+44.3 — roughly double what it was in 2008.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 35.1 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 44.3 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 44.3 points.
A population of 27,799, a 95% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $62,960 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Pike County and Perry County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Hocking County, Ohio. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/39073/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.