- Lead
- 99
- Total
- 19,417
- vs nation
- D+1.0
- Turnout
- 74.0%
Nicollet County, MN
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 74.0% of 26,347 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 604
- Total
- 19,125
- vs nation
- R+1.3
- Turnout
- 74.4%
- Lead
- 551
- Total
- 18,097
- vs nation
- R+5.1
- Turnout
- 72.7%
- Lead
- 1,438
- Total
- 18,357
- vs nation
- D+4.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,919
- Total
- 18,245
- vs nation
- D+3.2
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 108
- Total
- 17,741
- vs nation
- D+3.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 180
- Total
- 15,327
- vs nation
- R+1.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,715
- Total
- 13,842
- vs nation
- D+3.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+0.5MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 34,4112024 5-year
- Population density
- 77 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 449 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $79,7562024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 85.5%2024 5-year
- Black
- 4.5%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 5.4%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+27.5 in 1932MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+72.2 in 1920MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Blue Earth County, MN · twin score 94.5
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 74.0%19,508 participants ÷ 26,347 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +15.8 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -4.1 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 58.2%–60.8%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19,508 | 26,347 ± 291 | 74.0% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 15,377 | 26,232 ± 285 | 58.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 19,212 | 25,810 ± 300 | 74.4% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 15,873 | 25,583 ± 269 | 62.0% | Audited | A/A |
| 18,266 | 25,138 ± 283 | 72.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 18,357 | 24,990 | 73.5% | Derived | — | |
| 18,245 | 24,218 | 75.3% | Derived | — | |
| 17,741 | 23,446 extrapolated | 75.7% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Nicollet County only. The complete contest result is shown below for comparison.
Nicollet County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
Show all 7 candidates
Governor contest result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 58 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
58 precincts · 19,417 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -ST PETER W-1 P-1ST PETER W-1 P-1 | 1,675 | 1,317 | 75 | 3,067 | 54.6% | 42.9% | D+11.7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -ST PETER W-2 P-1ST PETER W-2 P-1 | 1,852 | 1,009 | 82 | 2,943 | 62.9% | 34.3% | D+28.6 |
| Precinct -NORTH MANKATO P-4NORTH MANKATO P-4 | 728 | 567 | 31 | 1,326 | 54.9% | 42.8% | D+12.1 |
| Precinct -NORTH MANKATO P-5NORTH MANKATO P-5 | 597 | 652 | 27 | 1,276 | 46.8% | 51.1% | R+4.3 |
| Precinct -NORTH MANKATO P-7NORTH MANKATO P-7 | 573 | 621 | 31 | 1,225 | 46.8% | 50.7% | R+3.9 |
| Precinct -NORTH MANKATO P-6NORTH MANKATO P-6 | 565 | 567 | 22 | 1,154 | 49.0% | 49.1% | R+0.2 |
| Precinct -NORTH MANKATO P-1NORTH MANKATO P-1 | 643 | 462 | 14 | 1,119 | 57.5% | 41.3% | D+16.2 |
| Precinct -NORTH MANKATO P-2NORTH MANKATO P-2 | 639 | 442 | 24 | 1,105 | 57.8% | 40.0% | D+17.8 |
| Precinct -NORTH MANKATO P-3NORTH MANKATO P-3 | 616 | 450 | 28 | 1,094 | 56.3% | 41.1% | D+15.2 |
| Precinct -BELGRADE TWPBELGRADE TWP | 271 | 427 | 21 | 719 | 37.7% | 59.4% | R+21.7 |
| Precinct -NICOLLET CITYNICOLLET CITY | 197 | 467 | 7 | 671 | 29.4% | 69.6% | R+40.2 |
| Precinct -COURTLAND CITYCOURTLAND CITY | 123 | 347 | 6 | 476 | 25.8% | 72.9% | R+47.1 |
| Precinct -LAKE PRAIRIE TWPLAKE PRAIRIE TWP | 152 | 260 | 9 | 421 | 36.1% | 61.8% | R+25.7 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE TWPLAFAYETTE TWP | 109 | 295 | 6 | 410 | 26.6% | 72.0% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct -COURTLAND TWPCOURTLAND TWP | 96 | 274 | 5 | 375 | 25.6% | 73.1% | R+47.5 |
| Precinct -OSHAWA TWPOSHAWA TWP | 134 | 186 | 18 | 338 | 39.6% | 55.0% | R+15.4 |
| Precinct -NICOLLET TWPNICOLLET TWP | 93 | 232 | 3 | 328 | 28.4% | 70.7% | R+42.4 |
| Precinct -WEST NEWTON TWPWEST NEWTON TWP | 67 | 210 | 2 | 279 | 24.0% | 75.3% | R+51.3 |
| Precinct -LAFAYETTE CITYLAFAYETTE CITY | 69 | 189 | 7 | 265 | 26.0% | 71.3% | R+45.3 |
| Precinct -TRAVERSE TWPTRAVERSE TWP | 68 | 130 | 2 | 200 | 34.0% | 65.0% | R+31.0 |
| Precinct -NEW SWEDEN TWPNEW SWEDEN TWP | 56 | 115 | 6 | 177 | 31.6% | 65.0% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -GRANBY TWPGRANBY TWP | 41 | 109 | 6 | 156 | 26.3% | 69.9% | R+43.6 |
| Precinct -BERNADOTTE TWPBERNADOTTE TWP | 44 | 110 | 1 | 155 | 28.4% | 71.0% | R+42.6 |
| Precinct -BRIGHTON TWPBRIGHTON TWP | 12 | 64 | 2 | 78 | 15.4% | 82.1% | R+66.7 |
| Precinct -RIDGELY TWPRIDGELY TWP | 21 | 38 | 1 | 60 | 35.0% | 63.3% | R+28.3 |
| Belgrade Township Voting District27_271030005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bernadotte Township Voting District27_271030010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brighton Township Voting District27_271030015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| City Of Courtland Voting District27_271030020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| City Of Lafayette Voting District27_271030035 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| City Of Nicollet Voting District27_271030060 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Courtland Township Voting District27_271030025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Granby Township Voting District27_271030030 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lafayette Township Voting District27_271030040 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lake Prairie Township Voting District27_271030045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Mankato W-2 P-3027_271030050 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| New Sweden Township Voting District27_271030055 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Nicollet Township Voting District27_271030065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-1A27_271030070 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-1B27_271030075 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-2A27_271030080 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-2B27_271030085 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-3A27_271030090 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-3B27_271030095 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-4A27_271030100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-4B27_271030105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-5A27_271030106 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-5B27_271030107 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-6A27_271030108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| North Mankato P-6B27_271030109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Oshawa Township Voting District27_271030110 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ridgely Township Voting District27_271030115 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St Peter W-1 P-127_271030120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St Peter W-1 P-227_271030125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St Peter W-2 P-127_271030130 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| St Peter W-2 P-227_271030135 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Traverse Township Voting District27_271030140 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Newton Township Voting District27_271030145 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Nicollet County, MN · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
62.6%
3,960 votes · D+27.5
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1936 · 59.1%
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
83.5%
4,115 votes · R+72.2
Runner-up · Theodore Roosevelt, 1904 · 74.0%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
9,887votes
54.2% of the vote · D+10.5
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 9,652 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
9,540votes
49.1% of the vote · R+0.5
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 9,018 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1932
+9.8pts D vs U.S.
Place D+27.5 · U.S. D+17.8
Runner-up · George McGovern, 1972 · +9.1 pts
Republican
Warren G. Harding1920
+46.0pts R vs U.S.
Place R+72.2 · U.S. R+26.2
Runner-up · Thomas E. Dewey, 1944 · +37.7 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Nicollet County, MN. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 1 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
| Year | Vote lead | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | R | 46.7%8,772 | 53.3%10,017 | 18,789 |
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 21,078 |
| 2018 | 20,585 |
| 2020 | 21,693 |
| 2022 | 21,593 |
| 2024 | 22,743 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−36 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −859 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $56,179 in average income, against $90,291 for residents who stayed — 38% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+4.0 on average — 3.5 points more Republican-leaning than Nicollet County, MN itself (R+0.5).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Blue Earth County, MN473R+1.2
- Le Sueur County, MN75R+33.6
- Brown County, MN58R+35.0
- Hennepin County, MN54D+42.4
- Dakota County, MN29D+12.8
- Ramsey County, MN28D+43.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Blue Earth County, MN405
- Hennepin County, MN105
- Cottonwood County, MN62
- Le Sueur County, MN59
- Brown County, MN57
- Dakota County, MN41
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −4 |
| 2012 | −147 |
| 2013 | −212 |
| 2014 | +161 |
| 2015 | −72 |
| 2016 | −17 |
| 2017 | +125 |
| 2018 | +16 |
| 2019 | −53 |
| 2021 | −209 |
| 2022 | +53 |
| 2023 | −567 |
| 2024 | +103 |
| 2025 | −36 |
Nicollet County, anchored by Mankato's southern suburbs along the Minnesota River, has drifted toward competitive status over recent cycles — the 2024 presidential contest settled at roughly half a percentage point, reflecting a mixed blend of small-city and agricultural voters.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 27.5 points in 1932 and a Republican high of 72.2 points in 1920. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 0.5 points.
A population of 34,411, a 86% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $79,756 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Blue Earth County and Eau Claire County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Nicollet County, Minnesota. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/27103/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.