- Lead
- 5,810
- Total
- 27,407
- vs nation
- R+19.7
- Turnout
- 50.6%
Lauderdale County, MS
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 50.6% of 54,119 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 5,007
- Total
- 31,247
- vs nation
- R+20.5
- Turnout
- 55.3%
- Lead
- 6,472
- Total
- 29,506
- vs nation
- R+24.0
- Turnout
- 49.6%
- Lead
- 4,886
- Total
- 32,777
- vs nation
- R+18.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,250
- Total
- 33,114
- vs nation
- R+26.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 9,444
- Total
- 30,170
- vs nation
- R+28.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 8,903
- Total
- 25,970
- vs nation
- R+34.8
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 6,387
- Total
- 24,834
- vs nation
- R+34.2
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+21.2MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 71,5042024 5-year
- Population density
- 102 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 704 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $50,8172024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 50.3%2024 5-year
- Black
- 40.8%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 2.5%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+97.6 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+78.7 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Troup County, GA · twin score 95.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 50.6%27,407 participants ÷ 54,119 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +26.2 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.7 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 24.4%–32.9%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27,407 | 54,119 ± 240 | 50.6% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 16,040 | 55,105 ± 260 | 29.1% | Audited | A/A |
| 31,562 | 57,069 ± 336 | 55.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 23,382 | 58,091 ± 283 | 40.3% | Audited | A/A |
| 29,506 | 59,509 ± 292 | 49.6% | Audited | A/A | |
| 32,777 | 59,390 | 55.2% | Derived | — | |
| 33,114 | 57,049 | 58.0% | Derived | — | |
| 30,170 | 54,708 extrapolated | 55.1% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Lauderdale County only. The complete district District 3 result is shown below for comparison.
Lauderdale County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
District District 3 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 91 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
91 precincts · 27,407 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -101 - One101 - One | 733 | 842 | 23 | 1,598 | 45.9% | 52.7% | R+6.8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -331 - Collinsville331 - Collinsville | 269 | 1,246 | 5 | 1,520 | 17.7% | 82.0% | R+64.3 |
| Precinct -127 - Bailey127 - Bailey | 362 | 1,069 | 11 | 1,442 | 25.1% | 74.1% | R+49.0 |
| Precinct -361 - Suqualena361 - Suqualena | 327 | 1,076 | 16 | 1,419 | 23.0% | 75.8% | R+52.8 |
| Precinct -146 - New Lauderdale146 - New Lauderdale | 314 | 1,051 | 11 | 1,376 | 22.8% | 76.4% | R+53.6 |
| Precinct -105 - Five105 - Five | 524 | 774 | 25 | 1,323 | 39.6% | 58.5% | R+18.9 |
| Precinct -329 - Center Hill329 - Center Hill | 155 | 1,032 | 13 | 1,200 | 12.9% | 86.0% | R+73.1 |
| Precinct -530 - Clarkdale530 - Clarkdale | 97 | 1,068 | 7 | 1,172 | 8.3% | 91.1% | R+82.8 |
| Precinct -237 - East Lauderdale237 - East Lauderdale | 327 | 725 | 8 | 1,060 | 30.8% | 68.4% | R+37.5 |
| Precinct -564 - Vimville564 - Vimville | 294 | 713 | 7 | 1,014 | 29.0% | 70.3% | R+41.3 |
| Precinct -206 - Six206 - Six | 768 | 141 | 5 | 914 | 84.0% | 15.4% | D+68.6 |
| Precinct -343 - Martin343 - Martin | 50 | 788 | 1 | 839 | 6.0% | 93.9% | R+88.0 |
| Precinct -415 - Fifteen415 - Fifteen | 591 | 239 | 7 | 837 | 70.6% | 28.6% | D+42.1 |
| Precinct -567 - Zero567 - Zero | 117 | 648 | 4 | 769 | 15.2% | 84.3% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -313 - Thirteen313 - Thirteen | 414 | 332 | 5 | 751 | 55.1% | 44.2% | D+10.9 |
| Precinct -126 - The Landing on 39126 - The Landing on 39 | 196 | 534 | 14 | 744 | 26.3% | 71.8% | R+45.4 |
| Precinct -254 - Russell254 - Russell | 299 | 423 | 4 | 726 | 41.2% | 58.3% | R+17.1 |
| Precinct -238 - Marion238 - Marion | 333 | 359 | 10 | 702 | 47.4% | 51.1% | R+3.7 |
| Precinct -303 - Three303 - Three | 544 | 115 | 5 | 664 | 81.9% | 17.3% | D+64.6 |
| Precinct -412 - Twelve412 - Twelve | 610 | 50 | 4 | 664 | 91.9% | 7.5% | D+84.3 |
| Precinct -583 - Mt Gilead583 - Mt Gilead | 162 | 412 | 7 | 581 | 27.9% | 70.9% | R+43.0 |
| Precinct -214 - Fourteen214 - Fourteen | 483 | 76 | 8 | 567 | 85.2% | 13.4% | D+71.8 |
| Precinct -409 - Nine409 - Nine | 500 | 53 | 2 | 555 | 90.1% | 9.5% | D+80.5 |
| Precinct -408 - Eight408 - Eight | 422 | 117 | 4 | 543 | 77.7% | 21.5% | D+56.2 |
| Precinct -450 - Pickard450 - Pickard | 129 | 374 | 2 | 505 | 25.5% | 74.1% | R+48.5 |
| Precinct -517 - Seventeen517 - Seventeen | 185 | 258 | 3 | 446 | 41.5% | 57.8% | R+16.4 |
| Precinct -544 - Meehan544 - Meehan | 78 | 358 | 6 | 442 | 17.6% | 81.0% | R+63.3 |
| Precinct -565 - Whynot565 - Whynot | 67 | 360 | 2 | 429 | 15.6% | 83.9% | R+68.3 |
| Precinct -528 - Causeyville528 - Causeyville | 38 | 344 | 0 | 382 | 9.9% | 90.1% | R+80.1 |
| Precinct -549 - Odom549 - Odom | 161 | 199 | 4 | 364 | 44.2% | 54.7% | R+10.4 |
| Precinct -411 - Eleven411 - Eleven | 303 | 34 | 2 | 339 | 89.4% | 10.0% | D+79.4 |
| Precinct -560 - South Nellieburg560 - South Nellieburg | 66 | 265 | 3 | 334 | 19.8% | 79.3% | R+59.6 |
| Precinct -262 - Toomsuba262 - Toomsuba | 149 | 159 | 5 | 313 | 47.6% | 50.8% | R+3.2 |
| Precinct -407 - Seven407 - Seven | 219 | 44 | 4 | 267 | 82.0% | 16.5% | D+65.5 |
| Precinct -240 - Kewanee240 - Kewanee | 115 | 108 | 0 | 223 | 51.6% | 48.4% | D+3.1 |
| Precinct -235 - Daleville235 - Daleville | 127 | 67 | 4 | 198 | 64.1% | 33.8% | D+30.3 |
| Precinct -410 - Ten410 - Ten | 149 | 34 | 2 | 185 | 80.5% | 18.4% | D+62.2 |
| Alamucha Voting District28_28075202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Andrews Chapel Voting District28_28075103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bailey Voting District28_28075104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Causeyville Voting District28_28075512 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Center Hill Voting District28_28075303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Center Ridge Voting District28_28075211 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Clarkdale Voting District28_28075506 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Collinsville Voting District28_28075304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Culpepper Voting District28_28075507 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Daleville Voting District28_28075203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| East Bonita Voting District28_28075513 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| East Lauderdale Voting District28_28075206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| East Marion Voting District28_28075207 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Kewanee Voting District28_28075208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Marion Voting District28_28075106 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Martin Voting District28_28075305 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Meehan Voting District28_28075508 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Mt. Gilead Voting District28_28075517 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| New Lauderdale Voting District28_28075107 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Obadiah Voting District28_28075308 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Odom Voting District28_28075205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Pickard Voting District28_28075407 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Prospect Voting District28_28075108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Russell Voting District28_28075210 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Sageville Voting District28_28075408 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Nellieburg Voting District28_28075509 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| South Russell Voting District28_28075510 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Suqualena Voting District28_28075309 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Toomsuba Voting District28_28075209 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Valley Voting District28_28075511 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Vimville Voting District28_28075514 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 128_28075101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1028_28075403 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1128_28075404 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1228_28075405 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1328_28075109 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1428_28075204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1528_28075406 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1628_28075503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1728_28075504 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 1828_28075505 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 228_28075301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 2028_28075409 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 328_28075302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 428_28075401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 528_28075102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 628_28075201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 728_28075501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 828_28075502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Voting District 928_28075402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Dalewood Voting District28_28075105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Lauderdale Voting District28_28075306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Whynot Voting District28_28075515 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Zero Voting District28_28075516 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Lauderdale County, MS · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
98.7%
6,075 votes · D+97.6
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 95.9%
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
89.4%
13,291 votes · R+78.7
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · 81.8%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2012
13,814votes
42.1% of the vote · R+14.9
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · 13,332 votes
Republican
George W. Bush2004
19,736votes
65.4% of the vote · R+31.3
Runner-up · John McCain, 2008 · 19,582 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Alton B. Parker1904
+112.7pts D vs U.S.
Place D+93.0 · U.S. R+19.7
Runner-up · James M. Cox, 1920 · +106.1 pts
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
+101.3pts R vs U.S.
Place R+78.7 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · +43.2 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Lauderdale County, MS. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 3 state senate and 3 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 55,247 |
| 2018 | 48,407 |
| 2020 | 48,376 |
| 2022 | 45,434 |
| 2024 | 46,727 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−200 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −9,891 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $48,821 in average income, against $74,715 for residents who stayed — 35% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+18.3 on average — 2.9 points more Democratic-leaning than Lauderdale County, MS itself (R+21.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Clarke County, MS71R+35.2
- Newton County, MS63R+43.3
- Kemper County, MS50D+16.9
- Neshoba County, MS35R+50.9
- Escambia County, FL32R+19.5
- Rankin County, MS28R+47.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Clarke County, MS97
- Newton County, MS72
- Kemper County, MS41
- Rankin County, MS41
- Hinds County, MS36
- Harrison County, MS35
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +17 |
| 2012 | −715 |
| 2013 | −198 |
| 2014 | −1,164 |
| 2015 | −1,140 |
| 2016 | −1,133 |
| 2017 | −1,128 |
| 2018 | −1,139 |
| 2019 | −1,140 |
| 2021 | −370 |
| 2022 | −588 |
| 2023 | −557 |
| 2024 | −436 |
| 2025 | −200 |
Lauderdale County's largest city, Meridian, once gave Democrats a foothold in east-central Mississippi, but the county's presidential margins have widened consistently since 2000, reaching R+21.2 in 2024.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 97.6 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 78.7 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 5.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 21.2 points.
A population of 71,504, a 50% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $50,817 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Troup County and McDuffie County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lauderdale County, Mississippi. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/28075/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.