Amite County, Mississippi
Precinct data
Results by precinct
43 precincts · 6,815 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -WallsWalls | 145 | 403 | 3 | 551 | 26.3% | 73.1% | R+46.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -LibertyLiberty | 114 | 406 | 4 | 524 | 21.8% | 77.5% | R+55.7 |
| Precinct -GlosterGloster | 358 | 112 | 8 | 478 | 74.9% | 23.4% | D+51.5 |
| Precinct -TangipahoaTangipahoa | 67 | 409 | 2 | 478 | 14.0% | 85.6% | R+71.5 |
| Precinct -SmithdaleSmithdale | 115 | 281 | 4 | 400 | 28.7% | 70.3% | R+41.5 |
| Precinct -East CentrevilleEast Centreville | 114 | 249 | 7 | 370 | 30.8% | 67.3% | R+36.5 |
| Precinct -East ForkEast Fork | 37 | 326 | 4 | 367 | 10.1% | 88.8% | R+78.7 |
| Precinct -Zion HillZion Hill | 60 | 292 | 2 | 354 | 16.9% | 82.5% | R+65.5 |
| Precinct -New ZionNew Zion | 38 | 287 | 4 | 329 | 11.6% | 87.2% | R+75.7 |
| Precinct -TickfawTickfaw | 137 | 166 | 6 | 309 | 44.3% | 53.7% | R+9.4 |
| Precinct -RicevilleRiceville | 120 | 176 | 5 | 301 | 39.9% | 58.5% | R+18.6 |
| Precinct -StreetStreet | 52 | 243 | 4 | 299 | 17.4% | 81.3% | R+63.9 |
| Precinct -ArielAriel | 195 | 92 | 7 | 294 | 66.3% | 31.3% | D+35.0 |
| Precinct -OneilOneil | 12 | 260 | 0 | 272 | 4.4% | 95.6% | R+91.2 |
| Precinct -South LibertySouth Liberty | 119 | 132 | 5 | 256 | 46.5% | 51.6% | R+5.1 |
| Precinct -BerwickBerwick | 167 | 75 | 1 | 243 | 68.7% | 30.9% | D+37.9 |
| Precinct -East GlosterEast Gloster | 91 | 135 | 5 | 231 | 39.4% | 58.4% | R+19.0 |
| Precinct -Amite RiverAmite River | 158 | 55 | 4 | 217 | 72.8% | 25.3% | D+47.5 |
| Precinct -East LibertyEast Liberty | 52 | 116 | 3 | 171 | 30.4% | 67.8% | R+37.4 |
| Precinct -Vance ParkVance Park | 21 | 138 | 3 | 162 | 13.0% | 85.2% | R+72.2 |
| Precinct -Crosby Public LibraryCrosby Public Library | 68 | 74 | 2 | 144 | 47.2% | 51.4% | R+4.2 |
| Precinct -HomochittoHomochitto | 6 | 57 | 2 | 65 | 9.2% | 87.7% | R+78.5 |
| Amite River Voting District28_28005205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Ariel Voting District28_28005201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Berwick Voting District28_28005202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Crosby Voting District28_28005301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| East Centreville Voting District28_28005203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| East Fork Voting District28_28005401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| East Gloster Voting District28_28005101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| East Liberty Voting District28_28005402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Gloster Voting District28_28005302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Homochitto Voting District28_28005303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Liberty Voting District28_28005102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| New Zion Voting District28_28005103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Oneil Voting District28_28005304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Riceville Voting District28_28005501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Smithdale Voting District28_28005403 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| South Liberty Voting District28_28005502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Street Voting District28_28005204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Tangipahoa Voting District28_28005404 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Tickfaw Voting District28_28005503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Walls Voting District28_28005504 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| Zion Hill Voting District28_28005104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | +73.4% |
| 1896 | +93.7% |
| 1900 | +88.4% |
| 1904 | +86.1% |
| 1908 | +94.4% |
| 1912 | +96.4% |
| 1916 | +96.4% |
| 1920 | +72.5% |
| 1924 | +83.0% |
| 1928 | +57.1% |
| 1932 | +88.3% |
| 1936 | +91.5% |
| 1940 | +91.5% |
| 1944 | +88.5% |
| 1948 | +2.3% |
| 1952 | +18.1% |
| 1956 | +31.9% |
| 1960 | +2.4% |
| 1964 | −92.8% |
| 1968 | +22.2% |
| 1972 | −40.2% |
| 1976 | +6.4% |
| 1980 | +9.6% |
| 1984 | −14.8% |
| 1988 | −8.1% |
| 1992 | +0.8% |
| 1996 | +5.3% |
| 2000 | −15.7% |
| 2004 | −15.8% |
| 2008 | −11.7% |
| 2012 | −15.2% |
| 2016 | −22.6% |
| 2020 | −26.2% |
| 2024 | −32.8% |
U.S. Senate
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 10,402 |
| 2018 | 10,371 |
| 2020 | 10,694 |
| 2022 | 10,035 |
| 2024 | 10,344 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+33 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −498 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $51,514 in average income, against $55,889 for residents who stayed — 8% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+2.3 on average — 35 points more Democratic-leaning than Amite County, MS itself (R+32.8).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Pike County, MS84R+3.5
- Wilkinson County, MS21D+25.3
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Pike County, MS74
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −4 |
| 2012 | −216 |
| 2013 | −56 |
| 2014 | −249 |
| 2015 | −6 |
| 2016 | −66 |
| 2017 | +54 |
| 2018 | −92 |
| 2019 | −7 |
| 2021 | +16 |
| 2022 | +54 |
| 2023 | −14 |
| 2024 | +55 |
| 2025 | +33 |
Amite County's population has declined steadily since the 1980s, and its electorate—heavily rural, with agriculture anchoring the local economy—has shifted toward lopsided Republican margins in federal contests over the past two decades.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 96.4 points in 1916 and a Republican high of 92.8 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.7 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 32.8 points.
A population of 12,565, a 59% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $37,222 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Seminole County and Choctaw County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Amite County, Mississippi. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/28005/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.