Latah County, Idaho
Precinct data
Results by precinct
34 precincts · 20,461 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -07 MOSCOW07 MOSCOW | 519 | 658 | 52 | 1,229 | 42.2% | 53.5% | R+11.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -05 MOSCOW05 MOSCOW | 544 | 406 | 26 | 976 | 55.7% | 41.6% | D+14.1 |
| Precinct -12 MOSCOW12 MOSCOW | 409 | 504 | 33 | 946 | 43.2% | 53.3% | R+10.0 |
| Precinct -09 MOSCOW09 MOSCOW | 548 | 352 | 40 | 940 | 58.3% | 37.4% | D+20.9 |
| Precinct -03 MOSCOW03 MOSCOW | 417 | 478 | 36 | 931 | 44.8% | 51.3% | R+6.6 |
| Precinct -21 GENESEE21 GENESEE | 257 | 612 | 26 | 895 | 28.7% | 68.4% | R+39.7 |
| Precinct -02 MOSCOW02 MOSCOW | 452 | 401 | 38 | 891 | 50.7% | 45.0% | D+5.7 |
| Precinct -19 DEARY19 DEARY | 160 | 699 | 19 | 878 | 18.2% | 79.6% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -17 MOSCOW17 MOSCOW | 393 | 414 | 31 | 838 | 46.9% | 49.4% | R+2.5 |
| Precinct -04 MOSCOW04 MOSCOW | 412 | 383 | 27 | 822 | 50.1% | 46.6% | D+3.5 |
| Precinct -10 MOSCOW10 MOSCOW | 471 | 317 | 30 | 818 | 57.6% | 38.8% | D+18.8 |
| Precinct -29 TROY29 TROY | 230 | 546 | 28 | 804 | 28.6% | 67.9% | R+39.3 |
| Precinct -06 MOSCOW06 MOSCOW | 450 | 309 | 38 | 797 | 56.5% | 38.8% | D+17.7 |
| Precinct -11 MOSCOW11 MOSCOW | 462 | 267 | 38 | 767 | 60.2% | 34.8% | D+25.4 |
| Precinct -14 MOSCOW14 MOSCOW | 475 | 240 | 32 | 747 | 63.6% | 32.1% | D+31.5 |
| Precinct -15 MOSCOW15 MOSCOW | 454 | 241 | 30 | 725 | 62.6% | 33.2% | D+29.4 |
| Precinct -27 POTLATCH27 POTLATCH | 132 | 528 | 17 | 677 | 19.5% | 78.0% | R+58.5 |
| Precinct -16 MOSCOW16 MOSCOW | 372 | 260 | 25 | 657 | 56.6% | 39.6% | D+17.0 |
| Precinct -08 MOSCOW08 MOSCOW | 388 | 187 | 27 | 602 | 64.5% | 31.1% | D+33.4 |
| Precinct -13 MOSCOW13 MOSCOW | 372 | 204 | 25 | 601 | 61.9% | 33.9% | D+28.0 |
| Precinct -18 MOSCOW18 MOSCOW | 317 | 159 | 20 | 496 | 63.9% | 32.1% | D+31.9 |
| Precinct -39 TROY39 TROY | 150 | 312 | 12 | 474 | 31.6% | 65.8% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -28 PRINCETON28 PRINCETON | 62 | 386 | 12 | 460 | 13.5% | 83.9% | R+70.4 |
| Precinct -30 VIOLA30 VIOLA | 138 | 275 | 15 | 428 | 32.2% | 64.3% | R+32.0 |
| Precinct -23 JUL23 JUL | 67 | 296 | 8 | 371 | 18.1% | 79.8% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -24 KENDRICK24 KENDRICK | 69 | 236 | 14 | 319 | 21.6% | 74.0% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -26 PALOUSE26 PALOUSE | 90 | 205 | 14 | 309 | 29.1% | 66.3% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -22 HARVARD22 HARVARD | 38 | 211 | 9 | 258 | 14.7% | 81.8% | R+67.1 |
| Precinct -31 CORA31 CORA | 54 | 172 | 4 | 230 | 23.5% | 74.8% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -01 MOSCOW01 MOSCOW | 82 | 124 | 12 | 218 | 37.6% | 56.9% | R+19.3 |
| Precinct -32 BOVILL32 BOVILL | 24 | 109 | 4 | 137 | 17.5% | 79.6% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -37 ONAWAY37 ONAWAY | 19 | 68 | 10 | 97 | 19.6% | 70.1% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -25 LINDEN25 LINDEN | 8 | 87 | 1 | 96 | 8.3% | 90.6% | R+82.3 |
| Precinct -20 FARMINGTON20 FARMINGTON | 4 | 23 | 0 | 27 | 14.8% | 85.2% | R+70.4 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −45.5% |
| 1896 | +28.5% |
| 1900 | −0.2% |
| 1904 | −50.1% |
| 1908 | −23.5% |
| 1912 | +11.6% |
| 1916 | +0.6% |
| 1920 | −42.2% |
| 1924 | −37.9% |
| 1928 | −44.8% |
| 1932 | +7.0% |
| 1936 | +20.4% |
| 1940 | +6.2% |
| 1944 | −0.2% |
| 1948 | +0.1% |
| 1952 | −25.1% |
| 1956 | −15.4% |
| 1960 | −1.6% |
| 1964 | +20.3% |
| 1968 | −10.1% |
| 1972 | −13.7% |
| 1976 | −12.3% |
| 1980 | −13.0% |
| 1984 | −15.8% |
| 1988 | +1.3% |
| 1992 | +11.5% |
| 1996 | +8.8% |
| 2000 | −16.3% |
| 2004 | −1.5% |
| 2008 | +6.8% |
| 2012 | +4.3% |
| 2016 | +4.6% |
| 2020 | +3.7% |
| 2024 | −8.0% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 45.9%13,762 | 49.9%14,968 | 29,968 |
| 2020 | D | 50.4%10,373 | 46.1%9,501 | 20,593 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 15 points more Republican.
| Year | Total registered | Democratic | Republican | Unaffiliated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 22,651 | 4,504 | 7,699 | 10,046 | 402 |
| 2020 | 25,624 | 5,878 | 8,875 | 10,401 | 470 |
| 2022 | 22,664 | 4,840 | 9,301 | 8,108 | 415 |
| 2024 | 24,188 | 5,008 | 10,457 | 8,306 | 417 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−232 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +27 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,491 in average income, against $83,844 for residents who stayed — 39% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+19.6 on average — 12 points more Republican-leaning than Latah County, ID itself (R+8.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Whitman County, WA128D+8.9
- Nez Perce County, ID100R+38.6
- Ada County, ID92R+10.3
- Kootenai County, ID80R+51.8
- Spokane County, WA48R+4.9
- Canyon County, ID32R+46.6
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Whitman County, WA181
- Nez Perce County, ID110
- Ada County, ID104
- Kootenai County, ID89
- Spokane County, WA68
- King County, WA35
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +232 |
| 2012 | −26 |
| 2013 | −227 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | −246 |
| 2016 | −247 |
| 2017 | +287 |
| 2018 | −169 |
| 2019 | +20 |
| 2021 | +556 |
| 2022 | +317 |
| 2023 | −129 |
| 2024 | −109 |
| 2025 | −232 |
Latah County hosts the University of Idaho in Moscow, giving it a college-town demographic profile unusual for rural Idaho — yet the 2024 presidential margin landed at R+8, reflecting a broader rural realignment that has eroded onetime Democratic competitiveness here.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 28.5 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 50.1 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 11.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 8.0 points.
A population of 41,049, a 85% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $65,424 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Albany County and Kittitas County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Latah County, Idaho. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/16057/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.