- Lead
- 7,170
- Total
- 15,802
- vs nation
- R+43.9
- Turnout
- 59.1%
Lincoln County, MS
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 59.1% of 26,733 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 6,556
- Total
- 16,801
- vs nation
- R+43.5
- Turnout
- 64.7%
- Lead
- 6,092
- Total
- 15,193
- vs nation
- R+42.2
- Turnout
- 58.3%
- Lead
- 5,368
- Total
- 16,414
- vs nation
- R+36.6
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,276
- Total
- 16,402
- vs nation
- R+39.4
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 5,590
- Total
- 14,496
- vs nation
- R+36.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 4,182
- Total
- 13,000
- vs nation
- R+32.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,666
- Total
- 11,067
- vs nation
- R+23.6
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+45.4MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 34,8772024 5-year
- Population density
- 59 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 586 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $51,1192024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 67.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 30.0%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.3%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+93.8 in 1936MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+87.8 in 1964MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Jones County, MS · twin score 94.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 59.1%15,802 participants ÷ 26,733 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +31.2 ptsPresidential-dependent
- Drop-off vs state
- +3.3 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 27.9%–39.2%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15,802 | 26,733 ± 179 | 59.1% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2022Mid | 8,922 | 26,648 ± 146 | 33.5% | Audited | A/A |
| 16,824 | 26,011 ± 161 | 64.7% | Audited | A/A | |
| 2018Mid | 12,870 | 25,958 ± 147 | 49.6% | Audited | A/A |
| 15,193 | 26,079 ± 90 | 58.3% | Audited | A/A | |
| 16,414 | 25,563 | 64.2% | Derived | — | |
| 16,402 | 25,343 | 64.7% | Derived | — | |
| 14,496 | 25,123 extrapolated | 57.7% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 311/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 306/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 301/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 297/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:native; allocation share 0.0%; series 293/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
The map and local result cover Lincoln County only. The complete district District 3 result is shown below for comparison.
Lincoln County result
0 precinct units · 0 candidate votes
District District 3 result
Loading the complete contest result…
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 62 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
62 precincts · 15,802 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -New SightNew Sight | 396 | 691 | 5 | 1,092 | 36.3% | 63.3% | R+27.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -EnterpriseEnterprise | 61 | 981 | 5 | 1,047 | 5.8% | 93.7% | R+87.9 |
| Precinct -Loyd StarLoyd Star | 155 | 846 | 2 | 1,003 | 15.5% | 84.3% | R+68.9 |
| Precinct -Halbert HeightsHalbert Heights | 180 | 786 | 11 | 977 | 18.4% | 80.5% | R+62.0 |
| Precinct -Old BrookOld Brook | 149 | 695 | 4 | 848 | 17.6% | 82.0% | R+64.4 |
| Precinct -West LincolnWest Lincoln | 38 | 755 | 6 | 799 | 4.8% | 94.5% | R+89.7 |
| Precinct -ZetusZetus | 122 | 594 | 3 | 719 | 17.0% | 82.6% | R+65.6 |
| Precinct -ArlingtonArlington | 102 | 517 | 2 | 621 | 16.4% | 83.3% | R+66.8 |
| Precinct -Heucks RetreatHeucks Retreat | 104 | 504 | 5 | 613 | 17.0% | 82.2% | R+65.3 |
| Precinct -RuthRuth | 26 | 558 | 6 | 590 | 4.4% | 94.6% | R+90.2 |
| Precinct -Johnson GroveJohnson Grove | 89 | 493 | 3 | 585 | 15.2% | 84.3% | R+69.1 |
| Precinct -ForrestryForrestry | 186 | 360 | 5 | 551 | 33.8% | 65.3% | R+31.6 |
| Precinct -JohnsonJohnson | 70 | 440 | 4 | 514 | 13.6% | 85.6% | R+72.0 |
| Precinct -PearlhavenPearlhaven | 421 | 73 | 7 | 501 | 84.0% | 14.6% | D+69.5 |
| Precinct -Old Red StarOld Red Star | 71 | 408 | 0 | 479 | 14.8% | 85.2% | R+70.4 |
| Precinct -High SchoolHigh School | 365 | 72 | 9 | 446 | 81.8% | 16.1% | D+65.7 |
| Precinct -CaseyvilleCaseyville | 72 | 357 | 0 | 429 | 16.8% | 83.2% | R+66.4 |
| Precinct -VaughnVaughn | 85 | 322 | 0 | 407 | 20.9% | 79.1% | R+58.2 |
| Precinct -LipseyLipsey | 143 | 242 | 5 | 390 | 36.7% | 62.1% | R+25.4 |
| Precinct -AlexanderAlexander | 367 | 15 | 3 | 385 | 95.3% | 3.9% | D+91.4 |
| Precinct -Brignal / Rogers CircleBrignal / Rogers Circle | 228 | 144 | 5 | 377 | 60.5% | 38.2% | D+22.3 |
| Precinct -Governmental ComplexGovernmental Complex | 336 | 12 | 2 | 350 | 96.0% | 3.4% | D+92.6 |
| Precinct -MontgomeryMontgomery | 112 | 232 | 3 | 347 | 32.3% | 66.9% | R+34.6 |
| Precinct -Bogue ChittoBogue Chitto | 144 | 188 | 3 | 335 | 43.0% | 56.1% | R+13.1 |
| Precinct -East LincolnEast Lincoln | 14 | 289 | 1 | 304 | 4.6% | 95.1% | R+90.5 |
| Precinct -NorfieldNorfield | 49 | 184 | 0 | 233 | 21.0% | 79.0% | R+57.9 |
| Precinct -Little BahalaLittle Bahala | 73 | 147 | 2 | 222 | 32.9% | 66.2% | R+33.3 |
| Precinct -City HallCity Hall | 51 | 164 | 4 | 219 | 23.3% | 74.9% | R+51.6 |
| Precinct -Fair RiverFair River | 18 | 197 | 1 | 216 | 8.3% | 91.2% | R+82.9 |
| Precinct -Big SpringsBig Springs | 35 | 166 | 2 | 203 | 17.2% | 81.8% | R+64.5 |
| Alexander Jr. High Voting District28_28085101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Arlington Voting District28_28085403 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Big Springs Voting District28_28085203 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Bogue Chitto Voting District28_28085303 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Brignal Voting District28_28085207 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Caseyville Voting District28_28085505 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| City Hall Voting District28_28085301 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| East Lincoln Voting District28_28085102 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Enterprise Voting District28_28085302 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Fair River Voting District28_28085104 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Forrestry Voting District28_28085103 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Government Complex Voting District28_28085105 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Halbert Heights Voting District28_28085405 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Heucks Retreat Voting District28_28085202 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| High School Voting District28_28085106 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Johnson Grove Voting District28_28085402 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Johnson Voting District28_28085404 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Lipsey School Voting District28_28085506 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Little Bahala Voting District28_28085201 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Loyd Star Voting District28_28085502 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Montgomery Voting District28_28085205 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| New Pearlhaven Voting District28_28085204 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| New Sight Voting District28_28085206 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Norfield Voting District28_28085305 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Northwest Brookhaven Voting District28_28085406 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Old Brook Voting District28_28085306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Old Red Star Voting District28_28085501 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Rogers Circle Voting District28_28085208 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Ruth Voting District28_28085304 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Vaughn Voting District28_28085504 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| West Lincoln Voting District28_28085401 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| Zetus Voting District28_28085503 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Lincoln County, MS · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Franklin D. Roosevelt1936
96.7%
2,465 votes · D+93.8
Runner-up · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1932 · 96.0%
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
93.9%
6,750 votes · R+87.8
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · 86.0%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
5,505votes
33.6% of the vote · R+32.2
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2012 · 5,471 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2020
11,596votes
69.0% of the vote · R+39.0
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2024 · 11,432 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
John W. Davis1924
+100.0pts D vs U.S.
Place D+74.8 · U.S. R+25.2
Runner-up · Al Smith, 1928 · +85.2 pts
Republican
Barry Goldwater1964
+110.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+87.8 · U.S. D+22.6
Runner-up · Richard Nixon, 1972 · +50.7 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Lincoln County, MS. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 1 congressional, 1 state senate and 2 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
Total registered voters, over time
| Year | Total registered |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 25,026 |
| 2018 | 22,447 |
| 2020 | 23,186 |
| 2022 | 22,768 |
| 2024 | 23,549 |
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
−2 net domestic migration · 2025
Net −685 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $45,460 in average income, against $66,356 for residents who stayed — 31% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean R+11.0 on average — 34 points more Democratic-leaning than Lincoln County, MS itself (R+45.4).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Pike County, MS81R+3.5
- Copiah County, MS77R+6.1
- Lawrence County, MS47R+36.6
- Franklin County, MS32R+39.8
- Hinds County, MS20D+46.1
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Copiah County, MS85
- Pike County, MS72
- Lawrence County, MS37
- Franklin County, MS31
- Hinds County, MS31
- Rankin County, MS26
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −73 |
| 2012 | −115 |
| 2013 | −181 |
| 2014 | −41 |
| 2015 | −203 |
| 2016 | −145 |
| 2017 | −66 |
| 2018 | −132 |
| 2019 | −71 |
| 2021 | +229 |
| 2022 | −28 |
| 2023 | +2 |
| 2024 | +141 |
| 2025 | −2 |
Lincoln County has voted Republican in presidential races by wide margins for over two decades, reflecting the broader realignment of rural, majority-white Mississippi counties away from their historically Democratic roots.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 93.8 points in 1936 and a Republican high of 87.8 points in 1964. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 6.4 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 45.4 points.
A population of 34,877, a 67% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $51,119 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Jones County and Upson County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Lincoln County, Mississippi. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/28085/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.