Grayson County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
41 precincts · 66,041 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 109Precinct 109 | 1,071 | 3,866 | 69 | 5,006 | 21.4% | 77.2% | R+55.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 404Precinct 404 | 554 | 2,883 | 30 | 3,467 | 16.0% | 83.2% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 205Precinct 205 | 491 | 2,572 | 26 | 3,089 | 15.9% | 83.3% | R+67.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 202Precinct 202 | 885 | 2,122 | 42 | 3,049 | 29.0% | 69.6% | R+40.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 306Precinct 306 | 401 | 2,622 | 17 | 3,040 | 13.2% | 86.3% | R+73.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 304Precinct 304 | 821 | 2,181 | 29 | 3,031 | 27.1% | 72.0% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 403Precinct 403 | 571 | 2,410 | 27 | 3,008 | 19.0% | 80.1% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 406Precinct 406 | 360 | 2,161 | 18 | 2,539 | 14.2% | 85.1% | R+70.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 108Precinct 108 | 338 | 2,158 | 20 | 2,516 | 13.4% | 85.8% | R+72.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 201Precinct 201 | 681 | 1,578 | 32 | 2,291 | 29.7% | 68.9% | R+39.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 106Precinct 106 | 355 | 1,917 | 14 | 2,286 | 15.5% | 83.9% | R+68.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 302Precinct 302 | 811 | 1,332 | 19 | 2,162 | 37.5% | 61.6% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 307Precinct 307 | 225 | 1,673 | 13 | 1,911 | 11.8% | 87.5% | R+75.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 409Precinct 409 | 515 | 1,293 | 22 | 1,830 | 28.1% | 70.7% | R+42.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 402Precinct 402 | 532 | 1,264 | 27 | 1,823 | 29.2% | 69.3% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 210Precinct 210 | 204 | 1,566 | 15 | 1,785 | 11.4% | 87.7% | R+76.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 107Precinct 107 | 198 | 1,431 | 16 | 1,645 | 12.0% | 87.0% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 410Precinct 410 | 441 | 1,180 | 18 | 1,639 | 26.9% | 72.0% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 301Precinct 301 | 517 | 1,061 | 20 | 1,598 | 32.4% | 66.4% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 206Precinct 206 | 442 | 1,037 | 26 | 1,505 | 29.4% | 68.9% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 105Precinct 105 | 214 | 1,215 | 18 | 1,447 | 14.8% | 84.0% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 103Precinct 103 | 520 | 760 | 6 | 1,286 | 40.4% | 59.1% | R+18.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 209Precinct 209 | 193 | 1,034 | 12 | 1,239 | 15.6% | 83.5% | R+67.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 305Precinct 305 | 147 | 1,010 | 8 | 1,165 | 12.6% | 86.7% | R+74.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 101Precinct 101 | 466 | 672 | 20 | 1,158 | 40.2% | 58.0% | R+17.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 208Precinct 208 | 221 | 922 | 10 | 1,153 | 19.2% | 80.0% | R+60.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 308Precinct 308 | 166 | 971 | 5 | 1,142 | 14.5% | 85.0% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 412Precinct 412 | 300 | 762 | 17 | 1,079 | 27.8% | 70.6% | R+42.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 104Precinct 104 | 165 | 826 | 14 | 1,005 | 16.4% | 82.2% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 401Precinct 401 | 412 | 533 | 19 | 964 | 42.7% | 55.3% | R+12.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 102Precinct 102 | 527 | 414 | 6 | 947 | 55.6% | 43.7% | D+11.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 207Precinct 207 | 137 | 743 | 6 | 886 | 15.5% | 83.9% | R+68.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 203Precinct 203 | 297 | 442 | 9 | 748 | 39.7% | 59.1% | R+19.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 408Precinct 408 | 193 | 528 | 11 | 732 | 26.4% | 72.1% | R+45.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 309Precinct 309 | 102 | 525 | 10 | 637 | 16.0% | 82.4% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 405Precinct 405 | 160 | 284 | 5 | 449 | 35.6% | 63.3% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 303Precinct 303 | 44 | 231 | 1 | 276 | 15.9% | 83.7% | R+67.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 411Precinct 411 | 25 | 155 | 2 | 182 | 13.7% | 85.2% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 310Precinct 310 | 36 | 139 | 4 | 179 | 20.1% | 77.7% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 407Precinct 407 | 53 | 55 | 2 | 110 | 48.2% | 50.0% | R+1.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 204Precinct 204 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 37 | 24.3% | 75.7% | R+51.4 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +48.4% |
| 1908 | +50.8% |
| 1912 | +67.4% |
| 1916 | +63.4% |
| 1920 | +39.2% |
| 1924 | +52.6% |
| 1928 | −15.4% |
| 1932 | +75.6% |
| 1936 | +83.5% |
| 1940 | +80.6% |
| 1944 | +72.9% |
| 1948 | +62.3% |
| 1952 | +14.8% |
| 1956 | +9.0% |
| 1960 | +14.8% |
| 1964 | +44.1% |
| 1968 | +10.3% |
| 1972 | −41.4% |
| 1976 | +17.3% |
| 1980 | −9.6% |
| 1984 | −31.2% |
| 1988 | −13.5% |
| 1992 | +0.6% |
| 1996 | −8.0% |
| 2000 | −29.9% |
| 2004 | −39.0% |
| 2008 | −37.9% |
| 2012 | −48.0% |
| 2016 | −52.8% |
| 2020 | −49.8% |
| 2024 | −54.2% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 78,723 |
| 2018 | 80,942 |
| 2020 | 86,740 |
| 2022 | 92,038 |
| 2024 | 100,124 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+2,423 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +28,731 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $78,407 in average income, against $83,513 for residents who stayed — 6% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+16.6 on average — 38 points more Democratic-leaning than Grayson County, TX itself (R+54.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Collin County, TX1,277R+11.1
- Denton County, TX576R+13.1
- Dallas County, TX382D+22.2
- Fannin County, TX211R+67.3
- Cooke County, TX189R+66.8
- Tarrant County, TX181R+5.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Collin County, TX718
- Bryan County, OK305
- Denton County, TX299
- Fannin County, TX238
- Dallas County, TX231
- Cooke County, TX157
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +56 |
| 2012 | +215 |
| 2013 | +274 |
| 2014 | +858 |
| 2015 | +1,669 |
| 2016 | +2,327 |
| 2017 | +2,533 |
| 2018 | +2,467 |
| 2019 | +2,193 |
| 2021 | +3,971 |
| 2022 | +3,449 |
| 2023 | +3,304 |
| 2024 | +2,992 |
| 2025 | +2,423 |
Grayson County, anchored by Sherman along the Oklahoma line, has delivered Republican presidential margins above 50 points in recent cycles, reflecting a rural-to-suburban demographic profile typical of North Texas's exurban tier.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 83.5 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 54.2 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 54.2 points.
A population of 143,337, a 71% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,182 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hunt County and Bartow County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Grayson County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48181/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.