Brazos County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
95 precincts · 90,445 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 69Precinct 69 | 1,089 | 2,311 | 54 | 3,454 | 31.5% | 66.9% | R+35.4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 26Precinct 26 | 992 | 2,208 | 48 | 3,248 | 30.5% | 68.0% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 64Precinct 64 | 906 | 2,239 | 36 | 3,181 | 28.5% | 70.4% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 40Precinct 40 | 1,066 | 2,052 | 47 | 3,165 | 33.7% | 64.8% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 10Precinct 10 | 1,073 | 1,952 | 64 | 3,089 | 34.7% | 63.2% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 80Precinct 80 | 964 | 2,041 | 72 | 3,077 | 31.3% | 66.3% | R+35.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 12Precinct 12 | 1,152 | 1,867 | 56 | 3,075 | 37.5% | 60.7% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 35Precinct 35 | 1,307 | 1,681 | 43 | 3,031 | 43.1% | 55.5% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 36Precinct 36 | 1,138 | 1,679 | 39 | 2,856 | 39.8% | 58.8% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 27Precinct 27 | 555 | 2,218 | 41 | 2,814 | 19.7% | 78.8% | R+59.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 73Precinct 73 | 671 | 1,918 | 38 | 2,627 | 25.5% | 73.0% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 88Precinct 88 | 788 | 1,470 | 32 | 2,290 | 34.4% | 64.2% | R+29.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 63Precinct 63 | 619 | 1,593 | 25 | 2,237 | 27.7% | 71.2% | R+43.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 76Precinct 76 | 906 | 1,282 | 44 | 2,232 | 40.6% | 57.4% | R+16.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 31Precinct 31 | 934 | 1,194 | 41 | 2,169 | 43.1% | 55.0% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 20Precinct 20 | 1,191 | 870 | 46 | 2,107 | 56.5% | 41.3% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 17Precinct 17 | 956 | 940 | 34 | 1,930 | 49.5% | 48.7% | D+0.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 1Precinct 1 | 378 | 1,472 | 21 | 1,871 | 20.2% | 78.7% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 2Precinct 2 | 524 | 1,309 | 21 | 1,854 | 28.3% | 70.6% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 55Precinct 55 | 914 | 889 | 33 | 1,836 | 49.8% | 48.4% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 41Precinct 41 | 488 | 1,214 | 28 | 1,730 | 28.2% | 70.2% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 14Precinct 14 | 940 | 691 | 17 | 1,648 | 57.0% | 41.9% | D+15.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 15Precinct 15 | 583 | 1,014 | 24 | 1,621 | 36.0% | 62.6% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 75Precinct 75 | 721 | 856 | 24 | 1,601 | 45.0% | 53.5% | R+8.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 100Precinct 100 | 466 | 1,027 | 28 | 1,521 | 30.6% | 67.5% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 30Precinct 30 | 706 | 791 | 21 | 1,518 | 46.5% | 52.1% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 5Precinct 5 | 244 | 1,259 | 7 | 1,510 | 16.2% | 83.4% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 13Precinct 13 | 551 | 878 | 30 | 1,459 | 37.8% | 60.2% | R+22.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 24Precinct 24 | 621 | 762 | 16 | 1,399 | 44.4% | 54.5% | R+10.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 39Precinct 39 | 477 | 754 | 21 | 1,252 | 38.1% | 60.2% | R+22.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 34Precinct 34 | 606 | 585 | 27 | 1,218 | 49.8% | 48.0% | D+1.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 11Precinct 11 | 637 | 539 | 37 | 1,213 | 52.5% | 44.4% | D+8.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 8Precinct 8 | 517 | 538 | 31 | 1,086 | 47.6% | 49.5% | R+1.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 7Precinct 7 | 168 | 853 | 6 | 1,027 | 16.4% | 83.1% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 21Precinct 21 | 619 | 366 | 29 | 1,014 | 61.0% | 36.1% | D+25.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 28Precinct 28 | 223 | 731 | 12 | 966 | 23.1% | 75.7% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 6Precinct 6 | 139 | 775 | 7 | 921 | 15.1% | 84.1% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 9Precinct 9 | 315 | 534 | 12 | 861 | 36.6% | 62.0% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 33Precinct 33 | 457 | 366 | 14 | 837 | 54.6% | 43.7% | D+10.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 74Precinct 74 | 455 | 343 | 16 | 814 | 55.9% | 42.1% | D+13.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 4Precinct 4 | 587 | 204 | 7 | 798 | 73.6% | 25.6% | D+48.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 66Precinct 66 | 312 | 471 | 6 | 789 | 39.5% | 59.7% | R+20.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 62Precinct 62 | 337 | 363 | 15 | 715 | 47.1% | 50.8% | R+3.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 103Precinct 103 | 108 | 592 | 9 | 709 | 15.2% | 83.5% | R+68.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 58Precinct 58 | 296 | 392 | 8 | 696 | 42.5% | 56.3% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 3Precinct 3 | 227 | 457 | 9 | 693 | 32.8% | 65.9% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 29Precinct 29 | 201 | 432 | 9 | 642 | 31.3% | 67.3% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 16Precinct 16 | 363 | 254 | 6 | 623 | 58.3% | 40.8% | D+17.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 25Precinct 25 | 383 | 159 | 6 | 548 | 69.9% | 29.0% | D+40.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 54Precinct 54 | 106 | 431 | 7 | 544 | 19.5% | 79.2% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 32Precinct 32 | 192 | 255 | 8 | 455 | 42.2% | 56.0% | R+13.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 38Precinct 38 | 198 | 224 | 5 | 427 | 46.4% | 52.5% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 102Precinct 102 | 117 | 222 | 9 | 348 | 33.6% | 63.8% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 107Precinct 107 | 83 | 256 | 9 | 348 | 23.9% | 73.6% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 47Precinct 47 | 127 | 185 | 3 | 315 | 40.3% | 58.7% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 19Precinct 19 | 137 | 171 | 5 | 313 | 43.8% | 54.6% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 77Precinct 77 | 102 | 203 | 2 | 307 | 33.2% | 66.1% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 82Precinct 82 | 68 | 234 | 4 | 306 | 22.2% | 76.5% | R+54.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 43Precinct 43 | 117 | 182 | 5 | 304 | 38.5% | 59.9% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 46Precinct 46 | 112 | 173 | 2 | 287 | 39.0% | 60.3% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 18Precinct 18 | 198 | 74 | 3 | 275 | 72.0% | 26.9% | D+45.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 48Precinct 48 | 40 | 160 | 1 | 201 | 19.9% | 79.6% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 65Precinct 65 | 40 | 151 | 0 | 191 | 20.9% | 79.1% | R+58.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 22Precinct 22 | 81 | 94 | 1 | 176 | 46.0% | 53.4% | R+7.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 67Precinct 67 | 48 | 121 | 4 | 173 | 27.7% | 69.9% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 78Precinct 78 | 34 | 135 | 1 | 170 | 20.0% | 79.4% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 49Precinct 49 | 93 | 62 | 2 | 157 | 59.2% | 39.5% | D+19.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 106Precinct 106 | 92 | 61 | 2 | 155 | 59.4% | 39.4% | D+20.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 37Precinct 37 | 16 | 115 | 1 | 132 | 12.1% | 87.1% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 57Precinct 57 | 71 | 49 | 4 | 124 | 57.3% | 39.5% | D+17.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 56Precinct 56 | 33 | 89 | 0 | 122 | 27.0% | 73.0% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 44Precinct 44 | 24 | 95 | 0 | 119 | 20.2% | 79.8% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 45Precinct 45 | 27 | 82 | 1 | 110 | 24.5% | 74.5% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 71Precinct 71 | 25 | 82 | 3 | 110 | 22.7% | 74.5% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 53Precinct 53 | 46 | 59 | 2 | 107 | 43.0% | 55.1% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 72Precinct 72 | 50 | 53 | 2 | 105 | 47.6% | 50.5% | R+2.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 60Precinct 60 | 4 | 83 | 1 | 88 | 4.5% | 94.3% | R+89.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 23Precinct 23 | 8 | 67 | 1 | 76 | 10.5% | 88.2% | R+77.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 81Precinct 81 | 15 | 46 | 2 | 63 | 23.8% | 73.0% | R+49.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 79Precinct 79 | 27 | 32 | 1 | 60 | 45.0% | 53.3% | R+8.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 105Precinct 105 | 13 | 38 | 0 | 51 | 25.5% | 74.5% | R+49.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 61Precinct 61 | 13 | 37 | 1 | 51 | 25.5% | 72.5% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 59Precinct 59 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 23 | 13.0% | 87.0% | R+73.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 101Precinct 101 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 20 | 25.0% | 75.0% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 90Precinct 90 | 7 | 12 | 1 | 20 | 35.0% | 60.0% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 83Precinct 83 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 12 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 52Precinct 52 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 0.0% | 87.5% | R+87.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 89APrecinct 89A | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Even |
| Precinct -Precinct 91APrecinct 91A | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 85Precinct 85 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 50Precinct 50 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 84Precinct 84 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 91BPrecinct 91B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 98Precinct 98 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 96Precinct 96 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
Presidential margin, 1908–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1908 | +72.4% |
| 1912 | +64.5% |
| 1916 | +57.6% |
| 1920 | +46.2% |
| 1924 | +76.6% |
| 1928 | +33.4% |
| 1932 | +85.4% |
| 1936 | +96.5% |
| 1940 | +74.0% |
| 1944 | +66.1% |
| 1948 | +34.8% |
| 1952 | −5.3% |
| 1956 | −17.5% |
| 1960 | +12.9% |
| 1964 | +33.2% |
| 1968 | −3.5% |
| 1972 | −42.6% |
| 1976 | −18.9% |
| 1980 | −26.9% |
| 1984 | −47.4% |
| 1988 | −32.4% |
| 1992 | −18.5% |
| 1996 | −21.0% |
| 2000 | −43.7% |
| 2004 | −39.5% |
| 2008 | −28.9% |
| 2012 | −35.3% |
| 2016 | −23.2% |
| 2020 | −14.3% |
| 2024 | −24.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 106,821 |
| 2018 | 114,391 |
| 2020 | 122,137 |
| 2022 | 126,123 |
| 2024 | 133,384 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−2,322 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +6,340 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $62,973 in average income, against $91,247 for residents who stayed — 31% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+15.3 on average — 9.6 points more Democratic-leaning than Brazos County, TX itself (R+24.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Harris County, TX778D+5.5
- Montgomery County, TX263R+45.5
- Travis County, TX259D+39.3
- Bexar County, TX206D+9.7
- Burleson County, TX196R+62.8
- Williamson County, TX194R+2.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Harris County, TX958
- Travis County, TX412
- Dallas County, TX293
- Montgomery County, TX275
- Grimes County, TX261
- Tarrant County, TX232
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −1,130 |
| 2012 | −189 |
| 2013 | +871 |
| 2014 | +1,362 |
| 2015 | +3,771 |
| 2016 | +176 |
| 2017 | +1,018 |
| 2018 | −734 |
| 2019 | +931 |
| 2021 | +1,337 |
| 2022 | +2,137 |
| 2023 | +1,060 |
| 2024 | −1,948 |
| 2025 | −2,322 |
Home to Texas A&M University, Brazos County blends a large student and academic population with a conservative-leaning permanent electorate that has consistently returned Republican presidential margins above 20 points.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 96.5 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 47.4 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 10.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 24.8 points.
A population of 242,311, a 53% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $58,553 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lubbock County and McLennan County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Brazos County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48041/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.