Parker County, Texas
Precinct data
Results by precinct
45 precincts · 90,840 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -Precinct 335Precinct 335 | 377 | 3,764 | 26 | 4,167 | 9.0% | 90.3% | R+81.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -Precinct 455Precinct 455 | 962 | 2,663 | 41 | 3,666 | 26.2% | 72.6% | R+46.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 440Precinct 440 | 582 | 2,904 | 39 | 3,525 | 16.5% | 82.4% | R+65.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 100Precinct 100 | 691 | 2,774 | 37 | 3,502 | 19.7% | 79.2% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 215Precinct 215 | 380 | 3,084 | 18 | 3,482 | 10.9% | 88.6% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 315Precinct 315 | 611 | 2,478 | 38 | 3,127 | 19.5% | 79.2% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 260Precinct 260 | 562 | 2,485 | 25 | 3,072 | 18.3% | 80.9% | R+62.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 130Precinct 130 | 428 | 2,391 | 23 | 2,842 | 15.1% | 84.1% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 435Precinct 435 | 548 | 2,188 | 35 | 2,771 | 19.8% | 79.0% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 125Precinct 125 | 317 | 2,427 | 15 | 2,759 | 11.5% | 88.0% | R+76.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 400Precinct 400 | 530 | 2,073 | 28 | 2,631 | 20.1% | 78.8% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 305Precinct 305 | 506 | 2,071 | 18 | 2,595 | 19.5% | 79.8% | R+60.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 115Precinct 115 | 420 | 2,113 | 15 | 2,548 | 16.5% | 82.9% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 210Precinct 210 | 240 | 2,249 | 21 | 2,510 | 9.6% | 89.6% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 430Precinct 430 | 461 | 1,885 | 32 | 2,378 | 19.4% | 79.3% | R+59.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 410Precinct 410 | 437 | 1,738 | 18 | 2,193 | 19.9% | 79.3% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 105Precinct 105 | 379 | 1,784 | 22 | 2,185 | 17.3% | 81.6% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 345Precinct 345 | 266 | 1,804 | 18 | 2,088 | 12.7% | 86.4% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 450Precinct 450 | 438 | 1,620 | 17 | 2,075 | 21.1% | 78.1% | R+57.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 350Precinct 350 | 248 | 1,798 | 14 | 2,060 | 12.0% | 87.3% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 420Precinct 420 | 325 | 1,578 | 20 | 1,923 | 16.9% | 82.1% | R+65.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 120Precinct 120 | 234 | 1,638 | 14 | 1,886 | 12.4% | 86.9% | R+74.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 320Precinct 320 | 192 | 1,572 | 8 | 1,772 | 10.8% | 88.7% | R+77.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 135Precinct 135 | 246 | 1,448 | 15 | 1,709 | 14.4% | 84.7% | R+70.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 445Precinct 445 | 267 | 1,409 | 21 | 1,697 | 15.7% | 83.0% | R+67.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 325Precinct 325 | 223 | 1,447 | 14 | 1,684 | 13.2% | 85.9% | R+72.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 240Precinct 240 | 192 | 1,481 | 9 | 1,682 | 11.4% | 88.0% | R+76.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 415Precinct 415 | 372 | 1,266 | 18 | 1,656 | 22.5% | 76.4% | R+54.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 230Precinct 230 | 226 | 1,234 | 6 | 1,466 | 15.4% | 84.2% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 111Precinct 111 | 291 | 1,162 | 10 | 1,463 | 19.9% | 79.4% | R+59.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 330Precinct 330 | 210 | 1,216 | 7 | 1,433 | 14.7% | 84.9% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -Precinct 255Precinct 255 | 268 | 1,056 | 14 | 1,338 | 20.0% | 78.9% | R+58.9 |
| Precinct -Precinct 110Precinct 110 | 241 | 1,079 | 10 | 1,330 | 18.1% | 81.1% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 225Precinct 225 | 122 | 1,167 | 4 | 1,293 | 9.4% | 90.3% | R+80.8 |
| Precinct -Precinct 310Precinct 310 | 327 | 930 | 14 | 1,271 | 25.7% | 73.2% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 140Precinct 140 | 172 | 1,079 | 8 | 1,259 | 13.7% | 85.7% | R+72.0 |
| Precinct -Precinct 265Precinct 265 | 232 | 1,014 | 13 | 1,259 | 18.4% | 80.5% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 205Precinct 205 | 254 | 974 | 21 | 1,249 | 20.3% | 78.0% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -Precinct 300Precinct 300 | 300 | 928 | 15 | 1,243 | 24.1% | 74.7% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -Precinct 250Precinct 250 | 167 | 969 | 20 | 1,156 | 14.4% | 83.8% | R+69.4 |
| Precinct -Precinct 200Precinct 200 | 229 | 893 | 10 | 1,132 | 20.2% | 78.9% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 245Precinct 245 | 148 | 920 | 2 | 1,070 | 13.8% | 86.0% | R+72.1 |
| Precinct -Precinct 235Precinct 235 | 121 | 873 | 13 | 1,007 | 12.0% | 86.7% | R+74.7 |
| Precinct -Precinct 340Precinct 340 | 74 | 853 | 8 | 935 | 7.9% | 91.2% | R+83.3 |
| Precinct -Precinct 220Precinct 220 | 56 | 689 | 6 | 751 | 7.5% | 91.7% | R+84.3 |
Presidential margin, 1904–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | +49.7% |
| 1908 | No data |
| 1912 | +65.0% |
| 1916 | +72.9% |
| 1920 | +53.9% |
| 1924 | +65.6% |
| 1928 | −32.5% |
| 1932 | +77.6% |
| 1936 | +73.1% |
| 1940 | +73.6% |
| 1944 | +64.6% |
| 1948 | +55.3% |
| 1952 | −1.3% |
| 1956 | −3.4% |
| 1960 | +2.3% |
| 1964 | +41.5% |
| 1968 | +13.3% |
| 1972 | −38.3% |
| 1976 | +26.9% |
| 1980 | −7.2% |
| 1984 | −38.4% |
| 1988 | −24.5% |
| 1992 | −8.7% |
| 1996 | −19.1% |
| 2000 | −44.5% |
| 2004 | −55.7% |
| 2008 | −55.2% |
| 2012 | −65.8% |
| 2016 | −67.1% |
| 2020 | −64.4% |
| 2024 | −66.4% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 85,277 |
| 2018 | 92,876 |
| 2020 | 103,999 |
| 2022 | 115,621 |
| 2024 | 127,635 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+4,614 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +54,139 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $94,147 in average income, against $121,990 for residents who stayed — 23% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+14.1 on average — 52 points more Democratic-leaning than Parker County, TX itself (R+66.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Tarrant County, TX2,699R+5.1
- Denton County, TX271R+13.1
- Dallas County, TX250D+22.2
- Palo Pinto County, TX214R+67.1
- Hood County, TX210R+65.9
- Wise County, TX188R+70.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Tarrant County, TX1,714
- Palo Pinto County, TX257
- Wise County, TX210
- Hood County, TX203
- Denton County, TX158
- Johnson County, TX146
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +667 |
| 2012 | +773 |
| 2013 | −77 |
| 2014 | +1,861 |
| 2015 | +3,035 |
| 2016 | +2,786 |
| 2017 | +4,154 |
| 2018 | +4,108 |
| 2019 | +4,369 |
| 2021 | +7,708 |
| 2022 | +7,966 |
| 2023 | +6,780 |
| 2024 | +5,395 |
| 2025 | +4,614 |
Parker County's exurban and rural mix produced an R+66.4 margin in 2024, placing it among the state's most consistently one-sided presidential results despite its proximity to the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 77.6 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 67.1 points in 2016. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 66.4 points.
A population of 165,168, a 79% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $104,443 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Hood County and Wise County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Parker County, Texas. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/48367/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.