Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana
Precinct data
Results by precinct
74 precincts · 55,090 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -000145000145 | 265 | 1,122 | 12 | 1,399 | 18.9% | 80.2% | R+61.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -122C122C | 278 | 1,086 | 15 | 1,379 | 20.2% | 78.8% | R+58.6 |
| Precinct -00122B00122B | 179 | 1,138 | 12 | 1,329 | 13.5% | 85.6% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct -000151000151 | 127 | 1,164 | 13 | 1,304 | 9.7% | 89.3% | R+79.5 |
| Precinct -000120000120 | 158 | 1,091 | 13 | 1,262 | 12.5% | 86.5% | R+73.9 |
| Precinct -00137C00137C | 133 | 1,084 | 16 | 1,233 | 10.8% | 87.9% | R+77.1 |
| Precinct -000124000124 | 211 | 982 | 7 | 1,200 | 17.6% | 81.8% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -00072A00072A | 388 | 775 | 6 | 1,169 | 33.2% | 66.3% | R+33.1 |
| Precinct -00120A00120A | 84 | 1,055 | 18 | 1,157 | 7.3% | 91.2% | R+83.9 |
| Precinct -00149A00149A | 174 | 937 | 19 | 1,130 | 15.4% | 82.9% | R+67.5 |
| Precinct -000002000002 | 860 | 239 | 28 | 1,127 | 76.3% | 21.2% | D+55.1 |
| Precinct -000073000073 | 393 | 698 | 16 | 1,107 | 35.5% | 63.1% | R+27.6 |
| Precinct -000118000118 | 151 | 902 | 10 | 1,063 | 14.2% | 84.9% | R+70.6 |
| Precinct -000044000044 | 227 | 794 | 10 | 1,031 | 22.0% | 77.0% | R+55.0 |
| Precinct -00121A00121A | 257 | 745 | 9 | 1,011 | 25.4% | 73.7% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -000104000104 | 202 | 783 | 10 | 995 | 20.3% | 78.7% | R+58.4 |
| Precinct -000070000070 | 229 | 749 | 15 | 993 | 23.1% | 75.4% | R+52.4 |
| Precinct -000123000123 | 318 | 664 | 9 | 991 | 32.1% | 67.0% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct -000137000137 | 120 | 856 | 15 | 991 | 12.1% | 86.4% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -00137D00137D | 109 | 875 | 4 | 988 | 11.0% | 88.6% | R+77.5 |
| Precinct -000074000074 | 257 | 666 | 13 | 936 | 27.5% | 71.2% | R+43.7 |
| Precinct -000125000125 | 337 | 586 | 13 | 936 | 36.0% | 62.6% | R+26.6 |
| Precinct -000102000102 | 194 | 716 | 9 | 919 | 21.1% | 77.9% | R+56.8 |
| Precinct -000071000071 | 342 | 527 | 12 | 881 | 38.8% | 59.8% | R+21.0 |
| Precinct -000112000112 | 104 | 750 | 7 | 861 | 12.1% | 87.1% | R+75.0 |
| Precinct -000117000117 | 151 | 704 | 3 | 858 | 17.6% | 82.1% | R+64.5 |
| Precinct -00143A00143A | 243 | 605 | 7 | 855 | 28.4% | 70.8% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -000043000043 | 666 | 168 | 16 | 850 | 78.4% | 19.8% | D+58.6 |
| Precinct -000110000110 | 128 | 711 | 9 | 848 | 15.1% | 83.8% | R+68.8 |
| Precinct -000042000042 | 438 | 377 | 18 | 833 | 52.6% | 45.3% | D+7.3 |
| Precinct -000147000147 | 123 | 685 | 7 | 815 | 15.1% | 84.0% | R+69.0 |
| Precinct -000017000017 | 650 | 135 | 16 | 801 | 81.1% | 16.9% | D+64.3 |
| Precinct -000116000116 | 160 | 612 | 7 | 779 | 20.5% | 78.6% | R+58.0 |
| Precinct -000143000143 | 311 | 451 | 16 | 778 | 40.0% | 58.0% | R+18.0 |
| Precinct -00137A00137A | 110 | 645 | 10 | 765 | 14.4% | 84.3% | R+69.9 |
| Precinct -000041000041 | 232 | 481 | 24 | 737 | 31.5% | 65.3% | R+33.8 |
| Precinct -00040A00040A | 329 | 398 | 9 | 736 | 44.7% | 54.1% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -00111A00111A | 390 | 320 | 7 | 717 | 54.4% | 44.6% | D+9.8 |
| Precinct -000108000108 | 158 | 543 | 4 | 705 | 22.4% | 77.0% | R+54.6 |
| Precinct -000046000046 | 642 | 40 | 9 | 691 | 92.9% | 5.8% | D+87.1 |
| Precinct -000028000028 | 207 | 467 | 7 | 681 | 30.4% | 68.6% | R+38.2 |
| Precinct -000133000133 | 227 | 436 | 12 | 675 | 33.6% | 64.6% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -000049000049 | 410 | 247 | 12 | 669 | 61.3% | 36.9% | D+24.4 |
| Precinct -00137B00137B | 278 | 384 | 4 | 666 | 41.7% | 57.7% | R+15.9 |
| Precinct -00122A00122A | 110 | 546 | 4 | 660 | 16.7% | 82.7% | R+66.1 |
| Precinct -00133A00133A | 202 | 436 | 9 | 647 | 31.2% | 67.4% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct -000127000127 | 220 | 413 | 13 | 646 | 34.1% | 63.9% | R+29.9 |
| Precinct -000047000047 | 485 | 130 | 9 | 624 | 77.7% | 20.8% | D+56.9 |
| Precinct -000114000114 | 48 | 572 | 4 | 624 | 7.7% | 91.7% | R+84.0 |
| Precinct -000119000119 | 171 | 408 | 4 | 583 | 29.3% | 70.0% | R+40.7 |
| Precinct -00045A00045A | 403 | 163 | 4 | 570 | 70.7% | 28.6% | D+42.1 |
| Precinct -118A118A | 77 | 477 | 7 | 561 | 13.7% | 85.0% | R+71.3 |
| Precinct -000106000106 | 130 | 405 | 15 | 550 | 23.6% | 73.6% | R+50.0 |
| Precinct -00141A00141A | 160 | 363 | 6 | 529 | 30.2% | 68.6% | R+38.4 |
| Precinct -000109000109 | 288 | 223 | 3 | 514 | 56.0% | 43.4% | D+12.6 |
| Precinct -000149000149 | 58 | 422 | 10 | 490 | 11.8% | 86.1% | R+74.3 |
| Precinct -000101000101 | 183 | 297 | 4 | 484 | 37.8% | 61.4% | R+23.6 |
| Precinct -00120B00120B | 155 | 322 | 7 | 484 | 32.0% | 66.5% | R+34.5 |
| Precinct -000141000141 | 197 | 254 | 12 | 463 | 42.5% | 54.9% | R+12.3 |
| Precinct -000011000011 | 267 | 157 | 7 | 431 | 61.9% | 36.4% | D+25.5 |
| Precinct -000107000107 | 293 | 114 | 10 | 417 | 70.3% | 27.3% | D+42.9 |
| Precinct -00070A00070A | 132 | 275 | 3 | 410 | 32.2% | 67.1% | R+34.9 |
| Precinct -00129A00129A | 150 | 235 | 3 | 388 | 38.7% | 60.6% | R+21.9 |
| Precinct -00106A00106A | 74 | 289 | 3 | 366 | 20.2% | 79.0% | R+58.7 |
| Precinct -000033000033 | 74 | 285 | 6 | 365 | 20.3% | 78.1% | R+57.8 |
| Precinct -000139000139 | 135 | 207 | 13 | 355 | 38.0% | 58.3% | R+20.3 |
| Precinct -000121000121 | 49 | 294 | 7 | 350 | 14.0% | 84.0% | R+70.0 |
| Precinct -000072000072 | 100 | 211 | 3 | 314 | 31.8% | 67.2% | R+35.4 |
| Precinct -45B45B | 151 | 154 | 3 | 308 | 49.0% | 50.0% | R+1.0 |
| Precinct -000006000006 | 235 | 35 | 3 | 273 | 86.1% | 12.8% | D+73.3 |
| Precinct -000016000016 | 58 | 190 | 7 | 255 | 22.7% | 74.5% | R+51.8 |
| Precinct -000015000015 | 137 | 112 | 4 | 253 | 54.2% | 44.3% | D+9.9 |
| Precinct -00115B00115B | 173 | 50 | 7 | 230 | 75.2% | 21.7% | D+53.5 |
| Precinct -000105000105 | 21 | 74 | 0 | 95 | 22.1% | 77.9% | R+55.8 |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +71.2% |
| 1896 | +55.7% |
| 1900 | +60.8% |
| 1904 | +56.3% |
| 1908 | +63.3% |
| 1912 | +77.0% |
| 1916 | +78.0% |
| 1920 | +54.7% |
| 1924 | +54.5% |
| 1928 | +33.4% |
| 1932 | +81.2% |
| 1936 | +54.2% |
| 1940 | +64.2% |
| 1944 | +47.5% |
| 1948 | +12.1% |
| 1952 | +6.2% |
| 1956 | −8.6% |
| 1960 | +23.4% |
| 1964 | −15.6% |
| 1968 | +9.9% |
| 1972 | −34.6% |
| 1976 | +21.3% |
| 1980 | +0.3% |
| 1984 | −20.8% |
| 1988 | −10.2% |
| 1992 | +3.1% |
| 1996 | +8.2% |
| 2000 | −12.3% |
| 2004 | −25.7% |
| 2008 | −30.9% |
| 2012 | −27.7% |
| 2016 | −32.6% |
| 2020 | −32.8% |
| 2024 | −37.4% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | R | 26.3%9,325 | 71.7%25,435 | 35,489 |
| 2020 | R | 28.5%15,921 | 66.8%37,283 | 55,831 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 31 points more Democratic.
82,044 registered voters · 2024
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+969 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +11,674 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $46,288 in average income, against $67,903 for residents who stayed — 32% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+25.0 on average — 12 points more Democratic-leaning than Tangipahoa Parish, LA itself (R+37.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- St. Tammany Parish, LA579R+43.8
- Livingston Parish, LA412R+68.5
- Jefferson Parish, LA301R+13.0
- East Baton Rouge Parish, LA186D+11.1
- St. Helena Parish, LA155D+0.8
- Orleans Parish, LA137D+67.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Livingston Parish, LA466
- St. Tammany Parish, LA436
- East Baton Rouge Parish, LA202
- Jefferson Parish, LA156
- St. Helena Parish, LA130
- Washington Parish, LA109
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +319 |
| 2012 | +189 |
| 2013 | +948 |
| 2014 | +656 |
| 2015 | +956 |
| 2016 | +1,008 |
| 2017 | +1,041 |
| 2018 | +874 |
| 2019 | +350 |
| 2021 | +1,429 |
| 2022 | +1,028 |
| 2023 | +705 |
| 2024 | +1,202 |
| 2025 | +969 |
Tangipahoa Parish stretches from the Mississippi border to Lake Pontchartrain's north shore, blending small agricultural communities with commuter towns tied to Hammond's Southeastern Louisiana University economy.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 81.2 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 37.4 points in 2024. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 37.4 points.
A population of 136,738, a 61% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $56,760 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Calcasieu Parish and St. Bernard Parish.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/22105/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.