Bannock County, Idaho
Precinct data
Results by precinct
57 precincts · 39,976 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -037037 | 457 | 835 | 53 | 1,345 | 34.0% | 62.1% | R+28.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -051051 | 318 | 818 | 36 | 1,172 | 27.1% | 69.8% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -052052 | 327 | 765 | 44 | 1,136 | 28.8% | 67.3% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -036036 | 364 | 724 | 44 | 1,132 | 32.2% | 64.0% | R+31.8 |
| Precinct -005005 | 505 | 569 | 39 | 1,113 | 45.4% | 51.1% | R+5.8 |
| Precinct -053053 | 344 | 634 | 49 | 1,027 | 33.5% | 61.7% | R+28.2 |
| Precinct -004004 | 507 | 471 | 31 | 1,009 | 50.2% | 46.7% | D+3.6 |
| Precinct -071071 | 233 | 732 | 34 | 999 | 23.3% | 73.3% | R+49.9 |
| Precinct -066066 | 304 | 655 | 28 | 987 | 30.8% | 66.4% | R+35.6 |
| Precinct -010010 | 315 | 620 | 34 | 969 | 32.5% | 64.0% | R+31.5 |
| Precinct -054054 | 207 | 678 | 21 | 906 | 22.8% | 74.8% | R+52.0 |
| Precinct -042042 | 398 | 465 | 35 | 898 | 44.3% | 51.8% | R+7.5 |
| Precinct -006006 | 457 | 390 | 41 | 888 | 51.5% | 43.9% | D+7.5 |
| Precinct -022022 | 352 | 486 | 34 | 872 | 40.4% | 55.7% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -018018 | 266 | 571 | 27 | 864 | 30.8% | 66.1% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct -025025 | 431 | 388 | 36 | 855 | 50.4% | 45.4% | D+5.0 |
| Precinct -043043 | 319 | 490 | 24 | 833 | 38.3% | 58.8% | R+20.5 |
| Precinct -040040 | 313 | 502 | 16 | 831 | 37.7% | 60.4% | R+22.7 |
| Precinct -011011 | 269 | 535 | 21 | 825 | 32.6% | 64.8% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -009009 | 331 | 461 | 25 | 817 | 40.5% | 56.4% | R+15.9 |
| Precinct -039039 | 267 | 480 | 17 | 764 | 34.9% | 62.8% | R+27.9 |
| Precinct -002002 | 309 | 392 | 38 | 739 | 41.8% | 53.0% | R+11.2 |
| Precinct -026026 | 442 | 246 | 34 | 722 | 61.2% | 34.1% | D+27.1 |
| Precinct -001001 | 332 | 369 | 18 | 719 | 46.2% | 51.3% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -003003 | 303 | 395 | 19 | 717 | 42.3% | 55.1% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -059059 | 170 | 510 | 24 | 704 | 24.1% | 72.4% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -021021 | 275 | 387 | 25 | 687 | 40.0% | 56.3% | R+16.3 |
| Precinct -012012 | 224 | 438 | 23 | 685 | 32.7% | 63.9% | R+31.2 |
| Precinct -070070 | 342 | 308 | 30 | 680 | 50.3% | 45.3% | D+5.0 |
| Precinct -015015 | 250 | 394 | 30 | 674 | 37.1% | 58.5% | R+21.4 |
| Precinct -056056 | 214 | 434 | 15 | 663 | 32.3% | 65.5% | R+33.2 |
| Precinct -035035 | 258 | 373 | 22 | 653 | 39.5% | 57.1% | R+17.6 |
| Precinct -032032 | 329 | 278 | 26 | 633 | 52.0% | 43.9% | D+8.1 |
| Precinct -030030 | 280 | 320 | 22 | 622 | 45.0% | 51.4% | R+6.4 |
| Precinct -084084 | 118 | 482 | 11 | 611 | 19.3% | 78.9% | R+59.6 |
| Precinct -027027 | 343 | 237 | 30 | 610 | 56.2% | 38.9% | D+17.4 |
| Precinct -062062 | 79 | 510 | 20 | 609 | 13.0% | 83.7% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -017017 | 239 | 336 | 27 | 602 | 39.7% | 55.8% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -081081 | 143 | 444 | 15 | 602 | 23.8% | 73.8% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -034034 | 212 | 366 | 20 | 598 | 35.5% | 61.2% | R+25.8 |
| Precinct -057057 | 152 | 433 | 12 | 597 | 25.5% | 72.5% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -019019 | 240 | 333 | 16 | 589 | 40.7% | 56.5% | R+15.8 |
| Precinct -023023 | 241 | 326 | 21 | 588 | 41.0% | 55.4% | R+14.5 |
| Precinct -082082 | 97 | 441 | 17 | 555 | 17.5% | 79.5% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -038038 | 184 | 346 | 15 | 545 | 33.8% | 63.5% | R+29.7 |
| Precinct -013013 | 204 | 320 | 13 | 537 | 38.0% | 59.6% | R+21.6 |
| Precinct -058058 | 162 | 352 | 14 | 528 | 30.7% | 66.7% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -014014 | 224 | 282 | 20 | 526 | 42.6% | 53.6% | R+11.0 |
| Precinct -050050 | 115 | 324 | 18 | 457 | 25.2% | 70.9% | R+45.7 |
| Precinct -055055 | 136 | 291 | 15 | 442 | 30.8% | 65.8% | R+35.1 |
| Precinct -080080 | 90 | 340 | 7 | 437 | 20.6% | 77.8% | R+57.2 |
| Precinct -063063 | 73 | 292 | 5 | 370 | 19.7% | 78.9% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -061061 | 40 | 249 | 11 | 300 | 13.3% | 83.0% | R+69.7 |
| Precinct -083083 | 31 | 215 | 4 | 250 | 12.4% | 86.0% | R+73.6 |
| Precinct -016016 | 105 | 135 | 7 | 247 | 42.5% | 54.7% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -041041 | 61 | 119 | 7 | 187 | 32.6% | 63.6% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -068068 | 5 | 43 | 1 | 49 | 10.2% | 87.8% | R+77.6 |
Presidential margin, 1896–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1896 | +71.0% |
| 1900 | −3.1% |
| 1904 | −42.8% |
| 1908 | −16.8% |
| 1912 | −17.2% |
| 1916 | +15.4% |
| 1920 | −24.0% |
| 1924 | −28.9% |
| 1928 | −7.0% |
| 1932 | +27.5% |
| 1936 | +41.9% |
| 1940 | +31.9% |
| 1944 | +28.3% |
| 1948 | +26.3% |
| 1952 | −10.6% |
| 1956 | −7.0% |
| 1960 | +15.8% |
| 1964 | +26.6% |
| 1968 | −5.4% |
| 1972 | −22.6% |
| 1976 | −11.9% |
| 1980 | −32.9% |
| 1984 | −32.8% |
| 1988 | −6.7% |
| 1992 | −2.9% |
| 1996 | −4.0% |
| 2000 | −23.8% |
| 2004 | −24.6% |
| 2008 | −13.0% |
| 2012 | −22.1% |
| 2016 | −20.5% |
| 2020 | −21.7% |
| 2024 | −25.1% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 35.6%18,108 | 56.9%28,960 | 50,886 |
| 2020 | R | 39.3%15,472 | 55.9%22,048 | 39,413 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 10 points more Republican.
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 41,456 | 4,792 | 17,416 | 18,710 | 538 |
| 2020 | 47,155 | 6,297 | 20,394 | 19,782 | 682 |
| 2022 | 46,734 | 6,071 | 22,226 | 17,705 | 732 |
| 2024 | 47,945 | 6,302 | 23,317 | 17,555 | 771 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+248 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +587 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,129 in average income, against $71,866 for residents who stayed — 26% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+40.8 on average — 16 points more Republican-leaning than Bannock County, ID itself (R+25.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Bingham County, ID198R+59.6
- Bonneville County, ID161R+45.4
- Ada County, ID94R+10.3
- Power County, ID82R+45.1
- Salt Lake County, UT77D+10.2
- Canyon County, ID55R+46.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Bingham County, ID180
- Ada County, ID171
- Bonneville County, ID165
- Power County, ID79
- Salt Lake County, UT71
- Cache County, UT61
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −233 |
| 2012 | −610 |
| 2013 | −1,141 |
| 2014 | −668 |
| 2015 | −345 |
| 2016 | −398 |
| 2017 | +80 |
| 2018 | +740 |
| 2019 | +606 |
| 2021 | +1,045 |
| 2022 | +918 |
| 2023 | +365 |
| 2024 | −20 |
| 2025 | +248 |
Bannock County runs notably closer in statewide contests than its neighbors, anchored by Pocatello's university population and union-era labor heritage, which consistently trims Republican margins to the mid-twenties even as surrounding counties run 40–50 points redder.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 71.0 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 42.8 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 25.1 points.
A population of 89,454, a 80% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $66,499 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Weber County and Salt Lake County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Bannock County, Idaho. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/16005/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.