Jasper County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
58 precincts · 15,846 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -WALKER WESTWALKER WEST | 274 | 1,008 | 14 | 1,296 | 21.1% | 77.8% | R+56.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -KEENER 03KEENER 03 | 239 | 907 | 27 | 1,173 | 20.4% | 77.3% | R+56.9 |
| Precinct -KEENER 02KEENER 02 | 238 | 900 | 21 | 1,159 | 20.5% | 77.7% | R+57.1 |
| Precinct -WHEATFIELD WEST 02WHEATFIELD WEST 02 | 223 | 849 | 13 | 1,085 | 20.6% | 78.2% | R+57.7 |
| Precinct -KEENER 05KEENER 05 | 203 | 816 | 17 | 1,036 | 19.6% | 78.8% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -KEENER 01KEENER 01 | 230 | 708 | 23 | 961 | 23.9% | 73.7% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -KEENER 04KEENER 04 | 253 | 686 | 16 | 955 | 26.5% | 71.8% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -WALKER EASTWALKER EAST | 134 | 567 | 10 | 711 | 18.8% | 79.7% | R+60.9 |
| Precinct -MARION 01MARION 01 | 155 | 460 | 11 | 626 | 24.8% | 73.5% | R+48.7 |
| Precinct -WHEATFIELD EASTWHEATFIELD EAST | 140 | 439 | 12 | 591 | 23.7% | 74.3% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -MARION 05MARION 05 | 131 | 377 | 8 | 516 | 25.4% | 73.1% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -WHEATFIELD WEST 01WHEATFIELD WEST 01 | 102 | 372 | 8 | 482 | 21.2% | 77.2% | R+56.0 |
| Precinct -KANKAKEEKANKAKEE | 135 | 330 | 9 | 474 | 28.5% | 69.6% | R+41.1 |
| Precinct -NEWTONNEWTON | 96 | 343 | 5 | 444 | 21.6% | 77.3% | R+55.6 |
| Precinct -UNION NORTHUNION NORTH | 81 | 349 | 3 | 433 | 18.7% | 80.6% | R+61.9 |
| Precinct -MARION 02MARION 02 | 117 | 295 | 11 | 423 | 27.7% | 69.7% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -CARPENTER WESTCARPENTER WEST | 89 | 323 | 7 | 419 | 21.2% | 77.1% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -CARPENTER EASTCARPENTER EAST | 85 | 315 | 12 | 412 | 20.6% | 76.5% | R+55.8 |
| Precinct -MARION 06MARION 06 | 58 | 271 | 9 | 338 | 17.2% | 80.2% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -MARION 03MARION 03 | 116 | 191 | 5 | 312 | 37.2% | 61.2% | R+24.0 |
| Precinct -BARKLEY NORTHBARKLEY NORTH | 70 | 232 | 8 | 310 | 22.6% | 74.8% | R+52.3 |
| Precinct -MARION 04MARION 04 | 78 | 220 | 4 | 302 | 25.8% | 72.8% | R+47.0 |
| Precinct -GILLAMGILLAM | 40 | 240 | 5 | 285 | 14.0% | 84.2% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -UNION SOUTHUNION SOUTH | 50 | 208 | 5 | 263 | 19.0% | 79.1% | R+60.1 |
| Precinct -MARION 07MARION 07 | 41 | 158 | 4 | 203 | 20.2% | 77.8% | R+57.6 |
| Precinct -BARKLEY SOUTHBARKLEY SOUTH | 37 | 158 | 2 | 197 | 18.8% | 80.2% | R+61.4 |
| Precinct -JORDANJORDAN | 43 | 130 | 2 | 175 | 24.6% | 74.3% | R+49.7 |
| Precinct -HANGING GROVEHANGING GROVE | 7 | 123 | 3 | 133 | 5.3% | 92.5% | R+87.2 |
| Precinct -MILROYMILROY | 24 | 107 | 1 | 132 | 18.2% | 81.1% | R+62.9 |
| BARKLEY NORTH18_1807300010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| BARLEY SOUTH18_1807300020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CARPENTER EAST18_1807300030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CARPENTER WEST18_1807300040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| GILLIAM18_1807300050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HANGING GROVE18_1807300060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JORDAN18_1807300070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KANKAKEE18_1807300080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KEENER 118_1807300090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KEENER 218_1807300100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KEENER 318_1807300110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KEENER 418_1807300120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| KEENER 518_1807300130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARION 118_1807300140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARION 218_1807300150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARION 318_1807300160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARION 418_1807300170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARION 518_1807300180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARION 618_1807300190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MARION 718_1807300200 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILROY18_1807300210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| NEWTON18_1807300220 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION NORTH18_1807300230 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| UNION SOUTH18_1807300240 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WALKER EAST18_1807300250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WALKER WEST18_1807300260 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WHEATFIELD EAST18_1807300270 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WHEATFIELD WEST 118_1807300280 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WHEATFIELD WEST 218_1807300290 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −15.6% |
| 1896 | −11.5% |
| 1900 | −13.4% |
| 1904 | −21.8% |
| 1908 | −12.6% |
| 1912 | +1.6% |
| 1916 | −14.4% |
| 1920 | −35.1% |
| 1924 | −33.9% |
| 1928 | −31.7% |
| 1932 | +9.9% |
| 1936 | −6.4% |
| 1940 | −23.6% |
| 1944 | −33.5% |
| 1948 | −31.9% |
| 1952 | −44.9% |
| 1956 | −45.5% |
| 1960 | −28.8% |
| 1964 | −5.9% |
| 1968 | −33.9% |
| 1972 | −53.2% |
| 1976 | −23.8% |
| 1980 | −40.7% |
| 1984 | −39.3% |
| 1988 | −29.8% |
| 1992 | −18.0% |
| 1996 | −16.1% |
| 2000 | −31.1% |
| 2004 | −37.0% |
| 2008 | −20.4% |
| 2012 | −25.4% |
| 2016 | −44.9% |
| 2020 | −49.0% |
| 2024 | −54.3% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 23,692 |
| 2018 | 21,542 |
| 2020 | 22,556 |
| 2022 | 23,057 |
| 2024 | 23,592 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+136 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +286 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $53,417 in average income, against $78,082 for residents who stayed — 32% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+14.6 on average — 40 points more Democratic-leaning than Jasper County, IN itself (R+54.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lake County, IN193D+5.6
- Newton County, IN111R+56.9
- Porter County, IN110R+10.5
- Cook County, IL33D+41.6
- White County, IN29R+45.0
- Tippecanoe County, IN27R+0.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lake County, IN126
- Porter County, IN87
- Newton County, IN77
- Tippecanoe County, IN61
- White County, IN36
- Marion County, IN23
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −171 |
| 2012 | −37 |
| 2013 | −131 |
| 2014 | +25 |
| 2015 | −66 |
| 2016 | −152 |
| 2017 | −10 |
| 2018 | −135 |
| 2019 | +166 |
| 2021 | +272 |
| 2022 | +235 |
| 2023 | +207 |
| 2024 | −53 |
| 2025 | +136 |
Jasper County's flat agricultural landscape and small-town demographic profile have produced some of Indiana's widest presidential margins, with the Republican candidate clearing 54 points in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 9.9 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 54.3 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 54.3 points.
A population of 33,234, a 87% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $77,314 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Pulaski County and Fulton County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Jasper County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18073/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.