Ozaukee County, Wisconsin
Precinct data
Results by precinct
51 precincts · 63,472 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 17-18CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 17-18 | 1,193 | 1,067 | 43 | 2,303 | 51.8% | 46.3% | D+5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 19-20CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 19-20 | 1,189 | 1,043 | 65 | 2,297 | 51.8% | 45.4% | D+6.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 1-3CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 1-3 | 809 | 1,366 | 36 | 2,211 | 36.6% | 61.8% | R+25.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 6-7,8CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 6-7,8 | 990 | 1,101 | 46 | 2,137 | 46.3% | 51.5% | R+5.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 14-16CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 14-16 | 1,108 | 985 | 42 | 2,135 | 51.9% | 46.1% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 9-11ACITY OF MEQUON WARDS 9-11A | 918 | 798 | 16 | 1,732 | 53.0% | 46.1% | D+6.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GRAFTON WARDS 1-2,5TOWN OF GRAFTON WARDS 1-2,5 | 607 | 984 | 19 | 1,610 | 37.7% | 61.1% | R+23.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BELGIUM WARDS 1-3VILLAGE OF BELGIUM WARDS 1-3 | 453 | 1,111 | 24 | 1,588 | 28.5% | 70.0% | R+41.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 12-13CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 12-13 | 721 | 814 | 28 | 1,563 | 46.1% | 52.1% | R+6.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF GRAFTON WARDS 3-4,6TOWN OF GRAFTON WARDS 3-4,6 | 597 | 927 | 17 | 1,541 | 38.7% | 60.2% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 1CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 1 | 728 | 736 | 23 | 1,487 | 49.0% | 49.5% | R+0.5 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 13-14VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 13-14 | 666 | 771 | 17 | 1,454 | 45.8% | 53.0% | R+7.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF FREDONIA WARDS 1-3VILLAGE OF FREDONIA WARDS 1-3 | 406 | 994 | 32 | 1,432 | 28.4% | 69.4% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARD 5CITY OF MEQUON WARD 5 | 696 | 677 | 26 | 1,399 | 49.7% | 48.4% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF FREDONIA WARDS 1-4TOWN OF FREDONIA WARDS 1-4 | 321 | 1,048 | 30 | 1,399 | 22.9% | 74.9% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CEDARBURG WARDS 5-6,10TOWN OF CEDARBURG WARDS 5-6,10 | 491 | 877 | 24 | 1,392 | 35.3% | 63.0% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 7CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 7 | 681 | 690 | 17 | 1,388 | 49.1% | 49.7% | R+0.6 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF SAUKVILLE WARDS 1,6-7VILLAGE OF SAUKVILLE WARDS 1,6-7 | 514 | 844 | 20 | 1,378 | 37.3% | 61.2% | R+23.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CEDARBURG WARDS 7-9TOWN OF CEDARBURG WARDS 7-9 | 502 | 815 | 23 | 1,340 | 37.5% | 60.8% | R+23.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARDS 4,8CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARDS 4,8 | 644 | 666 | 17 | 1,327 | 48.5% | 50.2% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 1-2 | 546 | 731 | 21 | 1,298 | 42.1% | 56.3% | R+14.3 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF SAUKVILLE WARDS 1-3TOWN OF SAUKVILLE WARDS 1-3 | 342 | 935 | 14 | 1,291 | 26.5% | 72.4% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF SAUKVILLE WARDS 2-5VILLAGE OF SAUKVILLE WARDS 2-5 | 475 | 784 | 27 | 1,286 | 36.9% | 61.0% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF THIENSVILLE WARDS 1-2VILLAGE OF THIENSVILLE WARDS 1-2 | 636 | 625 | 24 | 1,285 | 49.5% | 48.6% | D+0.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 3CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 3 | 640 | 612 | 14 | 1,266 | 50.6% | 48.3% | D+2.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 9-10VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 9-10 | 613 | 634 | 16 | 1,263 | 48.5% | 50.2% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 5-6VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 5-6 | 571 | 657 | 22 | 1,250 | 45.7% | 52.6% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 6CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 6 | 640 | 570 | 28 | 1,238 | 51.7% | 46.0% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 5CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 5 | 619 | 536 | 29 | 1,184 | 52.3% | 45.3% | D+7.0 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 2CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 2 | 575 | 583 | 25 | 1,183 | 48.6% | 49.3% | R+0.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 5CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 5 | 558 | 603 | 21 | 1,182 | 47.2% | 51.0% | R+3.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 7CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 7 | 567 | 588 | 17 | 1,172 | 48.4% | 50.2% | R+1.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 2CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 2 | 535 | 601 | 14 | 1,150 | 46.5% | 52.3% | R+5.7 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 1CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 1 | 510 | 614 | 18 | 1,142 | 44.7% | 53.8% | R+9.1 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF PORT WASHINGTON WARDS 1-2TOWN OF PORT WASHINGTON WARDS 1-2 | 393 | 717 | 23 | 1,133 | 34.7% | 63.3% | R+28.6 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 3CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 3 | 566 | 516 | 30 | 1,112 | 50.9% | 46.4% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 4CITY OF CEDARBURG WARD 4 | 562 | 526 | 19 | 1,107 | 50.8% | 47.5% | D+3.3 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 7-8VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 7-8 | 447 | 606 | 16 | 1,069 | 41.8% | 56.7% | R+14.9 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 3-4VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 3-4 | 456 | 592 | 18 | 1,066 | 42.8% | 55.5% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARD 4CITY OF MEQUON WARD 4 | 555 | 435 | 17 | 1,007 | 55.1% | 43.2% | D+11.9 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF BELGIUM WARDS 1-3TOWN OF BELGIUM WARDS 1-3 | 322 | 665 | 18 | 1,005 | 32.0% | 66.2% | R+34.1 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 11-12VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARDS 11-12 | 399 | 545 | 19 | 963 | 41.4% | 56.6% | R+15.2 |
| Precinct -CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 6CITY OF PORT WASHINGTON WARD 6 | 446 | 501 | 15 | 962 | 46.4% | 52.1% | R+5.7 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF THIENSVILLE WARDS 3-4VILLAGE OF THIENSVILLE WARDS 3-4 | 463 | 465 | 29 | 957 | 48.4% | 48.6% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CEDARBURG WARDS 1-2TOWN OF CEDARBURG WARDS 1-2 | 347 | 568 | 13 | 928 | 37.4% | 61.2% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -TOWN OF CEDARBURG WARDS 3-4TOWN OF CEDARBURG WARDS 3-4 | 356 | 488 | 11 | 855 | 41.6% | 57.1% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 10-11CITY OF MEQUON WARDS 10-11 | 319 | 310 | 7 | 636 | 50.2% | 48.7% | D+1.4 |
| Precinct -CITY OF MEQUON WARD 7ACITY OF MEQUON WARD 7A | 90 | 84 | 2 | 176 | 51.1% | 47.7% | D+3.4 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF BAYSIDE WARD 6VILLAGE OF BAYSIDE WARD 6 | 52 | 25 | 2 | 79 | 65.8% | 31.6% | D+34.2 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARD 15VILLAGE OF GRAFTON WARD 15 | 27 | 33 | 0 | 60 | 45.0% | 55.0% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -VILLAGE OF NEWBURG WARD 3VILLAGE OF NEWBURG WARD 3 | 13 | 41 | 0 | 54 | 24.1% | 75.9% | R+51.9 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +51.4% |
| 1896 | +11.5% |
| 1900 | +21.4% |
| 1904 | +0.3% |
| 1908 | +20.3% |
| 1912 | +38.0% |
| 1916 | −1.0% |
| 1920 | −57.7% |
| 1924 | −8.6% |
| 1928 | +24.3% |
| 1932 | +64.1% |
| 1936 | +48.1% |
| 1940 | −14.3% |
| 1944 | −22.3% |
| 1948 | −7.7% |
| 1952 | −34.2% |
| 1956 | −40.2% |
| 1960 | −18.0% |
| 1964 | +5.2% |
| 1968 | −23.5% |
| 1972 | −28.5% |
| 1976 | −26.8% |
| 1980 | −30.2% |
| 1984 | −37.6% |
| 1988 | −28.6% |
| 1992 | −25.5% |
| 1996 | −22.6% |
| 2000 | −33.8% |
| 2004 | −32.4% |
| 2008 | −21.7% |
| 2012 | −30.3% |
| 2016 | −18.9% |
| 2020 | −12.0% |
| 2024 | −10.4% |
U.S. Senate
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+726 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +4,324 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $100,849 in average income, against $155,611 for residents who stayed — 35% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+10.0 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Ozaukee County, WI itself (R+10.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Milwaukee County, WI898D+38.4
- Washington County, WI329R+36.2
- Waukesha County, WI221R+19.7
- Sheboygan County, WI156R+16.3
- Dane County, WI65D+51.5
- Cook County, IL49D+41.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Milwaukee County, WI633
- Washington County, WI316
- Waukesha County, WI196
- Sheboygan County, WI176
- Cook County, IL96
- Dane County, WI92
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +300 |
| 2012 | +205 |
| 2013 | −68 |
| 2014 | +144 |
| 2015 | +150 |
| 2016 | +270 |
| 2017 | −59 |
| 2018 | +603 |
| 2019 | +121 |
| 2021 | +984 |
| 2022 | +487 |
| 2023 | +293 |
| 2024 | +168 |
| 2025 | +726 |
Once reliably among Wisconsin's most Republican counties, Ozaukee has moderated noticeably over the past decade as college-educated suburban voters reshaped its electorate, making its margin a closely watched statewide bellwether.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 64.1 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 57.7 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.6 points toward the Democratic candidate; the 2024 margin was 10.4 points.
A population of 92,966, a 89% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $96,996 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Waukesha County and Washington County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Ozaukee County, Wisconsin. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/55089/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.