Clinton County, Pennsylvania
Precinct data
Results by precinct
68 precincts · 18,522 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 0370420350370 | 469 | 918 | 9 | 1,396 | 33.6% | 65.8% | R+32.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 0160420350160 | 341 | 964 | 12 | 1,317 | 25.9% | 73.2% | R+47.3 |
| Precinct 0030420350030 | 294 | 768 | 11 | 1,073 | 27.4% | 71.6% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct 0280420350280 | 261 | 806 | 4 | 1,071 | 24.4% | 75.3% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct 0210420350210 | 420 | 603 | 13 | 1,036 | 40.5% | 58.2% | R+17.7 |
| Precinct 0290420350290 | 310 | 605 | 6 | 921 | 33.7% | 65.7% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct 0020420350020 | 195 | 604 | 5 | 804 | 24.3% | 75.1% | R+50.9 |
| Precinct 0300420350300 | 183 | 607 | 8 | 798 | 22.9% | 76.1% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct 0350420350350 | 208 | 570 | 6 | 784 | 26.5% | 72.7% | R+46.2 |
| Precinct 0250420350250 | 204 | 545 | 9 | 758 | 26.9% | 71.9% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct 0120420350120 | 232 | 488 | 5 | 725 | 32.0% | 67.3% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct 0200420350200 | 352 | 342 | 5 | 699 | 50.4% | 48.9% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct 0140420350140 | 111 | 524 | 4 | 639 | 17.4% | 82.0% | R+64.6 |
| Precinct 0060420350060 | 198 | 430 | 2 | 630 | 31.4% | 68.3% | R+36.8 |
| Precinct 0100420350100 | 142 | 449 | 4 | 595 | 23.9% | 75.5% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct 0040420350040 | 133 | 452 | 5 | 590 | 22.5% | 76.6% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct 0070420350070 | 131 | 397 | 3 | 531 | 24.7% | 74.8% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct 0220420350220 | 178 | 320 | 7 | 505 | 35.2% | 63.4% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct 0090420350090 | 75 | 386 | 4 | 465 | 16.1% | 83.0% | R+66.9 |
| Precinct 0180420350180 | 192 | 258 | 8 | 458 | 41.9% | 56.3% | R+14.4 |
| Precinct 0050420350050 | 104 | 318 | 4 | 426 | 24.4% | 74.6% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct 0315420350315 | 132 | 281 | 7 | 420 | 31.4% | 66.9% | R+35.5 |
| Precinct 0230420350230 | 96 | 238 | 5 | 339 | 28.3% | 70.2% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct 0130420350130 | 52 | 224 | 1 | 277 | 18.8% | 80.9% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct 0190420350190 | 91 | 135 | 4 | 230 | 39.6% | 58.7% | R+19.1 |
| Precinct 0240420350240 | 78 | 143 | 3 | 224 | 34.8% | 63.8% | R+29.0 |
| Precinct 0265420350265 | 43 | 156 | 1 | 200 | 21.5% | 78.0% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct 0340420350340 | 68 | 108 | 2 | 178 | 38.2% | 60.7% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct 0010420350010 | 50 | 96 | 1 | 147 | 34.0% | 65.3% | R+31.3 |
| Precinct 0080420350080 | 25 | 87 | 1 | 113 | 22.1% | 77.0% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct 0170420350170 | 20 | 90 | 3 | 113 | 17.7% | 79.6% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct 0150420350150 | 7 | 27 | 0 | 34 | 20.6% | 79.4% | R+58.8 |
| Precinct 0360420350360 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct 0110420350110 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| ALLISON TWP Voting District42_4203510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| AVIS Voting District42_4203520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BALD EAGLE TWP Voting District42_4203530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BEECH CREEK BOROUGH Voting District42_4203550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BEECH CREEK TWP Voting District42_4203540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CASTANEA TWP Voting District42_4203560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CHAPMAN TWP Voting District42_4203570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| COLEBROOK TWP Voting District42_4203580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CRAWFORD TWP Voting District42_4203590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| DUNNSTABLE TWP Voting District42_42035100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| EAST KEATING TWP Voting District42_42035110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FLEMINGTON BOROUGH Voting District42_42035120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GALLAGHER TWP Voting District42_42035130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREENE TWP Voting District42_42035140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GRUGAN TWP Voting District42_42035150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LAMAR TWP Voting District42_42035160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LEIDY TWP Voting District42_42035170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOCK HAVEN WD 0142_42035180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOCK HAVEN WD 0242_42035190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOCK HAVEN WD 0342_42035200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOCK HAVEN WD 0442_42035210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOCK HAVEN WD 0542_42035220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOGAN TWP Voting District42_42035230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LOGANTON BOROUGH Voting District42_42035240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILL HALL BOROUGH Voting District42_42035250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOYES TWP Voting District42_42035260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PINE CREEK TWP VTD 0142_42035280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PINE CREEK TWP VTD 0242_42035290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PORTER TWP Voting District42_42035300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RENOVO BOROUGH Voting District42_42035310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SOUTH RENOVO BOROUGH Voting District42_42035340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WAYNE TWP Voting District42_42035350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WEST KEATING TWP Voting District42_42035360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WOODWARD TWP Voting District42_42035370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +8.6% |
| 1896 | −6.4% |
| 1900 | −4.5% |
| 1904 | −27.7% |
| 1908 | −14.6% |
| 1912 | +16.3% |
| 1916 | +2.8% |
| 1920 | −16.8% |
| 1924 | −34.0% |
| 1928 | −47.8% |
| 1932 | −12.5% |
| 1936 | +12.5% |
| 1940 | +8.2% |
| 1944 | −1.8% |
| 1948 | −5.7% |
| 1952 | −17.0% |
| 1956 | −20.8% |
| 1960 | −21.2% |
| 1964 | +39.9% |
| 1968 | −1.9% |
| 1972 | −26.2% |
| 1976 | +5.4% |
| 1980 | −12.0% |
| 1984 | −19.1% |
| 1988 | +0.2% |
| 1992 | +7.4% |
| 1996 | +11.9% |
| 2000 | −4.5% |
| 2004 | −15.8% |
| 2008 | −2.8% |
| 2012 | −11.8% |
| 2016 | −34.0% |
| 2020 | −36.3% |
| 2024 | −40.9% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 8.8 points more Democratic.
22,514 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+127 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −110 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,278 in average income, against $65,840 for residents who stayed — 22% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+24.4 on average — 16 points more Democratic-leaning than Clinton County, PA itself (R+40.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lycoming County, PA181R+41.5
- Centre County, PA113D+2.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lycoming County, PA219
- Centre County, PA134
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +195 |
| 2012 | +184 |
| 2013 | +29 |
| 2014 | −376 |
| 2015 | −151 |
| 2016 | −417 |
| 2017 | −156 |
| 2018 | −160 |
| 2019 | −41 |
| 2021 | +754 |
| 2022 | −119 |
| 2023 | −19 |
| 2024 | +40 |
| 2025 | +127 |
Clinton County's population of under 40,000 is concentrated along the West Branch Susquehanna River, and its presidential margins have swung from competitive to R+40.9 over the past two decades—one of the steeper realignment arcs in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 39.9 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 47.8 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 40.9 points.
A population of 37,798, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,816 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Vermillion County and Montgomery County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Clinton County, Pennsylvania. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/42035/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.