Bossier Parish, Louisiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
74 precincts · 52,243 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -004-4B004-4B | 271 | 1,366 | 15 | 1,652 | 16.4% | 82.7% | R+66.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -004-6A004-6A | 250 | 1,375 | 14 | 1,639 | 15.3% | 83.9% | R+68.6 |
| Precinct -02-21D02-21D | 463 | 1,101 | 29 | 1,593 | 29.1% | 69.1% | R+40.1 |
| Precinct -02-21C02-21C | 232 | 1,212 | 15 | 1,459 | 15.9% | 83.1% | R+67.2 |
| Precinct -004-4A004-4A | 246 | 1,033 | 12 | 1,291 | 19.1% | 80.0% | R+61.0 |
| Precinct -004-8B004-8B | 330 | 932 | 27 | 1,289 | 25.6% | 72.3% | R+46.7 |
| Precinct -02-22A02-22A | 173 | 1,081 | 15 | 1,269 | 13.6% | 85.2% | R+71.6 |
| Precinct -04-11B04-11B | 305 | 938 | 14 | 1,257 | 24.3% | 74.6% | R+50.4 |
| Precinct -004-10004-10 | 311 | 899 | 15 | 1,225 | 25.4% | 73.4% | R+48.0 |
| Precinct -004-6B004-6B | 340 | 862 | 20 | 1,222 | 27.8% | 70.5% | R+42.7 |
| Precinct -02-18C02-18C | 280 | 919 | 17 | 1,216 | 23.0% | 75.6% | R+52.5 |
| Precinct -0004-90004-9 | 161 | 998 | 8 | 1,167 | 13.8% | 85.5% | R+71.7 |
| Precinct -004-8A004-8A | 321 | 829 | 14 | 1,164 | 27.6% | 71.2% | R+43.6 |
| Precinct -0001-40001-4 | 384 | 765 | 14 | 1,163 | 33.0% | 65.8% | R+32.8 |
| Precinct -02-18G02-18G | 255 | 680 | 12 | 947 | 26.9% | 71.8% | R+44.9 |
| Precinct -004-1A004-1A | 138 | 802 | 6 | 946 | 14.6% | 84.8% | R+70.2 |
| Precinct -2-18I2-18I | 236 | 693 | 12 | 941 | 25.1% | 73.6% | R+48.6 |
| Precinct -4-2A4-2A | 40 | 864 | 15 | 919 | 4.4% | 94.0% | R+89.7 |
| Precinct -02-21A02-21A | 248 | 651 | 12 | 911 | 27.2% | 71.5% | R+44.2 |
| Precinct -04-11A04-11A | 123 | 743 | 12 | 878 | 14.0% | 84.6% | R+70.6 |
| Precinct -001-3A001-3A | 257 | 548 | 9 | 814 | 31.6% | 67.3% | R+35.7 |
| Precinct -004-3A004-3A | 238 | 559 | 6 | 803 | 29.6% | 69.6% | R+40.0 |
| Precinct -02-21B02-21B | 207 | 588 | 8 | 803 | 25.8% | 73.2% | R+47.4 |
| Precinct -0004-20004-2 | 140 | 645 | 11 | 796 | 17.6% | 81.0% | R+63.4 |
| Precinct -004-7A004-7A | 96 | 680 | 8 | 784 | 12.2% | 86.7% | R+74.5 |
| Precinct -004-3B004-3B | 119 | 642 | 11 | 772 | 15.4% | 83.2% | R+67.7 |
| Precinct -02-18B02-18B | 100 | 662 | 5 | 767 | 13.0% | 86.3% | R+73.3 |
| Precinct -004-3D004-3D | 125 | 629 | 9 | 763 | 16.4% | 82.4% | R+66.1 |
| Precinct -0001-20001-2 | 242 | 498 | 12 | 752 | 32.2% | 66.2% | R+34.0 |
| Precinct -004-5A004-5A | 204 | 531 | 6 | 741 | 27.5% | 71.7% | R+44.1 |
| Precinct -0003-40003-4 | 305 | 423 | 12 | 740 | 41.2% | 57.2% | R+15.9 |
| Precinct -002-16002-16 | 407 | 322 | 8 | 737 | 55.2% | 43.7% | D+11.5 |
| Precinct -02-12A02-12A | 447 | 252 | 15 | 714 | 62.6% | 35.3% | D+27.3 |
| Precinct -0002-20002-2 | 123 | 574 | 9 | 706 | 17.4% | 81.3% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -0001-30001-3 | 238 | 449 | 11 | 698 | 34.1% | 64.3% | R+30.2 |
| Precinct -2-18H2-18H | 209 | 478 | 9 | 696 | 30.0% | 68.7% | R+38.6 |
| Precinct -0001-10001-1 | 202 | 414 | 12 | 628 | 32.2% | 65.9% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -0002-90002-9 | 296 | 285 | 9 | 590 | 50.2% | 48.3% | D+1.9 |
| Precinct -02-18F02-18F | 52 | 531 | 6 | 589 | 8.8% | 90.2% | R+81.3 |
| Precinct -002-3A002-3A | 313 | 254 | 5 | 572 | 54.7% | 44.4% | D+10.3 |
| Precinct -0003-20003-2 | 121 | 438 | 3 | 562 | 21.5% | 77.9% | R+56.4 |
| Precinct -02-22B02-22B | 52 | 485 | 14 | 551 | 9.4% | 88.0% | R+78.6 |
| Precinct -04-11C04-11C | 140 | 388 | 18 | 546 | 25.6% | 71.1% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct -0002-70002-7 | 207 | 324 | 9 | 540 | 38.3% | 60.0% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -004-8E004-8E | 54 | 482 | 3 | 539 | 10.0% | 89.4% | R+79.4 |
| Precinct -0003-10003-1 | 196 | 335 | 5 | 536 | 36.6% | 62.5% | R+25.9 |
| Precinct -004-7B004-7B | 108 | 417 | 5 | 530 | 20.4% | 78.7% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -002-20002-20 | 196 | 324 | 3 | 523 | 37.5% | 62.0% | R+24.5 |
| Precinct -002-19002-19 | 373 | 136 | 6 | 515 | 72.4% | 26.4% | D+46.0 |
| Precinct -0002-10002-1 | 282 | 221 | 9 | 512 | 55.1% | 43.2% | D+11.9 |
| Precinct -0001-50001-5 | 157 | 331 | 9 | 497 | 31.6% | 66.6% | R+35.0 |
| Precinct -002-13002-13 | 265 | 206 | 6 | 477 | 55.6% | 43.2% | D+12.4 |
| Precinct -004-8G004-8G | 84 | 390 | 3 | 477 | 17.6% | 81.8% | R+64.2 |
| Precinct -0003-30003-3 | 61 | 397 | 3 | 461 | 13.2% | 86.1% | R+72.9 |
| Precinct -02-17B02-17B | 273 | 180 | 2 | 455 | 60.0% | 39.6% | D+20.4 |
| Precinct -002-15002-15 | 288 | 153 | 9 | 450 | 64.0% | 34.0% | D+30.0 |
| Precinct -0002-40002-4 | 104 | 327 | 11 | 442 | 23.5% | 74.0% | R+50.5 |
| Precinct -001-3B001-3B | 138 | 289 | 6 | 433 | 31.9% | 66.7% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct -02-18D02-18D | 54 | 368 | 8 | 430 | 12.6% | 85.6% | R+73.0 |
| Precinct -0002-30002-3 | 150 | 250 | 5 | 405 | 37.0% | 61.7% | R+24.7 |
| Precinct -002-14002-14 | 184 | 204 | 2 | 390 | 47.2% | 52.3% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -002-11002-11 | 200 | 180 | 3 | 383 | 52.2% | 47.0% | D+5.2 |
| Precinct -2-1A2-1A | 71 | 298 | 11 | 380 | 18.7% | 78.4% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -002-10002-10 | 100 | 267 | 3 | 370 | 27.0% | 72.2% | R+45.1 |
| Precinct -02-22C02-22C | 23 | 303 | 0 | 326 | 7.1% | 92.9% | R+85.9 |
| Precinct -004-8C004-8C | 173 | 136 | 2 | 311 | 55.6% | 43.7% | D+11.9 |
| Precinct -0002-80002-8 | 242 | 29 | 6 | 277 | 87.4% | 10.5% | D+76.9 |
| Precinct -02-17A02-17A | 136 | 125 | 3 | 264 | 51.5% | 47.3% | D+4.2 |
| Precinct -02-12B02-12B | 134 | 94 | 8 | 236 | 56.8% | 39.8% | D+16.9 |
| Precinct -0002-60002-6 | 156 | 59 | 9 | 224 | 69.6% | 26.3% | D+43.3 |
| Precinct -002-5A002-5A | 119 | 96 | 5 | 220 | 54.1% | 43.6% | D+10.5 |
| Precinct -002-23002-23 | 100 | 79 | 2 | 181 | 55.2% | 43.6% | D+11.6 |
| Precinct -004-8D004-8D | 96 | 61 | 2 | 159 | 60.4% | 38.4% | D+22.0 |
| Precinct -2-21E2-21E | 2 | 26 | 0 | 28 | 7.1% | 92.9% | R+85.7 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +95.8% |
| 1896 | +95.4% |
| 1900 | +98.1% |
| 1904 | +95.9% |
| 1908 | +94.9% |
| 1912 | +86.4% |
| 1916 | +97.4% |
| 1920 | +88.6% |
| 1924 | +85.5% |
| 1928 | +68.1% |
| 1932 | +95.0% |
| 1936 | +82.1% |
| 1940 | +82.9% |
| 1944 | +59.2% |
| 1948 | +20.9% |
| 1952 | −15.6% |
| 1956 | −18.2% |
| 1960 | −14.1% |
| 1964 | −67.1% |
| 1968 | −6.1% |
| 1972 | −60.8% |
| 1976 | −19.9% |
| 1980 | −27.1% |
| 1984 | −52.5% |
| 1988 | −39.1% |
| 1992 | −13.2% |
| 1996 | −3.8% |
| 2000 | −31.4% |
| 2004 | −41.5% |
| 2008 | −43.7% |
| 2012 | −45.4% |
| 2016 | −45.8% |
| 2020 | −41.0% |
| 2024 | −43.3% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 22.8%7,334 | 75.8%24,401 | 32,181 |
| 2020 | R | 25.9%13,765 | 71.6%38,066 | 53,200 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 21 points more Democratic.
77,921 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−30 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +427 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,808 in average income, against $80,259 for residents who stayed — 35% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+5.2 on average — 38 points more Democratic-leaning than Bossier Parish, LA itself (R+43.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Caddo Parish, LA1,598D+4.6
- Webster Parish, LA225R+36.5
- Dallas County, TX72D+22.2
- De Soto Parish, LA68R+35.5
- Ouachita Parish, LA68R+27.9
- Lincoln Parish, LA60R+25.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Caddo Parish, LA1,498
- Webster Parish, LA170
- Dallas County, TX87
- Tarrant County, TX72
- De Soto Parish, LA66
- Harris County, TX59
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +1,508 |
| 2012 | +1,746 |
| 2013 | −281 |
| 2014 | −177 |
| 2015 | −348 |
| 2016 | −564 |
| 2017 | +385 |
| 2018 | −446 |
| 2019 | −477 |
| 2021 | +232 |
| 2022 | −666 |
| 2023 | −53 |
| 2024 | −402 |
| 2025 | −30 |
Bossier Parish sits across the Red River from Shreveport and combines a large active-duty military population at Barksdale AFB with fast-growing suburban communities, producing some of the widest Republican margins in the state.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 98.1 points in 1900 and a Republican high of 67.1 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.3 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 43.3 points.
A population of 129,789, a 62% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $69,617 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Autauga County and Rankin County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Bossier Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22015/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.