Florence County, South Carolina
Precinct data
Results by precinct
63 precincts · 61,140 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Savannah GroveSavannah Grove | 1,564 | 1,327 | 34 | 2,925 | 53.5% | 45.4% | D+8.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Ebenezer 1Ebenezer 1 | 947 | 1,799 | 36 | 2,782 | 34.0% | 64.7% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -West Florence 1West Florence 1 | 1,064 | 1,497 | 39 | 2,600 | 40.9% | 57.6% | R+16.7 |
| Precinct -Ebenezer 2Ebenezer 2 | 1,080 | 1,294 | 33 | 2,407 | 44.9% | 53.8% | R+8.9 |
| Precinct -Coles CrossroadsColes Crossroads | 933 | 1,011 | 23 | 1,967 | 47.4% | 51.4% | R+4.0 |
| Precinct -South Florence 1South Florence 1 | 856 | 1,014 | 28 | 1,898 | 45.1% | 53.4% | R+8.3 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 12Florence Ward 12 | 576 | 1,097 | 28 | 1,701 | 33.9% | 64.5% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 14Florence Ward 14 | 619 | 961 | 32 | 1,612 | 38.4% | 59.6% | R+21.2 |
| Precinct -Mars Bluff No. 1Mars Bluff No. 1 | 715 | 847 | 19 | 1,581 | 45.2% | 53.6% | R+8.3 |
| Precinct -ClaussenClaussen | 537 | 1,027 | 15 | 1,579 | 34.0% | 65.0% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -GreenwoodGreenwood | 752 | 781 | 26 | 1,559 | 48.2% | 50.1% | R+1.9 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 8Florence Ward 8 | 441 | 995 | 19 | 1,455 | 30.3% | 68.4% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -Delmae 2Delmae 2 | 374 | 1,032 | 16 | 1,422 | 26.3% | 72.6% | R+46.3 |
| Precinct -JohnsonvilleJohnsonville | 352 | 1,048 | 17 | 1,417 | 24.8% | 74.0% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -Delmae 1Delmae 1 | 708 | 641 | 26 | 1,375 | 51.5% | 46.6% | D+4.9 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 7Florence Ward 7 | 507 | 793 | 23 | 1,323 | 38.3% | 59.9% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -Ebenezer 3Ebenezer 3 | 464 | 820 | 15 | 1,299 | 35.7% | 63.1% | R+27.4 |
| Precinct -Tans BayTans Bay | 560 | 695 | 23 | 1,278 | 43.8% | 54.4% | R+10.6 |
| Precinct -Elim-GlenwoodElim-Glenwood | 304 | 934 | 6 | 1,244 | 24.4% | 75.1% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -West Florence 2West Florence 2 | 373 | 762 | 12 | 1,147 | 32.5% | 66.4% | R+33.9 |
| Precinct -GilbertGilbert | 920 | 206 | 15 | 1,141 | 80.6% | 18.1% | D+62.6 |
| Precinct -South Florence 2South Florence 2 | 872 | 245 | 23 | 1,140 | 76.5% | 21.5% | D+55.0 |
| Precinct -Mars Bluff No. 2Mars Bluff No. 2 | 376 | 678 | 12 | 1,066 | 35.3% | 63.6% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -Lake City No. 3Lake City No. 3 | 564 | 406 | 11 | 981 | 57.5% | 41.4% | D+16.1 |
| Precinct -OlantaOlanta | 333 | 584 | 11 | 928 | 35.9% | 62.9% | R+27.0 |
| Precinct -Lake City No. 4Lake City No. 4 | 847 | 67 | 12 | 926 | 91.5% | 7.2% | D+84.2 |
| Precinct -Timmonsville 2Timmonsville 2 | 449 | 466 | 11 | 926 | 48.5% | 50.3% | R+1.8 |
| Precinct -Timmonsville 1Timmonsville 1 | 629 | 177 | 14 | 820 | 76.7% | 21.6% | D+55.1 |
| Precinct -Pamplico No. 1Pamplico No. 1 | 202 | 608 | 7 | 817 | 24.7% | 74.4% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -Lake City No. 2Lake City No. 2 | 294 | 511 | 6 | 811 | 36.3% | 63.0% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -Oak Grove-SardisOak Grove-Sardis | 129 | 674 | 6 | 809 | 15.9% | 83.3% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -Lake City No. 1Lake City No. 1 | 601 | 177 | 10 | 788 | 76.3% | 22.5% | D+53.8 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 9Florence Ward 9 | 736 | 30 | 12 | 778 | 94.6% | 3.9% | D+90.7 |
| Precinct -SpauldingSpaulding | 720 | 39 | 5 | 764 | 94.2% | 5.1% | D+89.1 |
| Precinct -EvergreenEvergreen | 191 | 539 | 8 | 738 | 25.9% | 73.0% | R+47.2 |
| Precinct -Kingsburg-StoneKingsburg-Stone | 317 | 345 | 5 | 667 | 47.5% | 51.7% | R+4.2 |
| Precinct -Coward 2Coward 2 | 154 | 508 | 3 | 665 | 23.2% | 76.4% | R+53.2 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 1Florence Ward 1 | 600 | 35 | 11 | 646 | 92.9% | 5.4% | D+87.5 |
| Precinct -QuinbyQuinby | 439 | 161 | 14 | 614 | 71.5% | 26.2% | D+45.3 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 5Florence Ward 5 | 367 | 209 | 16 | 592 | 62.0% | 35.3% | D+26.7 |
| Precinct -Coward 1Coward 1 | 155 | 423 | 5 | 583 | 26.6% | 72.6% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 3Florence Ward 3 | 542 | 25 | 15 | 582 | 93.1% | 4.3% | D+88.8 |
| Precinct -EffinghamEffingham | 124 | 439 | 11 | 574 | 21.6% | 76.5% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 11Florence Ward 11 | 277 | 279 | 7 | 563 | 49.2% | 49.6% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 6Florence Ward 6 | 195 | 355 | 11 | 561 | 34.8% | 63.3% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -ScrantonScranton | 204 | 318 | 5 | 527 | 38.7% | 60.3% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 2Florence Ward 2 | 444 | 53 | 14 | 511 | 86.9% | 10.4% | D+76.5 |
| Precinct -CartersvilleCartersville | 201 | 299 | 4 | 504 | 39.9% | 59.3% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -HannahHannah | 57 | 429 | 5 | 491 | 11.6% | 87.4% | R+75.8 |
| Precinct -McAllister MillMcAllister Mill | 136 | 341 | 1 | 478 | 28.5% | 71.3% | R+42.9 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 4Florence Ward 4 | 243 | 179 | 5 | 427 | 56.9% | 41.9% | D+15.0 |
| Precinct -VoxVox | 77 | 336 | 5 | 418 | 18.4% | 80.4% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -BrookgreenBrookgreen | 308 | 94 | 6 | 408 | 75.5% | 23.0% | D+52.5 |
| Precinct -FriendfieldFriendfield | 50 | 357 | 1 | 408 | 12.3% | 87.5% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -Mill BranchMill Branch | 225 | 171 | 7 | 403 | 55.8% | 42.4% | D+13.4 |
| Precinct -SalemSalem | 33 | 346 | 1 | 380 | 8.7% | 91.1% | R+82.4 |
| Precinct -Pamplico No. 2Pamplico No. 2 | 210 | 154 | 11 | 375 | 56.0% | 41.1% | D+14.9 |
| Precinct -High HillHigh Hill | 79 | 269 | 2 | 350 | 22.6% | 76.9% | R+54.3 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 10Florence Ward 10 | 310 | 17 | 5 | 332 | 93.4% | 5.1% | D+88.3 |
| Precinct -Back SwampBack Swamp | 100 | 226 | 4 | 330 | 30.3% | 68.5% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -ProspectProspect | 19 | 252 | 3 | 274 | 6.9% | 92.0% | R+85.0 |
| Precinct -LeoLeo | 86 | 157 | 3 | 246 | 35.0% | 63.8% | R+28.9 |
| Precinct -Florence Ward 15Florence Ward 15 | 165 | 56 | 6 | 227 | 72.7% | 24.7% | D+48.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +69.2% |
| 1896 | +82.0% |
| 1900 | +89.1% |
| 1904 | +95.7% |
| 1908 | +95.6% |
| 1912 | +95.1% |
| 1916 | +97.3% |
| 1920 | +91.4% |
| 1924 | +91.1% |
| 1928 | +89.5% |
| 1932 | +99.0% |
| 1936 | +99.4% |
| 1940 | +92.9% |
| 1944 | +83.9% |
| 1948 | +19.5% |
| 1952 | +1.0% |
| 1956 | +16.5% |
| 1960 | +2.3% |
| 1964 | −18.2% |
| 1968 | −3.4% |
| 1972 | −31.2% |
| 1976 | +9.2% |
| 1980 | −2.0% |
| 1984 | −21.6% |
| 1988 | −21.6% |
| 1992 | −10.9% |
| 1996 | −7.4% |
| 2000 | −15.7% |
| 2004 | −12.6% |
| 2008 | −3.2% |
| 2012 | −0.6% |
| 2016 | −4.9% |
| 2020 | −2.3% |
| 2024 | −8.0% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 41.6%17,185 | 58.4%24,129 | 41,314 |
| 2020 | R | 49.1%31,748 | 49.9%32,217 | 64,615 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 88,135 |
| 2018 | 96,050 |
| 2020 | 102,547 |
| 2022 | 94,486 |
| 2024 | 95,751 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+178 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +582 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $52,400 in average income, against $73,057 for residents who stayed — 28% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+4.8 on average — 3.2 points more Democratic-leaning than Florence County, SC itself (R+8.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Darlington County, SC528R+13.3
- Williamsburg County, SC170D+21.7
- Horry County, SC145R+38.5
- Richland County, SC111D+34.6
- Marion County, SC108D+10.5
- Sumter County, SC75D+4.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Darlington County, SC501
- Richland County, SC163
- Horry County, SC143
- Williamsburg County, SC130
- Mecklenburg County, NC93
- Sumter County, SC86
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +135 |
| 2012 | −55 |
| 2013 | −10 |
| 2014 | +217 |
| 2015 | −418 |
| 2016 | −426 |
| 2017 | −243 |
| 2018 | −510 |
| 2019 | −142 |
| 2021 | +33 |
| 2022 | +726 |
| 2023 | +575 |
| 2024 | +522 |
| 2025 | +178 |
Florence anchors the Pee Dee region and functions as a regional service hub, producing presidential margins closer than most surrounding counties while reflecting South Carolina's broader shift toward Republican-leaning results over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 99.4 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 31.2 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.8 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 8.0 points.
A population of 137,117, a 49% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,305 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Bibb County and Nash County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Florence County, South Carolina. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/45041/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.