- Lead
- 2,922
- Total
- 11,468
- vs nation
- R+24.0
- Turnout
- 65.2%
Asotin County, WA
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 65.2% of 17,728 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 3,069
- Total
- 11,951
- vs nation
- R+30.1
- Turnout
- 68.4%
- Lead
- 2,607
- Total
- 9,974
- vs nation
- R+28.2
- Turnout
- 58.4%
- Lead
- 1,651
- Total
- 9,972
- vs nation
- R+20.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,312
- Total
- 9,780
- vs nation
- R+20.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,001
- Total
- 8,786
- vs nation
- R+20.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,173
- Total
- 7,985
- vs nation
- R+27.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 489
- Total
- 7,311
- vs nation
- R+1.8
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+25.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 22,4672024 5-year
- Population density
- 35 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 636 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $72,2832024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 87.1%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.9%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 4.6%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+39.1 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+50.5 in 1904MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Carbon County, MT · twin score 79.9
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 65.2%11,565 participants ÷ 17,728 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +16.3 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -4.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 48.9%–54.4%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11,565 | 17,728 ± 158 | 65.2% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 9,073 | 17,427 ± 237 | 52.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 12,027 | 17,584 ± 234 | 68.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 9,254 | 17,399 ± 204 | 53.2% | Audited | A/A |
| 10,160 | 17,386 ± 185 | 58.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 9,972 | 16,812 | 59.3% | Derived | — | |
| 9,780 | 16,264 | 60.1% | Derived | — | |
| 8,786 | 15,716 extrapolated | 55.9% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Asotin County only. The complete district District 5 result is shown below for comparison.
Asotin County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Show all 13 candidates
District District 5 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 56 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
56 precincts · 11,468 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #2CLARKSTON HTS #2 | 310 | 543 | 27 | 880 | 35.2% | 61.7% | R+26.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #5CLARKSTON HTS #5 | 244 | 570 | 29 | 843 | 28.9% | 67.6% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #6CLARKSTON HTS #6 | 292 | 512 | 20 | 824 | 35.4% | 62.1% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -SWALLOWS NESTSWALLOWS NEST | 198 | 372 | 17 | 587 | 33.7% | 63.4% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -WEST CLARKSTON #3WEST CLARKSTON #3 | 253 | 282 | 34 | 569 | 44.5% | 49.6% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -SOUTH CLARKSTON #2SOUTH CLARKSTON #2 | 193 | 332 | 24 | 549 | 35.2% | 60.5% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #7CLARKSTON HTS #7 | 189 | 333 | 14 | 536 | 35.3% | 62.1% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -WEST CLARKSTON #2WEST CLARKSTON #2 | 194 | 321 | 19 | 534 | 36.3% | 60.1% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -WEST CLARKSTON #1WEST CLARKSTON #1 | 199 | 276 | 13 | 488 | 40.8% | 56.6% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #2CLARKSTON #2 | 214 | 234 | 23 | 471 | 45.4% | 49.7% | R+4.2 |
| Precinct -SOUTH CLARKSTON #1SOUTH CLARKSTON #1 | 139 | 304 | 19 | 462 | 30.1% | 65.8% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #1CLARKSTON HTS #1 | 153 | 275 | 6 | 434 | 35.3% | 63.4% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #4CLARKSTON #4 | 166 | 221 | 14 | 401 | 41.4% | 55.1% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #6CLARKSTON #6 | 172 | 217 | 11 | 400 | 43.0% | 54.3% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -ANATONEANATONE | 79 | 309 | 9 | 397 | 19.9% | 77.8% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #8CLARKSTON #8 | 165 | 212 | 17 | 394 | 41.9% | 53.8% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #4CLARKSTON HTS #4 | 114 | 259 | 17 | 390 | 29.2% | 66.4% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -ASOTIN #2ASOTIN #2 | 109 | 222 | 5 | 336 | 32.4% | 66.1% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #3CLARKSTON #3 | 139 | 164 | 9 | 312 | 44.6% | 52.6% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -ASOTIN #1ASOTIN #1 | 101 | 196 | 9 | 306 | 33.0% | 64.1% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -W ASOTINW ASOTIN | 78 | 213 | 9 | 300 | 26.0% | 71.0% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #1CLARKSTON #1 | 116 | 164 | 11 | 291 | 39.9% | 56.4% | R+16.5 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #7CLARKSTON #7 | 129 | 147 | 9 | 285 | 45.3% | 51.6% | R+6.3 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #5CLARKSTON #5 | 89 | 148 | 9 | 246 | 36.2% | 60.2% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #3CLARKSTON HTS #3 | 31 | 106 | 5 | 142 | 21.8% | 74.6% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -RURAL ASOTINRURAL ASOTIN | 16 | 72 | 3 | 91 | 17.6% | 79.1% | R+61.5 |
| Anatone Voting District53_5300303001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Asotin 1 Voting District53_5300303101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Asotin 2 Voting District53_5300303102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston 1 Voting District53_5300303201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston 2 Voting District53_5300303202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston 3 Voting District53_5300303203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston 4 Voting District53_5300303204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston 5 Voting District53_5300303205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston 6 Voting District53_5300303206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston 7 Voting District53_5300303207 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston 8 Voting District53_5300303208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston Heights 1 Voting District53_5300303301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston Heights 2 Voting District53_5300303302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston Heights 3 Voting District53_5300303303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston Heights 4 Voting District53_5300303304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston Heights 5 Voting District53_5300303305 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston Heights 6 Voting District53_5300303306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkston Heights 7 Voting District53_5300303307 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rural Asotin Voting District53_5300303003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Clarkston 1 Voting District53_5300303401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Clarkston 2 Voting District53_5300303402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Swallows Nest Voting District53_5300303005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Water: Grande Ronde River53_53003WVGRND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Water: Snake River53_53003WVSNKR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Water: Snake River - Asotin53_53003WVSNAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Water: Snake River - Clarkston53_53003WVSNCL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Asotin Voting District53_5300303004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Clarkston 1 Voting District53_5300303501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Clarkston 2 Voting District53_5300303502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Clarkston 3 Voting District53_5300303503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Asotin County, WA · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
67.3%
3,657 votes · D+34.6
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 65.7%
Republican
Theodore Roosevelt1904
72.6%
747 votes · R+50.5
Runner-up · Herbert Hoover, 1928 · 69.4%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Joe Biden2020
4,250votes
35.6% of the vote · R+25.7
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 4,139 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
7,319votes
61.2% of the vote · R+25.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 7,004 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
William J. Bryan1896
+17.4pts D vs U.S.
Place D+11.3 · U.S. R+6.1
Runner-up · George McGovern, 1972 · +17.1 pts
Republican
Theodore Roosevelt1904
+30.9pts R vs U.S.
Place R+50.5 · U.S. R+19.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +30.1 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Asotin County, WA. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 16,642 |
| 2018 | 17,555 |
| 2020 | 18,006 |
| 2022 | 17,053 |
| 2024 | 17,046 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−17 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,700 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $62,918 in average income, against $80,577 for residents who stayed — 22% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+27.2 on average — 1.7 points more Republican-leaning than Asotin County, WA itself (R+25.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Nez Perce County, ID246R+38.6
- Whitman County, WA44D+8.9
- Latah County, ID32R+8.0
- Spokane County, WA28R+4.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Nez Perce County, ID236
- Spokane County, WA46
- Whitman County, WA35
- Ada County, ID21
- Latah County, ID21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +227 |
| 2012 | −19 |
| 2013 | +253 |
| 2014 | +72 |
| 2015 | −43 |
| 2016 | +233 |
| 2017 | +283 |
| 2018 | +163 |
| 2019 | +38 |
| 2021 | +221 |
| 2022 | +131 |
| 2023 | +90 |
| 2024 | +68 |
| 2025 | −17 |
Asotin sits at Washington's southeastern corner along the Snake River, where a rural, agriculture-rooted electorate has delivered consistent double-digit Republican presidential margins for over two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 39.1 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 50.5 points in 1904. The 2024 margin was 25.5 points.
A population of 22,467, a 87% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,283 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Carbon County and Bonner County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Asotin County, Washington. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/53003/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.