De Soto Parish, Louisiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
57 precincts · 13,868 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -000010000010 | 344 | 673 | 3 | 1,020 | 33.7% | 66.0% | R+32.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -000034000034 | 97 | 684 | 11 | 792 | 12.2% | 86.4% | R+74.1 |
| Precinct -000033000033 | 217 | 511 | 9 | 737 | 29.4% | 69.3% | R+39.9 |
| Precinct -16A16A | 83 | 643 | 11 | 737 | 11.3% | 87.2% | R+76.0 |
| Precinct -000030000030 | 85 | 569 | 5 | 659 | 12.9% | 86.3% | R+73.4 |
| Precinct -000016000016 | 68 | 495 | 6 | 569 | 12.0% | 87.0% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -000046000046 | 21 | 469 | 2 | 492 | 4.3% | 95.3% | R+91.1 |
| Precinct -000021000021 | 83 | 354 | 2 | 439 | 18.9% | 80.6% | R+61.7 |
| Precinct -000063000063 | 290 | 90 | 3 | 383 | 75.7% | 23.5% | D+52.2 |
| Precinct -000022000022 | 39 | 335 | 2 | 376 | 10.4% | 89.1% | R+78.7 |
| Precinct -000023000023 | 77 | 291 | 0 | 368 | 20.9% | 79.1% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -000005000005 | 240 | 111 | 8 | 359 | 66.9% | 30.9% | D+35.9 |
| Precinct -000032000032 | 130 | 166 | 2 | 298 | 43.6% | 55.7% | R+12.1 |
| Precinct -000044000044 | 197 | 90 | 5 | 292 | 67.5% | 30.8% | D+36.6 |
| Precinct -000056000056 | 83 | 201 | 6 | 290 | 28.6% | 69.3% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -49A49A | 68 | 213 | 2 | 283 | 24.0% | 75.3% | R+51.2 |
| Precinct -000035000035 | 35 | 234 | 6 | 275 | 12.7% | 85.1% | R+72.4 |
| Precinct -000026000026 | 118 | 148 | 3 | 269 | 43.9% | 55.0% | R+11.2 |
| Precinct -000059000059 | 219 | 46 | 3 | 268 | 81.7% | 17.2% | D+64.6 |
| Precinct -000031000031 | 132 | 118 | 2 | 252 | 52.4% | 46.8% | D+5.6 |
| Precinct -000051000051 | 10 | 238 | 0 | 248 | 4.0% | 96.0% | R+91.9 |
| Precinct -000037000037 | 75 | 162 | 5 | 242 | 31.0% | 66.9% | R+36.0 |
| Precinct -16B16B | 14 | 220 | 2 | 236 | 5.9% | 93.2% | R+87.3 |
| Precinct -22A22A | 23 | 213 | 0 | 236 | 9.7% | 90.3% | R+80.5 |
| Precinct -000055000055 | 99 | 116 | 3 | 218 | 45.4% | 53.2% | R+7.8 |
| Precinct -000028000028 | 37 | 171 | 0 | 208 | 17.8% | 82.2% | R+64.4 |
| Precinct -000053000053 | 25 | 178 | 0 | 203 | 12.3% | 87.7% | R+75.4 |
| Precinct -000009000009 | 132 | 51 | 2 | 185 | 71.4% | 27.6% | D+43.8 |
| Precinct -33A33A | 85 | 97 | 0 | 182 | 46.7% | 53.3% | R+6.6 |
| Precinct -34A34A | 151 | 30 | 0 | 181 | 83.4% | 16.6% | D+66.9 |
| Precinct -000048000048 | 39 | 141 | 0 | 180 | 21.7% | 78.3% | R+56.7 |
| Precinct -000049000049 | 12 | 160 | 0 | 172 | 7.0% | 93.0% | R+86.0 |
| Precinct -000060000060 | 120 | 42 | 0 | 162 | 74.1% | 25.9% | D+48.1 |
| Precinct -11B11B | 41 | 120 | 0 | 161 | 25.5% | 74.5% | R+49.1 |
| Precinct -000001000001 | 130 | 23 | 3 | 156 | 83.3% | 14.7% | D+68.6 |
| Precinct -35A35A | 33 | 120 | 2 | 155 | 21.3% | 77.4% | R+56.1 |
| Precinct -000004000004 | 141 | 9 | 3 | 153 | 92.2% | 5.9% | D+86.3 |
| Precinct -000006000006 | 122 | 12 | 5 | 139 | 87.8% | 8.6% | D+79.1 |
| Precinct -11C11C | 19 | 116 | 0 | 135 | 14.1% | 85.9% | R+71.9 |
| Precinct -37C37C | 27 | 92 | 0 | 119 | 22.7% | 77.3% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -46A46A | 14 | 104 | 0 | 118 | 11.9% | 88.1% | R+76.3 |
| Precinct -46B46B | 41 | 74 | 0 | 115 | 35.7% | 64.3% | R+28.7 |
| Precinct -000038000038 | 64 | 46 | 0 | 110 | 58.2% | 41.8% | D+16.4 |
| Precinct -38A38A | 52 | 46 | 5 | 103 | 50.5% | 44.7% | D+5.8 |
| Precinct -63A63A | 81 | 14 | 0 | 95 | 85.3% | 14.7% | D+70.5 |
| Precinct -16C16C | 2 | 90 | 0 | 92 | 2.2% | 97.8% | R+95.7 |
| Precinct -30A30A | 14 | 58 | 0 | 72 | 19.4% | 80.6% | R+61.1 |
| Precinct -26A26A | 29 | 35 | 2 | 66 | 43.9% | 53.0% | R+9.1 |
| Precinct -000042000042 | 29 | 32 | 0 | 61 | 47.5% | 52.5% | R+4.9 |
| Precinct -000011000011 | 0 | 60 | 0 | 60 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -6B6B | 39 | 9 | 5 | 53 | 73.6% | 17.0% | D+56.6 |
| Precinct -5A5A | 31 | 7 | 2 | 40 | 77.5% | 17.5% | D+60.0 |
| Precinct -31A31A | 14 | 16 | 0 | 30 | 46.7% | 53.3% | R+6.7 |
| Precinct -35B35B | 8 | 9 | 0 | 17 | 47.1% | 52.9% | R+5.9 |
| Precinct -6A6A | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -60A60A | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | R+100.0 |
| Precinct -34B34B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +69.0% |
| 1896 | +84.3% |
| 1900 | +96.4% |
| 1904 | +96.7% |
| 1908 | +91.9% |
| 1912 | +87.5% |
| 1916 | +97.0% |
| 1920 | +91.2% |
| 1924 | +80.6% |
| 1928 | +47.3% |
| 1932 | +93.0% |
| 1936 | +92.3% |
| 1940 | +86.3% |
| 1944 | +55.1% |
| 1948 | +12.5% |
| 1952 | −15.7% |
| 1956 | −21.3% |
| 1960 | −9.5% |
| 1964 | −51.8% |
| 1968 | +28.3% |
| 1972 | −19.9% |
| 1976 | +12.3% |
| 1980 | +14.6% |
| 1984 | −12.5% |
| 1988 | +3.3% |
| 1992 | +18.4% |
| 1996 | +25.6% |
| 2000 | −2.1% |
| 2004 | −10.5% |
| 2008 | −13.4% |
| 2012 | −13.8% |
| 2016 | −21.5% |
| 2020 | −24.8% |
| 2024 | −35.5% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 29.4%2,715 | 69.2%6,401 | 9,247 |
| 2020 | R | 32.8%4,699 | 63.1%9,048 | 14,336 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 33 points more Democratic.
19,745 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+113 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +1,007 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $61,381 in average income, against $87,687 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+8.6 on average — 27 points more Democratic-leaning than De Soto Parish, LA itself (R+35.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Caddo Parish, LA299D+4.6
- Bossier Parish, LA66R+43.3
- Sabine Parish, LA32R+70.1
- Harris County, TX21D+5.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Caddo Parish, LA220
- Bossier Parish, LA68
- Sabine Parish, LA26
- Shelby County, TX26
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +44 |
| 2012 | +149 |
| 2013 | +4 |
| 2014 | −73 |
| 2015 | −22 |
| 2016 | +49 |
| 2017 | +62 |
| 2018 | +161 |
| 2019 | +14 |
| 2021 | +129 |
| 2022 | −30 |
| 2023 | +273 |
| 2024 | +134 |
| 2025 | +113 |
De Soto Parish sits in Louisiana's Ark-La-Tex corner, where an economy rooted in timber, oil, and agriculture correlates with some of the state's most lopsided presidential margins — Republicans carried it by roughly 35 points in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 97.0 points in 1916 and a Republican high of 51.8 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 10.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 35.5 points.
A population of 27,026, a 59% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $48,578 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Jenkins County and Lauderdale County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
De Soto Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22031/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.