Sherburne County, Minnesota
Precinct data
Results by precinct
68 precincts · 57,960 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -BECKER TWPBECKER TWP | 812 | 2,674 | 75 | 3,561 | 22.8% | 75.1% | R+52.3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -BIG LAKE CITY P-03BIG LAKE CITY P-03 | 940 | 1,974 | 59 | 2,973 | 31.6% | 66.4% | R+34.8 |
| Precinct -ELK RIVER W2 P2AELK RIVER W2 P2A | 893 | 1,832 | 45 | 2,770 | 32.2% | 66.1% | R+33.9 |
| Precinct -BECKER CITYBECKER CITY | 768 | 1,933 | 54 | 2,755 | 27.9% | 70.2% | R+42.3 |
| Precinct -BIG LAKE TWP P2BIG LAKE TWP P2 | 689 | 1,807 | 50 | 2,546 | 27.1% | 71.0% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -ORROCK TWPORROCK TWP | 659 | 1,729 | 51 | 2,439 | 27.0% | 70.9% | R+43.9 |
| Precinct -LIVONIA TWP P2LIVONIA TWP P2 | 592 | 1,795 | 42 | 2,429 | 24.4% | 73.9% | R+49.5 |
| Precinct -BALDWIN TWP P1BALDWIN TWP P1 | 571 | 1,661 | 57 | 2,289 | 24.9% | 72.6% | R+47.6 |
| Precinct -ELK RIVER W4 P4BELK RIVER W4 P4B | 919 | 1,172 | 39 | 2,130 | 43.1% | 55.0% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -BALDWIN TWP P2BALDWIN TWP P2 | 511 | 1,564 | 35 | 2,110 | 24.2% | 74.1% | R+49.9 |
| Precinct -ZIMMERMAN P-2ZIMMERMAN P-2 | 533 | 1,460 | 27 | 2,020 | 26.4% | 72.3% | R+45.9 |
| Precinct -ELK RIVER W3 P3AELK RIVER W3 P3A | 803 | 1,133 | 45 | 1,981 | 40.5% | 57.2% | R+16.7 |
| Precinct -ELK RIVER W4 P4AELK RIVER W4 P4A | 756 | 1,052 | 29 | 1,837 | 41.2% | 57.3% | R+16.1 |
| Precinct -BIG LAKE CITY P-02BIG LAKE CITY P-02 | 639 | 1,108 | 25 | 1,772 | 36.1% | 62.5% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -BIG LAKE TWP P1BIG LAKE TWP P1 | 548 | 1,167 | 37 | 1,752 | 31.3% | 66.6% | R+35.3 |
| Precinct -ELK RIVER W3 P3BELK RIVER W3 P3B | 735 | 973 | 39 | 1,747 | 42.1% | 55.7% | R+13.6 |
| Precinct -PALMER TWPPALMER TWP | 434 | 1,266 | 23 | 1,723 | 25.2% | 73.5% | R+48.3 |
| Precinct -ELK RIVER W1 P1AELK RIVER W1 P1A | 666 | 950 | 24 | 1,640 | 40.6% | 57.9% | R+17.3 |
| Precinct -ELK RIVER W1 P1BELK RIVER W1 P1B | 581 | 1,011 | 28 | 1,620 | 35.9% | 62.4% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -ZIMMERMAN P-1ZIMMERMAN P-1 | 420 | 1,154 | 36 | 1,610 | 26.1% | 71.7% | R+45.6 |
| Precinct -BLUE HILL TWPBLUE HILL TWP | 341 | 1,244 | 22 | 1,607 | 21.2% | 77.4% | R+56.2 |
| Precinct -BIG LAKE CITY P-01BIG LAKE CITY P-01 | 499 | 1,036 | 37 | 1,572 | 31.7% | 65.9% | R+34.2 |
| Precinct -ELK RIVER W2 P2BELK RIVER W2 P2B | 516 | 974 | 36 | 1,526 | 33.8% | 63.8% | R+30.0 |
| Precinct -LIVONIA TWP P1LIVONIA TWP P1 | 423 | 1,050 | 24 | 1,497 | 28.3% | 70.1% | R+41.9 |
| Precinct -ST CLOUD W2 P7ST CLOUD W2 P7 | 771 | 570 | 55 | 1,396 | 55.2% | 40.8% | D+14.4 |
| Precinct -CLEAR LAKE TWPCLEAR LAKE TWP | 390 | 781 | 18 | 1,189 | 32.8% | 65.7% | R+32.9 |
| Precinct -HAVEN TWP P-2HAVEN TWP P-2 | 390 | 773 | 26 | 1,189 | 32.8% | 65.0% | R+32.2 |
| Precinct -SANTIAGO TWPSANTIAGO TWP | 221 | 924 | 17 | 1,162 | 19.0% | 79.5% | R+60.5 |
| Precinct -BIG LAKE TWP P3BIG LAKE TWP P3 | 273 | 564 | 22 | 859 | 31.8% | 65.7% | R+33.9 |
| Precinct -ST CLOUD W2 P6ST CLOUD W2 P6 | 394 | 353 | 26 | 773 | 51.0% | 45.7% | D+5.3 |
| Precinct -ST CLOUD W2 P5ST CLOUD W2 P5 | 410 | 274 | 22 | 706 | 58.1% | 38.8% | D+19.3 |
| Precinct -CLEAR LAKE CITYCLEAR LAKE CITY | 126 | 275 | 11 | 412 | 30.6% | 66.7% | R+36.2 |
| Precinct -LIVONIA TWP P3LIVONIA TWP P3 | 30 | 114 | 2 | 146 | 20.5% | 78.1% | R+57.5 |
| Precinct -PRINCETON CITY P2PRINCETON CITY P2 | 52 | 87 | 2 | 141 | 36.9% | 61.7% | R+24.8 |
| Precinct -HAVEN TWP P-1HAVEN TWP P-1 | 24 | 57 | 0 | 81 | 29.6% | 70.4% | R+40.7 |
| Baldwin Twp. P-127_271410125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Baldwin Twp. P-227_271410005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Becker City Voting District27_271410010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Becker Twp. Voting District27_271410015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Big Lake City P-127_271410020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Big Lake City P-227_271410022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Big Lake City P-327_271410024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Big Lake Twp. P-127_271410025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Big Lake Twp. P-227_271410120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Big Lake Twp. P-327_271410121 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Blue Hill Twp. Voting District27_271410030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clear Lake Twp. Voting District27_271410040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Clear Lake Voting District27_271410035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elk River W-1 P-1A27_271410045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elk River W-1 P-1B27_271410130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elk River W-2 P-2A27_271410050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elk River W-2 P-2B27_271410135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elk River W-3 P-3A27_271410055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elk River W-3 P-3B27_271410140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elk River W-4 P-4A27_271410060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Elk River W-4 P-4B27_271410145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Haven Twp. Voting District27_271410065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Livonia Twp. P-127_271410070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Livonia Twp. P-227_271410150 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Orrock Twp. Voting District27_271410075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Palmer Twp. Voting District27_271410080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Princeton P-227_271410085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Santiago Twp. Voting District27_271410105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| St. Cloud W-2 P-527_271410090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| St. Cloud W-2 P-627_271410095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| St. Cloud W-2 P-727_271410100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Zimmerman P-127_271410110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Zimmerman P-227_271410111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −29.2% |
| 1896 | −29.9% |
| 1900 | −41.0% |
| 1904 | −69.5% |
| 1908 | −43.1% |
| 1912 | +1.6% |
| 1916 | −13.1% |
| 1920 | −75.7% |
| 1924 | −57.8% |
| 1928 | −38.9% |
| 1932 | +9.3% |
| 1936 | +6.9% |
| 1940 | −21.8% |
| 1944 | −17.0% |
| 1948 | +3.3% |
| 1952 | −27.0% |
| 1956 | −19.7% |
| 1960 | −5.0% |
| 1964 | +27.9% |
| 1968 | +11.3% |
| 1972 | −3.0% |
| 1976 | +20.2% |
| 1980 | +1.4% |
| 1984 | −11.4% |
| 1988 | −2.4% |
| 1992 | +2.3% |
| 1996 | +8.0% |
| 2000 | −15.3% |
| 2004 | −22.6% |
| 2008 | −18.2% |
| 2012 | −22.0% |
| 2016 | −36.8% |
| 2020 | −32.6% |
| 2024 | −34.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 56,994 |
| 2018 | 56,926 |
| 2020 | 63,322 |
| 2022 | 63,733 |
| 2024 | 68,237 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+404 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +5,487 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $65,477 in average income, against $93,961 for residents who stayed — 30% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+5.5 on average — 29 points more Democratic-leaning than Sherburne County, MN itself (R+34.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Hennepin County, MN565D+42.4
- Anoka County, MN479R+4.4
- Wright County, MN459R+29.2
- Stearns County, MN409R+26.7
- Mille Lacs County, MN146R+40.8
- Benton County, MN120R+35.8
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Hennepin County, MN494
- Wright County, MN468
- Stearns County, MN445
- Anoka County, MN366
- Benton County, MN175
- Mille Lacs County, MN168
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −268 |
| 2012 | −580 |
| 2013 | −109 |
| 2014 | +80 |
| 2015 | −241 |
| 2016 | +1,102 |
| 2017 | +554 |
| 2018 | +791 |
| 2019 | +582 |
| 2021 | +1,186 |
| 2022 | +1,200 |
| 2023 | +769 |
| 2024 | +17 |
| 2025 | +404 |
Sherburne sits at the outer edge of the Minneapolis–St. Paul metro, and its fast-growing exurban population has shifted the county from competitive to reliably lopsided, posting an R+34.8 margin in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.9 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 75.7 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 2.1 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 34.8 points.
A population of 100,560, a 86% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $105,466 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Wright County and Chisago County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Sherburne County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27141/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.