Crawford County, Pennsylvania
Precinct data
Results by precinct
128 precincts · 42,872 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 0630420390630 | 622 | 1,186 | 13 | 1,821 | 34.2% | 65.1% | R+31.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 0370420390370 | 537 | 1,264 | 9 | 1,810 | 29.7% | 69.8% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct 0180420390180 | 397 | 1,250 | 11 | 1,658 | 23.9% | 75.4% | R+51.4 |
| Precinct 0660420390660 | 317 | 1,101 | 10 | 1,428 | 22.2% | 77.1% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct 0608420390608 | 353 | 901 | 11 | 1,265 | 27.9% | 71.2% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct 0240420390240 | 597 | 603 | 11 | 1,211 | 49.3% | 49.8% | R+0.5 |
| Precinct 0390420390390 | 364 | 817 | 6 | 1,187 | 30.7% | 68.8% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct 0602420390602 | 403 | 757 | 7 | 1,167 | 34.5% | 64.9% | R+30.3 |
| Precinct 0640420390640 | 414 | 734 | 10 | 1,158 | 35.8% | 63.4% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct 0460420390460 | 281 | 808 | 7 | 1,096 | 25.6% | 73.7% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct 0220420390220 | 533 | 532 | 10 | 1,075 | 49.6% | 49.5% | D+0.1 |
| Precinct 0310420390310 | 191 | 782 | 9 | 982 | 19.5% | 79.6% | R+60.2 |
| Precinct 0030420390030 | 248 | 719 | 10 | 977 | 25.4% | 73.6% | R+48.2 |
| Precinct 0250420390250 | 535 | 392 | 11 | 938 | 57.0% | 41.8% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct 0210420390210 | 493 | 401 | 7 | 901 | 54.7% | 44.5% | D+10.2 |
| Precinct 0510420390510 | 288 | 578 | 4 | 870 | 33.1% | 66.4% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct 0330420390330 | 190 | 671 | 8 | 869 | 21.9% | 77.2% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct 0120420390120 | 224 | 625 | 8 | 857 | 26.1% | 72.9% | R+46.8 |
| Precinct 0300420390300 | 265 | 579 | 5 | 849 | 31.2% | 68.2% | R+37.0 |
| Precinct 0610420390610 | 150 | 692 | 5 | 847 | 17.7% | 81.7% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct 0050420390050 | 276 | 548 | 11 | 835 | 33.1% | 65.6% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct 0340420390340 | 172 | 584 | 6 | 762 | 22.6% | 76.6% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct 0230420390230 | 361 | 381 | 5 | 747 | 48.3% | 51.0% | R+2.7 |
| Precinct 0060420390060 | 273 | 466 | 5 | 744 | 36.7% | 62.6% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct 0170420390170 | 125 | 606 | 8 | 739 | 16.9% | 82.0% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct 0470420390470 | 246 | 491 | 1 | 738 | 33.3% | 66.5% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct 0590420390590 | 224 | 511 | 2 | 737 | 30.4% | 69.3% | R+38.9 |
| Precinct 0490420390490 | 263 | 462 | 6 | 731 | 36.0% | 63.2% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct 0150420390150 | 180 | 550 | 0 | 730 | 24.7% | 75.3% | R+50.7 |
| Precinct 0420420390420 | 188 | 491 | 7 | 686 | 27.4% | 71.6% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct 0090420390090 | 171 | 504 | 6 | 681 | 25.1% | 74.0% | R+48.9 |
| Precinct 0350420390350 | 190 | 465 | 6 | 661 | 28.7% | 70.3% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct 0080420390080 | 195 | 440 | 7 | 642 | 30.4% | 68.5% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct 0260420390260 | 315 | 303 | 5 | 623 | 50.6% | 48.6% | D+1.9 |
| Precinct 0160420390160 | 84 | 507 | 0 | 591 | 14.2% | 85.8% | R+71.6 |
| Precinct 0550420390550 | 114 | 465 | 2 | 581 | 19.6% | 80.0% | R+60.4 |
| Precinct 0570420390570 | 160 | 414 | 3 | 577 | 27.7% | 71.8% | R+44.0 |
| Precinct 0450420390450 | 127 | 428 | 12 | 567 | 22.4% | 75.5% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct 0360420390360 | 76 | 456 | 3 | 535 | 14.2% | 85.2% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct 0400420390400 | 113 | 412 | 6 | 531 | 21.3% | 77.6% | R+56.3 |
| Precinct 0140420390140 | 113 | 399 | 8 | 520 | 21.7% | 76.7% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct 0200420390200 | 155 | 357 | 6 | 518 | 29.9% | 68.9% | R+39.0 |
| Precinct 0560420390560 | 135 | 358 | 5 | 498 | 27.1% | 71.9% | R+44.8 |
| Precinct 0130420390130 | 97 | 389 | 1 | 487 | 19.9% | 79.9% | R+60.0 |
| Precinct 0380420390380 | 116 | 311 | 4 | 431 | 26.9% | 72.2% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct 0440420390440 | 102 | 311 | 1 | 414 | 24.6% | 75.1% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct 0010420390010 | 38 | 339 | 3 | 380 | 10.0% | 89.2% | R+79.2 |
| Precinct 0100420390100 | 112 | 262 | 1 | 375 | 29.9% | 69.9% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct 0110420390110 | 119 | 247 | 4 | 370 | 32.2% | 66.8% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct 0020420390020 | 84 | 256 | 2 | 342 | 24.6% | 74.9% | R+50.3 |
| Precinct 0620420390620 | 51 | 246 | 2 | 299 | 17.1% | 82.3% | R+65.2 |
| Precinct 0190420390190 | 85 | 205 | 6 | 296 | 28.7% | 69.3% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct 0320420390320 | 84 | 179 | 1 | 264 | 31.8% | 67.8% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct 0650420390650 | 62 | 171 | 1 | 234 | 26.5% | 73.1% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct 0040420390040 | 39 | 170 | 3 | 212 | 18.4% | 80.2% | R+61.8 |
| Precinct 0430420390430 | 65 | 121 | 2 | 188 | 34.6% | 64.4% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct 0410420390410 | 37 | 128 | 3 | 168 | 22.0% | 76.2% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct 0540420390540 | 24 | 142 | 0 | 166 | 14.5% | 85.5% | R+71.1 |
| Precinct 0580420390580 | 51 | 70 | 2 | 123 | 41.5% | 56.9% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct 0070420390070 | 23 | 88 | 0 | 111 | 20.7% | 79.3% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct 0670420390670 | 11 | 60 | 1 | 72 | 15.3% | 83.3% | R+68.1 |
| ATHENS TWP Voting District42_4203910 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BEAVER TWP Voting District42_4203920 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMFIELD TWP Voting District42_4203930 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BLOOMING VALLEY Voting District42_4203940 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CAMBRIDGE SPRINGS Voting District42_4203960 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CAMBRIDGE TWP Voting District42_4203950 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CENTERVILLE Voting District42_4203970 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| COCHRANTON Voting District42_4203980 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONNEAUT LAKE Voting District42_42039100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONNEAUT TWP Voting District42_4203990 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONNEAUTVILLE Voting District42_42039110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CUSSEWAGO TWP Voting District42_42039120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| EAST FAIRFIELD TWP Voting District42_42039130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| EAST FALLOWFIELD TWP Voting District42_42039140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| EAST MEAD TWP Voting District42_42039150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FAIRFIELD TWP Voting District42_42039160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GREENWOOD TWP Voting District42_42039170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HAYFIELD TWP Voting District42_42039180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HYDETOWN Voting District42_42039190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LINESVILLE Voting District42_42039200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 01 PCT 0142_42039210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 01 PCT 0242_42039220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 02 PCT 0142_42039230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 02 PCT 0242_42039240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 02 PCT 0342_42039250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 03 PCT 0142_42039260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 03 PCT 0242_42039270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 0442_42039280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEADVILLE WD 0542_42039290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NORTH SHENANGO TWP Voting District42_42039300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| OIL CREEK TWP Voting District42_42039310 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PINE TWP Voting District42_42039320 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RANDOLPH TWP Voting District42_42039330 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHMOND TWP Voting District42_42039340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ROCKDALE TWP Voting District42_42039350 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ROME TWP Voting District42_42039360 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SADSBURY TWP Voting District42_42039370 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SAEGERTOWN Voting District42_42039380 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SOUTH SHENANGO TWP Voting District42_42039390 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPARTA TWP Voting District42_42039400 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPARTANSBURG Voting District42_42039410 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPRING TWP Voting District42_42039420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPRINGBORO Voting District42_42039430 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| STEUBEN TWP Voting District42_42039440 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SUMMERHILL TWP Voting District42_42039450 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SUMMIT TWP Voting District42_42039460 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TITUSVILLE WD 01 PCT 0142_42039470 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TITUSVILLE WD 01 PCT 0242_42039480 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TITUSVILLE WD 02 PCT 0142_42039490 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TITUSVILLE WD 02 PCT 0242_42039500 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TITUSVILLE WD 0342_42039510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TITUSVILLE WD 0442_42039520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TITUSVILLE WD 0542_42039530 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWNVILLE Voting District42_42039540 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TROY TWP Voting District42_42039550 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION TWP Voting District42_42039560 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VENANGO TWP Voting District42_42039570 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VENANGO Voting District42_42039580 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VERNON TWP DIST 0142_42039590 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VERNON TWP DIST 0242_42039600 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WAYNE TWP Voting District42_42039610 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WEST FALLOWFIELD TWP Voting District42_42039620 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WEST MEAD TWP DIST 0142_42039630 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WEST MEAD TWP DIST 0242_42039640 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WEST SHENANGO TWP Voting District42_42039650 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WOODCOCK TWP Voting District42_42039660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WOODCOCK Voting District42_42039670 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −6.5% |
| 1896 | +3.2% |
| 1900 | −4.6% |
| 1904 | −30.2% |
| 1908 | −13.8% |
| 1912 | +11.6% |
| 1916 | +2.6% |
| 1920 | −36.4% |
| 1924 | −45.9% |
| 1928 | −43.2% |
| 1932 | −7.3% |
| 1936 | −5.9% |
| 1940 | −21.7% |
| 1944 | −24.4% |
| 1948 | −21.4% |
| 1952 | −31.6% |
| 1956 | −33.7% |
| 1960 | −21.7% |
| 1964 | +26.0% |
| 1968 | −12.9% |
| 1972 | −31.6% |
| 1976 | −1.9% |
| 1980 | −15.4% |
| 1984 | −22.3% |
| 1988 | −13.8% |
| 1992 | −3.8% |
| 1996 | −5.5% |
| 2000 | −16.8% |
| 2004 | −15.5% |
| 2008 | −10.4% |
| 2012 | −19.7% |
| 2016 | −37.1% |
| 2020 | −37.2% |
| 2024 | −39.2% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 6.4 points more Democratic.
53,152 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+23 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −4,337 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $49,258 in average income, against $63,830 for residents who stayed — 23% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+13.5 on average — 26 points more Democratic-leaning than Crawford County, PA itself (R+39.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Erie County, PA340R+1.0
- Mercer County, PA134R+30.2
- Venango County, PA128R+42.1
- Allegheny County, PA94D+20.3
- Ashtabula County, OH29R+28.4
- Butler County, PA28R+32.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Erie County, PA337
- Mercer County, PA159
- Venango County, PA128
- Allegheny County, PA83
- Warren County, PA28
- Butler County, PA25
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −325 |
| 2012 | −468 |
| 2013 | −172 |
| 2014 | −267 |
| 2015 | −555 |
| 2016 | −197 |
| 2017 | −452 |
| 2018 | −668 |
| 2019 | −447 |
| 2021 | −278 |
| 2022 | −479 |
| 2023 | −163 |
| 2024 | +111 |
| 2025 | +23 |
Crawford County's R+39.3 margin in 2024 reflects a broader rural realignment in Pennsylvania's northwest corner, where manufacturing decline and an aging population have steadily shifted a once-competitive county toward lopsided results.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 26.0 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 45.9 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 39.2 points.
A population of 82,716, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $60,476 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Venango County and Clearfield County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Crawford County, Pennsylvania. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/42039/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.