Pulaski County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
30 precincts · 5,768 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -SALEMSALEM | 107 | 484 | 11 | 602 | 17.8% | 80.4% | R+62.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -MONROE 03MONROE 03 | 109 | 355 | 17 | 481 | 22.7% | 73.8% | R+51.1 |
| Precinct -TIPPECANOETIPPECANOE | 98 | 340 | 4 | 442 | 22.2% | 76.9% | R+54.8 |
| Precinct -MONROE 04MONROE 04 | 108 | 316 | 15 | 439 | 24.6% | 72.0% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -MONROE 01MONROE 01 | 111 | 304 | 10 | 425 | 26.1% | 71.5% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct -WHITE POSTWHITE POST | 60 | 355 | 9 | 424 | 14.2% | 83.7% | R+69.6 |
| Precinct -VAN BURENVAN BUREN | 83 | 316 | 7 | 406 | 20.4% | 77.8% | R+57.4 |
| Precinct -MONROE 02MONROE 02 | 132 | 256 | 12 | 400 | 33.0% | 64.0% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -RICH GROVERICH GROVE | 88 | 268 | 3 | 359 | 24.5% | 74.7% | R+50.1 |
| Precinct -CASSCASS | 76 | 264 | 5 | 345 | 22.0% | 76.5% | R+54.5 |
| Precinct -FRANKLINFRANKLIN | 66 | 266 | 6 | 338 | 19.5% | 78.7% | R+59.2 |
| Precinct -HARRISONHARRISON | 70 | 255 | 7 | 332 | 21.1% | 76.8% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -INDIAN CREEKINDIAN CREEK | 76 | 219 | 5 | 300 | 25.3% | 73.0% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -JEFFERSONJEFFERSON | 38 | 216 | 2 | 256 | 14.8% | 84.4% | R+69.5 |
| Precinct -BEAVERBEAVER | 58 | 158 | 3 | 219 | 26.5% | 72.1% | R+45.7 |
| BEAVER18_1813100010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CASS18_1813100020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FRANKLIN18_1813100030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| HARRISON18_1813100040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| INDIAN CREEK18_1813100050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JEFFERSON18_1813100060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE 0118_1813100070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE 0218_1813100080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE 0318_1813100090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MONROE 0418_1813100100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICH GROVE18_1813100110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SALEM18_1813100120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TIPPECANOE18_1813100130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| VAN BUREN18_1813100140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| WHITE POST18_1813100150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +13.7% |
| 1896 | +18.4% |
| 1900 | +11.6% |
| 1904 | −2.3% |
| 1908 | +7.7% |
| 1912 | +17.7% |
| 1916 | −2.8% |
| 1920 | −10.1% |
| 1924 | −15.6% |
| 1928 | −14.4% |
| 1932 | +18.8% |
| 1936 | +8.1% |
| 1940 | −6.8% |
| 1944 | −12.0% |
| 1948 | −5.1% |
| 1952 | −28.0% |
| 1956 | −25.5% |
| 1960 | −17.1% |
| 1964 | +3.1% |
| 1968 | −21.0% |
| 1972 | −38.7% |
| 1976 | −11.7% |
| 1980 | −28.9% |
| 1984 | −34.7% |
| 1988 | −24.7% |
| 1992 | −12.9% |
| 1996 | −12.7% |
| 2000 | −28.6% |
| 2004 | −36.5% |
| 2008 | −15.5% |
| 2012 | −27.2% |
| 2016 | −46.3% |
| 2020 | −47.9% |
| 2024 | −53.7% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 9,626 |
| 2018 | 8,763 |
| 2020 | 8,891 |
| 2022 | 9,119 |
| 2024 | 9,400 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+60 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −750 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,774 in average income, against $68,617 for residents who stayed — 17% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+49.4 on average — 4.3 points more Democratic-leaning than Pulaski County, IN itself (R+53.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Starke County, IN50R+52.0
- White County, IN23R+45.0
- Cass County, IN22R+46.2
- Fulton County, IN20R+51.2
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Starke County, IN44
- Jasper County, IN26
- Fulton County, IN22
- White County, IN20
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −78 |
| 2012 | −195 |
| 2013 | −54 |
| 2014 | −30 |
| 2015 | −111 |
| 2016 | −183 |
| 2017 | −74 |
| 2018 | −42 |
| 2019 | −141 |
| 2021 | −94 |
| 2022 | +156 |
| 2023 | +14 |
| 2024 | +22 |
| 2025 | +60 |
Pulaski County's agricultural flatlands and small-town base produce among the widest presidential margins in the state, with the 2024 result exceeding 53 points — a gap that has widened steadily over the past decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 18.8 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 53.7 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 53.7 points.
A population of 12,441, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $62,792 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Fulton County and Fountain County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Pulaski County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18131/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.