- Lead
- 6,761
- Total
- 72,261
- vs nation
- D+10.8
- Turnout
- 75.5%
La Crosse County, WI
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 75.5% of 96,296 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 9,162
- Total
- 67,884
- vs nation
- D+9.0
- Turnout
- 72.6%
- Lead
- 6,028
- Total
- 63,674
- vs nation
- D+7.4
- Turnout
- 69.3%
- Lead
- 10,942
- Total
- 63,462
- vs nation
- D+13.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 14,823
- Total
- 63,218
- vs nation
- D+16.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,881
- Total
- 62,136
- vs nation
- D+10.3
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,128
- Total
- 55,559
- vs nation
- D+6.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 7,165
- Total
- 46,001
- vs nation
- D+7.1
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- D+9.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 120,4882024 5-year
- Population density
- 267 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 452 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $73,0132024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 87.4%2024 5-year
- Black
- 1.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.7%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+30.2 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+54.9 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Eau Claire County, WI · twin score 95.4
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 75.5%72,726 participants ÷ 96,296 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +14.5 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 61.0%–64.5%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 72,726 | 96,296 ± 453 | 75.5% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2022Mid | 55,655 | 95,832 ± 418 | 58.1% | Audited | C/A |
| 68,082 | 93,824 ± 445 | 72.6% | Audited | C/A | |
| 2018Mid | 57,553 | 93,331 ± 466 | 61.7% | Audited | C/A |
| 64,092 | 92,479 ± 446 | 69.3% | Audited | C/A | |
| 63,462 | 88,706 | 71.5% | Derived | — | |
| 63,218 | 86,234 | 73.3% | Derived | — | |
| 62,136 | 83,762 extrapolated | 74.2% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 0.6%; series 312/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 0.6%; series 307/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 0.6%; series 302/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 0.5%; series 298/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:partially allocated; allocation share 0.5%; series 294/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 50 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
50 precincts · 72,261 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CITY OF ONALASKA WARDS 1-5CITY OF ONALASKA WARDS 1-5 | 2,135 | 1,793 | 54 | 3,982 | 53.6% | 45.0% | D+8.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CITY OF ONALASKA WARDS 11-15CITY OF ONALASKA WARDS 11-15 | 1,954 | 1,929 | 49 | 3,932 | 49.7% | 49.1% | D+0.6 |
| Precinct -CITY OF ONALASKA WARDS 6-10CITY OF ONALASKA WARDS 6-10 | 2,135 | 1,654 | 76 | 3,865 | 55.2% | 42.8% | D+12.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF HOLMEN WARDS 6-11VILLAGE OF HOLMEN WARDS 6-11 | 1,882 | 1,576 | 37 | 3,495 | 53.8% | 45.1% | D+8.8 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF HOLMEN WARDS 1-5,12-13VILLAGE OF HOLMEN WARDS 1-5,12-13 | 1,684 | 1,633 | 34 | 3,351 | 50.3% | 48.7% | D+1.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SHELBY WARDS 1-6TOWN OF SHELBY WARDS 1-6 | 1,842 | 1,311 | 56 | 3,209 | 57.4% | 40.9% | D+16.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF WEST SALEM WARDS 1-8VILLAGE OF WEST SALEM WARDS 1-8 | 1,470 | 1,647 | 40 | 3,157 | 46.6% | 52.2% | R+5.6 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HOLLAND WARDS 1-5TOWN OF HOLLAND WARDS 1-5 | 1,308 | 1,646 | 23 | 2,977 | 43.9% | 55.3% | R+11.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CAMPBELL WARDS 1-5TOWN OF CAMPBELL WARDS 1-5 | 1,413 | 1,206 | 39 | 2,658 | 53.2% | 45.4% | D+7.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ONALASKA WARDS 1-4TOWN OF ONALASKA WARDS 1-4 | 822 | 1,062 | 29 | 1,913 | 43.0% | 55.5% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF ONALASKA WARDS 5-8TOWN OF ONALASKA WARDS 5-8 | 874 | 990 | 34 | 1,898 | 46.0% | 52.2% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF HAMILTON WARDS 1-5TOWN OF HAMILTON WARDS 1-5 | 646 | 972 | 15 | 1,633 | 39.6% | 59.5% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 7CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 7 | 1,085 | 393 | 24 | 1,502 | 72.2% | 26.2% | D+46.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 26CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 26 | 856 | 577 | 15 | 1,448 | 59.1% | 39.8% | D+19.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GREENFIELD WARDS 1-3TOWN OF GREENFIELD WARDS 1-3 | 639 | 736 | 14 | 1,389 | 46.0% | 53.0% | R+7.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 19CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 19 | 881 | 441 | 19 | 1,341 | 65.7% | 32.9% | D+32.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 17CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 17 | 941 | 367 | 22 | 1,330 | 70.8% | 27.6% | D+43.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 18CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 18 | 818 | 467 | 32 | 1,317 | 62.1% | 35.5% | D+26.7 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FARMINGTON WARDS 1-3TOWN OF FARMINGTON WARDS 1-3 | 462 | 796 | 18 | 1,276 | 36.2% | 62.4% | R+26.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 11CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 11 | 598 | 664 | 12 | 1,274 | 46.9% | 52.1% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 23CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 23 | 738 | 487 | 25 | 1,250 | 59.0% | 39.0% | D+20.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 8CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 8 | 683 | 517 | 7 | 1,207 | 56.6% | 42.8% | D+13.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 4CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 4 | 670 | 445 | 20 | 1,135 | 59.0% | 39.2% | D+19.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 25CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 25 | 710 | 386 | 17 | 1,113 | 63.8% | 34.7% | D+29.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 10CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 10 | 567 | 519 | 11 | 1,097 | 51.7% | 47.3% | D+4.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 24CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 24 | 714 | 360 | 18 | 1,092 | 65.4% | 33.0% | D+32.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 6CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 6 | 632 | 439 | 15 | 1,086 | 58.2% | 40.4% | D+17.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 22CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 22 | 648 | 421 | 13 | 1,082 | 59.9% | 38.9% | D+21.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 21CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 21 | 663 | 373 | 24 | 1,060 | 62.5% | 35.2% | D+27.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 9CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 9 | 475 | 547 | 17 | 1,039 | 45.7% | 52.6% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 16CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 16 | 650 | 325 | 13 | 988 | 65.8% | 32.9% | D+32.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 12CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 12 | 658 | 314 | 13 | 985 | 66.8% | 31.9% | D+34.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 5CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 5 | 567 | 406 | 11 | 984 | 57.6% | 41.3% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 13CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 13 | 683 | 287 | 13 | 983 | 69.5% | 29.2% | D+40.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 20CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 20 | 637 | 322 | 9 | 968 | 65.8% | 33.3% | D+32.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 1CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 1 | 525 | 377 | 14 | 916 | 57.3% | 41.2% | D+16.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BANGOR WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF BANGOR WARDS 1-2 | 394 | 500 | 8 | 902 | 43.7% | 55.4% | R+11.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MEDARY WARDS 2-3TOWN OF MEDARY WARDS 2-3 | 452 | 423 | 16 | 891 | 50.7% | 47.5% | D+3.3 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 14CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 14 | 583 | 282 | 20 | 885 | 65.9% | 31.9% | D+34.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 15CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 15 | 613 | 251 | 17 | 881 | 69.6% | 28.5% | D+41.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BARRE WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BARRE WARDS 1-2 | 288 | 547 | 14 | 849 | 33.9% | 64.4% | R+30.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 2CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 2 | 432 | 346 | 9 | 787 | 54.9% | 44.0% | D+10.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 3CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 3 | 472 | 215 | 8 | 695 | 67.9% | 30.9% | D+37.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BURNS WARDS 1-2TOWN OF BURNS WARDS 1-2 | 202 | 365 | 6 | 573 | 35.3% | 63.7% | R+28.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF ROCKLAND WARD 1VILLAGE OF ROCKLAND WARD 1 | 186 | 236 | 6 | 428 | 43.5% | 55.1% | R+11.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 27CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 27 | 244 | 138 | 8 | 390 | 62.6% | 35.4% | D+27.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BANGOR WARD 1TOWN OF BANGOR WARD 1 | 140 | 220 | 2 | 362 | 38.7% | 60.8% | R+22.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF WASHINGTON WARD 1TOWN OF WASHINGTON WARD 1 | 147 | 167 | 3 | 317 | 46.4% | 52.7% | R+6.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF MEDARY WARD 1TOWN OF MEDARY WARD 1 | 116 | 145 | 4 | 265 | 43.8% | 54.7% | R+10.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 28CITY OF LA CROSSE WARD 28 | 74 | 27 | 3 | 104 | 71.2% | 26.0% | D+45.2 |
presidential history
Party record book
La Crosse County, WI · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
63.3%
14,455 votes · D+30.2
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 62.1%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
74.0%
10,067 votes · R+54.9
Runner-up · William McKinley, 1896 · 64.6%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
39,008votes
54.0% of the vote · D+9.4
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 38,524 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
32,247votes
44.6% of the vote · D+9.4
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 28,684 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
+16.2pts D vs U.S.
Place D+23.4 · U.S. D+7.3
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · +13.4 pts
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
+28.8pts R vs U.S.
Place R+54.9 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · William McKinley, 1896 · +27.1 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing La Crosse County, WI. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 3 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+395 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,118 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $54,928 in average income, against $89,937 for residents who stayed — 39% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+3.7 on average — 13 points more Republican-leaning than La Crosse County, WI itself (D+9.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Monroe County, WI254R+26.0
- Houston County, MN160R+16.5
- Vernon County, WI154R+7.8
- Trempealeau County, WI134R+21.4
- Dane County, WI114D+51.5
- Winona County, MN101R+4.9
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Monroe County, WI205
- Dane County, WI180
- Houston County, MN169
- Trempealeau County, WI147
- Vernon County, WI132
- Hennepin County, MN115
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +2 |
| 2012 | +934 |
| 2013 | +71 |
| 2014 | +205 |
| 2015 | −51 |
| 2016 | −269 |
| 2017 | +135 |
| 2018 | −115 |
| 2019 | −172 |
| 2021 | −1,479 |
| 2022 | +939 |
| 2023 | +328 |
| 2024 | +195 |
| 2025 | +395 |
Home to the University of Wisconsin–La Crosse and a regional medical hub, La Crosse County has voted Democratic in every presidential race since 2000, with its 2024 margin of D+9.4 reflecting a consistent urban-academic lean along the Mississippi.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 30.2 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 54.9 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 9.4 points.
A population of 120,488, a 87% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $73,013 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Eau Claire County and Dane County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
La Crosse County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55063/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.