Elk County, Pennsylvania
Precinct data
Results by precinct
61 precincts · 16,433 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 0230420470230 | 228 | 928 | 3 | 1,159 | 19.7% | 80.1% | R+60.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 0385420470385 | 268 | 883 | 4 | 1,155 | 23.2% | 76.5% | R+53.2 |
| Precinct 0070420470070 | 296 | 817 | 12 | 1,125 | 26.3% | 72.6% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct 0242420470242 | 287 | 771 | 7 | 1,065 | 26.9% | 72.4% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct 0080420470080 | 277 | 767 | 6 | 1,050 | 26.4% | 73.0% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct 0335420470335 | 199 | 740 | 12 | 951 | 20.9% | 77.8% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct 0200420470200 | 182 | 678 | 3 | 863 | 21.1% | 78.6% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct 0365420470365 | 200 | 645 | 5 | 850 | 23.5% | 75.9% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct 0315420470315 | 205 | 600 | 6 | 811 | 25.3% | 74.0% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct 0355420470355 | 160 | 637 | 3 | 800 | 20.0% | 79.6% | R+59.6 |
| Precinct 0250420470250 | 269 | 493 | 7 | 769 | 35.0% | 64.1% | R+29.1 |
| Precinct 0110420470110 | 150 | 612 | 5 | 767 | 19.6% | 79.8% | R+60.2 |
| Precinct 0395420470395 | 212 | 509 | 9 | 730 | 29.0% | 69.7% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct 0375420470375 | 213 | 477 | 5 | 695 | 30.6% | 68.6% | R+38.0 |
| Precinct 0325420470325 | 181 | 430 | 3 | 614 | 29.5% | 70.0% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct 0262420470262 | 157 | 328 | 5 | 490 | 32.0% | 66.9% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct 0345420470345 | 154 | 288 | 4 | 446 | 34.5% | 64.6% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct 0140420470140 | 107 | 274 | 5 | 386 | 27.7% | 71.0% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct 0220420470220 | 81 | 208 | 4 | 293 | 27.6% | 71.0% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct 0160420470160 | 81 | 171 | 6 | 258 | 31.4% | 66.3% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct 0150420470150 | 68 | 178 | 1 | 247 | 27.5% | 72.1% | R+44.5 |
| Precinct 0170420470170 | 66 | 158 | 3 | 227 | 29.1% | 69.6% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct 0010420470010 | 35 | 130 | 0 | 165 | 21.2% | 78.8% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct 0100420470100 | 32 | 98 | 1 | 131 | 24.4% | 74.8% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct 0295420470295 | 35 | 94 | 1 | 130 | 26.9% | 72.3% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct 0090420470090 | 28 | 85 | 2 | 115 | 24.3% | 73.9% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct 0210420470210 | 25 | 47 | 0 | 72 | 34.7% | 65.3% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct 0190420470190 | 12 | 56 | 1 | 69 | 17.4% | 81.2% | R+63.8 |
| BENEZETT TWP Voting District42_4204710 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FOX TWP DIST 0142_4204770 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FOX TWP DIST 0242_4204780 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HIGHLAND TWP VTD HIGHLAND42_4204790 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HIGHLAND TWP VTD JAMES CITY42_42047100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HORTON TWP Voting District42_42047110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JAY TWP VTD CALEDONIA42_42047120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JAY TWP VTD WEEDVILLE42_42047130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JOHNSONBURG DIST 0142_42047140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JOHNSONBURG DIST 0242_42047150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JOHNSONBURG DIST 0342_42047160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JOHNSONBURG DIST 0442_42047170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JONES TWP VTD LAMONT42_42047190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JONES TWP VTD WILCOX42_42047200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLSTONE TWP Voting District42_42047210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Precinct 0122420470122 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RIDGWAY TWP VTD NORTH42_42047220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RIDGWAY TWP VTD SOUTH42_42047230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RIDGWAY WD 0142_42047240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RIDGWAY WD 0242_42047250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RIDGWAY WD 0342_42047260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RIDGWAY WD 0442_42047270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RIDGWAY WD 0542_42047280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SPRING CREEK TWP Voting District42_42047290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0142_42047315 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0242_42047325 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0342_42047335 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0442_42047345 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0542_42047355 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0642_42047365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0742_42047375 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0842_42047385 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| ST. MARYS WD 0942_42047395 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +18.6% |
| 1896 | −1.6% |
| 1900 | −2.3% |
| 1904 | −13.9% |
| 1908 | −7.9% |
| 1912 | +25.3% |
| 1916 | −11.9% |
| 1920 | −39.9% |
| 1924 | −56.2% |
| 1928 | +19.0% |
| 1932 | +5.3% |
| 1936 | +22.7% |
| 1940 | −0.2% |
| 1944 | +3.8% |
| 1948 | +2.0% |
| 1952 | −8.8% |
| 1956 | −23.8% |
| 1960 | +8.0% |
| 1964 | +41.1% |
| 1968 | +4.9% |
| 1972 | −24.7% |
| 1976 | +4.2% |
| 1980 | −9.3% |
| 1984 | −21.3% |
| 1988 | −6.7% |
| 1992 | +0.8% |
| 1996 | +6.6% |
| 2000 | −11.7% |
| 2004 | −8.7% |
| 2008 | +4.3% |
| 2012 | −15.9% |
| 2016 | −42.4% |
| 2020 | −45.1% |
| 2024 | −47.0% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 16 points more Democratic.
20,462 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−1 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −1,345 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $52,890 in average income, against $70,663 for residents who stayed — 25% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+52.8 on average — 5.8 points more Republican-leaning than Elk County, PA itself (R+47.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Jefferson County, PA41R+58.5
- Clearfield County, PA28R+51.5
- McKean County, PA26R+47.2
- Cameron County, PA22R+50.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Clearfield County, PA53
- Jefferson County, PA40
- McKean County, PA35
- Allegheny County, PA29
- Erie County, PA22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +25 |
| 2012 | −98 |
| 2013 | −101 |
| 2014 | −223 |
| 2015 | −177 |
| 2016 | −287 |
| 2017 | −147 |
| 2018 | −50 |
| 2019 | −109 |
| 2021 | +6 |
| 2022 | −108 |
| 2023 | −84 |
| 2024 | +9 |
| 2025 | −1 |
Elk County's heavily forested terrain and legacy timber and manufacturing economy underpin a voter profile that broke roughly 73–26 for the Republican presidential nominee in 2024, among the widest margins in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 41.1 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 56.2 points in 1924. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 47.0 points.
A population of 30,506, a 95% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,380 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Cambria County and Putnam County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Elk County, Pennsylvania. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/42047/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.