Linn County, Oregon
Precinct data
Results by precinct
85 precincts · 71,429 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -011011 | 1,309 | 1,255 | 103 | 2,667 | 49.1% | 47.1% | D+2.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -018018 | 1,099 | 1,053 | 92 | 2,244 | 49.0% | 46.9% | D+2.0 |
| Precinct -076076 | 746 | 1,416 | 65 | 2,227 | 33.5% | 63.6% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -048048 | 1,091 | 1,064 | 68 | 2,223 | 49.1% | 47.9% | D+1.2 |
| Precinct -084084 | 702 | 1,202 | 100 | 2,004 | 35.0% | 60.0% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -005005 | 1,033 | 847 | 83 | 1,963 | 52.6% | 43.1% | D+9.5 |
| Precinct -029029 | 571 | 1,285 | 54 | 1,910 | 29.9% | 67.3% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -001001 | 1,057 | 589 | 98 | 1,744 | 60.6% | 33.8% | D+26.8 |
| Precinct -010010 | 830 | 768 | 75 | 1,673 | 49.6% | 45.9% | D+3.7 |
| Precinct -016016 | 874 | 743 | 55 | 1,672 | 52.3% | 44.4% | D+7.8 |
| Precinct -014014 | 808 | 751 | 76 | 1,635 | 49.4% | 45.9% | D+3.5 |
| Precinct -059059 | 436 | 1,045 | 49 | 1,530 | 28.5% | 68.3% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -079079 | 539 | 858 | 53 | 1,450 | 37.2% | 59.2% | R+22.0 |
| Precinct -003003 | 334 | 1,040 | 51 | 1,425 | 23.4% | 73.0% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -035035 | 343 | 1,037 | 43 | 1,423 | 24.1% | 72.9% | R+48.8 |
| Precinct -061061 | 618 | 744 | 55 | 1,417 | 43.6% | 52.5% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -013013 | 578 | 773 | 64 | 1,415 | 40.8% | 54.6% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -036036 | 517 | 829 | 48 | 1,394 | 37.1% | 59.5% | R+22.4 |
| Precinct -067067 | 620 | 656 | 43 | 1,319 | 47.0% | 49.7% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct -082082 | 626 | 659 | 32 | 1,317 | 47.5% | 50.0% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -073073 | 399 | 766 | 45 | 1,210 | 33.0% | 63.3% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct -080080 | 311 | 855 | 36 | 1,202 | 25.9% | 71.1% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -009009 | 510 | 595 | 45 | 1,150 | 44.3% | 51.7% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -062062 | 331 | 754 | 46 | 1,131 | 29.3% | 66.7% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -046046 | 276 | 796 | 44 | 1,116 | 24.7% | 71.3% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -031031 | 249 | 820 | 33 | 1,102 | 22.6% | 74.4% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -037037 | 406 | 620 | 44 | 1,070 | 37.9% | 57.9% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -025025 | 284 | 729 | 30 | 1,043 | 27.2% | 69.9% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -075075 | 253 | 742 | 27 | 1,022 | 24.8% | 72.6% | R+47.8 |
| Precinct -038038 | 366 | 588 | 40 | 994 | 36.8% | 59.2% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -006006 | 304 | 641 | 42 | 987 | 30.8% | 64.9% | R+34.1 |
| Precinct -074074 | 238 | 684 | 35 | 957 | 24.9% | 71.5% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -085085 | 274 | 639 | 27 | 940 | 29.1% | 68.0% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -045045 | 227 | 655 | 23 | 905 | 25.1% | 72.4% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct -015015 | 246 | 603 | 30 | 879 | 28.0% | 68.6% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -056056 | 236 | 597 | 19 | 852 | 27.7% | 70.1% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -023023 | 205 | 604 | 33 | 842 | 24.3% | 71.7% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -008008 | 360 | 433 | 27 | 820 | 43.9% | 52.8% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -043043 | 256 | 535 | 28 | 819 | 31.3% | 65.3% | R+34.1 |
| Precinct -012012 | 388 | 388 | 41 | 817 | 47.5% | 47.5% | Even |
| Precinct -019019 | 361 | 417 | 31 | 809 | 44.6% | 51.5% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -053053 | 158 | 598 | 24 | 780 | 20.3% | 76.7% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -051051 | 164 | 577 | 21 | 762 | 21.5% | 75.7% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -081081 | 423 | 294 | 45 | 762 | 55.5% | 38.6% | D+16.9 |
| Precinct -042042 | 163 | 538 | 29 | 730 | 22.3% | 73.7% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct -070070 | 191 | 490 | 27 | 708 | 27.0% | 69.2% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -072072 | 199 | 483 | 20 | 702 | 28.3% | 68.8% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -060060 | 230 | 431 | 31 | 692 | 33.2% | 62.3% | R+29.0 |
| Precinct -078078 | 225 | 440 | 22 | 687 | 32.8% | 64.0% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct -020020 | 160 | 492 | 14 | 666 | 24.0% | 73.9% | R+49.8 |
| Precinct -039039 | 308 | 318 | 37 | 663 | 46.5% | 48.0% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -032032 | 140 | 496 | 26 | 662 | 21.1% | 74.9% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -055055 | 126 | 488 | 24 | 638 | 19.7% | 76.5% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -041041 | 246 | 311 | 25 | 582 | 42.3% | 53.4% | R+11.2 |
| Precinct -064064 | 145 | 420 | 14 | 579 | 25.0% | 72.5% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -077077 | 136 | 366 | 25 | 527 | 25.8% | 69.4% | R+43.6 |
| Precinct -027027 | 132 | 347 | 26 | 505 | 26.1% | 68.7% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -069069 | 107 | 377 | 16 | 500 | 21.4% | 75.4% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -052052 | 142 | 338 | 12 | 492 | 28.9% | 68.7% | R+39.8 |
| Precinct -004004 | 135 | 338 | 18 | 491 | 27.5% | 68.8% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -050050 | 69 | 366 | 13 | 448 | 15.4% | 81.7% | R+66.3 |
| Precinct -054054 | 108 | 263 | 13 | 384 | 28.1% | 68.5% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -021021 | 74 | 235 | 10 | 319 | 23.2% | 73.7% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -034034 | 88 | 227 | 4 | 319 | 27.6% | 71.2% | R+43.6 |
| Precinct -063063 | 59 | 213 | 8 | 280 | 21.1% | 76.1% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -047047 | 111 | 128 | 12 | 251 | 44.2% | 51.0% | R+6.8 |
| Precinct -066066 | 73 | 167 | 8 | 248 | 29.4% | 67.3% | R+37.9 |
| Precinct -026026 | 69 | 168 | 3 | 240 | 28.7% | 70.0% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -068068 | 57 | 165 | 5 | 227 | 25.1% | 72.7% | R+47.6 |
| Precinct -028028 | 33 | 184 | 6 | 223 | 14.8% | 82.5% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -030030 | 32 | 151 | 5 | 188 | 17.0% | 80.3% | R+63.3 |
| Precinct -022022 | 29 | 105 | 5 | 139 | 20.9% | 75.5% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -071071 | 33 | 104 | 2 | 139 | 23.7% | 74.8% | R+51.1 |
| Precinct -044044 | 53 | 58 | 6 | 117 | 45.3% | 49.6% | R+4.3 |
| Precinct -007007 | 11 | 60 | 4 | 75 | 14.7% | 80.0% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -057057 | 21 | 44 | 4 | 69 | 30.4% | 63.8% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -058058 | 16 | 48 | 1 | 65 | 24.6% | 73.8% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -040040 | 12 | 43 | 1 | 56 | 21.4% | 76.8% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -024024 | 14 | 35 | 0 | 49 | 28.6% | 71.4% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -033033 | 15 | 27 | 0 | 42 | 35.7% | 64.3% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -065065 | 8 | 31 | 2 | 41 | 19.5% | 75.6% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -083083 | 13 | 20 | 0 | 33 | 39.4% | 60.6% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -017017 | 8 | 17 | 1 | 26 | 30.8% | 65.4% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -049049 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 66.7% | 33.3% | D+33.3 |
| Precinct -002002 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −24.7% |
| 1896 | +13.7% |
| 1900 | +1.6% |
| 1904 | −26.4% |
| 1908 | −8.6% |
| 1912 | +15.5% |
| 1916 | +1.5% |
| 1920 | −18.1% |
| 1924 | −18.2% |
| 1928 | −37.2% |
| 1932 | +12.6% |
| 1936 | +15.6% |
| 1940 | −1.3% |
| 1944 | −2.9% |
| 1948 | −4.3% |
| 1952 | −26.0% |
| 1956 | −10.2% |
| 1960 | −7.8% |
| 1964 | +28.1% |
| 1968 | −10.6% |
| 1972 | −14.0% |
| 1976 | +5.3% |
| 1980 | −15.0% |
| 1984 | −18.4% |
| 1988 | −3.6% |
| 1992 | −2.3% |
| 1996 | −3.1% |
| 2000 | −19.5% |
| 2004 | −21.8% |
| 2008 | −11.4% |
| 2012 | −16.7% |
| 2016 | −26.4% |
| 2020 | −23.4% |
| 2024 | −24.3% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 36.3%22,041 | 60.6%36,740 | 60,638 |
| 2020 | R | 38.3%27,048 | 57.8%40,801 | 70,546 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 12 points more Democratic.
100,861 registered voters · 2024 · up from 97,606 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+260 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +14,715 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,470 in average income, against $70,650 for residents who stayed — 23% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+17.9 on average — 42 points more Democratic-leaning than Linn County, OR itself (R+24.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Benton County, OR761D+39.3
- Marion County, OR643R+2.0
- Lane County, OR443D+22.9
- Polk County, OR156R+3.6
- Washington County, OR138D+33.7
- Multnomah County, OR108D+61.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Marion County, OR547
- Benton County, OR511
- Lane County, OR378
- Multnomah County, OR124
- Polk County, OR116
- Washington County, OR103
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +892 |
| 2012 | −158 |
| 2013 | −43 |
| 2014 | +420 |
| 2015 | +1,012 |
| 2016 | +2,254 |
| 2017 | +1,964 |
| 2018 | +2,198 |
| 2019 | +2,066 |
| 2021 | +1,117 |
| 2022 | +806 |
| 2023 | +1,022 |
| 2024 | +905 |
| 2025 | +260 |
Linn County sits at the valley's southern edge where agriculture and wood-products manufacturing define the economy, and it has delivered Republican presidential margins above 20 points in each of the last three cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 28.1 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 37.2 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 0.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 24.3 points.
A population of 130,706, a 81% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $76,329 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Yamhill County and Polk County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Linn County, Oregon. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/41043/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.