Vermilion Parish, Louisiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
66 precincts · 26,430 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -4949 | 152 | 1,336 | 11 | 1,499 | 10.1% | 89.1% | R+79.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -000053000053 | 196 | 1,182 | 11 | 1,389 | 14.1% | 85.1% | R+71.0 |
| Precinct -000025000025 | 238 | 874 | 11 | 1,123 | 21.2% | 77.8% | R+56.6 |
| Precinct -000014000014 | 84 | 1,012 | 8 | 1,104 | 7.6% | 91.7% | R+84.1 |
| Precinct -000001000001 | 47 | 944 | 15 | 1,006 | 4.7% | 93.8% | R+89.2 |
| Precinct -000018000018 | 79 | 867 | 4 | 950 | 8.3% | 91.3% | R+82.9 |
| Precinct -000024000024 | 149 | 696 | 10 | 855 | 17.4% | 81.4% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -00057A00057A | 73 | 578 | 8 | 659 | 11.1% | 87.7% | R+76.6 |
| Precinct -000006000006 | 65 | 592 | 1 | 658 | 9.9% | 90.0% | R+80.1 |
| Precinct -000002000002 | 109 | 522 | 4 | 635 | 17.2% | 82.2% | R+65.0 |
| Precinct -000040000040 | 83 | 539 | 1 | 623 | 13.3% | 86.5% | R+73.2 |
| Precinct -000009000009 | 100 | 511 | 11 | 622 | 16.1% | 82.2% | R+66.1 |
| Precinct -1919 | 73 | 534 | 10 | 617 | 11.8% | 86.5% | R+74.7 |
| Precinct -000051000051 | 73 | 520 | 7 | 600 | 12.2% | 86.7% | R+74.5 |
| Precinct -000023000023 | 60 | 527 | 11 | 598 | 10.0% | 88.1% | R+78.1 |
| Precinct -5050 | 71 | 501 | 7 | 579 | 12.3% | 86.5% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -000044000044 | 50 | 513 | 3 | 566 | 8.8% | 90.6% | R+81.8 |
| Precinct -1010 | 73 | 441 | 6 | 520 | 14.0% | 84.8% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -4242 | 87 | 429 | 4 | 520 | 16.7% | 82.5% | R+65.8 |
| Precinct -000028000028 | 52 | 445 | 7 | 504 | 10.3% | 88.3% | R+78.0 |
| Precinct -000029000029 | 92 | 397 | 3 | 492 | 18.7% | 80.7% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -000011000011 | 76 | 404 | 3 | 483 | 15.7% | 83.6% | R+67.9 |
| Precinct -000037000037 | 376 | 86 | 7 | 469 | 80.2% | 18.3% | D+61.8 |
| Precinct -000012000012 | 193 | 253 | 1 | 447 | 43.2% | 56.6% | R+13.4 |
| Precinct -46E46E | 125 | 304 | 11 | 440 | 28.4% | 69.1% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -00019A00019A | 31 | 397 | 6 | 434 | 7.1% | 91.5% | R+84.3 |
| Precinct -1717 | 34 | 392 | 6 | 432 | 7.9% | 90.7% | R+82.9 |
| Precinct -2222 | 76 | 335 | 6 | 417 | 18.2% | 80.3% | R+62.1 |
| Precinct -55 | 23 | 385 | 0 | 408 | 5.6% | 94.4% | R+88.7 |
| Precinct -00007B00007B | 24 | 340 | 4 | 368 | 6.5% | 92.4% | R+85.9 |
| Precinct -7A7A | 34 | 328 | 6 | 368 | 9.2% | 89.1% | R+79.9 |
| Precinct -00026A00026A | 57 | 292 | 6 | 355 | 16.1% | 82.3% | R+66.2 |
| Precinct -000034000034 | 133 | 202 | 3 | 338 | 39.3% | 59.8% | R+20.4 |
| Precinct -000035000035 | 89 | 236 | 11 | 336 | 26.5% | 70.2% | R+43.8 |
| Precinct -000026000026 | 34 | 272 | 3 | 309 | 11.0% | 88.0% | R+77.0 |
| Precinct -88 | 26 | 277 | 1 | 304 | 8.6% | 91.1% | R+82.6 |
| Precinct -20B20B | 18 | 284 | 1 | 303 | 5.9% | 93.7% | R+87.8 |
| Precinct -3838 | 269 | 24 | 10 | 303 | 88.8% | 7.9% | D+80.9 |
| Precinct -26B26B | 32 | 263 | 4 | 299 | 10.7% | 88.0% | R+77.3 |
| Precinct -00045A00045A | 34 | 257 | 1 | 292 | 11.6% | 88.0% | R+76.4 |
| Precinct -4646 | 73 | 173 | 8 | 254 | 28.7% | 68.1% | R+39.4 |
| Precinct -000021000021 | 44 | 198 | 1 | 243 | 18.1% | 81.5% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -000039000039 | 125 | 89 | 3 | 217 | 57.6% | 41.0% | D+16.6 |
| Precinct -46B46B | 89 | 121 | 3 | 213 | 41.8% | 56.8% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -00021A00021A | 18 | 185 | 4 | 207 | 8.7% | 89.4% | R+80.7 |
| Precinct -49B49B | 8 | 193 | 0 | 201 | 4.0% | 96.0% | R+92.0 |
| Precinct -3232 | 134 | 48 | 6 | 188 | 71.3% | 25.5% | D+45.7 |
| Precinct -36A36A | 102 | 77 | 3 | 182 | 56.0% | 42.3% | D+13.7 |
| Precinct -20A20A | 23 | 149 | 1 | 173 | 13.3% | 86.1% | R+72.8 |
| Precinct -00034A00034A | 120 | 43 | 3 | 166 | 72.3% | 25.9% | D+46.4 |
| Precinct -46C46C | 94 | 55 | 1 | 150 | 62.7% | 36.7% | D+26.0 |
| Precinct -000016000016 | 3 | 128 | 0 | 131 | 2.3% | 97.7% | R+95.4 |
| Precinct -46D46D | 41 | 86 | 0 | 127 | 32.3% | 67.7% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -00057B00057B | 3 | 108 | 3 | 114 | 2.6% | 94.7% | R+92.1 |
| Precinct -44 | 11 | 99 | 0 | 110 | 10.0% | 90.0% | R+80.0 |
| Precinct -4747 | 19 | 89 | 0 | 108 | 17.6% | 82.4% | R+64.8 |
| Precinct -4545 | 6 | 84 | 0 | 90 | 6.7% | 93.3% | R+86.7 |
| Precinct -49C49C | 3 | 67 | 0 | 70 | 4.3% | 95.7% | R+91.4 |
| Precinct -000041000041 | 2 | 63 | 0 | 65 | 3.1% | 96.9% | R+93.8 |
| Precinct -2020 | 3 | 48 | 0 | 51 | 5.9% | 94.1% | R+88.2 |
| Precinct -49A49A | 3 | 43 | 1 | 47 | 6.4% | 91.5% | R+85.1 |
| Precinct -7C7C | 8 | 38 | 1 | 47 | 17.0% | 80.9% | R+63.8 |
| Precinct -77 | 0 | 21 | 0 | 21 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -5656 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 11.8% | 88.2% | R+76.5 |
| Precinct -3131 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 14 | 78.6% | 21.4% | D+57.1 |
| Precinct -3030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +17.5% |
| 1896 | +55.8% |
| 1900 | +25.5% |
| 1904 | +74.5% |
| 1908 | +51.9% |
| 1912 | +45.7% |
| 1916 | +56.1% |
| 1920 | −44.2% |
| 1924 | +17.9% |
| 1928 | +70.2% |
| 1932 | +83.3% |
| 1936 | +78.4% |
| 1940 | +30.9% |
| 1944 | +74.8% |
| 1948 | +9.5% |
| 1952 | +15.3% |
| 1956 | +7.9% |
| 1960 | +62.3% |
| 1964 | +29.7% |
| 1968 | +3.5% |
| 1972 | −37.5% |
| 1976 | +28.6% |
| 1980 | −3.4% |
| 1984 | −16.5% |
| 1988 | +13.5% |
| 1992 | +22.4% |
| 1996 | +21.9% |
| 2000 | −17.0% |
| 2004 | −24.4% |
| 2008 | −47.5% |
| 2012 | −52.8% |
| 2016 | −59.3% |
| 2020 | −61.9% |
| 2024 | −63.8% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 14.7%2,636 | 83.7%15,033 | 17,953 |
| 2020 | R | 14.9%3,910 | 81.2%21,256 | 26,181 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 51 points more Democratic.
38,669 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−66 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −507 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $45,813 in average income, against $65,269 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+34.4 on average — 29 points more Democratic-leaning than Vermilion Parish, LA itself (R+63.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Lafayette Parish, LA509R+31.4
- Iberia Parish, LA155R+34.1
- Acadia Parish, LA85R+64.0
- St. Martin Parish, LA34R+40.7
- Harris County, TX33D+5.5
- St. Landry Parish, LA29R+18.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Lafayette Parish, LA510
- Iberia Parish, LA131
- Acadia Parish, LA95
- St. Martin Parish, LA43
- St. Landry Parish, LA38
- Harris County, TX38
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −107 |
| 2012 | +117 |
| 2013 | +306 |
| 2014 | −22 |
| 2015 | +131 |
| 2016 | −101 |
| 2017 | −348 |
| 2018 | −221 |
| 2019 | −507 |
| 2021 | −60 |
| 2022 | +148 |
| 2023 | −14 |
| 2024 | +237 |
| 2025 | −66 |
Vermilion Parish, anchored by the coastal prairies and crawfish-farming communities along the Vermilion Bay shoreline, recorded an R+63.8 presidential margin in 2024—among the steepest in a state already tilted heavily toward Republican candidates.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 83.3 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 63.8 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 1.9 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 63.8 points.
A population of 57,123, a 76% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $55,707 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lafourche Parish and Acadia Parish.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Vermilion Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22113/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.