Acadia Parish, Louisiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
47 precincts · 26,731 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -0003-30003-3 | 282 | 1,028 | 11 | 1,321 | 21.3% | 77.8% | R+56.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -0002-10002-1 | 83 | 1,039 | 11 | 1,133 | 7.3% | 91.7% | R+84.4 |
| Precinct -0004-40004-4 | 50 | 1,058 | 5 | 1,113 | 4.5% | 95.1% | R+90.6 |
| Precinct -0001-10001-1 | 87 | 991 | 17 | 1,095 | 7.9% | 90.5% | R+82.6 |
| Precinct -0007-30007-3 | 51 | 950 | 6 | 1,007 | 5.1% | 94.3% | R+89.3 |
| Precinct -0001-40001-4 | 149 | 783 | 12 | 944 | 15.8% | 82.9% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -0003-70003-7 | 66 | 762 | 6 | 834 | 7.9% | 91.4% | R+83.5 |
| Precinct -0001-30001-3 | 141 | 648 | 8 | 797 | 17.7% | 81.3% | R+63.6 |
| Precinct -0002-30002-3 | 107 | 672 | 6 | 785 | 13.6% | 85.6% | R+72.0 |
| Precinct -0003-40003-4 | 392 | 373 | 5 | 770 | 50.9% | 48.4% | D+2.5 |
| Precinct -0003-20003-2 | 32 | 731 | 5 | 768 | 4.2% | 95.2% | R+91.0 |
| Precinct -0001-20001-2 | 171 | 559 | 9 | 739 | 23.1% | 75.6% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -0002-20002-2 | 30 | 704 | 3 | 737 | 4.1% | 95.5% | R+91.5 |
| Precinct -0001-80001-8 | 123 | 586 | 9 | 718 | 17.1% | 81.6% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -0004-50004-5 | 21 | 688 | 2 | 711 | 3.0% | 96.8% | R+93.8 |
| Precinct -0003-50003-5 | 95 | 607 | 2 | 704 | 13.5% | 86.2% | R+72.7 |
| Precinct -0007-40007-4 | 32 | 651 | 5 | 688 | 4.7% | 94.6% | R+90.0 |
| Precinct -0007-20007-2 | 65 | 596 | 0 | 661 | 9.8% | 90.2% | R+80.3 |
| Precinct -0005-30005-3 | 32 | 599 | 8 | 639 | 5.0% | 93.7% | R+88.7 |
| Precinct -0004-20004-2 | 80 | 543 | 5 | 628 | 12.7% | 86.5% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -0004-60004-6 | 41 | 577 | 8 | 626 | 6.5% | 92.2% | R+85.6 |
| Precinct -0004-10004-1 | 26 | 586 | 2 | 614 | 4.2% | 95.4% | R+91.2 |
| Precinct -0001-60001-6 | 512 | 87 | 14 | 613 | 83.5% | 14.2% | D+69.3 |
| Precinct -1-71-7 | 30 | 529 | 5 | 564 | 5.3% | 93.8% | R+88.5 |
| Precinct -006-12006-12 | 101 | 416 | 6 | 523 | 19.3% | 79.5% | R+60.2 |
| Precinct -006-14006-14 | 41 | 448 | 3 | 492 | 8.3% | 91.1% | R+82.7 |
| Precinct -0006-40006-4 | 183 | 295 | 3 | 481 | 38.0% | 61.3% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -0006-70006-7 | 51 | 424 | 5 | 480 | 10.6% | 88.3% | R+77.7 |
| Precinct -0002-50002-5 | 35 | 421 | 9 | 465 | 7.5% | 90.5% | R+83.0 |
| Precinct -0006-10006-1 | 312 | 114 | 3 | 429 | 72.7% | 26.6% | D+46.2 |
| Precinct -0006-60006-6 | 405 | 17 | 3 | 425 | 95.3% | 4.0% | D+91.3 |
| Precinct -0006-80006-8 | 87 | 332 | 5 | 424 | 20.5% | 78.3% | R+57.8 |
| Precinct -0003-10003-1 | 141 | 268 | 2 | 411 | 34.3% | 65.2% | R+30.9 |
| Precinct -0005-40005-4 | 21 | 361 | 3 | 385 | 5.5% | 93.8% | R+88.3 |
| Precinct -0001-50001-5 | 185 | 160 | 8 | 353 | 52.4% | 45.3% | D+7.1 |
| Precinct -0006-30006-3 | 153 | 176 | 6 | 335 | 45.7% | 52.5% | R+6.9 |
| Precinct -0005-10005-1 | 50 | 262 | 0 | 312 | 16.0% | 84.0% | R+67.9 |
| Precinct -0005-20005-2 | 44 | 254 | 6 | 304 | 14.5% | 83.6% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -006-16006-16 | 20 | 253 | 3 | 276 | 7.2% | 91.7% | R+84.4 |
| Precinct -006-10006-10 | 17 | 245 | 2 | 264 | 6.4% | 92.8% | R+86.4 |
| Precinct -0006-50006-5 | 72 | 159 | 3 | 234 | 30.8% | 67.9% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -0005-50005-5 | 26 | 179 | 2 | 207 | 12.6% | 86.5% | R+73.9 |
| Precinct -006-13006-13 | 15 | 187 | 0 | 202 | 7.4% | 92.6% | R+85.1 |
| Precinct -006-15006-15 | 9 | 162 | 2 | 173 | 5.2% | 93.6% | R+88.4 |
| Precinct -0006-20006-2 | 35 | 121 | 3 | 159 | 22.0% | 76.1% | R+54.1 |
| Precinct -2-42-4 | 3 | 100 | 0 | 103 | 2.9% | 97.1% | R+94.2 |
| Precinct -4-34-3 | 0 | 79 | 6 | 85 | 0.0% | 92.9% | R+92.9 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +38.7% |
| 1896 | +63.9% |
| 1900 | +40.0% |
| 1904 | +60.7% |
| 1908 | +58.5% |
| 1912 | +71.7% |
| 1916 | +69.3% |
| 1920 | −3.8% |
| 1924 | +34.5% |
| 1928 | +54.5% |
| 1932 | +82.2% |
| 1936 | +82.2% |
| 1940 | +75.1% |
| 1944 | +62.5% |
| 1948 | +23.9% |
| 1952 | +16.9% |
| 1956 | +18.2% |
| 1960 | +58.5% |
| 1964 | +17.1% |
| 1968 | +5.4% |
| 1972 | −34.8% |
| 1976 | +25.6% |
| 1980 | −7.2% |
| 1984 | −22.9% |
| 1988 | +0.8% |
| 1992 | +13.3% |
| 1996 | +12.8% |
| 2000 | −21.2% |
| 2004 | −28.3% |
| 2008 | −45.7% |
| 2012 | −49.8% |
| 2016 | −56.7% |
| 2020 | −60.3% |
| 2024 | −64.0% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 15.4%3,033 | 82.6%16,224 | 19,647 |
| 2020 | R | 15.9%4,376 | 80.8%22,212 | 27,499 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 51 points more Democratic.
39,352 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−169 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −3,206 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $39,677 in average income, against $61,935 for residents who stayed — 36% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+35.2 on average — 29 points more Democratic-leaning than Acadia Parish, LA itself (R+64.0).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lafayette Parish, LA406R+31.4
- St. Landry Parish, LA187R+18.8
- Vermilion Parish, LA95R+63.8
- Jefferson Davis Parish, LA80R+61.1
- Calcasieu Parish, LA65R+39.6
- Evangeline Parish, LA59R+49.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lafayette Parish, LA459
- St. Landry Parish, LA202
- Calcasieu Parish, LA86
- Vermilion Parish, LA85
- Jefferson Davis Parish, LA76
- East Baton Rouge Parish, LA43
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −222 |
| 2012 | −140 |
| 2013 | +66 |
| 2014 | +30 |
| 2015 | −245 |
| 2016 | −236 |
| 2017 | −508 |
| 2018 | −498 |
| 2019 | −312 |
| 2021 | −154 |
| 2022 | −424 |
| 2023 | −265 |
| 2024 | −129 |
| 2025 | −169 |
Acadia Parish, anchored by Crowley in the Cajun Prairie, delivered a 64-point Republican presidential margin in 2024—among the widest in a state already dominated by rural conservative realignment.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 82.2 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 64.0 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 64.0 points.
A population of 56,955, a 76% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $45,562 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Vermilion Parish and Jefferson Davis Parish.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Acadia Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22001/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.