Wyoming County, Pennsylvania
Precinct data
Results by precinct
58 precincts · 15,052 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct 0230421310230 | 576 | 1,029 | 13 | 1,618 | 35.6% | 63.6% | R+28.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct 0075421310075 | 375 | 695 | 12 | 1,082 | 34.7% | 64.2% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct 0220421310220 | 382 | 575 | 8 | 965 | 39.6% | 59.6% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct 0150421310150 | 232 | 716 | 10 | 958 | 24.2% | 74.7% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct 0200421310200 | 259 | 629 | 8 | 896 | 28.9% | 70.2% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct 0030421310030 | 282 | 600 | 10 | 892 | 31.6% | 67.3% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct 0020421310020 | 323 | 487 | 6 | 816 | 39.6% | 59.7% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct 0290421310290 | 198 | 538 | 10 | 746 | 26.5% | 72.1% | R+45.6 |
| Precinct 0240421310240 | 233 | 487 | 7 | 727 | 32.0% | 67.0% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct 0160421310160 | 206 | 516 | 4 | 726 | 28.4% | 71.1% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct 0110421310110 | 203 | 518 | 3 | 724 | 28.0% | 71.5% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct 0120421310120 | 102 | 369 | 5 | 476 | 21.4% | 77.5% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct 0210421310210 | 99 | 363 | 2 | 464 | 21.3% | 78.2% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct 0130421310130 | 79 | 377 | 6 | 462 | 17.1% | 81.6% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct 0300421310300 | 89 | 312 | 6 | 407 | 21.9% | 76.7% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct 0040421310040 | 121 | 281 | 3 | 405 | 29.9% | 69.4% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct 0175421310175 | 139 | 233 | 10 | 382 | 36.4% | 61.0% | R+24.6 |
| Precinct 0260421310260 | 147 | 189 | 6 | 342 | 43.0% | 55.3% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct 0010421310010 | 55 | 190 | 0 | 245 | 22.4% | 77.6% | R+55.1 |
| Precinct 0280421310280 | 109 | 134 | 2 | 245 | 44.5% | 54.7% | R+10.2 |
| Precinct 0050421310050 | 122 | 118 | 4 | 244 | 50.0% | 48.4% | D+1.6 |
| Precinct 0060421310060 | 86 | 115 | 3 | 204 | 42.2% | 56.4% | R+14.2 |
| Precinct 0270421310270 | 75 | 121 | 2 | 198 | 37.9% | 61.1% | R+23.2 |
| Precinct 0090421310090 | 39 | 154 | 1 | 194 | 20.1% | 79.4% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct 0250421310250 | 50 | 126 | 4 | 180 | 27.8% | 70.0% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct 0100421310100 | 28 | 131 | 1 | 160 | 17.5% | 81.9% | R+64.4 |
| Precinct 0140421310140 | 38 | 111 | 1 | 150 | 25.3% | 74.0% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct 0190421310190 | 33 | 108 | 3 | 144 | 22.9% | 75.0% | R+52.1 |
| BRAINTRIM TWP Voting District42_4213110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CLINTON TWP Voting District42_4213120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| EATON TWP Voting District42_4213130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| EXETER TWP Voting District42_4213140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FACTORYVILLE WD 0142_4213150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FACTORYVILLE WD 0242_4213160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FALLS TWP WD 0142_4213170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FALLS TWP WD 0242_4213180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FORKSTON TWP Voting District42_4213190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LACEYVILLE Voting District42_42131100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| LEMON TWP Voting District42_42131110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MEHOOPANY TWP Voting District42_42131120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MESHOPPEN TWP Voting District42_42131130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MESHOPPEN Voting District42_42131140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE TWP Voting District42_42131150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NICHOLSON TWP Voting District42_42131160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NICHOLSON WD 0142_42131170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NICHOLSON WD 0242_42131180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NORTH BRANCH TWP Voting District42_42131190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NORTHMORELAND TWP Voting District42_42131200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NOXEN TWP Voting District42_42131210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| OVERFIELD TWP Voting District42_42131220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TUNKHANNOCK TWP DIST 0142_42131230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TUNKHANNOCK TWP DIST 0242_42131240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TUNKHANNOCK WD 0142_42131250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TUNKHANNOCK WD 0242_42131260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TUNKHANNOCK WD 0342_42131270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TUNKHANNOCK WD 0442_42131280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WASHINGTON TWP Voting District42_42131290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WINDHAM TWP Voting District42_42131300 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −3.0% |
| 1896 | −9.5% |
| 1900 | −8.7% |
| 1904 | −18.1% |
| 1908 | −15.1% |
| 1912 | +29.0% |
| 1916 | −7.8% |
| 1920 | −41.8% |
| 1924 | −42.8% |
| 1928 | −70.5% |
| 1932 | −18.1% |
| 1936 | −23.6% |
| 1940 | −34.7% |
| 1944 | −39.5% |
| 1948 | −43.4% |
| 1952 | −51.9% |
| 1956 | −47.2% |
| 1960 | −38.8% |
| 1964 | +5.0% |
| 1968 | −35.0% |
| 1972 | −49.9% |
| 1976 | −22.0% |
| 1980 | −34.4% |
| 1984 | −48.2% |
| 1988 | −40.3% |
| 1992 | −18.3% |
| 1996 | −8.1% |
| 2000 | −21.9% |
| 2004 | −21.8% |
| 2008 | −7.6% |
| 2012 | −12.8% |
| 2016 | −37.9% |
| 2020 | −35.2% |
| 2024 | −36.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration and the presidential vote track closely here — within 0.8 points.
18,487 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+11 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −991 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $61,090 in average income, against $85,799 for residents who stayed — 29% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+18.8 on average — 18 points more Democratic-leaning than Wyoming County, PA itself (R+36.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lackawanna County, PA158D+2.8
- Luzerne County, PA144R+19.2
- Susquehanna County, PA84R+44.7
- Bradford County, PA41R+47.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lackawanna County, PA128
- Luzerne County, PA96
- Susquehanna County, PA69
- Bradford County, PA43
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +24 |
| 2012 | +53 |
| 2013 | −241 |
| 2014 | +10 |
| 2015 | −338 |
| 2016 | −214 |
| 2017 | −97 |
| 2018 | −257 |
| 2019 | −234 |
| 2021 | +219 |
| 2022 | +90 |
| 2023 | −27 |
| 2024 | +10 |
| 2025 | +11 |
Wyoming County sits in Pennsylvania's Endless Mountains region, where a sparse, overwhelmingly white rural population has shifted the presidential margin from competitive to reliably Republican over the past three election cycles.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 29.0 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 70.5 points in 1928. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 36.8 points.
A population of 25,967, a 93% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,460 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Orleans County and Cattaraugus County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Wyoming County, Pennsylvania. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/42131/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.