Amador County, California
Precinct data
Results by precinct
47 precincts · 22,402 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -CP06CP06 | 595 | 1,329 | 43 | 1,967 | 30.2% | 67.6% | R+37.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -CP07CP07 | 303 | 844 | 28 | 1,175 | 25.8% | 71.8% | R+46.0 |
| Precinct -CP01CP01 | 463 | 630 | 31 | 1,124 | 41.2% | 56.0% | R+14.9 |
| Precinct -CP15CP15 | 417 | 673 | 30 | 1,120 | 37.2% | 60.1% | R+22.9 |
| Precinct -CP12CP12 | 350 | 606 | 34 | 990 | 35.4% | 61.2% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -CP18CP18 | 421 | 450 | 27 | 898 | 46.9% | 50.1% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -CP02CP02 | 335 | 516 | 20 | 871 | 38.5% | 59.2% | R+20.8 |
| Precinct -CP14CP14 | 290 | 518 | 17 | 825 | 35.2% | 62.8% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -CP31CP31 | 141 | 607 | 20 | 768 | 18.4% | 79.0% | R+60.7 |
| Precinct -CP04CP04 | 221 | 529 | 16 | 766 | 28.9% | 69.1% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -CP29CP29 | 264 | 470 | 24 | 758 | 34.8% | 62.0% | R+27.2 |
| Precinct -CP24CP24 | 292 | 428 | 21 | 741 | 39.4% | 57.8% | R+18.4 |
| Precinct -CP23CP23 | 274 | 416 | 20 | 710 | 38.6% | 58.6% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -CP17CP17 | 286 | 393 | 19 | 698 | 41.0% | 56.3% | R+15.3 |
| Precinct -CP20CP20 | 221 | 438 | 13 | 672 | 32.9% | 65.2% | R+32.3 |
| Precinct -CP16CP16 | 240 | 409 | 19 | 668 | 35.9% | 61.2% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -CP22CP22 | 229 | 408 | 23 | 660 | 34.7% | 61.8% | R+27.1 |
| Precinct -CP28CP28 | 206 | 390 | 17 | 613 | 33.6% | 63.6% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -CP03CP03 | 275 | 310 | 24 | 609 | 45.2% | 50.9% | R+5.7 |
| Precinct -CP30CP30 | 173 | 411 | 20 | 604 | 28.6% | 68.0% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -CP13CP13 | 205 | 367 | 14 | 586 | 35.0% | 62.6% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -CP21CP21 | 186 | 371 | 7 | 564 | 33.0% | 65.8% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -CP41CP41 | 184 | 338 | 18 | 540 | 34.1% | 62.6% | R+28.5 |
| Precinct -CP08CP08 | 123 | 388 | 14 | 525 | 23.4% | 73.9% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -CP05CP05 | 148 | 285 | 15 | 448 | 33.0% | 63.6% | R+30.6 |
| Precinct -CP19CP19 | 162 | 267 | 12 | 441 | 36.7% | 60.5% | R+23.8 |
| Precinct -CP46CP46 | 129 | 196 | 8 | 333 | 38.7% | 58.9% | R+20.1 |
| Precinct -CP10CP10 | 65 | 163 | 5 | 233 | 27.9% | 70.0% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -CP27CP27 | 82 | 85 | 5 | 172 | 47.7% | 49.4% | R+1.7 |
| Precinct -CP11CP11 | 89 | 45 | 4 | 138 | 64.5% | 32.6% | D+31.9 |
| Precinct -CP34CP34 | 38 | 85 | 7 | 130 | 29.2% | 65.4% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct -CP36CP36 | 26 | 89 | 2 | 117 | 22.2% | 76.1% | R+53.8 |
| Precinct -CP09CP09 | 25 | 87 | 1 | 113 | 22.1% | 77.0% | R+54.9 |
| Precinct -CP44CP44 | 40 | 54 | 0 | 94 | 42.6% | 57.4% | R+14.9 |
| Precinct -CP42CP42 | 26 | 64 | 3 | 93 | 28.0% | 68.8% | R+40.9 |
| Precinct -CP35CP35 | 10 | 74 | 2 | 86 | 11.6% | 86.0% | R+74.4 |
| Precinct -CP39CP39 | 41 | 44 | 1 | 86 | 47.7% | 51.2% | R+3.5 |
| Precinct -CP38CP38 | 41 | 42 | 1 | 84 | 48.8% | 50.0% | R+1.2 |
| Precinct -CP25CP25 | 27 | 43 | 3 | 73 | 37.0% | 58.9% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -CP47CP47 | 46 | 14 | 3 | 63 | 73.0% | 22.2% | D+50.8 |
| Precinct -CP43CP43 | 27 | 26 | 1 | 54 | 50.0% | 48.1% | D+1.9 |
| Precinct -CP40CP40 | 20 | 30 | 0 | 50 | 40.0% | 60.0% | R+20.0 |
| Precinct -CP45CP45 | 12 | 25 | 4 | 41 | 29.3% | 61.0% | R+31.7 |
| Precinct -CP26CP26 | 8 | 24 | 3 | 35 | 22.9% | 68.6% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -CP32CP32 | 14 | 15 | 2 | 31 | 45.2% | 48.4% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -CP37CP37 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 24 | 50.0% | 50.0% | Even |
| Precinct -CP33CP33 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 9.1% | 90.9% | R+81.8 |
Presidential margin, 1876–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1876 | +5.7% |
| 1880 | +2.4% |
| 1884 | +1.5% |
| 1888 | +1.9% |
| 1892 | +5.0% |
| 1896 | +9.9% |
| 1900 | −6.7% |
| 1904 | −15.5% |
| 1908 | −8.1% |
| 1912 | +64.8% |
| 1916 | +17.8% |
| 1920 | −33.8% |
| 1924 | −21.8% |
| 1928 | +11.4% |
| 1932 | +47.6% |
| 1936 | +52.0% |
| 1940 | +33.3% |
| 1944 | +24.5% |
| 1948 | +18.6% |
| 1952 | −5.3% |
| 1956 | +1.3% |
| 1960 | +10.5% |
| 1964 | +33.9% |
| 1968 | +3.2% |
| 1972 | −12.5% |
| 1976 | +4.2% |
| 1980 | −22.9% |
| 1984 | −24.6% |
| 1988 | −13.7% |
| 1992 | −1.2% |
| 1996 | −6.9% |
| 2000 | −18.5% |
| 2004 | −25.5% |
| 2008 | −14.6% |
| 2012 | −19.5% |
| 2016 | −24.9% |
| 2020 | −24.3% |
| 2024 | −27.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 5.2 points more Democratic.
26,217 registered voters · 2024 · up from 26,104 in 2022
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+81 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +5,198 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $84,217 in average income, against $86,814 for residents who stayed — 3% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+10.8 on average — 39 points more Democratic-leaning than Amador County, CA itself (R+27.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Sacramento County, CA264D+19.7
- San Joaquin County, CA94R+0.9
- Calaveras County, CA86R+28.1
- El Dorado County, CA73R+12.0
- Contra Costa County, CA60D+37.9
- Alameda County, CA47D+53.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Sacramento County, CA177
- Calaveras County, CA77
- San Joaquin County, CA71
- El Dorado County, CA64
- Placer County, CA41
- Stanislaus County, CA20
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −179 |
| 2012 | −298 |
| 2013 | −345 |
| 2014 | +221 |
| 2015 | +403 |
| 2016 | +514 |
| 2017 | +1,212 |
| 2018 | +952 |
| 2019 | +451 |
| 2021 | +888 |
| 2022 | +442 |
| 2023 | +498 |
| 2024 | +358 |
| 2025 | +81 |
Amador's small, older, and predominantly white population in the Sierra Nevada foothills has delivered Republican presidential margins exceeding 25 points in recent cycles, making it one of the most reliably conservative counties in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 64.8 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 33.8 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 27.8 points.
A population of 41,428, a 73% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $88,044 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Calaveras County and Tuolumne County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Amador County, California. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/06005/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.