Merrimack County, New Hampshire
Precinct data
Results by precinct
65 precincts · 92,978 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -013-Concord013-Concord | 15,216 | 8,670 | 383 | 24,269 | 62.7% | 35.7% | D+27.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -013-Hooksett013-Hooksett | 4,211 | 4,639 | 137 | 8,987 | 46.9% | 51.6% | R+4.8 |
| Precinct -013-Bow013-Bow | 3,093 | 2,246 | 90 | 5,429 | 57.0% | 41.4% | D+15.6 |
| Precinct -013-Pembroke013-Pembroke | 2,205 | 2,250 | 64 | 4,519 | 48.8% | 49.8% | R+1.0 |
| Precinct -013-Franklin013-Franklin | 1,852 | 2,573 | 76 | 4,501 | 41.1% | 57.2% | R+16.0 |
| Precinct -013-Hopkinton013-Hopkinton | 2,636 | 1,492 | 77 | 4,205 | 62.7% | 35.5% | D+27.2 |
| Precinct -013-Loudon013-Loudon | 1,427 | 2,259 | 42 | 3,728 | 38.3% | 60.6% | R+22.3 |
| Precinct -013-New London013-New London | 2,078 | 1,043 | 53 | 3,174 | 65.5% | 32.9% | D+32.6 |
| Precinct -013-Epsom013-Epsom | 1,146 | 1,853 | 39 | 3,038 | 37.7% | 61.0% | R+23.3 |
| Precinct -013-Henniker013-Henniker | 1,548 | 1,324 | 39 | 2,911 | 53.2% | 45.5% | D+7.7 |
| Precinct -013-Northfield013-Northfield | 1,115 | 1,624 | 42 | 2,781 | 40.1% | 58.4% | R+18.3 |
| Precinct -013-Allenstown013-Allenstown | 1,151 | 1,468 | 34 | 2,653 | 43.4% | 55.3% | R+11.9 |
| Precinct -013-Pittsfield013-Pittsfield | 850 | 1,441 | 46 | 2,337 | 36.4% | 61.7% | R+25.3 |
| Precinct -013-Boscawen013-Boscawen | 935 | 1,213 | 25 | 2,173 | 43.0% | 55.8% | R+12.8 |
| Precinct -013-Dunbarton013-Dunbarton | 899 | 1,173 | 37 | 2,109 | 42.6% | 55.6% | R+13.0 |
| Precinct -013-Warner013-Warner | 1,013 | 868 | 28 | 1,909 | 53.1% | 45.5% | D+7.6 |
| Precinct -013-Chichester013-Chichester | 741 | 1,077 | 25 | 1,843 | 40.2% | 58.4% | R+18.2 |
| Precinct -013-Canterbury013-Canterbury | 950 | 774 | 31 | 1,755 | 54.1% | 44.1% | D+10.0 |
| Precinct -013-Newbury013-Newbury | 908 | 762 | 31 | 1,701 | 53.4% | 44.8% | D+8.6 |
| Precinct -013-Andover013-Andover | 801 | 788 | 23 | 1,612 | 49.7% | 48.9% | D+0.8 |
| Precinct -013-Sutton013-Sutton | 770 | 636 | 26 | 1,432 | 53.8% | 44.4% | D+9.4 |
| Precinct -013-Webster013-Webster | 554 | 727 | 15 | 1,296 | 42.7% | 56.1% | R+13.3 |
| Precinct -013-Bradford013-Bradford | 571 | 521 | 19 | 1,111 | 51.4% | 46.9% | D+4.5 |
| Precinct -013-Wilmot013-Wilmot | 598 | 392 | 16 | 1,006 | 59.4% | 39.0% | D+20.5 |
| Precinct -013-Salisbury013-Salisbury | 381 | 610 | 14 | 1,005 | 37.9% | 60.7% | R+22.8 |
| Precinct -013-Danbury013-Danbury | 297 | 519 | 13 | 829 | 35.8% | 62.6% | R+26.8 |
| Precinct -013-Hill013-Hill | 235 | 422 | 8 | 665 | 35.3% | 63.5% | R+28.1 |
| CONCORD WARD 133_33013CONC01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 1033_33013CONC10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 233_33013CONC02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 333_33013CONC03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 433_33013CONC04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 533_33013CONC05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 633_33013CONC06 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 733_33013CONC07 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 833_33013CONC08 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| CONCORD WARD 933_33013CONC09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FRANKLIN WARD 133_33013FRAN01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FRANKLIN WARD 233_33013FRAN02 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| FRANKLIN WARD 333_33013FRAN03 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF ALLENSTOWN Voting District33_33013ALLE01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF ANDOVER Voting District33_33013ANDO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF BOSCAWEN Voting District33_33013BOSC01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF BOW Voting District33_33013BOW01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF BRADFORD Voting District33_33013BRAD01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF CANTERBURY Voting District33_33013CANT01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF CHICHESTER Voting District33_33013CHIC01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF DANBURY Voting District33_33013DANB01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF DUNBARTON Voting District33_33013DUNB01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF EPSOM Voting District33_33013EPSO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF HENNIKER Voting District33_33013HENN01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF HILL Voting District33_33013HILL01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF HOOKSETT Voting District33_33013HOOK01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF HOPKINTON Voting District33_33013HOPK01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF LOUDON Voting District33_33013LOUD01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF NEW LONDON Voting District33_33013NLON01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF NEWBURY Voting District33_33013NBRY01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF NORTHFIELD Voting District33_33013NFLD01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF PEMBROKE Voting District33_33013PEMB01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF PITTSFIELD Voting District33_33013PITF01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF SALISBURY Voting District33_33013SALI01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF SUTTON Voting District33_33013SUTT01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF WARNER Voting District33_33013WARN01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF WEBSTER Voting District33_33013WEBS01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
| TOWN OF WILMOT Voting District33_33013WILM01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | Even |
Presidential margin, 1892–2024
Democratic minus Republican, by election
| Year | Margin (D minus R) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | −1.6% |
| 1896 | −37.5% |
| 1900 | −17.4% |
| 1904 | −21.6% |
| 1908 | −17.0% |
| 1912 | +0.9% |
| 1916 | −0.0% |
| 1920 | −17.2% |
| 1924 | −23.4% |
| 1928 | −21.5% |
| 1932 | −4.4% |
| 1936 | −2.9% |
| 1940 | −0.8% |
| 1944 | −4.3% |
| 1948 | −19.4% |
| 1952 | −35.8% |
| 1956 | −43.4% |
| 1960 | −21.1% |
| 1964 | +22.4% |
| 1968 | −19.8% |
| 1972 | −36.4% |
| 1976 | −18.7% |
| 1980 | −27.4% |
| 1984 | −34.7% |
| 1988 | −22.4% |
| 1992 | +3.9% |
| 1996 | +14.5% |
| 2000 | +0.9% |
| 2004 | +5.1% |
| 2008 | +13.9% |
| 2012 | +12.7% |
| 2016 | +3.0% |
| 2020 | +9.8% |
| 2024 | +5.2% |
U.S. Senate
| Year | Won | Democratic | Republican | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | D | 55.6%39,367 | 42.3%29,965 | 70,858 |
| 2020 | D | 58.8%52,343 | 38.9%34,687 | 89,061 |
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Merrimack County, NH registers Republican but votes Democratic — a 9.2-point gap between how voters register and how they vote, the signature of ancestral registration that trails realignment.
106,311 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+810 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +6,596 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $90,862 in average income, against $100,221 for residents who stayed — 9% lower. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+6.0 on average — about the same lean as Merrimack County, NH (D+5.2).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Hillsborough County, NH1,362D+2.9
- Rockingham County, NH473R+2.4
- Belknap County, NH424R+13.0
- Grafton County, NH205D+19.8
- Middlesex County, MA177D+39.2
- Strafford County, NH140D+12.0
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Hillsborough County, NH1,059
- Belknap County, NH396
- Rockingham County, NH384
- Grafton County, NH208
- Strafford County, NH132
- Middlesex County, MA128
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | +1 |
| 2012 | −144 |
| 2013 | −100 |
| 2014 | +234 |
| 2015 | +88 |
| 2016 | −63 |
| 2017 | +558 |
| 2018 | +636 |
| 2019 | +551 |
| 2021 | +499 |
| 2022 | +1,787 |
| 2023 | +881 |
| 2024 | +858 |
| 2025 | +810 |
Merrimack County anchors central New Hampshire with a mix of state-capital civics in Concord and working-class mill-town heritage, producing margins that have shifted modestly toward Democrats over the past decade while remaining genuinely competitive.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 22.4 points in 1964 and a Republican high of 43.4 points in 1956. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 4.6 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 5.2 points.
A population of 155,967, a 90% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $97,004 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of York County and Strafford County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Merrimack County, New Hampshire. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/33013/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.