- Lead
- 60,296
- Total
- 90,840
- vs nation
- R+64.9
- Turnout
- 75.4%
Parker County, TX
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 75.4% of 120,467 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 49,028
- Total
- 76,128
- vs nation
- R+68.9
- Turnout
- 75.8%
- Lead
- 38,129
- Total
- 56,817
- vs nation
- R+69.2
- Turnout
- 64.7%
- Lead
- 31,390
- Total
- 47,694
- vs nation
- R+69.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 26,472
- Total
- 47,951
- vs nation
- R+62.5
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 22,829
- Total
- 40,957
- vs nation
- R+53.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 14,773
- Total
- 33,225
- vs nation
- R+45.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,133
- Total
- 26,855
- vs nation
- R+27.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+66.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 165,1682024 5-year
- Population density
- 183 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 904 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $104,4432024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 79.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.3%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 14.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+77.6 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+67.1 in 2016MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Hood County, TX · twin score 94.4
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 75.4%90,877 participants ÷ 120,467 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +18.0 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 57.4%–63.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90,877 | 120,467 ± 908 | 75.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 63,580 | 110,059 ± 851 | 57.8% | Audited | A/A |
| 76,128 | 100,480 ± 815 | 75.8% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2018Mid | 55,332 | 94,331 ± 625 | 58.7% | Audited | A/A |
| 58,285 | 90,120 ± 540 | 64.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 47,694 | 84,669 | 56.3% | Derived | — | |
| 47,951 | 77,954 | 61.5% | Derived | — | |
| 40,957 | 71,239 extrapolated | 57.5% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 152/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Parker County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Parker County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Show all 9 candidates
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 45 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
45 precincts · 90,840 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 335Precinct 335 | 377 | 3,764 | 26 | 4,167 | 9.0% | 90.3% | R+81.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 455Precinct 455 | 962 | 2,663 | 41 | 3,666 | 26.2% | 72.6% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 440Precinct 440 | 582 | 2,904 | 39 | 3,525 | 16.5% | 82.4% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 100Precinct 100 | 691 | 2,774 | 37 | 3,502 | 19.7% | 79.2% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 215Precinct 215 | 380 | 3,084 | 18 | 3,482 | 10.9% | 88.6% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 315Precinct 315 | 611 | 2,478 | 38 | 3,127 | 19.5% | 79.2% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 260Precinct 260 | 562 | 2,485 | 25 | 3,072 | 18.3% | 80.9% | R+62.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 130Precinct 130 | 428 | 2,391 | 23 | 2,842 | 15.1% | 84.1% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 435Precinct 435 | 548 | 2,188 | 35 | 2,771 | 19.8% | 79.0% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 125Precinct 125 | 317 | 2,427 | 15 | 2,759 | 11.5% | 88.0% | R+76.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 400Precinct 400 | 530 | 2,073 | 28 | 2,631 | 20.1% | 78.8% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 305Precinct 305 | 506 | 2,071 | 18 | 2,595 | 19.5% | 79.8% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 115Precinct 115 | 420 | 2,113 | 15 | 2,548 | 16.5% | 82.9% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 210Precinct 210 | 240 | 2,249 | 21 | 2,510 | 9.6% | 89.6% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 430Precinct 430 | 461 | 1,885 | 32 | 2,378 | 19.4% | 79.3% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 410Precinct 410 | 437 | 1,738 | 18 | 2,193 | 19.9% | 79.3% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 105Precinct 105 | 379 | 1,784 | 22 | 2,185 | 17.3% | 81.6% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 345Precinct 345 | 266 | 1,804 | 18 | 2,088 | 12.7% | 86.4% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 450Precinct 450 | 438 | 1,620 | 17 | 2,075 | 21.1% | 78.1% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 350Precinct 350 | 248 | 1,798 | 14 | 2,060 | 12.0% | 87.3% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 420Precinct 420 | 325 | 1,578 | 20 | 1,923 | 16.9% | 82.1% | R+65.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 120Precinct 120 | 234 | 1,638 | 14 | 1,886 | 12.4% | 86.9% | R+74.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 320Precinct 320 | 192 | 1,572 | 8 | 1,772 | 10.8% | 88.7% | R+77.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 135Precinct 135 | 246 | 1,448 | 15 | 1,709 | 14.4% | 84.7% | R+70.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 445Precinct 445 | 267 | 1,409 | 21 | 1,697 | 15.7% | 83.0% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 325Precinct 325 | 223 | 1,447 | 14 | 1,684 | 13.2% | 85.9% | R+72.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 240Precinct 240 | 192 | 1,481 | 9 | 1,682 | 11.4% | 88.0% | R+76.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 415Precinct 415 | 372 | 1,266 | 18 | 1,656 | 22.5% | 76.4% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 230Precinct 230 | 226 | 1,234 | 6 | 1,466 | 15.4% | 84.2% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 111Precinct 111 | 291 | 1,162 | 10 | 1,463 | 19.9% | 79.4% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 330Precinct 330 | 210 | 1,216 | 7 | 1,433 | 14.7% | 84.9% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 255Precinct 255 | 268 | 1,056 | 14 | 1,338 | 20.0% | 78.9% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 110Precinct 110 | 241 | 1,079 | 10 | 1,330 | 18.1% | 81.1% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 225Precinct 225 | 122 | 1,167 | 4 | 1,293 | 9.4% | 90.3% | R+80.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 310Precinct 310 | 327 | 930 | 14 | 1,271 | 25.7% | 73.2% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 140Precinct 140 | 172 | 1,079 | 8 | 1,259 | 13.7% | 85.7% | R+72.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 265Precinct 265 | 232 | 1,014 | 13 | 1,259 | 18.4% | 80.5% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 205Precinct 205 | 254 | 974 | 21 | 1,249 | 20.3% | 78.0% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 300Precinct 300 | 300 | 928 | 15 | 1,243 | 24.1% | 74.7% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 250Precinct 250 | 167 | 969 | 20 | 1,156 | 14.4% | 83.8% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 200Precinct 200 | 229 | 893 | 10 | 1,132 | 20.2% | 78.9% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 245Precinct 245 | 148 | 920 | 2 | 1,070 | 13.8% | 86.0% | R+72.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 235Precinct 235 | 121 | 873 | 13 | 1,007 | 12.0% | 86.7% | R+74.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 340Precinct 340 | 74 | 853 | 8 | 935 | 7.9% | 91.2% | R+83.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 220Precinct 220 | 56 | 689 | 6 | 751 | 7.5% | 91.7% | R+84.3 |
presidential history
Party record book
Parker County, TX · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1904–2024 · 30 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
88.3%
3,074 votes · D+77.6
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1940 · 86.7%
Republican
Donald Trump2024
82.7%
75,168 votes · R+66.4
Runner-up · Mitt Romney, 2012 · 82.3%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
14,872votes
16.4% of the vote · R+66.4
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 13,017 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
75,168votes
82.7% of the vote · R+66.4
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 62,045 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+90.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+65.6 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · James M. Cox, 1920 · +80.1 pts
Republican
Mitt Romney2012
+69.7pts R vs U.S.
Place R+65.8 · U.S. D+3.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2016 · +69.2 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Parker County, TX. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 2 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 85,277 |
| 2018 | 92,876 |
| 2020 | 103,999 |
| 2022 | 115,621 |
| 2024 | 127,635 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+4,614 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +54,139 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $94,147 in average income, against $121,990 for residents who stayed — 23% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+14.1 on average — 52 points more Democratic-leaning than Parker County, TX itself (R+66.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tarrant County, TX2,699R+5.1
- Denton County, TX271R+13.1
- Dallas County, TX250D+22.2
- Palo Pinto County, TX214R+67.1
- Hood County, TX210R+65.9
- Wise County, TX188R+70.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tarrant County, TX1,714
- Palo Pinto County, TX257
- Wise County, TX210
- Hood County, TX203
- Denton County, TX158
- Johnson County, TX146
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +667 |
| 2012 | +773 |
| 2013 | −77 |
| 2014 | +1,861 |
| 2015 | +3,035 |
| 2016 | +2,786 |
| 2017 | +4,154 |
| 2018 | +4,108 |
| 2019 | +4,369 |
| 2021 | +7,708 |
| 2022 | +7,966 |
| 2023 | +6,780 |
| 2024 | +5,395 |
| 2025 | +4,614 |
Parker County's exurban and rural mix produced an R+66.4 margin in 2024, placing it among the state's most consistently one-sided presidential results despite its proximity to the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 77.6 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 67.1 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 66.4 points.
A population of 165,168, a 79% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $104,443 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hood County and Wise County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Parker County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48367/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.