Steuben County, Indiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
42 precincts · 16,409 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -PLEASANT 7PLEASANT 7 | 352 | 839 | 21 | 1,212 | 29.0% | 69.2% | R+40.2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -JAMESTOWN 2JAMESTOWN 2 | 366 | 750 | 24 | 1,140 | 32.1% | 65.8% | R+33.7 |
| Precinct -SALEMSALEM | 193 | 849 | 16 | 1,058 | 18.2% | 80.2% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 2PLEASANT 2 | 337 | 635 | 17 | 989 | 34.1% | 64.2% | R+30.1 |
| Precinct -JAMESTOWN 1JAMESTOWN 1 | 289 | 632 | 21 | 942 | 30.7% | 67.1% | R+36.4 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 6PLEASANT 6 | 264 | 588 | 21 | 873 | 30.2% | 67.4% | R+37.1 |
| Precinct -MILLGROVEMILLGROVE | 219 | 636 | 9 | 864 | 25.3% | 73.6% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -JACKSONJACKSON | 192 | 641 | 15 | 848 | 22.6% | 75.6% | R+52.9 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 3PLEASANT 3 | 310 | 489 | 21 | 820 | 37.8% | 59.6% | R+21.8 |
| Precinct -OTSEGO 1OTSEGO 1 | 232 | 560 | 17 | 809 | 28.7% | 69.2% | R+40.5 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 1PLEASANT 1 | 269 | 494 | 31 | 794 | 33.9% | 62.2% | R+28.3 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 5PLEASANT 5 | 219 | 506 | 13 | 738 | 29.7% | 68.6% | R+38.9 |
| Precinct -STEUBEN 1STEUBEN 1 | 190 | 455 | 11 | 656 | 29.0% | 69.4% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -OTSEGO 2OTSEGO 2 | 142 | 488 | 9 | 639 | 22.2% | 76.4% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct -STEUBEN 2STEUBEN 2 | 148 | 455 | 16 | 619 | 23.9% | 73.5% | R+49.6 |
| Precinct -SCOTTSCOTT | 125 | 451 | 5 | 581 | 21.5% | 77.6% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -PLEASANT 4PLEASANT 4 | 225 | 299 | 16 | 540 | 41.7% | 55.4% | R+13.7 |
| Precinct -CLEAR LAKECLEAR LAKE | 122 | 391 | 6 | 519 | 23.5% | 75.3% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 3FREMONT 3 | 82 | 362 | 7 | 451 | 18.2% | 80.3% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 1FREMONT 1 | 118 | 294 | 8 | 420 | 28.1% | 70.0% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -FREMONT 2FREMONT 2 | 123 | 256 | 10 | 389 | 31.6% | 65.8% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -YORKYORK | 59 | 284 | 7 | 350 | 16.9% | 81.1% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -RICHLANDRICHLAND | 22 | 133 | 3 | 158 | 13.9% | 84.2% | R+70.3 |
| CLEAR LAKE18_1815100010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FREMONT18_1815100020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JACKSON18_1815100030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JAMESTOWN 0118_1815100040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| JAMESTOWN 0218_1815100050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| MILLGROVE18_1815100060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| OSTEGO18_1815100070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0118_1815100080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0218_1815100090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0318_1815100100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0418_1815100110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0518_1815100120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0618_1815100130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| PLEASANT 0718_1815100140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| RICHLAND18_1815100150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SALEM18_1815100160 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| SCOTT18_1815100170 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| STEUBEN18_1815100180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| YORK18_1815100190 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −22.2% |
| 1896 | −22.2% |
| 1900 | −27.2% |
| 1904 | −37.3% |
| 1908 | −28.7% |
| 1912 | −0.6% |
| 1916 | −20.8% |
| 1920 | −48.0% |
| 1924 | −41.3% |
| 1928 | −43.5% |
| 1932 | +1.7% |
| 1936 | −7.9% |
| 1940 | −33.2% |
| 1944 | −43.9% |
| 1948 | −36.3% |
| 1952 | −47.1% |
| 1956 | −43.5% |
| 1960 | −35.6% |
| 1964 | −0.9% |
| 1968 | −32.7% |
| 1972 | −40.1% |
| 1976 | −20.5% |
| 1980 | −34.0% |
| 1984 | −44.6% |
| 1988 | −37.4% |
| 1992 | −10.8% |
| 1996 | −12.5% |
| 2000 | −25.3% |
| 2004 | −31.7% |
| 2008 | −9.8% |
| 2012 | −27.0% |
| 2016 | −43.4% |
| 2020 | −42.2% |
| 2024 | −42.1% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 23,349 |
| 2018 | 22,795 |
| 2020 | 24,385 |
| 2022 | 25,821 |
| 2024 | 26,853 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+80 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +498 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $67,563 in average income, against $80,998 for residents who stayed — 17% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+36.2 on average — 5.9 points more Democratic-leaning than Steuben County, IN itself (R+42.1).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Allen County, IN174R+12.5
- DeKalb County, IN141R+47.1
- LaGrange County, IN55R+56.8
- Branch County, MI55R+42.4
- Noble County, IN34R+51.4
- Hillsdale County, MI24R+51.4
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Allen County, IN163
- DeKalb County, IN161
- LaGrange County, IN41
- Branch County, MI41
- Noble County, IN39
- Marion County, IN22
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −111 |
| 2012 | +13 |
| 2013 | +131 |
| 2014 | +43 |
| 2015 | −76 |
| 2016 | −233 |
| 2017 | −10 |
| 2018 | +97 |
| 2019 | +106 |
| 2021 | +245 |
| 2022 | +104 |
| 2023 | +172 |
| 2024 | −63 |
| 2025 | +80 |
Nestled in Indiana's northeastern lake district, Steuben has delivered Republican presidential margins above 40 points in recent cycles, reflecting a rural, predominantly white electorate with deep conservative roots and little urban counterweight.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 1.7 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 48.0 points in 1920. The 2024 margin was 42.1 points.
A population of 34,726, a 91% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $74,911 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Posey County and Tipton County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Steuben County, Indiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/18151/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.