Ector County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
41 precincts · 42,748 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 201Precinct 201 | 497 | 2,208 | 32 | 2,737 | 18.2% | 80.7% | R+62.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 110Precinct 110 | 545 | 2,140 | 20 | 2,705 | 20.1% | 79.1% | R+59.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 203Precinct 203 | 493 | 2,018 | 20 | 2,531 | 19.5% | 79.7% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 208Precinct 208 | 517 | 1,889 | 24 | 2,430 | 21.3% | 77.7% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 204Precinct 204 | 390 | 1,656 | 13 | 2,059 | 18.9% | 80.4% | R+61.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 202Precinct 202 | 343 | 1,390 | 18 | 1,751 | 19.6% | 79.4% | R+59.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 101Precinct 101 | 323 | 1,274 | 4 | 1,601 | 20.2% | 79.6% | R+59.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 207Precinct 207 | 118 | 1,282 | 10 | 1,410 | 8.4% | 90.9% | R+82.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 108Precinct 108 | 187 | 1,186 | 5 | 1,378 | 13.6% | 86.1% | R+72.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 407Precinct 407 | 251 | 1,079 | 3 | 1,333 | 18.8% | 80.9% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 111Precinct 111 | 295 | 988 | 11 | 1,294 | 22.8% | 76.4% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 301Precinct 301 | 407 | 856 | 9 | 1,272 | 32.0% | 67.3% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 104Precinct 104 | 236 | 980 | 10 | 1,226 | 19.2% | 79.9% | R+60.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 205Precinct 205 | 253 | 942 | 20 | 1,215 | 20.8% | 77.5% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 102Precinct 102 | 255 | 931 | 6 | 1,192 | 21.4% | 78.1% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 406Precinct 406 | 378 | 742 | 15 | 1,135 | 33.3% | 65.4% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 307Precinct 307 | 313 | 745 | 13 | 1,071 | 29.2% | 69.6% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 403Precinct 403 | 505 | 473 | 10 | 988 | 51.1% | 47.9% | D+3.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 209Precinct 209 | 202 | 739 | 7 | 948 | 21.3% | 78.0% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 303Precinct 303 | 261 | 645 | 15 | 921 | 28.3% | 70.0% | R+41.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 404Precinct 404 | 202 | 638 | 7 | 847 | 23.8% | 75.3% | R+51.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 103Precinct 103 | 158 | 660 | 8 | 826 | 19.1% | 79.9% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 206Precinct 206 | 137 | 677 | 7 | 821 | 16.7% | 82.5% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 402Precinct 402 | 373 | 421 | 11 | 805 | 46.3% | 52.3% | R+6.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 312Precinct 312 | 202 | 585 | 9 | 796 | 25.4% | 73.5% | R+48.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 314Precinct 314 | 196 | 584 | 6 | 786 | 24.9% | 74.3% | R+49.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 409Precinct 409 | 176 | 516 | 6 | 698 | 25.2% | 73.9% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 310Precinct 310 | 172 | 501 | 6 | 679 | 25.3% | 73.8% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 309Precinct 309 | 149 | 497 | 9 | 655 | 22.7% | 75.9% | R+53.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 311Precinct 311 | 175 | 430 | 4 | 609 | 28.7% | 70.6% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 302Precinct 302 | 170 | 377 | 7 | 554 | 30.7% | 68.1% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 313Precinct 313 | 73 | 464 | 5 | 542 | 13.5% | 85.6% | R+72.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 308Precinct 308 | 121 | 410 | 3 | 534 | 22.7% | 76.8% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 306Precinct 306 | 171 | 320 | 7 | 498 | 34.3% | 64.3% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 405Precinct 405 | 158 | 203 | 1 | 362 | 43.6% | 56.1% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 401Precinct 401 | 113 | 237 | 6 | 356 | 31.7% | 66.6% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 408Precinct 408 | 114 | 172 | 3 | 289 | 39.4% | 59.5% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 412Precinct 412 | 104 | 168 | 0 | 272 | 38.2% | 61.8% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 305Precinct 305 | 83 | 178 | 5 | 266 | 31.2% | 66.9% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 304Precinct 304 | 65 | 148 | 3 | 216 | 30.1% | 68.5% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 109Precinct 109 | 19 | 118 | 3 | 140 | 13.6% | 84.3% | R+70.7 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +88.8% |
| 1908 | +89.7% |
| 1912 | +89.6% |
| 1916 | +96.7% |
| 1920 | +61.6% |
| 1924 | +81.3% |
| 1928 | −5.3% |
| 1932 | +82.9% |
| 1936 | +80.9% |
| 1940 | +72.0% |
| 1944 | +59.3% |
| 1948 | +55.5% |
| 1952 | −22.1% |
| 1956 | −26.2% |
| 1960 | −10.4% |
| 1964 | −3.0% |
| 1968 | −21.4% |
| 1972 | −59.1% |
| 1976 | −26.9% |
| 1980 | −47.3% |
| 1984 | −55.3% |
| 1988 | −36.1% |
| 1992 | −19.5% |
| 1996 | −17.5% |
| 2000 | −40.9% |
| 2004 | −52.1% |
| 2008 | −48.0% |
| 2012 | −48.9% |
| 2016 | −40.4% |
| 2020 | −47.8% |
| 2024 | −52.9% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 71,630 |
| 2018 | 76,573 |
| 2020 | 80,872 |
| 2022 | 83,323 |
| 2024 | 86,640 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+488 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +6,499 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,217 in average income, against $78,011 for residents who stayed — 34% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+30.6 on average — 22 points more Democratic-leaning than Ector County, TX itself (R+52.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Midland County, TX970R+60.5
- El Paso County, TX220D+15.1
- Miami-Dade County, FL152R+11.4
- Harris County, TX119D+5.5
- Lubbock County, TX97R+39.5
- Tarrant County, TX82R+5.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Midland County, TX1,168
- El Paso County, TX138
- Bexar County, TX114
- Tarrant County, TX106
- Dallas County, TX103
- Harris County, TX92
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +1,388 |
| 2012 | +3,139 |
| 2013 | +3,233 |
| 2014 | +2,644 |
| 2015 | +2,886 |
| 2016 | −4,258 |
| 2017 | −2,786 |
| 2018 | +3,106 |
| 2019 | +2,324 |
| 2021 | −5,590 |
| 2022 | −2,056 |
| 2023 | +883 |
| 2024 | +1,098 |
| 2025 | +488 |
Home to Odessa, Ector County's economy runs on petroleum extraction, and that industrial identity has reinforced an R+50-plus presidential margin for well over a decade, making it one of West Texas's most reliably one-sided counties.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 96.7 points in 1916 and a Republican high of 59.1 points in 1972. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 52.9 points.
A population of 164,654, a 29% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $71,536 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lea County and Deaf Smith County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Ector County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48135/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.