Chippewa County, Wisconsin
Precinct data
Results by precinct
37 precincts · 38,471 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -TOWN OF LAFAYETTE WARDS 1-8TOWN OF LAFAYETTE WARDS 1-8 | 1,726 | 2,582 | 54 | 4,362 | 39.6% | 59.2% | R+19.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF LAKE HALLIE WARDS 1-10VILLAGE OF LAKE HALLIE WARDS 1-10 | 1,746 | 2,475 | 60 | 4,281 | 40.8% | 57.8% | R+17.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 3,4-6,15CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 3,4-6,15 | 1,293 | 1,334 | 51 | 2,678 | 48.3% | 49.8% | R+1.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF BLOOMER WARDS 1-4CITY OF BLOOMER WARDS 1-4 | 705 | 1,442 | 22 | 2,169 | 32.5% | 66.5% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EAGLE POINT WARDS 1-5TOWN OF EAGLE POINT WARDS 1-5 | 781 | 1,233 | 24 | 2,038 | 38.3% | 60.5% | R+22.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 11-14,16CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 11-14,16 | 932 | 1,067 | 26 | 2,025 | 46.0% | 52.7% | R+6.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 1-2,9-10CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 1-2,9-10 | 910 | 977 | 32 | 1,919 | 47.4% | 50.9% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WHEATON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF WHEATON WARDS 1-3 | 703 | 1,127 | 18 | 1,848 | 38.0% | 61.0% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ANSON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF ANSON WARDS 1-3 | 596 | 1,003 | 17 | 1,616 | 36.9% | 62.1% | R+25.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF STANLEY WARDS 1-6,9CITY OF STANLEY WARDS 1-6,9 | 337 | 730 | 13 | 1,080 | 31.2% | 67.6% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 8-7CITY OF CHIPPEWA FALLS WARDS 8-7 | 585 | 470 | 21 | 1,076 | 54.4% | 43.7% | D+10.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF EAU CLAIRE WARD 16CITY OF EAU CLAIRE WARD 16 | 537 | 475 | 21 | 1,033 | 52.0% | 46.0% | D+6.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF TILDEN WARDS 1-3TOWN OF TILDEN WARDS 1-3 | 349 | 658 | 8 | 1,015 | 34.4% | 64.8% | R+30.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CORNELL WARDS 1-4CITY OF CORNELL WARDS 1-4 | 247 | 499 | 10 | 756 | 32.7% | 66.0% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF CADOTT WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF CADOTT WARDS 1-2 | 273 | 472 | 11 | 756 | 36.1% | 62.4% | R+26.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WOODMOHR WARDS 1-2TOWN OF WOODMOHR WARDS 1-2 | 195 | 482 | 6 | 683 | 28.6% | 70.6% | R+42.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LAKE HOLCOMBE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LAKE HOLCOMBE WARDS 1-2 | 166 | 498 | 6 | 670 | 24.8% | 74.3% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SIGEL WARDS 1-2TOWN OF SIGEL WARDS 1-2 | 202 | 454 | 6 | 662 | 30.5% | 68.6% | R+38.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BLOOMER WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BLOOMER WARDS 1-2 | 177 | 465 | 6 | 648 | 27.3% | 71.8% | R+44.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SAMPSON WARD 1TOWN OF SAMPSON WARD 1 | 186 | 446 | 5 | 637 | 29.2% | 70.0% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF DELMAR WARDS 1-2TOWN OF DELMAR WARDS 1-2 | 144 | 398 | 9 | 551 | 26.1% | 72.2% | R+46.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CLEVELAND WARD 1TOWN OF CLEVELAND WARD 1 | 178 | 364 | 4 | 546 | 32.6% | 66.7% | R+34.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EDSON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF EDSON WARDS 1-2 | 135 | 379 | 5 | 519 | 26.0% | 73.0% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HOWARD WARD 1TOWN OF HOWARD WARD 1 | 172 | 338 | 9 | 519 | 33.1% | 65.1% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF COLBURN WARD 1TOWN OF COLBURN WARD 1 | 108 | 388 | 7 | 503 | 21.5% | 77.1% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF COOKS VALLEY WARD 1TOWN OF COOKS VALLEY WARD 1 | 110 | 358 | 3 | 471 | 23.4% | 76.0% | R+52.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GOETZ WARD 1TOWN OF GOETZ WARD 1 | 152 | 314 | 4 | 470 | 32.3% | 66.8% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF AUBURN WARD 1TOWN OF AUBURN WARD 1 | 123 | 327 | 3 | 453 | 27.2% | 72.2% | R+45.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ARTHUR WARD 1TOWN OF ARTHUR WARD 1 | 112 | 321 | 11 | 444 | 25.2% | 72.3% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BIRCH CREEK WARD 1TOWN OF BIRCH CREEK WARD 1 | 123 | 228 | 4 | 355 | 34.6% | 64.2% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BOYD WARD 1VILLAGE OF BOYD WARD 1 | 103 | 218 | 4 | 325 | 31.7% | 67.1% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ESTELLA WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ESTELLA WARDS 1-2 | 51 | 230 | 2 | 283 | 18.0% | 81.3% | R+63.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF RUBY WARD 1TOWN OF RUBY WARD 1 | 59 | 213 | 4 | 276 | 21.4% | 77.2% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF NEW AUBURN WARD 1VILLAGE OF NEW AUBURN WARD 1 | 75 | 183 | 5 | 263 | 28.5% | 69.6% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF EAU CLAIRE WARD 41CITY OF EAU CLAIRE WARD 41 | 134 | 92 | 5 | 231 | 58.0% | 39.8% | D+18.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF EAGLE POINT WARD 6TOWN OF EAGLE POINT WARD 6 | 87 | 96 | 2 | 185 | 47.0% | 51.9% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HALLIE WARD 1TOWN OF HALLIE WARD 1 | 61 | 63 | 1 | 125 | 48.8% | 50.4% | R+1.6 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +11.1% |
| 1896 | −10.1% |
| 1900 | −26.0% |
| 1904 | −36.8% |
| 1908 | −22.2% |
| 1912 | +5.7% |
| 1916 | −19.1% |
| 1920 | −69.1% |
| 1924 | −37.2% |
| 1928 | −11.3% |
| 1932 | +27.2% |
| 1936 | +14.2% |
| 1940 | −9.5% |
| 1944 | −7.8% |
| 1948 | +11.0% |
| 1952 | −28.3% |
| 1956 | −19.2% |
| 1960 | +6.0% |
| 1964 | +26.9% |
| 1968 | −2.7% |
| 1972 | −1.4% |
| 1976 | +16.9% |
| 1980 | −3.2% |
| 1984 | −3.7% |
| 1988 | +7.9% |
| 1992 | +9.0% |
| 1996 | +10.1% |
| 2000 | −2.8% |
| 2004 | −2.3% |
| 2008 | +9.1% |
| 2012 | −0.3% |
| 2016 | −19.1% |
| 2020 | −20.4% |
| 2024 | −22.9% |
U.S. Senate
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+384 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,232 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $63,414 in average income, against $77,840 for residents who stayed — 19% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+2.5 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Chippewa County, WI itself (R+22.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Eau Claire County, WI622D+10.6
- Dunn County, WI129R+15.9
- Barron County, WI91R+29.0
- Clark County, WI73R+38.9
- Rusk County, WI49R+38.0
- Taylor County, WI30R+48.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Eau Claire County, WI661
- Dunn County, WI119
- Barron County, WI83
- Clark County, WI57
- Rusk County, WI48
- Hennepin County, MN32
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +59 |
| 2012 | −163 |
| 2013 | −94 |
| 2014 | +134 |
| 2015 | −18 |
| 2016 | +31 |
| 2017 | +115 |
| 2018 | +272 |
| 2019 | +474 |
| 2021 | +264 |
| 2022 | +213 |
| 2023 | +181 |
| 2024 | +380 |
| 2025 | +384 |
Chippewa County, anchored by the city of Chippewa Falls, swung from a near-toss-up in the early 2000s to an R+22.9 margin in 2024, mirroring the broader rural realignment across Wisconsin's Chippewa Valley.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.2 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 69.1 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.5 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 22.9 points.
A population of 66,799, a 92% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $74,680 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Barron County and Monroe County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Chippewa County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55017/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.