- Lead
- 25,925
- Total
- 46,733
- vs nation
- R+54.0
- Turnout
- 61.1%
Hunt County, TX
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 61.1% of 76,930 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 20,257
- Total
- 38,597
- vs nation
- R+56.9
- Turnout
- 56.2%
- Lead
- 17,514
- Total
- 31,554
- vs nation
- R+57.6
- Turnout
- 52.7%
- Lead
- 14,340
- Total
- 28,049
- vs nation
- R+55.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 11,979
- Total
- 29,524
- vs nation
- R+47.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 12,094
- Total
- 28,194
- vs nation
- R+40.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 8,320
- Total
- 24,466
- vs nation
- R+34.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,945
- Total
- 21,876
- vs nation
- R+17.4
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+55.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 108,9722024 5-year
- Population density
- 130 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 840 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $71,9382024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 65.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 7.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 21.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+88.9 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+55.5 in 2016MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Grayson County, TX · twin score 96.7
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 61.1%46,972 participants ÷ 76,930 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.0 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -5.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 47.0%–49.3%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46,972 | 76,930 ± 806 | 61.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 30,874 | 73,150 ± 717 | 42.2% | Audited | A/A |
| 39,005 | 69,360 ± 588 | 56.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 28,726 | 66,382 ± 486 | 43.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 33,764 | 64,092 ± 420 | 52.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 28,049 | 60,857 | 46.1% | Derived | — | |
| 29,524 | 58,406 | 50.5% | Derived | — | |
| 28,194 | 55,955 extrapolated | 50.4% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Hunt County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Hunt County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Show all 9 candidates
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 36 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
36 precincts · 46,733 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 215APrecinct 215A | 1,416 | 4,340 | 53 | 5,809 | 24.4% | 74.7% | R+50.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 107Precinct 107 | 687 | 1,703 | 28 | 2,418 | 28.4% | 70.4% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 216Precinct 216 | 513 | 1,847 | 13 | 2,373 | 21.6% | 77.8% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 215BPrecinct 215B | 389 | 1,865 | 15 | 2,269 | 17.1% | 82.2% | R+65.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 214APrecinct 214A | 348 | 1,899 | 16 | 2,263 | 15.4% | 83.9% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 323Precinct 323 | 314 | 1,922 | 17 | 2,253 | 13.9% | 85.3% | R+71.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 325Precinct 325 | 493 | 1,710 | 24 | 2,227 | 22.1% | 76.8% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 324Precinct 324 | 456 | 1,634 | 32 | 2,122 | 21.5% | 77.0% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 320Precinct 320 | 284 | 1,411 | 9 | 1,704 | 16.7% | 82.8% | R+66.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 427Precinct 427 | 694 | 876 | 18 | 1,588 | 43.7% | 55.2% | R+11.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 319Precinct 319 | 202 | 1,366 | 14 | 1,582 | 12.8% | 86.3% | R+73.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 433Precinct 433 | 774 | 708 | 13 | 1,495 | 51.8% | 47.4% | D+4.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 428Precinct 428 | 431 | 854 | 14 | 1,299 | 33.2% | 65.7% | R+32.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 217Precinct 217 | 202 | 1,070 | 8 | 1,280 | 15.8% | 83.6% | R+67.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 434Precinct 434 | 172 | 1,065 | 10 | 1,247 | 13.8% | 85.4% | R+71.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 432Precinct 432 | 149 | 1,057 | 11 | 1,217 | 12.2% | 86.9% | R+74.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 106Precinct 106 | 422 | 719 | 18 | 1,159 | 36.4% | 62.0% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 101Precinct 101 | 141 | 981 | 5 | 1,127 | 12.5% | 87.0% | R+74.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 109Precinct 109 | 145 | 924 | 10 | 1,079 | 13.4% | 85.6% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 321Precinct 321 | 166 | 898 | 5 | 1,069 | 15.5% | 84.0% | R+68.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 108Precinct 108 | 302 | 653 | 11 | 966 | 31.3% | 67.6% | R+36.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 213Precinct 213 | 106 | 739 | 1 | 846 | 12.5% | 87.4% | R+74.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 104Precinct 104 | 119 | 672 | 3 | 794 | 15.0% | 84.6% | R+69.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 322Precinct 322 | 86 | 638 | 3 | 727 | 11.8% | 87.8% | R+75.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 110Precinct 110 | 150 | 545 | 4 | 699 | 21.5% | 78.0% | R+56.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 214BPrecinct 214B | 91 | 523 | 2 | 616 | 14.8% | 84.9% | R+70.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 103Precinct 103 | 89 | 511 | 1 | 601 | 14.8% | 85.0% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 318Precinct 318 | 71 | 483 | 1 | 555 | 12.8% | 87.0% | R+74.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 111Precinct 111 | 144 | 345 | 5 | 494 | 29.1% | 69.8% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 105Precinct 105 | 148 | 314 | 3 | 465 | 31.8% | 67.5% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 102Precinct 102 | 62 | 380 | 3 | 445 | 13.9% | 85.4% | R+71.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 212Precinct 212 | 81 | 352 | 2 | 435 | 18.6% | 80.9% | R+62.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 431Precinct 431 | 113 | 314 | 4 | 431 | 26.2% | 72.9% | R+46.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 430Precinct 430 | 109 | 284 | 3 | 396 | 27.5% | 71.7% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 426Precinct 426 | 68 | 294 | 3 | 365 | 18.6% | 80.5% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 429Precinct 429 | 75 | 241 | 2 | 318 | 23.6% | 75.8% | R+52.2 |
presidential history
Party record book
Hunt County, TX · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1904–2024 · 31 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
94.4%
5,801 votes · D+88.9
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 93.4%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
77.3%
36,137 votes · R+55.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · 75.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
10,212votes
21.9% of the vote · R+55.5
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 8,906 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
36,137votes
77.3% of the vote · R+55.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 29,163 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+101.9pts D vs U.S.
Place D+76.7 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · James M. Cox, 1920 · +87.0 pts
Republican
Donald Trump2016
+57.6pts R vs U.S.
Place R+55.5 · U.S. D+2.1
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +56.9 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Hunt County, TX. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | R | 21.8%7,994 | 78.2%28,593 | 36,587 |
| 2018 | R | 23.0%6,335 | 77.0%21,267 | 27,602 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 50,312 |
| 2018 | 54,843 |
| 2020 | 59,367 |
| 2022 | 64,334 |
| 2024 | 72,860 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+3,351 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +29,318 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $65,627 in average income, against $73,648 for residents who stayed — 11% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+12.8 on average — 43 points more Democratic-leaning than Hunt County, TX itself (R+55.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Dallas County, TX1,117D+22.2
- Collin County, TX662R+11.1
- Rockwall County, TX553R+40.9
- Kaufman County, TX228R+27.9
- Denton County, TX178R+13.1
- Tarrant County, TX152R+5.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Dallas County, TX552
- Collin County, TX364
- Rockwall County, TX307
- Kaufman County, TX167
- Tarrant County, TX123
- Denton County, TX113
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −37 |
| 2012 | −10 |
| 2013 | +189 |
| 2014 | +902 |
| 2015 | +676 |
| 2016 | +1,933 |
| 2017 | +1,849 |
| 2018 | +2,225 |
| 2019 | +1,686 |
| 2021 | +3,386 |
| 2022 | +4,433 |
| 2023 | +4,515 |
| 2024 | +4,220 |
| 2025 | +3,351 |
Hunt County has delivered Republican presidential margins exceeding 50 points in recent cycles, reflecting a rural-to-exurban demographic profile that has grown more politically uniform even as the Dallas-Fort Worth metro edge creeps toward its western boundary.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 88.9 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 55.5 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 55.5 points.
A population of 108,972, a 65% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $71,938 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Grayson County and Randall County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Hunt County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48231/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.