Lincoln Parish, Louisiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
49 precincts · 18,165 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -0007-20007-2 | 385 | 971 | 43 | 1,399 | 27.5% | 69.4% | R+41.9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -0008-20008-2 | 234 | 972 | 30 | 1,236 | 18.9% | 78.6% | R+59.7 |
| Precinct -0006-10006-1 | 378 | 634 | 20 | 1,032 | 36.6% | 61.4% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -0005-20005-2 | 54 | 895 | 12 | 961 | 5.6% | 93.1% | R+87.5 |
| Precinct -0004-30004-3 | 43 | 847 | 8 | 898 | 4.8% | 94.3% | R+89.5 |
| Precinct -0009-10009-1 | 606 | 97 | 8 | 711 | 85.2% | 13.6% | D+71.6 |
| Precinct -0005-10005-1 | 95 | 578 | 9 | 682 | 13.9% | 84.8% | R+70.8 |
| Precinct -0005-40005-4 | 97 | 568 | 15 | 680 | 14.3% | 83.5% | R+69.3 |
| Precinct -0005-30005-3 | 41 | 578 | 15 | 634 | 6.5% | 91.2% | R+84.7 |
| Precinct -0003-20003-2 | 128 | 489 | 5 | 622 | 20.6% | 78.6% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -0003-10003-1 | 267 | 302 | 9 | 578 | 46.2% | 52.2% | R+6.1 |
| Precinct -0001-10001-1 | 538 | 27 | 9 | 574 | 93.7% | 4.7% | D+89.0 |
| Precinct -0012-10012-1 | 281 | 251 | 9 | 541 | 51.9% | 46.4% | D+5.5 |
| Precinct -0003-40003-4 | 108 | 414 | 3 | 525 | 20.6% | 78.9% | R+58.3 |
| Precinct -0004-20004-2 | 217 | 257 | 8 | 482 | 45.0% | 53.3% | R+8.3 |
| Precinct -0004-40004-4 | 54 | 412 | 2 | 468 | 11.5% | 88.0% | R+76.5 |
| Precinct -0002-10002-1 | 399 | 50 | 3 | 452 | 88.3% | 11.1% | D+77.2 |
| Precinct -0011-10011-1 | 366 | 64 | 5 | 435 | 84.1% | 14.7% | D+69.4 |
| Precinct -0010-10010-1 | 370 | 23 | 2 | 395 | 93.7% | 5.8% | D+87.8 |
| Precinct -0003-30003-3 | 116 | 255 | 8 | 379 | 30.6% | 67.3% | R+36.7 |
| Precinct -0008-10008-1 | 168 | 203 | 2 | 373 | 45.0% | 54.4% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -0004-50004-5 | 58 | 290 | 5 | 353 | 16.4% | 82.2% | R+65.7 |
| Precinct -0010-40010-4 | 321 | 25 | 2 | 348 | 92.2% | 7.2% | D+85.1 |
| Precinct -0003-50003-5 | 35 | 296 | 9 | 340 | 10.3% | 87.1% | R+76.8 |
| Precinct -0004-10004-1 | 43 | 292 | 3 | 338 | 12.7% | 86.4% | R+73.7 |
| Precinct -0001-20001-2 | 197 | 108 | 5 | 310 | 63.5% | 34.8% | D+28.7 |
| Precinct -0011-40011-4 | 163 | 85 | 11 | 259 | 62.9% | 32.8% | D+30.1 |
| Precinct -0007-10007-1 | 41 | 186 | 3 | 230 | 17.8% | 80.9% | R+63.0 |
| Precinct -0006-30006-3 | 64 | 139 | 2 | 205 | 31.2% | 67.8% | R+36.6 |
| Precinct -0010-30010-3 | 33 | 135 | 0 | 168 | 19.6% | 80.4% | R+60.7 |
| Precinct -0001-30001-3 | 120 | 35 | 5 | 160 | 75.0% | 21.9% | D+53.1 |
| Precinct -0004-60004-6 | 19 | 133 | 3 | 155 | 12.3% | 85.8% | R+73.5 |
| Precinct -0009-40009-4 | 97 | 50 | 6 | 153 | 63.4% | 32.7% | D+30.7 |
| Precinct -10-610-6 | 29 | 102 | 0 | 131 | 22.1% | 77.9% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -11-511-5 | 54 | 73 | 0 | 127 | 42.5% | 57.5% | R+15.0 |
| Precinct -0012-60012-6 | 85 | 39 | 0 | 124 | 68.5% | 31.5% | D+37.1 |
| Precinct -0003-60003-6 | 6 | 102 | 0 | 108 | 5.6% | 94.4% | R+88.9 |
| Precinct -0006-20006-2 | 17 | 81 | 2 | 100 | 17.0% | 81.0% | R+64.0 |
| Precinct -6-46-4 | 62 | 25 | 0 | 87 | 71.3% | 28.7% | D+42.5 |
| Precinct -0010-50010-5 | 70 | 10 | 0 | 80 | 87.5% | 12.5% | D+75.0 |
| Precinct -0011-30011-3 | 68 | 12 | 0 | 80 | 85.0% | 15.0% | D+70.0 |
| Precinct -0010-20010-2 | 12 | 60 | 0 | 72 | 16.7% | 83.3% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -6-56-5 | 29 | 14 | 0 | 43 | 67.4% | 32.6% | D+34.9 |
| Precinct -6-66-6 | 12 | 27 | 0 | 39 | 30.8% | 69.2% | R+38.5 |
| Precinct -8-38-3 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 36 | 47.2% | 47.2% | Even |
| Precinct -0009-20009-2 | 10 | 14 | 2 | 26 | 38.5% | 53.8% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -0012-20012-2 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 20 | 50.0% | 40.0% | D+10.0 |
| Precinct -9-39-3 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 80.0% | 20.0% | D+60.0 |
| Precinct -0012-40012-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0.0% | D+66.7 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −21.4% |
| 1896 | +92.0% |
| 1900 | +78.9% |
| 1904 | +90.0% |
| 1908 | +81.7% |
| 1912 | +84.1% |
| 1916 | +91.0% |
| 1920 | +68.8% |
| 1924 | +72.7% |
| 1928 | +21.7% |
| 1932 | +84.3% |
| 1936 | +82.9% |
| 1940 | +73.7% |
| 1944 | +24.6% |
| 1948 | +8.5% |
| 1952 | −21.0% |
| 1956 | −36.8% |
| 1960 | −33.6% |
| 1964 | −54.2% |
| 1968 | −7.1% |
| 1972 | −42.6% |
| 1976 | −15.5% |
| 1980 | −14.2% |
| 1984 | −24.9% |
| 1988 | −23.4% |
| 1992 | −0.1% |
| 1996 | +5.9% |
| 2000 | −14.5% |
| 2004 | −19.5% |
| 2008 | −12.5% |
| 2012 | −14.7% |
| 2016 | −19.6% |
| 2020 | −19.5% |
| 2024 | −25.5% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 32.0%4,028 | 66.4%8,349 | 12,583 |
| 2020 | R | 32.8%6,117 | 62.5%11,660 | 18,656 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 22 points more Democratic.
27,976 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+55 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −3,246 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $42,558 in average income, against $82,296 for residents who stayed — 48% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+27.5 on average — 2.0 points more Republican-leaning than Lincoln Parish, LA itself (R+25.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Ouachita Parish, LA185R+27.9
- Union Parish, LA85R+57.0
- Jackson Parish, LA74R+47.6
- Caddo Parish, LA61D+4.6
- Bossier Parish, LA46R+43.3
- Claiborne Parish, LA44R+22.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Ouachita Parish, LA182
- Jackson Parish, LA76
- Union Parish, LA64
- Dallas County, TX63
- Bossier Parish, LA60
- Caddo Parish, LA60
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −232 |
| 2012 | −407 |
| 2013 | −124 |
| 2014 | −334 |
| 2015 | −108 |
| 2016 | −370 |
| 2017 | −276 |
| 2018 | −525 |
| 2019 | −556 |
| 2021 | −205 |
| 2022 | −108 |
| 2023 | −56 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | +55 |
Lincoln Parish's two university campuses inject a younger, more transient population into a north Louisiana landscape that still votes heavily Republican, producing a college-town layer beneath a durable conservative baseline.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 92.0 points in 1896 and a Republican high of 54.2 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.0 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 25.5 points.
A population of 48,174, a 53% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $39,172 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Forrest County and Pike County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lincoln Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22061/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.