- Lead
- 604
- Total
- 34,658
- vs nation
- R+0.3
- Turnout
- 79.2%
Carroll County, NH
▦ precinct · ▥ counties · ▢ no spatial detail
President margin by year
Place winner margin
President results by year
2024 turnout 79.2% of 43,998 citizens 18+
- Lead
- 499
- Total
- 33,297
- vs nation
- R+3.0
- Turnout
- 82.5%
- Lead
- 1,648
- Total
- 29,616
- vs nation
- R+7.7
- Turnout
- 77.5%
- Lead
- 230
- Total
- 28,602
- vs nation
- R+4.7
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,834
- Total
- 28,910
- vs nation
- R+0.9
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 1,295
- Total
- 28,222
- vs nation
- R+2.1
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 2,745
- Total
- 23,879
- vs nation
- R+12.0
- Turnout
- —
- Lead
- 287
- Total
- 20,763
- vs nation
- R+9.9
- Turnout
- —
Key facts
- 2024 presidential margin
- R+1.7MIT Election Lab
- Population
- 51,8042024 5-year
- Population density
- 56 / sq mi2024 5-year · TIGER/Line
- Land area
- 932 sq miTIGER/Line
- Median household income
- $86,4632024 5-year
- White (non-Hispanic)
- 94.0%2024 5-year
- Black
- 0.6%2024 5-year
- Hispanic / Latino
- 1.8%2024 5-year
- Peak Democratic margin
- D+8.7 in 1912MIT Election Lab
- Peak Republican margin
- R+70.8 in 1956MIT Election Lab
- Most similar
- Lincoln County, ME · twin score 94.0
Turnout and midterm durability
Participation measured against the same-year citizen voting-age population. Audited cycles count total general-election participants — ballots or participating voters, not presidential candidate votes. Cycles before 2016 predate that series and are derived from the certified presidential returns instead; they are marked everywhere they appear and are excluded from the figures below.
- 2024 turnout
- 79.2%34,850 participants ÷ 43,998 CVAP
- 2020→2022 drop-off
- +17.3 ptsVolatile
- Drop-off vs state
- -1.8 ptsPositive means a larger decline than the statewide pattern
- Mechanical 2026
- 61.9%–62.6%Recent-cycle and two-cycle persistence scenarios; not a forecast
Select a presidential cycle to show it on the map and results ledger above.
| Cycle | Participants | CVAP | Turnout | Series | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34,850 | 43,998 ± 377 | 79.2% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2022Mid | 27,805 | 42,699 ± 325 | 65.1% | Audited | B/A |
| 33,515 | 40,645 ± 438 | 82.5% | Audited | B/A | |
| 2018Mid | 24,402 | 39,583 ± 305 | 61.6% | Audited | B/A |
| 30,075 | 38,798 ± 328 | 77.5% | Audited | B/A | |
| 28,602 | 38,303 | 74.7% | Derived | — | |
| 28,910 | 37,849 | 76.4% | Derived | — | |
| 28,222 | 37,395 extrapolated | 75.5% | Derived | — |
Sources and methods
Audited cycles (2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, 2024) count total general-election participants against the same-year CVAP special tabulation, each cell carrying its own numerator and denominator quality grade. Derived cycles (2004, 2008, 2012) come from the certified presidential returns on this page over the ACS 5-year CVAP series, so they measure presidential votes cast rather than ballots — a floor on participation. Where a derived cycle predates the ACS its denominator is extrapolated rather than read, and says so on its own line below. They are shown for the longer arc and are excluded from the drop-off, excess-drop-off, and 2026 scenario figures above.
- 2024: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 310/228.
- 2022: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 305/183.
- 2020: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 300/2.
- 2018: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 296/138.
- 2016: numerator source 158, denominator source 157; total voters participating; eavs-f1a-v1:observed:aggregated; allocation share 0.0%; series 292/111.
- 2012 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2008 (derived): Certified presidential returns · ACS 5-year CVAP (B05003); presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count.
- 2004 (derived): Certified presidential returns · extrapolated CVAP denominator; presidential votes cast — a floor on participation, not a ballot count; 2004 predates the ACS, so the denominator is a linear back-extrapolation from the 2008 and 2012 CVAP values, not a read figure.
Interactive election map
One map. Every available contest.
Explore precinct resultsSearch, sort, compare years, or export CSV · 36 precincts
Precinct data
Results by precinct
36 precincts · 34,658 votes
Precinct boundaries and identifiers are cycle-specific. This table does not join rows across years without a validated crosswalk.
| Precinct -003-Conway003-Conway | 3,372 | 2,529 | 71 | 5,972 | 56.5% | 42.3% | D+14.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Precinct -003-Wolfeboro003-Wolfeboro | 2,385 | 2,381 | 62 | 4,828 | 49.4% | 49.3% | D+0.1 |
| Precinct -003-Moultonborough003-Moultonborough | 1,692 | 2,182 | 52 | 3,926 | 43.1% | 55.6% | R+12.5 |
| Precinct -003-Wakefield003-Wakefield | 1,258 | 2,239 | 36 | 3,533 | 35.6% | 63.4% | R+27.8 |
| Precinct -003-Ossipee003-Ossipee | 979 | 1,693 | 24 | 2,696 | 36.3% | 62.8% | R+26.5 |
| Precinct -003-Bartlett003-Bartlett | 1,304 | 782 | 27 | 2,113 | 61.7% | 37.0% | D+24.7 |
| Precinct -003-Tuftonboro003-Tuftonboro | 900 | 1,070 | 25 | 1,995 | 45.1% | 53.6% | R+8.5 |
| Precinct -003-Tamworth003-Tamworth | 914 | 922 | 19 | 1,855 | 49.3% | 49.7% | R+0.4 |
| Precinct -003-Madison003-Madison | 939 | 824 | 21 | 1,784 | 52.6% | 46.2% | D+6.4 |
| Precinct -003-Sandwich003-Sandwich | 759 | 432 | 17 | 1,208 | 62.8% | 35.8% | D+27.1 |
| Precinct -003-Freedom003-Freedom | 536 | 647 | 12 | 1,195 | 44.9% | 54.1% | R+9.3 |
| Precinct -003-Effingham003-Effingham | 374 | 627 | 10 | 1,011 | 37.0% | 62.0% | R+25.0 |
| Precinct -003-Jackson003-Jackson | 541 | 220 | 15 | 776 | 69.7% | 28.4% | D+41.4 |
| Precinct -003-Brookfield003-Brookfield | 236 | 336 | 8 | 580 | 40.7% | 57.9% | R+17.2 |
| Precinct -003-Albany003-Albany | 253 | 194 | 5 | 452 | 56.0% | 42.9% | D+13.1 |
| Precinct -003-Eaton003-Eaton | 193 | 127 | 2 | 322 | 59.9% | 39.4% | D+20.5 |
| Precinct -003-Chatham003-Chatham | 113 | 119 | 2 | 234 | 48.3% | 50.9% | R+2.6 |
| Precinct -003-Hale’s Location003-Hale’s Location | 53 | 77 | 2 | 132 | 40.2% | 58.3% | R+18.2 |
| Precinct -003-Hart’s Location003-Hart’s Location | 21 | 25 | 0 | 46 | 45.7% | 54.3% | R+8.7 |
| TOWN OF ALBANY Voting District33_33003ALBA01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF BARTLETT Voting District33_33003BART01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF BROOKFIELD Voting District33_33003BROO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF CHATHAM Voting District33_33003CHAT01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF CONWAY Voting District33_33003CONW01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF EATON Voting District33_33003EATO01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF EFFINGHAM Voting District33_33003EFFI01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF FREEDOM Voting District33_33003FREE01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF JACKSON Voting District33_33003JACK01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF MADISON Voting District33_33003MADI01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF MOULTONBOROUGH Voting District33_33003MOUL01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF OSSIPEE Voting District33_33003OSSI01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF SANDWICH Voting District33_33003SAND01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF TAMWORTH Voting District33_33003TAMW01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF TUFTONBORO Voting District33_33003TUFT01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF WAKEFIELD Voting District33_33003WAKE01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
| TOWN OF WOLFEBORO Voting District33_33003WOLF01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | No votes |
presidential history
Party record book
Carroll County, NH · the strongest Democratic and Republican presidential performances recorded here, measured three ways.
1892–2024 · 34 presidential cycles
Highest vote share
Largest share of the presidential candidate vote cast here.
Democratic
Barack Obama2008
52.6%
15,221 votes · D+6.3
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 50.0%
Republican
Dwight D. Eisenhower1956
85.4%
7,527 votes · R+70.8
Runner-up · Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1952 · 82.6%
Most votes
Largest number of votes cast for the party’s presidential nominee here.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
16,822votes
48.5% of the vote · R+1.7
Runner-up · Joe Biden, 2020 · 16,649 votes
Republican
Donald Trump2024
17,426votes
50.3% of the vote · R+1.7
Runner-up · Donald Trump, 2020 · 16,150 votes
Best relative to the U.S.
This Place’s margin against the national margin in the same election — positive when it leaned toward the party more than the country did.
Democratic
Kamala Harris2024
−0.3pts D vs U.S.
Place R+1.7 · U.S. R+1.5
Runner-up · Barack Obama, 2008 · −0.9 pts
Republican
Richard Nixon1960
+59.4pts R vs U.S.
Place R+59.2 · U.S. D+0.2
Runner-up · Thomas E. Dewey, 1948 · +57.4 pts
Current officeholders
Seats representing Carroll County, NH. A county elects none of these itself — they are the members for the 2 congressional, 2 state senate and 6 state house districts it falls inside, so parts of the county are represented by different members.
Senate and governor results are in the Office selector at the top of this page.
U.S. House
Each row shows U.S. House votes counted inside this Place. “Vote lead” is the local lead here, not necessarily the winner of the full contest.
Registered voters
By party of registration, over time
Registration leans Republican; the presidential vote runs 10 points more Democratic than the rolls.
41,043 registered voters · 2026
Who moves in and out
Net migration over time, and who arrivals are — where they came from and what those places vote
+557 net domestic migration · 2025
Net +6,773 over 2011–2025 · gain loss
Arrivals reported $129,491 in average income, against $115,489 for residents who stayed — 12% higher. (IRS SOI, 2022–23)
The places arrivals came from lean D+11.7 on average — 13 points more Democratic-leaning than Carroll County, NH itself (R+1.7).
Where arrivals came from lean of each source
- Strafford County, NH194D+12.0
- Belknap County, NH137R+13.0
- Middlesex County, MA116D+39.2
- Rockingham County, NH114R+2.4
- Essex County, MA101D+20.2
- York County, ME65D+10.5
Where departures went households, 2022–23
- Strafford County, NH148
- Rockingham County, NH106
- Belknap County, NH80
- Oxford County, ME76
- Cumberland County, ME61
- York County, ME51
Migration is one input to a place’s political change, not its cause — a shift can also come from residents changing their minds, generational turnover, or turnout. These figures describe the places people moved between; they do not measure how any mover voted.
| Year | Net domestic migration |
|---|---|
| 2011 | −36 |
| 2012 | +69 |
| 2013 | −51 |
| 2014 | +81 |
| 2015 | +116 |
| 2016 | +265 |
| 2017 | +842 |
| 2018 | +885 |
| 2019 | +402 |
| 2021 | +1,866 |
| 2022 | +675 |
| 2023 | +618 |
| 2024 | +484 |
| 2025 | +557 |
Carroll County's economy revolves around tourism and second-home ownership along Lake Winnipesaukee, drawing a mix of year-round working residents and seasonal transplants whose competing priorities have kept presidential margins within single digits for over a decade.
Across the recorded series it reached a Democratic high of 8.7 points in 1912 and a Republican high of 70.8 points in 1956. Between 2020 and 2024 the county moved 3.2 points toward the Republican candidate; the 2024 margin was 1.7 points.
A population of 51,804, a 94% non-Hispanic-white share, and a median household income of $86,463 describe the county. The county's voting pattern over the last decade is most similar to that of Lincoln County and Belknap County.
The counties whose fingerprint — 2000–2024 trajectory, demographics, ancestry, religion — sits closest to this one, and why.
Twin score (0–100) = weighted cosine between tier-standardized fingerprints: presidential margins 2000–2024 with 12-yr trend and elasticity, ACS income, age, education, population and race, top reported ancestries, and religious adherence — chips name the closest-shared dimensions and the widest gap. Re-weight the groups in the twins explorer.
Browse places by community — income, education, race & ethnicity, language — all community cuts →
Compare two places, side by side
Twelve curated comparisons line up election history, demographics, and the divergence story for two places at a glance. Browse all comparisons →
Carroll County, New Hampshire. Akashic. https://akashic.app/county/33003/. Accessed May 20, 2026. License: CC BY 4.0.