Chisago County, Minnesota
Precinct data
Results by precinct
49 precincts · 35,601 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -NORTH BRANCH P-ANORTH BRANCH P-A | 1,112 | 2,140 | 64 | 3,316 | 33.5% | 64.5% | R+31.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -LINDSTROMLINDSTROM | 1,269 | 1,845 | 65 | 3,179 | 39.9% | 58.0% | R+18.1 |
| Precinct -WYOMING P-BWYOMING P-B | 1,091 | 1,764 | 60 | 2,915 | 37.4% | 60.5% | R+23.1 |
| Precinct -CHISAGO CITY P-BCHISAGO CITY P-B | 911 | 1,366 | 48 | 2,325 | 39.2% | 58.8% | R+19.6 |
| Precinct -WYOMING P-AWYOMING P-A | 728 | 1,446 | 40 | 2,214 | 32.9% | 65.3% | R+32.4 |
| Precinct -NORTH BRANCH P-CNORTH BRANCH P-C | 629 | 1,500 | 27 | 2,156 | 29.2% | 69.6% | R+40.4 |
| Precinct -STACY W-2 P-2STACY W-2 P-2 | 533 | 1,275 | 33 | 1,841 | 29.0% | 69.3% | R+40.3 |
| Precinct -CHISAGO LAKE TWP (S)CHISAGO LAKE TWP (S) | 591 | 1,098 | 30 | 1,719 | 34.4% | 63.9% | R+29.5 |
| Precinct -CHISAGO LAKE TWP (N)CHISAGO LAKE TWP (N) | 582 | 958 | 22 | 1,562 | 37.3% | 61.3% | R+24.1 |
| Precinct -FISH LAKE TWPFISH LAKE TWP | 414 | 1,037 | 25 | 1,476 | 28.0% | 70.3% | R+42.2 |
| Precinct -SUNRISE TWPSUNRISE TWP | 361 | 1,044 | 28 | 1,433 | 25.2% | 72.9% | R+47.7 |
| Precinct -CHISAGO CITY P-ACHISAGO CITY P-A | 507 | 843 | 30 | 1,380 | 36.7% | 61.1% | R+24.3 |
| Precinct -NESSEL TWPNESSEL TWP | 354 | 895 | 15 | 1,264 | 28.0% | 70.8% | R+42.8 |
| Precinct -FRANCONIA TWPFRANCONIA TWP | 448 | 710 | 29 | 1,187 | 37.7% | 59.8% | R+22.1 |
| Precinct -RUSH CITYRUSH CITY | 395 | 762 | 22 | 1,179 | 33.5% | 64.6% | R+31.1 |
| Precinct -NORTH BRANCH P-BNORTH BRANCH P-B | 327 | 817 | 21 | 1,165 | 28.1% | 70.1% | R+42.1 |
| Precinct -STACY W-1 P-1STACY W-1 P-1 | 267 | 590 | 11 | 868 | 30.8% | 68.0% | R+37.2 |
| Precinct -SHAFER TWPSHAFER TWP | 215 | 533 | 16 | 764 | 28.1% | 69.8% | R+41.6 |
| Precinct -HARRISHARRIS | 192 | 523 | 18 | 733 | 26.2% | 71.4% | R+45.2 |
| Precinct -TAYLORS FALLSTAYLORS FALLS | 268 | 342 | 9 | 619 | 43.3% | 55.3% | R+12.0 |
| Precinct -SHAFERSHAFER | 154 | 433 | 13 | 600 | 25.7% | 72.2% | R+46.5 |
| Precinct -AMADOR TWPAMADOR TWP | 178 | 409 | 10 | 597 | 29.8% | 68.5% | R+38.7 |
| Precinct -RUSHSEBA TWPRUSHSEBA TWP | 119 | 374 | 11 | 504 | 23.6% | 74.2% | R+50.6 |
| Precinct -CENTER CITYCENTER CITY | 201 | 218 | 11 | 430 | 46.7% | 50.7% | R+4.0 |
| Precinct -CHISAGO CITY P-CCHISAGO CITY P-C | 48 | 125 | 2 | 175 | 27.4% | 71.4% | R+44.0 |
| Amador Twp. Voting District27_270250005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Center City Voting District27_270250015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chisago City P-A27_270250020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chisago City P-B27_270250021 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chisago Lake Twp. (N) Voting District27_270250025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Chisago Lake Twp. (S) Voting District27_270250030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Fish Lake Twp. Voting District27_270250035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Franconia Twp. Voting District27_270250040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Harris P-A27_270250045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Harris P-B27_270250047 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lent Twp. Voting District27_270250050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Lindstrom Voting District27_270250055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Nessel Twp. Voting District27_270250060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| North Branch P-N27_270250065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| North Branch P-S27_270250066 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rush City Voting District27_270250070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Rushseba Twp. Voting District27_270250075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Shafer Twp. Voting District27_270250085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Shafer Voting District27_270250080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Stacy Voting District27_270250090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Sunrise Twp. Voting District27_270250095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Taylors Falls Voting District27_270250100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wyoming P-A27_270250105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Wyoming P-B27_270250106 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −57.9% |
| 1896 | −70.0% |
| 1900 | −68.8% |
| 1904 | −85.5% |
| 1908 | −64.4% |
| 1912 | +3.4% |
| 1916 | −28.2% |
| 1920 | −71.1% |
| 1924 | −50.1% |
| 1928 | −52.3% |
| 1932 | +9.1% |
| 1936 | +14.8% |
| 1940 | −12.9% |
| 1944 | −11.9% |
| 1948 | +7.9% |
| 1952 | −21.0% |
| 1956 | −11.1% |
| 1960 | −13.5% |
| 1964 | +26.4% |
| 1968 | +13.7% |
| 1972 | −5.9% |
| 1976 | +25.3% |
| 1980 | +9.8% |
| 1984 | +3.1% |
| 1988 | +12.1% |
| 1992 | +13.2% |
| 1996 | +14.8% |
| 2000 | −6.1% |
| 2004 | −12.3% |
| 2008 | −10.3% |
| 2012 | −12.6% |
| 2016 | −30.3% |
| 2020 | −29.2% |
| 2024 | −31.3% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 35,154 |
| 2018 | 34,967 |
| 2020 | 38,688 |
| 2022 | 38,738 |
| 2024 | 41,087 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+106 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +2,955 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $69,252 in average income, against $94,216 for residents who stayed — 26% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+6.4 on average — 38 points more Democratic-leaning than Chisago County, MN itself (R+31.3).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Anoka County, MN266R+4.4
- Washington County, MN264D+8.9
- Ramsey County, MN262D+43.1
- Isanti County, MN149R+41.1
- Hennepin County, MN138D+42.4
- Dakota County, MN69D+12.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Washington County, MN267
- Anoka County, MN209
- Ramsey County, MN171
- Isanti County, MN135
- Hennepin County, MN128
- Pine County, MN69
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −354 |
| 2012 | −540 |
| 2013 | +31 |
| 2014 | +14 |
| 2015 | +188 |
| 2016 | +265 |
| 2017 | +460 |
| 2018 | +518 |
| 2019 | +391 |
| 2021 | +772 |
| 2022 | +386 |
| 2023 | +518 |
| 2024 | +200 |
| 2025 | +106 |
Chisago County's rapid population growth since the 1990s, driven by Twin Cities commuters settling in affordable lake-country exurbs, coincided with a political realignment that produced a 31-point Republican presidential margin in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 26.4 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 85.5 points in 1904. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 31.3 points.
A population of 57,991, a 90% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $99,400 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Isanti County and Polk County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Chisago County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27025/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.