Glenn County, California
Precinct data
Results by precinct
82 precincts · 10,384 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -4110041100 | 206 | 359 | 18 | 583 | 35.3% | 61.6% | R+26.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -1012110121 | 175 | 330 | 10 | 515 | 34.0% | 64.1% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -5003150031 | 299 | 173 | 20 | 492 | 60.8% | 35.2% | D+25.6 |
| Precinct -1215012150 | 182 | 154 | 12 | 348 | 52.3% | 44.3% | D+8.0 |
| Precinct -2212022120 | 132 | 195 | 10 | 337 | 39.2% | 57.9% | R+18.7 |
| Precinct -2009220092 | 91 | 234 | 7 | 332 | 27.4% | 70.5% | R+43.1 |
| Precinct -5006350063 | 63 | 228 | 7 | 298 | 21.1% | 76.5% | R+55.4 |
| Precinct -3010030100 | 73 | 211 | 5 | 289 | 25.3% | 73.0% | R+47.8 |
| Precinct -2003020030 | 87 | 188 | 6 | 281 | 31.0% | 66.9% | R+35.9 |
| Precinct -3002030020 | 68 | 194 | 7 | 269 | 25.3% | 72.1% | R+46.8 |
| Precinct -1004010040 | 88 | 173 | 4 | 265 | 33.2% | 65.3% | R+32.1 |
| Precinct -3005030050 | 60 | 201 | 4 | 265 | 22.6% | 75.8% | R+53.2 |
| Precinct -4107041070 | 81 | 171 | 13 | 265 | 30.6% | 64.5% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -3004230042 | 49 | 206 | 2 | 257 | 19.1% | 80.2% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -2211022110 | 103 | 136 | 8 | 247 | 41.7% | 55.1% | R+13.4 |
| Precinct -1207412074 | 86 | 146 | 13 | 245 | 35.1% | 59.6% | R+24.5 |
| Precinct -4109041090 | 95 | 145 | 3 | 243 | 39.1% | 59.7% | R+20.6 |
| Precinct -2203022030 | 102 | 113 | 10 | 225 | 45.3% | 50.2% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -4112041120 | 44 | 164 | 6 | 214 | 20.6% | 76.6% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -5008850088 | 38 | 173 | 3 | 214 | 17.8% | 80.8% | R+63.1 |
| Precinct -3107031070 | 77 | 101 | 7 | 185 | 41.6% | 54.6% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -1207012070 | 73 | 104 | 3 | 180 | 40.6% | 57.8% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -2204022040 | 52 | 117 | 7 | 176 | 29.5% | 66.5% | R+36.9 |
| Precinct -4108041080 | 61 | 98 | 4 | 163 | 37.4% | 60.1% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -3002130021 | 19 | 133 | 4 | 156 | 12.2% | 85.3% | R+73.1 |
| Precinct -3007130071 | 21 | 121 | 8 | 150 | 14.0% | 80.7% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -5002250022 | 18 | 123 | 3 | 144 | 12.5% | 85.4% | R+72.9 |
| Precinct -3011030110 | 31 | 103 | 3 | 137 | 22.6% | 75.2% | R+52.6 |
| Precinct -5007150071 | 28 | 99 | 5 | 132 | 21.2% | 75.0% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -4113041130 | 38 | 89 | 2 | 129 | 29.5% | 69.0% | R+39.5 |
| Precinct -5008450084 | 45 | 79 | 2 | 126 | 35.7% | 62.7% | R+27.0 |
| Precinct -5001150011 | 18 | 101 | 1 | 120 | 15.0% | 84.2% | R+69.2 |
| Precinct -2209022090 | 40 | 75 | 2 | 117 | 34.2% | 64.1% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -3001530015 | 14 | 102 | 1 | 117 | 12.0% | 87.2% | R+75.2 |
| Precinct -5005250052 | 11 | 105 | 1 | 117 | 9.4% | 89.7% | R+80.3 |
| Precinct -1008010080 | 39 | 60 | 3 | 102 | 38.2% | 58.8% | R+20.6 |
| Precinct -2007020070 | 16 | 80 | 4 | 100 | 16.0% | 80.0% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -1206012060 | 42 | 54 | 1 | 97 | 43.3% | 55.7% | R+12.4 |
| Precinct -3006230062 | 8 | 84 | 1 | 93 | 8.6% | 90.3% | R+81.7 |
| Precinct -4106041060 | 30 | 52 | 4 | 86 | 34.9% | 60.5% | R+25.6 |
| Precinct -3006030060 | 29 | 55 | 0 | 84 | 34.5% | 65.5% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -2213022130 | 27 | 50 | 1 | 78 | 34.6% | 64.1% | R+29.5 |
| Precinct -2003120031 | 36 | 38 | 3 | 77 | 46.8% | 49.4% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -3011130111 | 7 | 53 | 7 | 67 | 10.4% | 79.1% | R+68.7 |
| Precinct -4104041040 | 18 | 47 | 0 | 65 | 27.7% | 72.3% | R+44.6 |
| Precinct -4111041110 | 23 | 41 | 1 | 65 | 35.4% | 63.1% | R+27.7 |
| Precinct -3012030120 | 5 | 54 | 1 | 60 | 8.3% | 90.0% | R+81.7 |
| Precinct -5004250042 | 17 | 43 | 0 | 60 | 28.3% | 71.7% | R+43.3 |
| Precinct -1010010100 | 18 | 38 | 1 | 57 | 31.6% | 66.7% | R+35.1 |
| Precinct -3008730087 | 10 | 42 | 2 | 54 | 18.5% | 77.8% | R+59.3 |
| Precinct -3000930009 | 9 | 43 | 1 | 53 | 17.0% | 81.1% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -3007030070 | 13 | 36 | 2 | 51 | 25.5% | 70.6% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -4105041050 | 19 | 30 | 2 | 51 | 37.3% | 58.8% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -1006110061 | 17 | 27 | 3 | 47 | 36.2% | 57.4% | R+21.3 |
| Precinct -2205022050 | 17 | 28 | 2 | 47 | 36.2% | 59.6% | R+23.4 |
| Precinct -5008350083 | 5 | 39 | 1 | 45 | 11.1% | 86.7% | R+75.6 |
| Precinct -3004330043 | 5 | 36 | 3 | 44 | 11.4% | 81.8% | R+70.5 |
| Precinct -4114041140 | 14 | 26 | 1 | 41 | 34.1% | 63.4% | R+29.3 |
| Precinct -2210022100 | 14 | 24 | 2 | 40 | 35.0% | 60.0% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -5001350013 | 12 | 24 | 1 | 37 | 32.4% | 64.9% | R+32.4 |
| Precinct -2214022140 | 3 | 30 | 1 | 34 | 8.8% | 88.2% | R+79.4 |
| Precinct -5008150081 | 13 | 21 | 0 | 34 | 38.2% | 61.8% | R+23.5 |
| Precinct -3008430084 | 4 | 26 | 1 | 31 | 12.9% | 83.9% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -5008650086 | 7 | 21 | 0 | 28 | 25.0% | 75.0% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -3013230132 | 12 | 15 | 0 | 27 | 44.4% | 55.6% | R+11.1 |
| Precinct -3001630016 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 24 | 8.3% | 91.7% | R+83.3 |
| Precinct -5001250012 | 9 | 15 | 0 | 24 | 37.5% | 62.5% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -5001450014 | 9 | 15 | 0 | 24 | 37.5% | 62.5% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -3007430074 | 4 | 16 | 3 | 23 | 17.4% | 69.6% | R+52.2 |
| Precinct -4115041150 | 9 | 14 | 0 | 23 | 39.1% | 60.9% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -5008750087 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 21 | 23.8% | 76.2% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -1206112061 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 20 | 45.0% | 45.0% | Even |
| Precinct -5003050030 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 18 | 33.3% | 66.7% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -1207312073 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 17 | 58.8% | 41.2% | D+17.6 |
| Precinct -5008550085 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 16 | 18.8% | 81.3% | R+62.5 |
| Precinct -3003230032 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 15 | 6.7% | 80.0% | R+73.3 |
| Precinct -2305023050 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Even |
| Precinct -1012210122 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 76.9% | 23.1% | D+53.8 |
| Precinct -3007530075 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 12 | 25.0% | 75.0% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -3007330073 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 11 | 18.2% | 81.8% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -3008530085 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -3008930089 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +17.9% |
| 1896 | +26.4% |
| 1900 | +19.4% |
| 1904 | −2.6% |
| 1908 | +6.7% |
| 1912 | +54.4% |
| 1916 | +13.6% |
| 1920 | −34.0% |
| 1924 | −33.4% |
| 1928 | −30.8% |
| 1932 | +33.7% |
| 1936 | +33.5% |
| 1940 | +11.0% |
| 1944 | +0.9% |
| 1948 | −4.4% |
| 1952 | −28.5% |
| 1956 | −4.1% |
| 1960 | −6.8% |
| 1964 | +8.0% |
| 1968 | −19.4% |
| 1972 | −24.4% |
| 1976 | −7.6% |
| 1980 | −38.0% |
| 1984 | −40.9% |
| 1988 | −25.7% |
| 1992 | −13.0% |
| 1996 | −24.8% |
| 2000 | −37.8% |
| 2004 | −35.0% |
| 2008 | −22.0% |
| 2012 | −25.2% |
| 2016 | −28.8% |
| 2020 | −27.2% |
| 2024 | −34.9% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 14 points more Democratic.
13,746 registered voters · 2024 · down from 14,377 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−212 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −2,001 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,171 in average income, against $65,087 for residents who stayed — 14% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+14.4 on average — 20 points more Democratic-leaning than Glenn County, CA itself (R+34.9).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Butte County, CA180R+3.1
- Tehama County, CA90R+41.8
- Colusa County, CA33R+28.2
- Sacramento County, CA26D+19.7
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Butte County, CA188
- Tehama County, CA98
- Sacramento County, CA31
- Shasta County, CA23
- Colusa County, CA22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −158 |
| 2012 | −412 |
| 2013 | −203 |
| 2014 | −89 |
| 2015 | −199 |
| 2016 | −26 |
| 2017 | −21 |
| 2018 | −28 |
| 2019 | +337 |
| 2021 | −274 |
| 2022 | −408 |
| 2023 | −298 |
| 2024 | −10 |
| 2025 | −212 |
Glenn County's economy centers on rice, almonds, and cattle ranching across the flat valley floor, and its rural, agriculture-dependent demographics have produced Republican presidential margins exceeding 30 points in every cycle since 2008.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 54.4 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 40.9 points in 1984. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 7.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 34.9 points.
A population of 28,494, a 48% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $67,139 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Colusa County and Grant County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Glenn County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06021/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.