Monroe County, Wisconsin
Precinct data
Results by precinct
37 precincts · 23,369 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CITY OF TOMAH WARDS 1-5,6-16,20CITY OF TOMAH WARDS 1-5,6-16,20 | 1,732 | 2,514 | 69 | 4,315 | 40.1% | 58.3% | R+18.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CITY OF SPARTA WARDS 1-5CITY OF SPARTA WARDS 1-5 | 1,189 | 1,327 | 35 | 2,551 | 46.6% | 52.0% | R+5.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF SPARTA WARDS 6-14CITY OF SPARTA WARDS 6-14 | 936 | 998 | 33 | 1,967 | 47.6% | 50.7% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SPARTA WARDS 1-5TOWN OF SPARTA WARDS 1-5 | 755 | 1,178 | 24 | 1,957 | 38.6% | 60.2% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LA GRANGE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LA GRANGE WARDS 1-2 | 374 | 771 | 14 | 1,159 | 32.3% | 66.5% | R+34.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LITTLE FALLS WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LITTLE FALLS WARDS 1-2 | 298 | 573 | 17 | 888 | 33.6% | 64.5% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF TOMAH WARDS 1-3TOWN OF TOMAH WARDS 1-3 | 266 | 591 | 10 | 867 | 30.7% | 68.2% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ANGELO WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ANGELO WARDS 1-2 | 252 | 565 | 11 | 828 | 30.4% | 68.2% | R+37.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BYRON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BYRON WARDS 1-2 | 223 | 474 | 9 | 706 | 31.6% | 67.1% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LEON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF LEON WARDS 1-2 | 200 | 485 | 10 | 695 | 28.8% | 69.8% | R+41.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF CASHTON WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF CASHTON WARDS 1-2 | 200 | 352 | 7 | 559 | 35.8% | 63.0% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ADRIAN WARDS 1-2TOWN OF ADRIAN WARDS 1-2 | 131 | 365 | 5 | 501 | 26.1% | 72.9% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LINCOLN WARD 1TOWN OF LINCOLN WARD 1 | 111 | 378 | 10 | 499 | 22.2% | 75.8% | R+53.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PORTLAND WARD 1TOWN OF PORTLAND WARD 1 | 162 | 303 | 11 | 476 | 34.0% | 63.7% | R+29.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GREENFIELD WARDS 1-2TOWN OF GREENFIELD WARDS 1-2 | 115 | 326 | 2 | 443 | 26.0% | 73.6% | R+47.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF OAKDALE WARD 1TOWN OF OAKDALE WARD 1 | 107 | 327 | 4 | 438 | 24.4% | 74.7% | R+50.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GLENDALE WARD 1TOWN OF GLENDALE WARD 1 | 114 | 283 | 3 | 400 | 28.5% | 70.8% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WELLS WARD 1TOWN OF WELLS WARD 1 | 100 | 226 | 3 | 329 | 30.4% | 68.7% | R+38.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF JEFFERSON WARD 1TOWN OF JEFFERSON WARD 1 | 115 | 206 | 7 | 328 | 35.1% | 62.8% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WILTON WARD 1TOWN OF WILTON WARD 1 | 95 | 210 | 1 | 306 | 31.0% | 68.6% | R+37.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WELLINGTON WARD 1TOWN OF WELLINGTON WARD 1 | 114 | 181 | 3 | 298 | 38.3% | 60.7% | R+22.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GRANT WARD 1TOWN OF GRANT WARD 1 | 61 | 222 | 7 | 290 | 21.0% | 76.6% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF RIDGEVILLE WARD 1TOWN OF RIDGEVILLE WARD 1 | 101 | 179 | 8 | 288 | 35.1% | 62.2% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SHELDON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF SHELDON WARDS 1-2 | 60 | 223 | 4 | 287 | 20.9% | 77.7% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WARRENS WARD 1VILLAGE OF WARRENS WARD 1 | 85 | 178 | 4 | 267 | 31.8% | 66.7% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CLIFTON WARD 1TOWN OF CLIFTON WARD 1 | 88 | 161 | 5 | 254 | 34.6% | 63.4% | R+28.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WILTON WARD 1VILLAGE OF WILTON WARD 1 | 108 | 143 | 0 | 251 | 43.0% | 57.0% | R+13.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF KENDALL WARD 1VILLAGE OF KENDALL WARD 1 | 87 | 144 | 5 | 236 | 36.9% | 61.0% | R+24.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LAFAYETTE WARD 1TOWN OF LAFAYETTE WARD 1 | 66 | 151 | 2 | 219 | 30.1% | 68.9% | R+38.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF NORWALK WARD 1VILLAGE OF NORWALK WARD 1 | 83 | 132 | 1 | 216 | 38.4% | 61.1% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF OAKDALE WARD 1VILLAGE OF OAKDALE WARD 1 | 43 | 105 | 4 | 152 | 28.3% | 69.1% | R+40.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF NEW LYME WARD 1TOWN OF NEW LYME WARD 1 | 24 | 85 | 1 | 110 | 21.8% | 77.3% | R+55.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF LA GRANGE WARDS 3-4TOWN OF LA GRANGE WARDS 3-4 | 22 | 66 | 0 | 88 | 25.0% | 75.0% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WYEVILLE WARD 1VILLAGE OF WYEVILLE WARD 1 | 23 | 49 | 1 | 73 | 31.5% | 67.1% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SCOTT WARD 1TOWN OF SCOTT WARD 1 | 12 | 41 | 0 | 53 | 22.6% | 77.4% | R+54.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF MELVINA WARD 1VILLAGE OF MELVINA WARD 1 | 11 | 41 | 0 | 52 | 21.2% | 78.8% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF TOMAH WARDS 17-19,21CITY OF TOMAH WARDS 17-19,21 | 13 | 10 | 0 | 23 | 56.5% | 43.5% | D+13.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −1.3% |
| 1896 | −21.3% |
| 1900 | −23.8% |
| 1904 | −36.8% |
| 1908 | −20.2% |
| 1912 | +5.0% |
| 1916 | −19.5% |
| 1920 | −71.3% |
| 1924 | −22.4% |
| 1928 | −22.8% |
| 1932 | +37.5% |
| 1936 | +15.0% |
| 1940 | −26.2% |
| 1944 | −28.7% |
| 1948 | −3.6% |
| 1952 | −40.2% |
| 1956 | −26.7% |
| 1960 | −17.9% |
| 1964 | +10.9% |
| 1968 | −24.4% |
| 1972 | −34.8% |
| 1976 | −5.6% |
| 1980 | −10.3% |
| 1984 | −19.2% |
| 1988 | −4.7% |
| 1992 | +1.8% |
| 1996 | +11.1% |
| 2000 | −4.6% |
| 2004 | −7.2% |
| 2008 | +8.0% |
| 2012 | −0.8% |
| 2016 | −21.8% |
| 2020 | −23.6% |
| 2024 | −26.0% |
U.S. Senate
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−35 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −691 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,245 in average income, against $70,395 for residents who stayed — 24% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+3.6 on average — 22 points more Democratic-leaning than Monroe County, WI itself (R+26.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- La Crosse County, WI205D+9.4
- Juneau County, WI121R+32.1
- Vernon County, WI58R+7.8
- Jackson County, WI42R+19.5
- Dane County, WI31D+51.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- La Crosse County, WI254
- Juneau County, WI115
- Vernon County, WI66
- Jackson County, WI48
- Dane County, WI44
- Sauk County, WI26
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +38 |
| 2012 | −322 |
| 2013 | −29 |
| 2014 | −189 |
| 2015 | −102 |
| 2016 | −140 |
| 2017 | +71 |
| 2018 | +289 |
| 2019 | −21 |
| 2021 | −151 |
| 2022 | −235 |
| 2023 | +74 |
| 2024 | +61 |
| 2025 | −35 |
Monroe County's economy is anchored by dairy farming and timber, and its largely non-Hispanic white, rural population has shifted toward the Republican column by double digits over the past four presidential elections.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 37.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 71.3 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 26.0 points.
A population of 46,208, a 88% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $69,467 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Chippewa County and Richland County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Monroe County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55081/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.