- Lead
- 8,826
- Total
- 38,471
- vs nation
- R+21.5
- Turnout
- 73.7%
Chippewa County, WI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 73.7% of 52,234 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 7,334
- Total
- 35,938
- vs nation
- R+24.9
- Turnout
- 72.4%
- Lead
- 6,029
- Total
- 31,568
- vs nation
- R+21.2
- Turnout
- 65.9%
- Lead
- 85
- Total
- 30,932
- vs nation
- R+4.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,747
- Total
- 30,231
- vs nation
- D+1.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 699
- Total
- 30,524
- vs nation
- D+0.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 733
- Total
- 26,173
- vs nation
- R+3.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,127
- Total
- 21,131
- vs nation
- D+1.5
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+22.9MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 66,7992024 5-year
- Population density
- 66 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 1,008 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $74,6802024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 92.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.4%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.0%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+27.2 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+69.1 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Barron County, WI · twin score 90.3
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 73.7%38,486 participants ÷ 52,234 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.4 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -0.2 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 58.3%–61.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38,486 | 52,234 ± 231 | 73.7% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2022Mid | 29,337 | 51,456 ± 239 | 57.0% | Audited | C/A |
| 35,938 | 49,653 ± 227 | 72.4% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2018Mid | 27,878 | 48,770 ± 228 | 57.2% | Audited | C/A |
| 31,999 | 48,553 ± 186 | 65.9% | Audited | C/A | |
| 30,932 | 47,448 | 65.2% | Derived | — | |
| 30,231 | 45,518 | 66.4% | Derived | — | |
| 30,524 | 43,588 extrapolated | 70.0% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 17.6%; series 312/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 16.7%; series 307/183.
- 2020: numerator source 159, denominator source 157; top ticket votes; canonical-complete-contest-floor-v1; allocation share 0.0%; series 152/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 6.3%; series 298/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 6.6%; series 294/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 37 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
37 precincts · 38,471 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -TOWN OF LAFAYETTE WARDS 1-8TOWN OF LAFAYETTE WARDS 1-8 | 1,726 | 2,582 | 54 | 4,362 | 39.6% | 59.2% | R+19.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF LAKE HALLIE WARDS 1-10VILLAGE OF LAKE HALLIE WARDS 1-10 | 1,746 | 2,475 | 60 | 4,281 | 40.8% | 57.8% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 3,4-6,15CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 3,4-6,15 | 1,293 | 1,334 | 51 | 2,678 | 48.3% | 49.8% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BLOOMER WARDS 1-4CITY OF BLOOMER WARDS 1-4 | 705 | 1,442 | 22 | 2,169 | 32.5% | 66.5% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EAGLE POINT WARDS 1-5TOWN OF EAGLE POINT WARDS 1-5 | 781 | 1,233 | 24 | 2,038 | 38.3% | 60.5% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 11-14,16CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 11-14,16 | 932 | 1,067 | 26 | 2,025 | 46.0% | 52.7% | R+6.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 1-2,9-10CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 1-2,9-10 | 910 | 977 | 32 | 1,919 | 47.4% | 50.9% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WHEATON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF WHEATON WARDS 1-3 | 703 | 1,127 | 18 | 1,848 | 38.0% | 61.0% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ANSON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF ANSON WARDS 1-3 | 596 | 1,003 | 17 | 1,616 | 36.9% | 62.1% | R+25.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STANLEY WARDS 1-6,9CITY OF STANLEY WARDS 1-6,9 | 337 | 730 | 13 | 1,080 | 31.2% | 67.6% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 8-7CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 8-7 | 585 | 470 | 21 | 1,076 | 54.4% | 43.7% | D+10.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF EAU CLAIRE WARD 16CITY OF EAU CLAIRE WARD 16 | 537 | 475 | 21 | 1,033 | 52.0% | 46.0% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF TILDEN WARDS 1-3TOWN OF TILDEN WARDS 1-3 | 349 | 658 | 8 | 1,015 | 34.4% | 64.8% | R+30.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CORNELL WARDS 1-4CITY OF CORNELL WARDS 1-4 | 247 | 499 | 10 | 756 | 32.7% | 66.0% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF CADOTT WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF CADOTT WARDS 1-2 | 273 | 472 | 11 | 756 | 36.1% | 62.4% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WOODMOHR WARDS 1-2TOWN OF WOODMOHR WARDS 1-2 | 195 | 482 | 6 | 683 | 28.6% | 70.6% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LAKE HOLCOMBE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LAKE HOLCOMBE WARDS 1-2 | 166 | 498 | 6 | 670 | 24.8% | 74.3% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SIGEL WARDS 1-2TOWN OF SIGEL WARDS 1-2 | 202 | 454 | 6 | 662 | 30.5% | 68.6% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BLOOMER WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BLOOMER WARDS 1-2 | 177 | 465 | 6 | 648 | 27.3% | 71.8% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SAMPSON WARD 1TOWN OF SAMPSON WARD 1 | 186 | 446 | 5 | 637 | 29.2% | 70.0% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF DELMAR WARDS 1-2TOWN OF DELMAR WARDS 1-2 | 144 | 398 | 9 | 551 | 26.1% | 72.2% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CLEVELAND WARD 1TOWN OF CLEVELAND WARD 1 | 178 | 364 | 4 | 546 | 32.6% | 66.7% | R+34.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EDSON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF EDSON WARDS 1-2 | 135 | 379 | 5 | 519 | 26.0% | 73.0% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HOWARD WARD 1TOWN OF HOWARD WARD 1 | 172 | 338 | 9 | 519 | 33.1% | 65.1% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF COLBURN WARD 1TOWN OF COLBURN WARD 1 | 108 | 388 | 7 | 503 | 21.5% | 77.1% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF COOKS VALLEY WARD 1TOWN OF COOKS VALLEY WARD 1 | 110 | 358 | 3 | 471 | 23.4% | 76.0% | R+52.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GOETZ WARD 1TOWN OF GOETZ WARD 1 | 152 | 314 | 4 | 470 | 32.3% | 66.8% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF AUBURN WARD 1TOWN OF AUBURN WARD 1 | 123 | 327 | 3 | 453 | 27.2% | 72.2% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ARTHUR WARD 1TOWN OF ARTHUR WARD 1 | 112 | 321 | 11 | 444 | 25.2% | 72.3% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BIRCH CREEK WARD 1TOWN OF BIRCH CREEK WARD 1 | 123 | 228 | 4 | 355 | 34.6% | 64.2% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BOYD WARD 1VILLAGE OF BOYD WARD 1 | 103 | 218 | 4 | 325 | 31.7% | 67.1% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ESTELLA WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ESTELLA WARDS 1-2 | 51 | 230 | 2 | 283 | 18.0% | 81.3% | R+63.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF RUBY WARD 1TOWN OF RUBY WARD 1 | 59 | 213 | 4 | 276 | 21.4% | 77.2% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF NEW AUBURN WARD 1VILLAGE OF NEW AUBURN WARD 1 | 75 | 183 | 5 | 263 | 28.5% | 69.6% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF EAU CLAIRE WARD 41CITY OF EAU CLAIRE WARD 41 | 134 | 92 | 5 | 231 | 58.0% | 39.8% | D+18.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EAGLE POINT WARD 6TOWN OF EAGLE POINT WARD 6 | 87 | 96 | 2 | 185 | 47.0% | 51.9% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HALLIE WARD 1TOWN OF HALLIE WARD 1 | 61 | 63 | 1 | 125 | 48.8% | 50.4% | R+1.6 |
presidential history
Party record book
Chippewa County, WI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Lyndon B. Johnson1964
63.4%
10,911 votes · D+26.9
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 62.9%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
82.6%
6,750 votes · R+69.1
Runner-up · Theodore Roosevelt, 1904 · 66.5%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
16,239votes
53.7% of the vote · D+9.1
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 15,237 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
23,399votes
60.8% of the vote · R+22.9
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 21,317 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
George McGovern1972
+21.7pts D vs U.S.
Place R+1.4 · U.S. R+23.2
Runner-up · Michael Dukakis, 1988 · +15.6 pts
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
+42.9pts R vs U.S.
Place R+69.1 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · +24.9 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Chippewa County, WI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 2 state senate and 3 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+384 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,232 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $63,414 in average income, against $77,840 for residents who stayed — 19% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+2.5 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Chippewa County, WI itself (R+22.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Eau Claire County, WI622D+10.6
- Dunn County, WI129R+15.9
- Barron County, WI91R+29.0
- Clark County, WI73R+38.9
- Rusk County, WI49R+38.0
- Taylor County, WI30R+48.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Eau Claire County, WI661
- Dunn County, WI119
- Barron County, WI83
- Clark County, WI57
- Rusk County, WI48
- Hennepin County, MN32
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +59 |
| 2012 | −163 |
| 2013 | −94 |
| 2014 | +134 |
| 2015 | −18 |
| 2016 | +31 |
| 2017 | +115 |
| 2018 | +272 |
| 2019 | +474 |
| 2021 | +264 |
| 2022 | +213 |
| 2023 | +181 |
| 2024 | +380 |
| 2025 | +384 |
Chippewa County, anchored by the city of Chippewa Falls, swung from a near-toss-up in the early 2000s to an R+22.9 margin in 2024, mirroring the broader rural realignment across Wisconsin's Chippewa Valley.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.2 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 69.1 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 22.9 points.
A population of 66,799, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $74,680 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Barron County and Monroe County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Chippewa County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55017/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.