Asotin County, Washington
Precinct data
Results by precinct
56 precincts · 11,468 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #2CLARKSTON HTS #2 | 310 | 543 | 27 | 880 | 35.2% | 61.7% | R+26.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #5CLARKSTON HTS #5 | 244 | 570 | 29 | 843 | 28.9% | 67.6% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #6CLARKSTON HTS #6 | 292 | 512 | 20 | 824 | 35.4% | 62.1% | R+26.7 |
| Precinct -SWALLOWS NESTSWALLOWS NEST | 198 | 372 | 17 | 587 | 33.7% | 63.4% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -WEST CLARKSTON #3WEST CLARKSTON #3 | 253 | 282 | 34 | 569 | 44.5% | 49.6% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -SOUTH CLARKSTON #2SOUTH CLARKSTON #2 | 193 | 332 | 24 | 549 | 35.2% | 60.5% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #7CLARKSTON HTS #7 | 189 | 333 | 14 | 536 | 35.3% | 62.1% | R+26.9 |
| Precinct -WEST CLARKSTON #2WEST CLARKSTON #2 | 194 | 321 | 19 | 534 | 36.3% | 60.1% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -WEST CLARKSTON #1WEST CLARKSTON #1 | 199 | 276 | 13 | 488 | 40.8% | 56.6% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #2CLARKSTON #2 | 214 | 234 | 23 | 471 | 45.4% | 49.7% | R+4.2 |
| Precinct -SOUTH CLARKSTON #1SOUTH CLARKSTON #1 | 139 | 304 | 19 | 462 | 30.1% | 65.8% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #1CLARKSTON HTS #1 | 153 | 275 | 6 | 434 | 35.3% | 63.4% | R+28.1 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #4CLARKSTON #4 | 166 | 221 | 14 | 401 | 41.4% | 55.1% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #6CLARKSTON #6 | 172 | 217 | 11 | 400 | 43.0% | 54.3% | R+11.3 |
| Precinct -ANATONEANATONE | 79 | 309 | 9 | 397 | 19.9% | 77.8% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #8CLARKSTON #8 | 165 | 212 | 17 | 394 | 41.9% | 53.8% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #4CLARKSTON HTS #4 | 114 | 259 | 17 | 390 | 29.2% | 66.4% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -ASOTIN #2ASOTIN #2 | 109 | 222 | 5 | 336 | 32.4% | 66.1% | R+33.6 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #3CLARKSTON #3 | 139 | 164 | 9 | 312 | 44.6% | 52.6% | R+8.0 |
| Precinct -ASOTIN #1ASOTIN #1 | 101 | 196 | 9 | 306 | 33.0% | 64.1% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -W ASOTINW ASOTIN | 78 | 213 | 9 | 300 | 26.0% | 71.0% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #1CLARKSTON #1 | 116 | 164 | 11 | 291 | 39.9% | 56.4% | R+16.5 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #7CLARKSTON #7 | 129 | 147 | 9 | 285 | 45.3% | 51.6% | R+6.3 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON #5CLARKSTON #5 | 89 | 148 | 9 | 246 | 36.2% | 60.2% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -CLARKSTON HTS #3CLARKSTON HTS #3 | 31 | 106 | 5 | 142 | 21.8% | 74.6% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -RURAL ASOTINRURAL ASOTIN | 16 | 72 | 3 | 91 | 17.6% | 79.1% | R+61.5 |
| Anatone Voting District53_5300303001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Asotin 1 Voting District53_5300303101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Asotin 2 Voting District53_5300303102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston 1 Voting District53_5300303201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston 2 Voting District53_5300303202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston 3 Voting District53_5300303203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston 4 Voting District53_5300303204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston 5 Voting District53_5300303205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston 6 Voting District53_5300303206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston 7 Voting District53_5300303207 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston 8 Voting District53_5300303208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston Heights 1 Voting District53_5300303301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston Heights 2 Voting District53_5300303302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston Heights 3 Voting District53_5300303303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston Heights 4 Voting District53_5300303304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston Heights 5 Voting District53_5300303305 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston Heights 6 Voting District53_5300303306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clarkston Heights 7 Voting District53_5300303307 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rural Asotin Voting District53_5300303003 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| South Clarkston 1 Voting District53_5300303401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| South Clarkston 2 Voting District53_5300303402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Swallows Nest Voting District53_5300303005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Water: Grande Ronde River53_53003WVGRND | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Water: Snake River53_53003WVSNKR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Water: Snake River - Asotin53_53003WVSNAS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Water: Snake River - Clarkston53_53003WVSNCL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| West Asotin Voting District53_5300303004 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| West Clarkston 1 Voting District53_5300303501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| West Clarkston 2 Voting District53_5300303502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| West Clarkston 3 Voting District53_5300303503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −13.8% |
| 1896 | +11.3% |
| 1900 | −9.2% |
| 1904 | −50.5% |
| 1908 | −26.0% |
| 1912 | −1.5% |
| 1916 | +5.6% |
| 1920 | −38.2% |
| 1924 | −24.9% |
| 1928 | −39.7% |
| 1932 | +33.9% |
| 1936 | +39.1% |
| 1940 | +17.3% |
| 1944 | +15.9% |
| 1948 | +18.7% |
| 1952 | −11.5% |
| 1956 | −0.4% |
| 1960 | +7.9% |
| 1964 | +34.6% |
| 1968 | +7.1% |
| 1972 | −6.1% |
| 1976 | +2.5% |
| 1980 | −8.3% |
| 1984 | −11.9% |
| 1988 | +8.6% |
| 1992 | +10.7% |
| 1996 | +6.7% |
| 2000 | −27.2% |
| 2004 | −22.8% |
| 2008 | −13.4% |
| 2012 | −16.6% |
| 2016 | −26.1% |
| 2020 | −25.7% |
| 2024 | −25.5% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 16,642 |
| 2018 | 17,555 |
| 2020 | 18,006 |
| 2022 | 17,053 |
| 2024 | 17,046 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−17 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,700 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $62,918 in average income, against $80,577 for residents who stayed — 22% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+27.2 on average — 1.7 points more Republican-leaning than Asotin County, WA itself (R+25.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Nez Perce County, ID246R+38.6
- Whitman County, WA44D+8.9
- Latah County, ID32R+8.0
- Spokane County, WA28R+4.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Nez Perce County, ID236
- Spokane County, WA46
- Whitman County, WA35
- Ada County, ID21
- Latah County, ID21
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +227 |
| 2012 | −19 |
| 2013 | +253 |
| 2014 | +72 |
| 2015 | −43 |
| 2016 | +233 |
| 2017 | +283 |
| 2018 | +163 |
| 2019 | +38 |
| 2021 | +221 |
| 2022 | +131 |
| 2023 | +90 |
| 2024 | +68 |
| 2025 | −17 |
Asotin sits at Washington's southeastern corner along the Snake River, where a rural, agriculture-rooted electorate has delivered consistent double-digit Republican presidential margins for over two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 39.1 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 50.5 points in 1904. The 2024 margin was 25.5 points.
A population of 22,467, a 87% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $72,283 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Carbon County and Bonner County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Asotin County, Washington. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/53003/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.